Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : anyonebutme (14)  

Feedback:   All (230)  |   Reviews (9)  |   Comments (8)  |   Replies (213)

Other:   Replies Received (151)  |   Trust Ratings (22)

Replies Given

Your replies to other users's reviews and comments.
Shown : 1-25 of 213 Page :    Next Page >

Type Site Feedback / Review Date
Reply
1
N/A Reply of Drooler's Poll

Not an easy question to answer. The best are solo, no toy videos. But it's not that common for a porn model to really excel at that content. So might go with solo w/ toys, or soft lez because the quantity of good material is much greater.

11-15-14  08:31pm

Reply
2
N/A Reply of jberryl69's Poll

The option "She turned into a MILF" is interesting, as the acronym itself literally says she's someone you still highly desire. "She aged" is probably the more correct option, but that just sounds mean and insulting to say.

I voted for "she moved into hard from soft". I'm completely backwards in my likes compared to the typical internet porn surfer.


02-12-14  11:55am

Reply
3
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

As someone who's full time job is computer services for businesses and individuals, believe me, a computer tech has seen it all and does not seek out saved material to judge the owner. Your porn is nothing special.

07-19-13  12:02am

Reply
4
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Only when the video shows scars or other signs of abuse does it become a turn-off.

04-16-13  06:24am

Reply
5
N/A Reply of Cybertoad's Poll

Other.

I inquire to what the director became sick from.


11-27-12  07:33pm

Reply
6
N/A Reply of RustyJ's Poll

No, seriously, if someone scores a site a 90, while stating in the review that at the time of the review there were, say for example, 40 scenes available - why would ANYONE have a problem with that review? Someone please give me a reason for why you would have a problem with such a review.

If you have reason to believe the review was a false or fake review, then by all means go after it. But you cannot challenge a review because the other person values different things than you do.

And if one of you sees someone score a new site higher than you believe it should be scored, then you subscribe to the website yourself and write your own competing review.


Every single website began as a new site, and all the top sites grew because there were people willing to give them a chance early on.



And full disclosure, the one thing that does irk me, are those who believe a website subscription entitles them to uninterrupted 24/7 full speed data streaming. Though I haven't ranted on that in a long while. If this were the widespread attitude of porn subscribers, simply put there would be little to no porn produced anymore. Ask any porn website operator how he really feels about users who use their bandwidth to the maximum.


02-12-12  10:47pm

Reply
7
N/A Reply of RustyJ's Poll

And as a follow-up, in particular to the third option - once you review a site, unless that site removes content, why would you ever change your score, change your review?

All reviews are based on the content that is available at the time of subscribing.

As the site grows, or doesn't grow, in the future, the content that was the entire basis of the review still exists in full for every successive subscriber.




"Live" sites, sites that focus on cam shows, model interactions, chats, etc., where the value of the content is dependent on interaction on the other end, then yes these sites would have their value changed over time. But the traditional sites which post static photoset and video updates?


02-12-12  09:54pm

Reply
8
N/A Reply of RustyJ's Poll

Does no one else recognize the inherent problem with the question? Scores are subjective opinions, and unique to the individual. No one should dictate what another person values in a site.

I don't view sites as a "did I get a month full of entertainment" as one here says, I view it as "did I get $xx.xx worth of entertainment" and new, small sites absolutely can deliver.

Some people value quantity more than others. If you do, then pay attention to reviews that value quantity. If not, then pay attention to reviews that value quality.


02-12-12  09:44pm

Reply
9
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I see pregnant porn anything, and for some strange reason, I wonder what will be for that child growing up when everyone around finds out he/she was in a porno.

I think that sums up my feelings on this subject very clearly.


01-06-12  09:28pm

Reply
10
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

If the site has something I want, why would I choose not to join the site?

No matter what the website is, whether it is still updating or not, I join based on the material that is currently on the site, not the material that will be added to the site.


12-23-11  07:10pm

Reply
11
N/A Reply of Capn's Poll

I think that first option was supposed to have the "less than" symbol. (and I can't create the symbol in this textbox)

10-19-11  08:17am

Reply
12
N/A Reply of Cybertoad's Poll

Being accepted by others. Having those you surround yourself with every day always inspecting your body for even the slightest hint of imperfection. Never knowing if the job you have today is the last job you will ever have in the business. Needing to question the motives of everyone around you...

