Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : mystery111 (1)  

Feedback:   All (2)  |   Reviews (1)  |   Comments (0)  |   Replies (1)

Other:   Replies Received (3)  |   Trust Ratings (7)

Replies Given

Your replies to other users's reviews and comments.
Shown : 1-1 of 1  

Type Site Feedback / Review Date
Reply
1
Visit FTV Girls

FTV Girls
(4)
Reply of rearadmiral's Reply

Thanks for replying to my review. I'll try and justify my score of 65. I was originally going to give it a 70, however based on PU rating definitions, my rating fits the description which I think suits my criticism; hence this site "Needs Work" and I also give it a "low recommendation." If my buddy had 32$ to spend, I'd tell him to go elsewhere. This site has to many issues.

Furthermore, I believe you misunderstood me; or rather I perhaps didn't explain it properly.. I have no issues with the quality of the camera equipment (as in megapixels). I mean the actual photo-shoot. A picture set which is engaging, with flair, which really showcases the girls. It's the photographers job to take a woman and make her a superstar. I find the photographers here lack this flair.

I didn't download one set, therefore I have nothing to comment about download speed. However, as I browse through the site (just browsing - therefore 1 click at a time, 1 photo at a time, or 1 set of thumbnails at a time), these servers are slow by today's standards. I don't want to wait 10 seconds (you heard right, sometimes it's 10 seconds) for a set of thumbnails to load. Let's not hide it, when you find a nice set you're ready to jack-off too, what a massive disappointment to have to wait for the pics to load. This is basic I would assume.

Befittingly you share the same opinion as me about the site navigation and search engine. "Needs work!" So I don't need to get into this topic.

I will however give credit when credit is due; the girls are gorgeous here. But many porn sites showcase gorgeous natural beauties. So to me, it is not enough to warrant the price considering all the issues. This brings about the issue of value.

So I think it is fitting (in my opinion) that this site "Needs work" and therefore a score in the 60's is accurate given the PU's rating definition.

I do appreciate criticism; I don't take it as negative. As long as people remain objective and non-personal, I'll respect your views opinions.


07-27-11  10:46pm


Shown : 1-1 of 1  

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.97 seconds.