| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1
|
Amy's Girlfriends
(0)
|
Reply of
BIGSTEVE's Comment
I'm guessing it's a repeat. I joined her site back when she was known as Liberty Valentine. Seems her webmaster must have sold her content and it is being re-released as new content for other sites. I noticed the same thing with Kitty Karsen's content lately.
|
06-04-09 07:42pm
|
Reply
2
|
Truth Or Sex
(0)
|
Reply of
troglodite's Comment
Just an update - looks like I'm out $39.95 on this one. My credit card company caught the rest of them and they never hit my account, meaning hopefully I won't have to do the whole dispute form thing again. I would dispute the charge with them, but I really don't think it's worth my effort, and hopefully my comments will keep enough people away from these scammers' sites.
|
06-04-09 06:42pm
|
Reply
3
|
Truth Or Sex
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Reply
I generally do too, but I make exceptions on occasion. Nothing shady had been reported on any of these sites' comments on TBP, so I thought maybe they'd be safe this time. Second time I've been burned that way. First time it has happened with a "Free" trial. Maybe it's time I start sticking to what's safe!
|
05-28-09 08:33pm
|
Reply
4
|
Stunt Cock Tryouts
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Reply
Thanks for the comments - odd how we both managed to review this network in the same time when it hadn't had any before! I did check out your review before I made mine to try and eliminate much crossover. I didn't check out much of the other sites because the models didn't appeal to me near as much. Not sure where this network is based, but it must not be the Miami/LA scene because I've not seen any of the girls before. I'm guessing it must be Canadian.
|
01-03-09 09:05am
|
Reply
5
|
Lacey Little
(0)
|
Reply of
Mr Fountain's Reply
Sorry I hadn't checked back in a few days for replies. Some good questions my review probably should have covered! There are 21 picsets that pretty much mimic the video sets. The size of the pics is about 800x1200 and each set has between 100-200 pics. They're definitely heavy on the nudity in most of them, and there is a mix of teasy stuff and lesbian and b/g hardcore. At the moment, there are 5 b/g sets, 4 g/g sets, and the rest are solo. I'll warn you there aren't any zipsets, so you won't be able to get the pics easy as they're not direct links (why oh why are sites made this way?).
As for the other sites, I'm going to try and get reviews up of a couple of them in the next week or so. They're all the same in layout and technical details, but the content is slightly different on most of them. Natalie Banks's site is lighter on the b/g stuff, Sophie Cocks is all about the b/g stuff, and Sasha Cane's site is all solo and g/g (she used to be known as Sasha Heart btw). I haven't looked much at the multi-girl sites yet. There ya go hopefully that answered some of your questions. Thanks for the comments :)
|
12-11-08 08:32pm
|
Reply
6
|
Incredible Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
Pornluver's Reply
I have shopped through ccbill before for sites and was considering doing so for this site since I thought that it might work without the shady billing (one of the sites has a vid I really want!). I'm glad to read that someone else beat me to it, but of course I also hope you do get it resolved and are not out any money for trying. I've run into that type of situation before, where the login you get from shopping directly at ccbill isn't recognized on the site. I think it's mostly due to webmasters who switch billing providers, but don't disable the available subscriptions at ccbill.
|
10-12-08 06:46pm
|
Reply
7
|
Incredible Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
Lionheart's Reply
Hate to keep seeing people getting scammed by this site and its obviously sketchy billing company. I would join this network in an instant if it weren't for all the billing issues people keep reporting. Other sites make money with memberships, but it sounds like these guys want to make their money through fraud. Just another reason to stick to sites that use ccbill or epoch to handle their billing. Hope you get it resolved :(
|
10-05-08 09:37pm
|
Reply
8
|
Minxxx Studios
(0)
|
Reply of
Goldfish's Reply
No music on vids that shouldn't have music. There's a few with music like the ones on Dream Taylor's site where she's dancing, but that makes sense :)
|
04-20-08 02:00pm
|
Reply
9
|
Melissa Midwest
(0)
|
Reply of
apoctom's Comment
They're very....incomplete I guess you could say. They're poorly lit, poorly shot, and in some cases, don't even have a "big finish". They're not really artsy, but closer to amateur. She's got some pretty high-quality solo sets on her site, but the new HC stuff isn't as good imo. She's pretty timid in those scenes, and I'm pretty sure there's not a third guy holding a camera, so the camerawork isn't ever the best. I think there's only a handful of scenes with HC content.
|
12-18-07 03:53pm
|
Reply
10
|
Just Jannah
(0)
|
Reply of
bootiger's Comment
It looks like you can right click in Firefox. I tested (the tour - not members area) and right clicking in IE gives you a "property of justjannah.com" window while right-clicking in Firefox works like normal. Still - the act of disabling right click is enough to tip you off that the site is gonna be all about making money. I've had the site bookmarked as a "might-join" for a while, but I'll take it off now!
|
12-13-07 10:51pm
|
Reply
11
|
N/A
|
Reply of
asmith12's Poll
I'm sure I'm well over a few terabytes of porn now. It's definitely more than I'll ever be able to watch, but I'm a collector by nature so it just piles up onto DVD-R after DVD-R. The biggest problem is where to put them all when I know I will have visitors lol!
|
11-13-07 02:42pm
|
Reply
12
|
Brain Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
Brainpat's Reply
Thanks for the reply Brainpat - I'll keep my eyes open in case you guys ever decide to go back and re-encode some of the vids on the solo girl sites (namely Melissa's) to a higher res format. I've been a member a couple times before, and as long as the network keeps growing, I'm sure I'll be back for my 4th membership!
