See my review of this site. While I was a member, on June 3 2010, I sent an email to the only email addresses I could find, email@example.com and firstname.lastname@example.org. (email@example.com bounced.) The subject was "Reputation of allelitepass". I called attention to the comments on PU "claiming scams, deception, or inappropriate billing experiences" (my wording). I received a reply from firstname.lastname@example.org signed confusingly mitzashelp.com, with the name Mark Sanders, Support Team. The reply stated "Regarding the the deception and inappropriate billing reports including refund process this is being taking care of, in order for the member be satisfied on the service that we are offering.". However, no new comments appeared on the AllElitePass page of PU. So I contacted commenters maki and mbaya via PU email. (bjorn7 has disabled his PU email. I did not contact bigman because that account has zero points and zero trusts.) I received a reply from mbaya saying that nobody from AllElitePass had contacted him, and "This was my worst ever experience with any website. I remember sarcastic answers and a terribly negative attitude." Unless we hear from them, I conclude that they don't care about their reputation among the nearly 10,000 PU members and non-member readers!
Hey, omf456 thanks for the nice review. Do all scenes have the same stunt cock? Is he nice to the girls or rough and mean? Does he fuck like its a race to the finish, or is he tender and intimate and slow? Does he ever do oral and get the girl to cum that way? Do all the scenes end in facials (which I personally detest -- give me creampie from a truly excited guy any day). And most important, how often do the girls really get excited and orgasm? Hey, everybody, these are some of the things that are important to me (and a few others) and we'd love to see them addressed in reviews!
I resubscribed to DareDorm this month (June 2015) after subscribing two years ago. It is still one of my favorite sites. I think my review from two years ago is still accurate. If you like scenes of college students watching a few of their more daring friends fuck in front of everyone -- open acceptance of sexuality in groups -- this is for you. There were 52 videos since 2 years ago, so about 2 new ones per month. Still streaming only (which worked fine) with no downloads (unless you have special tools). I thought 3 were very hot (female orgasms in go-team-go, hot-mess, and team-work), 9 were hot (lick-lick-bang-bang, luau-party, lust-fest, my-first-time, pajama-party, pranks, pussy-to-go, study-group, and truth-or-dare), and 8 were less so but still fun. Camera work still very jerky and amateurish. There is a bonus site "Muffia" with videos of men getting massages with extras. In six of those, the women really get into it and have multiple orgasms, and there were 7 others that I thought were hot.
OK, Drooler, nice review! Two questions. Did you run into any of the locked-out/support issues that Sandfly encountered? And, do some of the girls get excited and cum, or do they all just lie there with their (according to Sandfly) large plastic tits (I prefer natural) while getting boned from behind?
Intrigued by the reviews, I took a look at the demo clip (which is unusually long and hires). The game idea is cool, but the models look like pros (sex is boring to them) and there seemed to be no arousal, plus too much emphasis on anal, double penetration, etc. Tho it has very little content, I like DareRing much better, where the game participants seem genuinely excited by the uncertanties in the game, reacted with real personalities (not plastic ones), were a little scared sometimes, a little embarrassed, and where some people really got off.
MassageRoomSeduction has only promo videos from FuckedHard18. The videos are mostly 5-15 min long and all the good parts are edited out. You can easily find these same promo videos at free sites that require no login. I joined the combo offer, paying for one month at RealitySexNetwork, mostly because of my interest in MassageRoomSeduction. It was a waste of time and money. There is nothing at RealitySexNetwork that interests me. If you like the promos, join FuckedHard18 instead.
Not sure what happened to jeppegut -- when I was a member in June 2010, I was able to download on several different days with no problems whatsoever. The video links were clearly labeled "Download". Like most sites, you need to RIGHT CLICK on the link to the video, then select SAVE. Instructions to do just that are right above the links. Simply clicking on the link streams the video. Each video was available in WMV or MPG.
I joined BigZ.Com for a month in January, 2015. I downloaded videos from DaneJones, FakeTaxi, FemaleAgent, Girlfriends, LoveCreampie, MassageRooms, and MomXXX. No problems with billing, canceling, or downloading. For me, the surprise was MomXXX, where I found 9 clips that I thought were very hot (see my profile for a description of my taste), and I'm quite picky. Those were 1043, 1109, 1113, 1125, 1129, 1175, 1241, 1277, and 1318. MomXXX has considerable overlap in actors with MassageRooms, which is fine since I like MassageRooms very well also. Uma is a gorgeous and amazing multi-orgasmic woman featured in both sites. I also found a few at LoveCreampie that I thought were hot to very hot. Nothing of interest at the other sites.
I joined PrivateSociety for a month in November, 2014. No problem with billing, canceling, or downloading. I thought it was creative and excellent. A group of male buddies cruise around midwestern and western towns and find women willing to be in videos for pay. Some are waitresses, some are wives mad at their husbands, etc. Videos are made in motel rooms. The women are very "real", down to earth, and often this is their first porn video. Some young, some middle aged, some older, all sizes. Amateurs with an occasional hooker. Usually the males fucking the women are the guys who set it up and operate the cameras, but sometimes it is a boyfriend of the woman. I like that they usually start with their clothes on and there is some foreplay. Above all I like that they have fun! And they don't enforce a standard script -- they are spontaneous -- except that they do often end in a facial (not my thing). I downloaded 78 clips, among which I found 8 clips that I thought were very hot (women getting turned on and having orgasms), and 15 more that I thought were hot. That is a high percentage for me as I am quite picky. I love the "waitress in the diner" or "woman next door" feel of these videos.
