Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : tomjones (1)  

Feedback:   All (6)  |   Reviews (2)  |   Comments (0)  |   Replies (4)

Other:   Replies Received (9)  |   Trust Ratings (5)

Replies Given

Your replies to other users's reviews and comments.
Shown : 1-4 of 4  

Type Site Feedback / Review Date
Reply
1
Visit abbywinters

abbywinters
(2)
Reply of abbywinters's Reply

Mr. Hall,
I've sent an email response to your post here, please alert me if it doesn't arrive. Regards,

TJ


09-05-11  09:32pm

Reply
2
Visit abbywinters

abbywinters
(2)
Reply of otoh's Reply

I understand why you are making the "it's an industry standard" argument, although I don't believe re-billing should stand in the remaining places that it continues to be tolerated. I might be more flexible in my views and rate them more highly for their product if AW was willing to rectify omissions and misunderstandings they can easily verify after the fact. They (so far) exhibit zero regret and deny any scintilla of culpability while asserting thus: "...we can assure you that Abbywinters does not engage in or tolerate deceptive billing practices or unfair treatment of their members in any way, shape, or form."

Nonsense.


09-04-11  12:23pm

Reply
3
Visit abbywinters

abbywinters
(2)
Reply of otoh's Reply

Yes, it is a standard practice with many second-rate sites who've failed to recognize its negative effects on their subscription rates and choose to boost profits with deception rather than effective promotion and customer service. I've subscribed to several more thoughtfully structured paysites that do not re-bill automatically. Most sensible pay-site webmasters have dropped automatic re-bill. If you read my review "pros" you'll see that I largely approve of AW's high-quality content, however its current billing scheme leaves me cold. AW could choose to bill users for services rendered, but has instead made a practice of denying responsibilities which I believe should be accepted by any merchant: payment in exchange for goods and services their patrons utilize, no more, no less. I would like to see such schemes disappear from an industry that needs to step out into the bright light of mainstream commerce.

09-04-11  09:54am

Reply
4
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I'm sure much of it is perfunctory acting, but no, it does nothing for me, and it's clear "actresses" don't like it either.

09-03-11  11:50pm


Shown : 1-4 of 4  

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.31 seconds.