| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Jay G's Reply
While "harem" has at times been a fantasy of mine, I think the one area you failed to address would be the financial one, though some Mormon extremists seem to be able to make it work.
|
05-19-13 06:31am
|
Reply
2
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
Not so much the first one (Bored) but could be any or all of the last four plus Other (my vote).
Thinking about myself, "no sex life" applies and porn helps my masturbation process. At my age, I can't remember the sex I had, so there is no recalling memories that will do it. If I could recall what my last sexual partner looked like, I'm not sure it would necessarily do it for me. Much better placing myself in the scene with a 19 - 35 year old.
I do recall some of my sex "acts" like rimming a girl friend and liking, almost to the exclusion of vaginal sex (never really did anal sex except with a finger or object), oral sex (both giving and receiving). So maybe not "by nature" but I'll cop to the perverted part.
The hobby part has come about from the vast collection of porn and trying to whittle it down into a viewing collection of about 100 scenes, edited for content.
|
05-19-13 06:28am
|
Reply
3
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Reply
Yeah - Peeing scenes make me squirm. The next big squeamish nitch is prolapse eating and tonguing, brought mainstream by Mike Adriano of Evil Angel. Makes me sweat bullets though there is something compelling about watching it.
|
05-17-13 03:51pm
|
Reply
4
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
I'm not a fan of it because half the fun is getting there and in shooting the "getting there" part it's too frenetic and gonzo with no continuity. Plus it is just these guys stand around whacking off.
|
05-17-13 06:48am
|
Reply
5
|
Evil Angel
(10)
|
Reply of
Ozark's Reply
I've never joined a site that didn't try to nefariously attempt to cross sell. The first site I ever signed up for, Throatjobs, got me and then even when I knew to look out for out I got caught once again with Porn Pros because I didn't take my time. But it should be pointed out, porn sites are not the only ones out there doing cross selling.
I'm glad you liked the review - hope it added something you didn't already know.
|
05-17-13 06:00am
|
Reply
6
|
N/A
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Poll
Didn't this just get asked recently? Hate notebooks - not good for gaming.
|
05-15-13 10:15am
|
Reply
7
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I say yes since a thumbnail doesn't tell you its been cropped and if you making a judgement off the thumbnail that could easily discourage you.
|
05-13-13 10:26am
|
Reply
8
|
Evil Angel
(10)
|
Reply of
elephant's Reply
While this is not the venue to discuss Plastic issues, I'm in agreement with you on that subject (though I wonder at the majority of people who express opinions on PU feel the same way).
Not familiar with Veronica (love that name) but since EA is currently open on my browser window, I will go have a look see. Thanks.
|
05-12-13 06:05am
|
Reply
9
|
Evil Angel
(10)
|
Reply of
jberryl69's Review
You mean this horrible privacy practice?
Email Marketing
The subscriber's e-mail address may be used by the site to communicate special offers and other relevant information such as new services, subscription information, etc. In addition, there may be occasions when a subscriber will be presented with special offers either from the operators of the site or from ***third-party service or content providers***, which may include consent to receive e-mail solicitations, communications, newsletters, commercial advertising, or other promotional or special event materials. The subscriber may opt-out of a mailing list by clicking on the remove link located at the bottom of the email promotions, or by visiting the site [site link removed]
The Way We Use Information
The user has to note that some personal information, such as but not limited to ***credit card number, may be collected by a third-party web service provider*** from whom EVIL ANGEL purchases services or that has an advertising banner or link on the Site. Users should read the privacy policy of those third parties whenever possible to look for modifications.
As soon as the subscriber uses the website, the subscriber agrees that EVIL ANGEL may use any personal information that has been provided or collected by the website about the subscriber for any purpose, including without limitation age verification, administration, customer administration, marketing, promotional and advertising use by the website or third parties authorized to use the information by the site. The user hereby agrees that the website may, in its sole discretion, sell, share, rent, or license any of the personal information about users that was provided or that was collected with affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.
_________________________________________________________________
No wonder I get so much e-mail sex spam. Thank god for a good spam filter. The moral of the "The Way We Use Information" section is don't accept any other offers on their website.
And thanks for the heads up - I guess I need to add this as an addendum to my review.
|
05-12-13 05:43am
|
Reply
10
|
Evil Angel
(10)
|
Reply of
elephant's Reply
I too am a fan of Dana's. She look a lot like Bobbi Starr. In fact she has worked for Bobbi and your observation of her is spot on.
