Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : anyonebutme (14)  

Feedback:   All (229)  |   Reviews (9)  |   Comments (8)  |   Replies (212)

Other:   Replies Received (151)  |   Trust Ratings (22)

Replies Given

Your replies to other users's reviews and comments.
Shown : 1-25 of 212 Page :    Next Page >

Type Site Feedback / Review Date
Reply
1
Visit Matt's Models

Matt's Models
(0)
Reply of RagingBuddhist's Comment

Last time I checked, you have the option to not sign up. Is this no longer the case? Either the material is worth $50 to you, in which case you'll buy, or it is not worth $50 and you will pass.

08-25-14  06:36pm

Reply
2
N/A Reply of jberryl69's Poll

The option "She turned into a MILF" is interesting, as the acronym itself literally says she's someone you still highly desire. "She aged" is probably the more correct option, but that just sounds mean and insulting to say.

I voted for "she moved into hard from soft". I'm completely backwards in my likes compared to the typical internet porn surfer.


02-12-14  11:55am

Reply
3
Visit Joy Mii

Joy Mii
(1)
Reply of Parsnip's Comment

I have cut way back on porn purchases, enjoyment in the material is way down, largely due to all the anal, but it's just a part of the problem - a site has to cater to the people who spend the money. If I don't spend my money while all the anal fans do, they get to dictate what scenes are created in the future.

12-26-13  10:22pm

Reply
4
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

As someone who's full time job is computer services for businesses and individuals, believe me, a computer tech has seen it all and does not seek out saved material to judge the owner. Your porn is nothing special.

07-19-13  12:02am

Reply
5
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Only when the video shows scars or other signs of abuse does it become a turn-off.

04-16-13  06:24am

Reply
6
Visit Real Peachez

Real Peachez
(1)
Reply of Marcie's Comment

I feel a little bad for mentioning here, I checked out this website a couple weeks back and there is no update schedule, and the updates that do come in sporadically are often ones that were previously published on the site in years past. A very large percentage (more than half) of the pics and videos that were once available on the site are no longer available. Several of the listed videos, click on them and the video files do not exist on the server. Of the videos present, they are lesser quality than was available previously, and many encoded in the wrong aspect ratio.

12-02-12  05:11pm

Reply
7
N/A Reply of Cybertoad's Poll

Other.

I inquire to what the director became sick from.


11-27-12  07:33pm

Reply
8
Visit DDF Network

DDF Network
(6)
Reply of PinkPanther's Comment

There are other ways that malware can screw things up.

For example, DDF has a bar at the top with interactions with google plus, facebook, & twitter, it is possible to have malware on your own computer that is redirecting DNS lookups on those popular domains to alternate sites.

Part of my daily job is cleaning viruses off computers, no anti-virus software is perfect. I clean up nasty virus that get on computers that are running Norton Anti-Virus, McAfee, Microsoft Security Essentials, Kaspersky, NOD32, Avast, AVG, the list goes on.

No anti-virus software is perfect, especially when it comes to rootkits which can be very nasty and very evasive. Rootkits often cause very strange things to happen while browsing the web.

In other words, be cautious browsing the web, but also make sure to inspect your own computer thoroughly when anything shows up.

And often double-check your Adobe flash & reader software, and java software, are updated to the current versions. Java especially has been where I've seen most recent malware get in.


10-28-12  07:00pm

Reply
9
N/A Reply of RustyJ's Poll

No, seriously, if someone scores a site a 90, while stating in the review that at the time of the review there were, say for example, 40 scenes available - why would ANYONE have a problem with that review? Someone please give me a reason for why you would have a problem with such a review.

If you have reason to believe the review was a false or fake review, then by all means go after it. But you cannot challenge a review because the other person values different things than you do.

And if one of you sees someone score a new site higher than you believe it should be scored, then you subscribe to the website yourself and write your own competing review.


Every single website began as a new site, and all the top sites grew because there were people willing to give them a chance early on.



And full disclosure, the one thing that does irk me, are those who believe a website subscription entitles them to uninterrupted 24/7 full speed data streaming. Though I haven't ranted on that in a long while. If this were the widespread attitude of porn subscribers, simply put there would be little to no porn produced anymore. Ask any porn website operator how he really feels about users who use their bandwidth to the maximum.


02-12-12  10:47pm

Reply
10
N/A Reply of RustyJ's Poll

And as a follow-up, in particular to the third option - once you review a site, unless that site removes content, why would you ever change your score, change your review?

All reviews are based on the content that is available at the time of subscribing.

As the site grows, or doesn't grow, in the future, the content that was the entire basis of the review still exists in full for every successive subscriber.




"Live" sites, sites that focus on cam shows, model interactions, chats, etc., where the value of the content is dependent on interaction on the other end, then yes these sites would have their value changed over time. But the traditional sites which post static photoset and video updates?