I joined this site in July, 2009. My interest is solely in BG (boy/girl) videos, not solos and not still photos. See my profile for my tastes. Anyway, I found NOTHING the least bit erotic here. The BG videos were mechanical, and the actors looked bored. The girls never had orgasms. There was no intimacy, and no creativity. Although the same was true of most videos at YoungModels and at KarupsHA, I found enough great gems at each of those (see them listed in my reviews) that my subscriptions were worthwhile. I did not save any of the videos that I downloaded from TeenDreams, and I feel that my money was wasted there.
Hey, Goldfish, thanks for the useful review. You had plenty of room left, and here's what I'd like to know. What makes a video a "good one" for you? And why not list 5 or 10 titles so anyone else who signs up can get those first, if they happen to agree with your taste? (I've been listing titles in my reviews.) Thanks!
Dear oogles: Are the videos all man/woman couples? That is, did you find any of the more creative Japanese type videos with many women and one man, bath houses, massage leading to sex, pick-up on the street, one initially shy girl watching a couple and then getting into it, etc.?
If you subscribe, be sure to uncheck the box which will also subscribe you to Nasty Angels if you aren't reading carefully! Links to SegPayEU (a reliable service, I'm told) are easy to find at the membership or FAQ pages.
I'm sad to say that 6 months after my last report, it appears that probably none of the sites in this group have any new videos. They continue to label old videos as new updates. At YoungModels, the latest "updates" were Felicia Flynt "Added May 10, 2010", Renee "Added May 3, 2010", and Madison Monroe "Added April 26, 2010". I had downloaded all of these in June, 2009. On to some bonus sites. At Interracial Sluts, recent "updates" were Christie Lee "March 25, 2010" and Lisa Marie "February 24, 2010". I had downloaded these in March, 2009. At Creampie Fucking, Lorena Sanchez "May 5, 2010" I had downloaded in March, 2009. At Amateur Couples, I found Dana Marie & Tony "April 27, 2010" and Kasey Kox & Johnny "April 13, 2010", which I had downloaded in March, 2009. In conclusion, while these sites have some worthwhile videos, they are apparently a fixed set with no real updates. I'm knocking 10 points off the score of my review. Well, I would if I could. I'm up against the PU rule that you can't edit a review more than 6 months old. Seems to me this is a case where I should be able to!
I returned to this site in November, hoping for some good new boy/girl videos. I was surprised and disappointed to find many old videos that I had downloaded months earlier being represented as updates in October or November! Many of those videos are quite good (to my taste) but still, it is dishonest to represent them as new. Destiny & Drifter, "added Nov 23, 2009", Madison & Derrick "added Nov 16, 2009", and Sabrina & Lucky, "added Oct 20, 2009": I had downloaded these videos when I was a member in June, 2009! Even worse, I had downloaded videos featuring Ginger, Sammy Cruz, and Aubrey (represented as recently added) in March, 2009. Although I kept no record of the site from which these were downloaded, the video filenames begin with "ym_" for YoungModels. Also, YoungModels is releasing content from their other sites, e.g. MacKenzie and Daisy/Nick which I had downloaded in March from AmateurCouples. That would be OK if they were not labeled as exclusive content. As you can tell from my review, I thought this was one of the better sites, so I am really disappointed to see what is happening there.
This is the followup to my previous comment about YoungModels titled "Warning: Fraudulent/Erroneous Charges!". Immediately upon complaining, I received a direct email response from a YoungModels staffer, who is also a PU member, khf2004. He promptly refunded the two erroneous monthly charges to my Visa account, and the erroneous membership was canceled. Further, he gave me a bonus gift. Therefore, I consider that this error was resolved promptly, courteously, professionally, and to my full satisfaction.
I subscribed to this site on 6/13/09 and canceled on 6/16/09. My membership was good thru 7/12/09. I was billed for one month ($29.95) in June, by cybersecurepayment.com. Other names used by this site are slickcash, netbilling, elecbillpayment. I was not billed for this site in July. In late September, I noticed that I had been billed on 8/21/09 and 9/20/09 by CMD-AZ.NET, $39.95 each time. I went to http://cmd-az.net and sent an email complaining. They responded that I have an active membership in YoungModels.Com! I then went to cybersecurepayment.com and was able to locate my original membership account, which confirmed that I had canceled it within the first month. Today I have sent a snapshot of the cancellation confirmation both to CMD-AZ.NET and to email@example.com (which sent me an email confirming my request to cancel in June). I am awaiting their responses. A SATISFACTORY RESPONSE WAS RECEIVED RESOLVING THIS MATTER -- PLEASE SEE MY SUBSEQUENT COMMENT.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.