I just stopped by to see what's hap's at good ol' 1byday. In Feb., they've added sets of Amy Reid, Cassia Riley, and Joey Hart (aka Adele Miller/Sharp/Rox, etc). But I've seen these at other sites. I guess they're in 2000px sizes, which of course would be good.
The home page shows two updates each for photos and videos. So I go to "photos" which aren't only photos but also videos "current daily updates" which seems kind of redundant and stuff at the bottom I'm not sure what it is and so I click "models" which shows 42 models which I don't think is all of the models 'cause "Riyeesa" is not there for example I wonder how many more models there might be but I don't know I wish I could see them so I could make a decision and then I see a link at the bottom of the models page "Meet the Sexy Girls of DN" I click it and it's the same page linking to itself which is like sneezing coffee into your own cup and then I start to wonder just how difficult it would be to navigate this site as a paying user it's so incoherent and I view some of the sample pics some look good nice sizes advertised but some are so dark (!) you know you only get detail when there's enough light you could get "6000 pixels" of darkness by closing your eyes in a cave and besides they're only a "random selection" of the model's galleries so how can I know what I'd be getting dammit it's frustrating fuck this I click the "X" at the top left of the window Bye!
Both paysitediscounts and TBP have a special price of $24.95 listed for this site, but repeated attempts from different links from those sites always bring up a join page with ccbill that lists $29.95.
What's the deal? (I mean, if there really is one ...)
UPDATE: Thanks to Khan stepping in for my not-so-computer-savvy-this-morning brain, I got the problem fixed and the discount.
Jana is still active, and still HOT. She's appeared very recently at TorridArt and also Art-Lingerie. I've nominated her site for a new review. Anyone care to join in and get a fresh look at her site from our friends at TBP?
Here's another recycling "gotcha." Today they had a set of Laura Stevens that I thought I'd seen somewhere before. I checked my stash ... Well, I'd actually gotten some time before. A couple of years ago.
From this very site.
And the links from that time, around February 2007 on their calendar, are now empty.
MPL Studios just released its first "Collector's Cut" series of Anya. This is what they've been saying about it in the member's area:
"Each 3000 res photo series will be created using photos previously not published with the set's initial release.
These "held back" photos are not rejects. They were intentionally set aside for future release. Editing techniques have improved in the last two years as well so the timing is perfect to now release these older, previously unpublished photos at 3000 resolution, now our standard release size."
My point here is that they DO look like rejects, aka "outtakes." You see lovely Anya not at her best. She squints and frowns a lot. (The poodle mutt that appears as well in some of the pics seems more content than Anya does.) Out of the 60 pics in this first series, I kept only 22. And I'm quite a fan.
Hopefully, future "cuts" will be better, but we'll see.
They've recently posted a Christmas gallery of Larissa ("Natusik" to them). I thought to myself, "Haven't I seen that before at some other site?" After all, their days of all-exclusive material have been long gone for some time.
Nope, it wasn't from another site. It was from THEIR site, two years ago!
And they've recently reposted a gallery twice of Natasha Marley, too, the one where she's sexing up the lorry.
This site looks attractive, but I wonder what distinguishes it from the other "only" sites that this same company puts out. The tour isn't nearly as good as at OnlyTease, for instance. Sure, it looks good, but it lacks the important details about image dimensions, zips, and so on.
Don't they'd think that people would want such details?
On this site, the Crissy Moran set "Breathe On Me" looked familiar. Yes, I'd first gotten it at least three years ago at FinestWomen, which has since become FinestModels.
But the set at My Glamour Site is better! It has 147 pics at 3000px; the FinestWomen version had 68 at 1024px long end. And the watermark at My Glamour is not as obvious.
Finally, when FinestModels would occasionally -- and much more recently -- redo a photoset in larger dimensions on their own site, the results were often blurry (yech) and, let's face it, just plain worthless. Not so at MyGlamour.
Funny how the original site has had such lower standards and that the quality of the content gets "rescued" by another.
I do look forward to more reduxes of FinestWomen at MyGlamourSite!
FM Teens has finally gotten it together and come up with a better design. Now you can browse through all sets sequentially, forwards or backwards. What's more, the model's name is right there with her, too on every page of her galleries, so you can't possibly miss it.
And so I've found my "mystery blond"! Her name is Olga.
To get the zip of a set, you click this little rectangle thingy on the bottom left, which takes you to the page with the link for the zip (yes, still a bit clunky, but not too bad).
And they have a model's index that makes sense now! Finally!!!
One more plus is that they seem to be less into covering the girls in flowers and beads and having them balance knick-knacks on their formidable fannies.
And formidable they are! The angles in the pics are suggestive sometimes of ground-zero viewer proximity.
And the lighting is consistently better, too.
But I do have a gripe. The pic sizes. They're still in the 15's on the long end. Why? Why not get into at least past the 2000px mark, as does NuDolls, which seems to have the same modeling agency on the most finger-worn card in their Rolodex?
My first comment stated that several of the links to sets of Sandra Shine were not working. That's been fixed. There are now 44 exclusive photosets on the site that can be accessed (was 35 when those links were broken).
Viv Thomas has just come out in a new site design. I thought that might also entail photos larger than 1280 pixels. After all, 1280 is on the small side these days, and there is VT content available at some other sites in much larger dimensions.
But all I see is 1280 as the max size in the new site tour. Too bad.
People who join Cruising Girls or Sandra Shine Live for the "4 for 1" deal get this site as part of it. GlamAndArt has only 35 working, exclusive photosets (several of Sandra Shine have dead links). No videos have been posted at all.
The site still stands out, IMHO, because it is so unlike the other sites in the package (Cruising Girls, Sandra Shine Live, and Sandra Shine Bonus). GlamAndArt has no toy play, and the photos are available in both 1500 pixels and a much larger 3500 pixels to nearly 5000 pixels, depending on the photoset. What's more, the watermarks are barely noticeable, which isn't true of the other sites (though those are thankfully less obvious than they used to be). Another big difference is that most of the GlamAndArt shoots are outdoors.
There is one thing in common with the other sites: no thumbs of photos. You have to download the zips to see the pics.
GlamAndArt has only 12 models. The finest is Bambi, with four photosets shot outdoors. There's also Angel Kiss, Anita Pearl, Klaudia (Cindy Hope), Regina Moon, Conny Ferrara, the brunette Jamie (who hasn't been on the scene in long time! She's at ALS Scans), Sandra Shine, and 4 lesser known models.
I know this is sounding like a review, but I just thought I'd give a heads up since visitors to the site can't see much of what they'd be getting. The photo quality is really good. I just hope that the site starts growing again in the future, as it's not presently updating.
The webmaster got in touch with me about a problem they were having during a revision of the site (see replies). I thought that they had decided to discontinue previews of the gallery thumbs for visitors -- a great feature that I wish more sites had. Turns out that hasn't changed. Hurray!
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.