Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : lurifax (0)  

Feedback:   All (53)  |   Reviews (0)  |   Comments (25)  |   Replies (28)

Other:   Replies Received (33)  |   Trust Ratings (6)

Replies Given

Your replies to other users's reviews and comments.
Shown : 1-25 of 28 Page :    Next Page >

Type Site Feedback / Review Date
Reply
1
Visit Reality Kings

Reality Kings
(3)
Reply of Vegas Ken's Comment

What is the euphoria about?

OK, the price is fine but…

A: There is a daily download limit xMB, which is not mentioned anywhere – I think – and that xMB include the entire bunch of sites… I.e. a little bit from here and a little bit from there – adding up to xMB and you are out for 24 hours.
B: The server they use for uploading (to discount customers only?) must be 10-15 years old – offering a measly (up to!) 750 kB/s. Very frustrating if you have a download capacity of 20MB/s!
C: My download manager (IDM) does not seem to work with rk.com – and that is a first.

Besides,
1. I am sick and tired of seeing all the commercial crap that clutters each and every page.
2. More of the ‘sickening stuff: “voted World’s Best Porn Site” – That must have been done by someone with very little experience of what is on offer out there!

AMEN!


05-24-10  11:22am

Reply
2
Visit Asian Apple Seed

Asian Apple Seed
(0)
Reply of stefanzo's Comment

Your comments saved me US$40 in money...
and a ship load of GRIEF!

Thank you!


05-09-09  01:23am

Reply
3
Visit G Queen

G Queen
(0)
Reply of WeeWillyWinky's Review

I am amazed.

In your 'review/cons:' you have NOT mentioned that the site has a daily download limit of 1.5 GB.

That, if anything, is a con!


04-05-09  06:27am

Reply
4
Visit LBFM

LBFM
(0)
Reply of Khan's Reply

There has been a mix-up.

The prices given by the editors are the prices for 'lbfm' - not 'g-queen'!

The correct prices are on page http://www2.g-queen.com/eng/join.html


10-28-08  07:53am

Reply
5
Visit LBFM

LBFM
(0)
Reply of Khan's Reply

Thanks, it is a start...but did you got the price right?

10-27-08  06:42pm

Reply
6
Visit LBFM

LBFM
(0)
Reply of badandy400's Reply

Firstly I want to apologize for not having noticed before that ‘www2.g-queen.com’ has a daily download limit of 1.5GB (the last item on F.A.Q.), which makes the site less interesting: No information is given about the video clips sizes, which makes one doubt if it is possible to download the lot (presently 121 of them) within a month.

That apart, (I quote “…something that is not truly unique…”) maybe you would be generous enough to let me know where else one may find a plentitude of Shaved Japanese girls?

I have seen enough amateurish drivel (“reviews”) to let myself into that business. It is, in my opinion, better left to the professionals. Besides – they are paid for it.


10-26-08  06:07pm

Reply
7
Visit LBFM

LBFM
(0)
Reply of Khan's Reply

An email was sent to the admin. @ TBP before my comments were posted.

10-26-08  11:06am

Reply
8
Visit Rachel Aziani

Rachel Aziani
(0)
Reply of badandy400's Reply

Hello badandy400,

My disappointment with reviews in general is based on the lack of (visible) consistency or accountability in the setting of scores. TBP for example do not show on what criteria they give scores. (‘Porninspector’ does something like it, but not enough.)

On whatever grounds you use (download speed, DVD quality, HD and so on)… If a table is set up - showing the scores (0-10/10, or 0-100/100 etc.) - and the same table structure is used over the board one gets COMPATIBLE results. The AVERAGE gives the score…

Let’s look at what happens when a new factor, like HD, comes in to the valuation;

At present you have no room for manoeuvre. (You have “painted yourself into a corner”.) With a template, as suggested, you don’t have that problem as you simply add HD to the template. – That’s basics in any valuation process.

Your point about Criticising or Creating a review is taken. My reason for not doing the latter is that I have neither time nor interest for it. Besides, I leave that to you guys. You are paid for it (I hope...).