|
11-12-07 03:05pm
|
Reply
13
|
Brain Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
sisterhood's Review
Does Melissa Doll's site have any of the high-quality vids? I'd rejoin the network just to get higher-quality versions of her vids. I see her tour has been updated, but no video previews to give any hints of quality.
|
11-11-07 06:52pm
|
Reply
14
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Pinche Kankun's Poll
Solo girl sites are actually probably my favorites. I don't know how to explain it, because I do like good hardcore porn as much as anyone, but at the same time, I'll join the site of a girl who looks like little summer twice as fast as I'd join a bangbros or similar HC network with 30 sites to choose from.
|
11-11-07 06:27pm
|
Reply
15
|
Private Camz
(0)
|
Reply of
jake07621's Review
One such site that offers access to the privatecamz archive is one of the sites in the College Fuck Fest network - nakedcollegecoeds.com. Previous members of any of their sites get periodic emails advertising a $10 recurring rate for returning customers, so it can be fairly cheap to get in and gain access to some of your favorite camz-stars' archives (my personal fav - Teen Deja!). Just a tip!
|
11-08-07 04:05pm
|
Reply
16
|
Alyssa Doll
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Review
Surprised to see there are now only 27 videos. I used to join every few months for the updates (she's one of the few girls I've found hot enough to do so for), and my collection sits at 62 total vids (just checked!). There used to be 2 sections of videos, one with the HD ones and one with not-so-HD ones. The last update I grabbed was titled "Hanging Out In The Bedroom". Is that the most recent one on the site now?
The new videos definitely *look* better, but I liked the older ones better for the content. I dunno why - but it seemed the action was a little hotter and a little less routine. Wish she was still updating!
|
11-08-07 03:55pm
|
Reply
17
|
Alyssa Doll
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Comment
That person is a genius! :)
|
11-07-07 03:34pm
|
Reply
18
|
Tina Doll
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Reply
So that it's not a complete waste, try your login on alyssadoll.com. Used to be that a login to one "doll" got access to the others too. I'd be interested to see if her site is still updating :)
|
11-05-07 04:16pm
|
Reply
19
|
Tina Doll
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Comment
I joined hmm...over a year ago. There were only 5-6 videos and they were very poor quality (like 500kbps or less). The tour has not changed at all that I can tell (yes it said "high definition videos" even back then) so I would say join with caution. The $3.95 tour was full access minus zip files for the picsets, so it isn't expensive to check it out at least. If you do check it out, I'd like to hear what you find! Hope this helps.
|
11-03-07 04:05pm
|
Reply
20
|
Chick Trick
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Comment
Took a look myself, and while it may be premature to have "beware" warnings based on just a tour in most cases, it does appear that there are no models here newer than the ones I first saw in like 2002 or 2003. Reality porn is anything but reality - so you can usually judge a site's ability to update based on the models in their tour, since they'll generally be most of the same ones between all of the more major sites. That said - I wouldn't join this one, but if someone's looking for a long lost Taylor Rain scene or something like that, it's nice that the site is still sitting around taking memberships. :)
|
10-28-07 09:02am
|
Reply
21
|
Try Teens
(4)
|
Reply of
apoctom's Reply
Only 1 of the 3 vids on my hard drive at the moment has anal. I don't think it's all that prominent on this site, but the same company does the site teachmyass.com, which has pretty much all the same cuties with anal in every scene. And if you're into deep-throats, check out youngthroats.com. I actually liked this network a lot. Unfortunately it's 49.95 for network access (or 29.95 for 1 site at a time).
|
10-26-07 03:16pm
|
Reply
22
|
Try Teens
(4)
|
Reply of
apoctom's Comment
I joined this site (whole expensive network in fact) a while back, and didn't find the videos to be too bad quality-wise. Only a few still sitting on my hard drive at the moment, but they're 640x480 and 1218kbps encoded. Not HD by any means, but acceptable and they look fine to me. Some of the oldest episodes are a little worse, but I believe the newest stuff may actually be in HD. Some real cuties on this network for sure!
|
10-26-07 03:01pm
|
Reply
23
|
Exploited Teens
(1)
|
Reply of
never's Comment
I joined this site like 2 years ago and it was the case then too. The guy likes to put girls on the tour that are not on the site and in some cases, he doesn't even plan on putting them on the site for months and months. I think it's a very dishonest practice, and I will never join again because of it. A tour should be there to show you what your membership is going to buy you. If it doesn't, then it's coercing you to join under a false pretense.
And yes I agree the content is painfully repetitious! Which reminds me...why must every porn director ask "are your nipples sensitive?" I've always thought that was like the most pointless question ever. I can't say I've ever looked at a porn starlet and thought "boy those nips sure look sensitive...and that's really important to my enjoyment of this clip!" To each their own I guess :p
|
10-24-07 02:59pm
|
Reply
24
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
I use Windows Media Player. I've tried VLC and MPC, but the feature that has continued to win me over is that I can jump to any point in the movie by clicking exactly where I want to jump to on the progress-bar thingy. If I try to jump to say 2/3 through the movie in WMP, I just click once right at that spot on the bar. If try that in MPC or VLC player, it jumps ahead in the movie some unknown amount. I can drag the progress bar if I want, but I wanna click it and have it go where I clicked, not some random spot that it chooses! Seems simple to me, but no other player seems to do that like WMP. Yes I'm picky :)
|
10-24-07 02:54pm
|
Reply
25
|
Oldje
(2)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
I can't see myself joining a site that uses realvideo format for their vids. I thought about this one a long time ago and passed on it for that very reason. I love Real as a company, but I don't like using realplayer for vids.
|
10-16-07 07:30pm
|