I'm not a big fan of the Raw movies - they are what they are. "Authentic" being that they look like a home movie, which is how he shoots them, yet it's not to say I enjoy that approach or Manuel's style. The girls seem to love him though. I did enjoy one he did with Phoenix Marie if only because she did it sans makeup. Now that was real and I love the fact she seems to have some freckles. FYI - Raw #04, Scene #01. Now that I enjoyed.
|
05-12-13 05:29am
|
Reply
11
|
Evil Angel
(10)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Reply
Pink - I had the hardest time fitting this review in. I did the original draft outside the site and when I started pasting it in I kept getting messages about line numbers. I had plenty of room letter wise but 15 line restriction wasn't easy. Then when I did submit it I saw that because the review box is larger than the draft box the number of lines were not an issue.
Of course this has nothing to do with your reply I realize but I thought you might lend an ear.
Thanks for the complement on the review.
|
05-11-13 12:42pm
|
Reply
12
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Reply
NOBODY picks on you Graymane without some retort, rest assured. I thought he was a little over sensitive with all the "prove it" language - maybe his GF is beating him up. Hell, maybe she even wrote it.
|
05-10-13 11:20am
|
Reply
13
|
Class Blowjob
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
I guess though I'm somewhat skeptical about Cherry posting ads in the forum.
|
05-09-13 05:50pm
|
Reply
14
|
N/A
|
Reply of
David19's Reply
David - Hey! Don't pick on our Graymane, friend to all and father figure to some.
The assumption is shared by more than just Graymane and the question centers around participation not member gender (Khan could tell us the latter number). Generally there are about 25 active participants who take part in discussions on a regular basis and had you been one of that number, you might have reached the same conclusion.
|
05-09-13 06:24am
|
Reply
15
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
Who the hell understands women and why they do or do not do things?
|
05-09-13 06:06am
|
Reply
16
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I said "rarely" but most often if there is not a current review.
|
05-05-13 12:53pm
|
Reply
17
|
Gag Factor
(3)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
Well, I find the studio websites are a mixed bag. Some do it better than others and even within a site, some stuff stinks. Take Evil Angel for instance. Pretty easy to navigate but some of the older material I have to use the IAFD data base to see who's in a movie and if it contains the type of material I want because the web master does not label them at all. Just yesterday, I found a movie there that was totally incorrect - different movie by different director distributed through another distributor. I jumped all of that one.
|
05-05-13 12:52pm
|
Reply
18
|
N/A
|
Reply of
gaypornolover's Reply
I learned it through trial and error - I just downloaded it this year so I'm no expert on the matter. I still manually ok each site. One of the issues is that some sites require you to turn on all the scripts for them to work - like show a video - which actually defeats the purpose in my mind and I don't turn on any sites permanently. Just temporarily. I have to do it for this site even though I trust it, I'll turn it on each time.
|
05-05-13 12:47pm
|
Reply
19
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
Amazon has Audible Audio Edition, Unabridged - quite nice, but i guess if it's reading I have to answer then online. The only mag I subscribe to is Nat Geographic. The newspaper here stop publishing a daily and went to three days. I've boycotted the carpetbaggers that run it so I don't even bother with their e-edition. Use to subscribe to Smithsonian but they started using cheap paper and upped their ads by 500% - and sleazy ads to boot.
|
05-03-13 01:39pm
|
Reply
20
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Reply
haha.. one can only try dude.
|
05-03-13 01:13pm
|
Reply
21
|
N/A
|
Reply of
gaypornolover's Reply
Every website sends out scripts and it's the only way you can assess them. So with the script blocker you can Allow a site but disable certain crap scripts like googleanalytics. facebook, twitter, etc. Or you can never allow a script permanently and do a temp allow for that one browser opening (another words, when you close the browser all your temp allows go away). I'm not sure that is what you had in mind but I feel it's none of their damn business what I'm browsing.
|
05-03-13 01:11pm
|
Reply
22
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Funny Drooler and well expressed sarcasm!
|
05-02-13 05:32am
|
Reply
23
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
If you don't you should. And a scrip blocker too.
(NoScript is free - though a pain somewhat cause I don't turn off scripts to any sites I have to manually accept them each time I bring up a new site - but at least you can block the nosy mother fuckers who mine your data - yeah you Google.)
|
05-01-13 05:50am
|
Reply
24
|
Gag Factor
(3)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
Well I have to tell you that after I read that (though I'd read his review) I saw the date of mbaya's review which was on the 28th of March, so my educated deductions says "Nope".
|
05-01-13 05:12am
|
Reply
25
|
German Goo Girls
(1)
|
Reply of
Anonymous64's Review
While having some reference to the billing practices of a web-site is good, I'm not sure you could actually call this a review of the site.
|
04-30-13 07:14am
|