If I have to choose between Camaro and Firebird, I stick to my bike until I have enough money to by a proper car like BMW or Mercedes…

I should not have bothered with Rachel Aziani in my last posting – I had not done so before.
My visit to Rachel Aziani was just a sidekick to AZIANI.com.

My comment to ‘ace of aces’ was as a reply to his childish previous remark, and ‘13’ is the impression I got of his mental age. I do not apologise for it.


08-04-08  05:52pm

Reply
9
Visit VideoBox

VideoBox
(6)
Reply of Wittyguy's Reply

Thanks Wittyguy.

I do not spend much time in this club and am therefore not well versed in moving around.

Could you let me know how I reach "Sites that Charge More in Eur than US"?


08-04-08  02:15pm

Reply
10
Visit VideoBox

VideoBox
(6)
Reply of jd1961's Reply

Well, I don't agree with you about the Japanese videos in general as the 'hairsuite' is not to my liking.

But do I agree with you about the male fuckers in American porn videos.

I could not for my life call them 'performers' as they obvioulsy - not beleiving their luck - fuck for pleasure. And to add to their disgrace, some of them seem to have obtained an ego larger than Rhode Island.

Where does the business get all these disgusting freaks/creepes from?

I really feel sorry for the girls who have to put up with it...

If that is the power of the 'mighty'$, I am immensely thankful to my parents: that I was not born or bred in the $ zone.


08-02-08  08:14pm

Reply
11
Visit VideoBox

VideoBox
(6)
Reply of messmer's Comment

Hello fellow pornuser,

It surprises me that anybody actually listen to any of the sound crap, which is added on to porn videos.

It must be @ least thirty years ago when I found that the usage of the 'mute' button vastly enhanced the viewing of porn videos.

...and so it is going to be - for ever!


08-02-08  07:49pm

Reply
12
Visit Rachel Aziani

Rachel Aziani
(0)
Reply of ace of aces's Reply

Aren't you too young for this?

I get the impression that you can hardly be older than 13 years of age.


08-02-08  06:54pm

Reply
13
Visit Rachel Aziani

Rachel Aziani
(0)
Reply of badandy400's Reply

The intelligent reader would have concluded that I was not 'bitching' about Videobox, but gave an example of how reviewers manage to paint themselves into a corner.

At first I thought "Why bother?", but for your benefit I shall explore;

As I was replying to 'ace of aces' 'review' on this site...what would be the point of making a statement, or comment, to the aforementioned 'review', on the Videobox site?

I have previously declared (nearly) all and every 'problem' I have with the 'Rachel Aziani' site... Although I could add that it is a bit too repetetive, but then again, that is just how it is with all the single model sites.

If anything, I should add to my original comment to 'ace of aces' 'review': What "hardcore"? The closest to it I have seen would not even shock a religious fanatic.

As for 'bitching' about Videobox...

1. I don't really have much critisism about the site, but what I have, I shall account for when it comes to that - probably in September this year.

2. As I mentioned before, I am not happy with the inflation of points given to websites by reviewers in general. Unfortunately I have not found a proper forum, where to vent and/or discuss these matters. As it stands, the whole point system is, if anything, ridiculus.

More often than not, sites are not compatible on the same criteria - although they are given points as if they were.

As an example;

Presently I am subscribing to xmovies.com, which TBP has given a score of 86.3. (I cannot make out what the 86.3 relates to.)

In comparison with Videobox, which has a TBP score of 98.0 one is led to believe that Videobox is vastly superior to xmovies.com. I, however, do not see it in such easy terms.

Whilst Videobox is outstanding in it's quantity of videos as well as how they handle their data base, it is comparably shortcoming in other aspects, where xmovies.com excels like website speed, download speed and quality of video clips, and not least; an actual, working and polite customer service (24/7!).

Between the two, I have come to the conclusion that, for the best result, one should work the two places in tandem. AMEN!