02-12-12  09:54pm

Reply
11
N/A Reply of RustyJ's Poll

Does no one else recognize the inherent problem with the question? Scores are subjective opinions, and unique to the individual. No one should dictate what another person values in a site.

I don't view sites as a "did I get a month full of entertainment" as one here says, I view it as "did I get $xx.xx worth of entertainment" and new, small sites absolutely can deliver.

Some people value quantity more than others. If you do, then pay attention to reviews that value quantity. If not, then pay attention to reviews that value quality.


02-12-12  09:44pm

Reply
12
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I see pregnant porn anything, and for some strange reason, I wonder what will be for that child growing up when everyone around finds out he/she was in a porno.

I think that sums up my feelings on this subject very clearly.


01-06-12  09:28pm

Reply
13
Visit Bound Gangbangs

Bound Gangbangs
(1)
Reply of elephant's Comment

You mean, the part at the end of the scene where she is given the choice to say she enjoyed the scene or not receive her paycheck?

01-06-12  09:24pm

Reply
14
Visit ATK Premium

ATK Premium
(1)
Reply of Capn's Reply

I don't know the details of the cam shows.

The forum I believe is open to anyone with any ATK subscription.

The actual content is just glammed up. In Premium she may start with an evening dress, where in Galleria she is starting with a t-shirt and jean shorts.


12-29-11  11:31pm

Reply
15
Visit ATK Premium

ATK Premium
(1)
Reply of Capn's Comment

Not sure what you mean by "quite a fe periphery bells, whistles & add-ons."

It's exactly like ATK Galleria, made for a glamour look, instead of the amateur look.


12-29-11  11:42am

Reply
16
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

If the site has something I want, why would I choose not to join the site?

No matter what the website is, whether it is still updating or not, I join based on the material that is currently on the site, not the material that will be added to the site.


12-23-11  07:10pm

Reply
17
Visit FTV Girls

FTV Girls
(5)
Reply of RLane's Comment

Their oldest stuff is 1090px on the long side. Their newest stuff is 1600px.

Then they have some "big sized" sets that are either 3000px or 4000px but they are more random than anything else, not even close to their complete collection, and only include a sampling of images from a given set.

Assume you're getting 1600px on their new material.


12-11-11  05:02pm

Reply
18
Visit Joy Bear

Joy Bear
(0)
Reply of messmer's Comment

All you have to do is subscribe to the website and write your own review.

It's as simple as that.

Seriously, what is the point of your comment?


12-08-11  08:31am

Reply
19
Visit VideosZ

VideosZ
(4)
Reply of jd1961's Reply

For a site with as much traffic as videoz, they are making use of cloud computing, having their site spread amongst many data centers. Most services don't advertise prices, Amazon's cloud services do:
http://aws.amazon.com/ec2/pricing/

Do the math with their numbers. And question if other services are going to give cheaper or more expensive rates to porn sites? All you have proven is that Action Jav has other subscribers who are not maxing out the bandwidth 24/7 for the full month.


11-20-11  10:31pm

Reply
20
Visit 21Sextury.com

21Sextury.com
(9)
Reply of littlejoe's Comment

You can cancel at any time without paying for any additional months. It's just saying that if you keep that subscription active for more than 4 months, the price for every additional month drops.

10-21-11  08:19pm

Reply
21
Visit VideosZ

VideosZ
(4)
Reply of sir noddy's Comment

A 20mbit connection running 24/7 for a full month racks up about $300 in hosting charges. Of course it varies depending on provider and amount of traffic amongst all users.

I'm not joking about hosting costs in that price range.

When they charge $18 for a 1 month subscription, with half of that price eaten up in referral fees, and another 15% in billing processing - there is a reason why you don't get full speed all the time.

To answer your question of when these "dinosaur sites" will drag themselves into the 21st century, it will be when you offer to pay $300/month for a subscription. Until then, it's best to find a way to be happy with what they do provide for you.


10-20-11  11:03pm

Reply
22
N/A Reply of Capn's Poll

I think that first option was supposed to have the "less than" symbol. (and I can't create the symbol in this textbox)

10-19-11  08:17am

Reply
23
Visit DDF Network

DDF Network
(6)
Reply of monty4321's Comment

It's a great site, but they do pack on the makeup thick.

10-17-11  05:00pm

Reply
24
Visit Reality Kings

Reality Kings
(4)
Reply of Vegas Ken's Comment

Good deal!

(fyi, Monday is the 17th)

Anyone reading, I suggest clicking their button "Try The Backup Processor" on their join page to use Epoch to subscribe. Probably all cool, but no reason to chance an in-house billing site, when Epoch is there at the same price.


10-15-11  01:39am

Reply
25
Visit Karup's PC

Karup's PC
(1)
Reply of Wittyguy's Reply

Yes, you're right, used to be more exclusive in the past, not quite as exclusive anymore.

10-13-11  09:53pm


Shown : 1-25 of 212 Page :    Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.77 seconds.