10-09-11  08:38am

Reply
13
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Had to vote "other" because "Don't care for it at all" doesn't do justice for how much I do not like this.

09-04-11  12:53am

Reply
14
N/A Reply of messmer's Reply

"I won't consider 3D until the technology evolves to a point where 3D can be experienced without goggles."

Already out to market. Check the tech in the latest tvs.


06-10-11  07:30pm

Reply
15
N/A Reply of turboshaft's Reply

"Just be thankful we don't have Smell-O-Vision..."

Oh they most definitely have this in the pipeline. Just wait, it's closer than you think.


06-10-11  07:28pm

Reply
16
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Personally have little to no interest at all in watching anything go into an ass.

Yea, so the majority of b/g porn I've long since given up on. Soft girl-only porn is soooo much better =D

Though I actually think that might be why b/g porn has turned mostly all anal, 'cause someone like me doesn't even bother to seek out non-anal b/g porn anymore, they're not getting a sale out of me either way. Producers are probably stuck catering to the all-anal crowd.


05-18-11  10:10pm

Reply
17
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

No big deal. Any email address used for porn already receives God-only-knows how much spam every day. One more spam list is nothing to be concerned with.

05-10-11  10:38am

Reply
18
N/A Reply of lk2fireone's Poll

It's also weird when they place condoms over the wand

04-28-11  06:21pm

Reply
19
N/A Reply of lk2fireone's Poll

It's fine. But it gets super weird when the girls go all orgasmic in the scene and you know the vibrator has not been turned on...

04-28-11  06:19pm

Reply
20
N/A Reply of Drooler's Reply

It's not that bad out there. The alternative to your situation, though, would be you could sign up to any website, download everything you want for a day, then demand a full immediate no-hassle refund from ccbill. I'd probably estimate 1% of complaints & refund requests are for legitimate reasons, it's gotta be tough on the other end to spot the real ones to take care of.

12-05-10  03:52am

Reply
21
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Only once I had to get the credit card company involved to refute a charge - it was with some no-name B.S. biller, and if I can never sign up through them again I consider that a good thing for me!

I've gotten a refund twice from ccbill, once the login details never worked with the site. The second time the website went out of business, shut everything down just two days after me joining.


12-05-10  03:47am

Reply
22
N/A Reply of Drooler's Reply

You wouldn't want to be like Woodman, he's a guy who cares most about the act, the sales revenue & his self-image. The girls are little more than soulless props to him.

12-04-10  11:09am

Reply
23
N/A Reply of graymane's Poll

The comments, "willing", "consensual", blah blah blah

When you realize/learn that girls who perform in such acts, pretty much across the board they all have either been (a) abused as a child, (b) abandoned as a child, or (c) abused and abandoned as a child...

Find me a pornstar who is performing in all these extreme acts who had a comfortable upbringing...


The other half is, porn thrives on misery. It's their bread & butter, how they make the big bucks. A girl gets attached to a healthy relationship with a boyfriend, she's most likely leaving the porn career. It is in pornographers' best interests to make her "undateable". It is also in pornographers' best interests to make porn buyers "undateable" also.


I say it is all abuse, and I don't like guys doing a single one of those things to girls on camera. Hence why I pretty much flat out refuse to watch any porn with a guy in the scene =D


11-30-10  11:35am

Reply
24
N/A Reply of RustyJ's Poll

This poll question is basically this question:

"Do you primarily value porn by the content of the scene, or by the price tag?"


11-17-10  11:22pm

Reply
25
N/A Reply of Drooler's Reply

"how are you going to look"?

You are going to look like a reviewer who gave your honest opinion on what the site was at the time you reviewed it. Look, no matter what updates come from there on forward, the site should still retain all the material that existed when you reviewed it. There is no reason at all to hold off a review based on how the site may adjust in the future.


11-17-10  10:37pm


Shown : 1-25 of 213 Page :    Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 1.35 seconds.