08-02-08  06:44pm

Reply
14
Visit Rachel Aziani

Rachel Aziani
(0)
Reply of ace of aces's Reply

A "review" should be as objective as possible.

Else it is not a 'review' but an opinion.

Having got your point of view clarified, I shall not bother any further to read any of your "reviews" as I can se no value in them.


07-02-08  04:10pm

Reply
15
Visit All Internal

All Internal
(0)
Reply of Flimo's Comment

Can only say one thing about it:

Don't go there if you are European.

Even for us, who are in the United Kingdom, they charge in Euros - despite our currency is GBP.

Some time ago I wrote to these guys and asked how they could justify this excess charge for Europeans - and got a load of waffle in return.

Asking them if they charge the Japanese the same amount in Yen, I had no reply...


07-01-08  06:31pm

Reply
16
Visit Rachel Aziani

Rachel Aziani
(0)
Reply of ace of aces's Review

What a load of rubbish! (If the '99' is out of 100.)

I have previously complained about the trend among all (professional) website reviewers.

'Ace of aces' have obviously fallen into the same trap.

A typical example is 'VideoBox', which is given 98/100 by TBP.

Shortcomings @ 'VideoBox';

1. Not all videos are of DVD quality.
2. Many 'updates' are 'recycled' old videos.
3. ...and last, but not least: No HD quality to be seen anywhere!

In conclusion I ask; would an adjustment (improvement) with regard to the 'shortcomings' only be worth 2% - or less?

Obviously not.


07-01-08  05:00pm

Reply
17
Visit Rachel Aziani

Rachel Aziani
(0)
Reply of nygiants03's Comment

Hi,

TBP has got the figures wrong.

Presently there is a trial offer @$4.95 for both the Aziani sites.


07-01-08  04:19pm

Reply
18
Visit VideoBox

VideoBox
(6)
Reply of RagingBuddhist's Reply

It was a few years ago when I last was a member to 'videobox'. Hence I am not sure about exactly how it happened.
However, I am sure it was when doing the editing in 'Windows movie maker' and therefore, I believe that it happened in conjunction with dragging the clip into that application.

I may go back to 'videobox' in a couple of months time...


04-07-08  09:48am

Reply
19
Visit VideoBox

VideoBox
(6)
Reply of Boobs4ever's Reply

Could you elaborate on your last reply?

I haven't a clue what you mean.


09-07-07  01:59am

Reply
20
Visit 9Buck Anal Scenes

9Buck Anal Scenes
(0)
Reply of Pelcito's Reply

Sorry, but I haven't a clue what this is about.

09-07-07  01:54am

Reply
21
Visit VideoBox

VideoBox
(6)
Reply of Boobs4ever's Reply

Hmm...

That's OK - if that is all one wants to do, but...

The problem I mentioned in my original comment comes up when you want to do further editing in the middle of a video clip.

That's when you get the 50-90 bits of the video clip - all to be dragged down to the Time Line in MS Moviemaker.

- A right Royal Pain In The Ass


09-04-07  08:36am

Reply
22
Visit VideoBox

VideoBox
(6)
Reply of Boobs4ever's Reply

Interesting!

Please let me know the procedure you follow when editing.


09-04-07  03:44am

Reply
23
Visit VideoBox

VideoBox
(6)
Reply of exotics4me's Reply

Hi,

Sorry, but I do not recognise the girl in question.

However, she is NOT 'Peaches'.

Good luck in your search!


08-17-07  05:55am

Reply
24
Visit VideoBox

VideoBox
(6)
Reply of exotics4me's Comment

Please let me know what you mean with "the title page".

Unless I know, I cannot find it and am therefore unable to assist...


08-16-07  05:52pm

Reply
25
Visit Give Me Pink

Give Me Pink
(0)
Reply of King's Reply

Do you have a vested interest in the company?

No other firm I know of is performing this blatant rip-off.

I just wonder what they charge in Japan...


08-16-07  05:13pm


Shown : 1-25 of 28 Page :    Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.62 seconds.