Seriously, how many reviews will this site get on what short time scales and how many praises will there be in the future? No one knows. Sorry, just had to get it out of my system. Erase, dismiss, ignore my comment, whatever.
I just watched a trailer from this site and mostly saw some half naked average looking girls doing exercises and such. Looking through the previews did not impress me either. One can really overdo this "natural girls" stuff. I got rather a bit disgusted here. Maybe it's not my genre, but where does the 95% rating come from?
I just surfed through some Latex Fetish lists in order to search for new interesting sites. There were many links to "sample pictures" from Adult-Empire.com with a lot of pictures I know from other sites but with deleted watermarks. They obviously claim it's their stuff. Massive copyright infringement? I am stunned.
I joined BDSM giant a few days ago. Since I had to retype something in the signup process I did not uncheck the "trial" memberships for incrediblepass.com and 12xmovies.com which reappeared after going back. They will renew after two days if not cancelled. First of all, I was NOT able to cancel these memberships. After contacting the merchants for these sites they stated that they could not find my details in their databases but I could clearly log into these two sites with my username and password from BDSM Giant. Up to now there were no billing fees on my credit card. But we will see how it turns out. Concerning these experiences I would honestly suggest to avoid even joining BDSM Giant itself. This is no policy which should be honoured.
I was billed by AMACCESS.org 39.62$ and called my credit card company to block access from this merchant. I hope these criminals are happy with my money. They won't get any more.
Just want to mention that I had a quick look at their previews. Besides other stuff I noticed the "artbook" preview. I have NEVER, repeat NEVER, come across ANY site that features artbook (not to mention complete artbooks) content which is not illegally copied and distributed as torrent or whatsoever. Also the other content seems a little bit fishy to me. Looks like the usual bunch of collected stuff from all over the internet. Personally I wouldn't even bother to think about paying a membership for these kind of sites. Please correct or rebuke me if I have it all wrong.
Personally I would love to pay a site with original artbooks, even the full price for each one. This would save me the troubles of waiting for months for the package to arrive, the hassle with the customs and the impertinent postage.
Just want to mention that the already slow update scheme has dropped to one update per month. 25$/month for one video or galllery is getting a little disproportionate. What about switching to a pay per view scheme here?
When checking out this site and decided to leave a popup went up stating if I am really sure that I want to leave and in the background another sleazy site popped up. One reason for me to never join this shady site.
I joined after a year or so to look for something new here, but there are only some unmotivated minor updates, which I did not care to download and some boring guest galleries, which one probably finds on preview pages on the internet. Closing this site should be in everyone's interest. Disappointed beyond belief.
Obtaining the Mega Pass gives access to about 15 Hustler's sites. I only joined again (after a long time) to see if they have developed their user friendliness, but was utterly disappointed. Credit Card sized streams, no zips, no high resolution pix, DRM protected vids (but who cares for this micro resolutions?). I am just wondering for how long they will keep their stone age design? If the girls were not this hot at Hustler's...It's the only thing which keeps one coming back from time to time.
first read the "about", if it's OK for you, join wholeheartedly
Just some observations I made there, randomly ordered. I joined about 1 week ago, so I am no expert yet, so you don't have the right yet to stone me to death. Maybe it will sound like douchebaggery but these points are what I felt after joining (at least I am not making them up). First of all, I strongly recommend that you read the "about" section before you join, so you can get the gist of what you should expect. The main points are "realism,", "naturalism" and "ethical" representations of women. This leads to one shortcoming: repetitive action, which was mentioned in some comments before. There are not many variations for a woman to masturbate as natural as possible. The self given statement "a historic achievement in erotica" is startling. The emphasis on aesthetic presentations of female masturbation etc. is really interesting and OK, but that's that. I have never seen such a self glorification on any other site. Joining is like to be getting a member of some special community which despises the watcher of "common" porn. One point which I want to emphasize is that there is a wide margin to judge from whether you are diverging from "ethical" (I love this word) porn. In general, sex is not as clean and sugar-coated as depicted here, there is a broad variation of perversion which is nonethless "ethical" in its own right. Just because you use no scripts doesn't make you better. So, after all, I was not really that disappointed by this site as it sounds. It's OK if you want to live out your voyeristic fantasies for some time. But it's nothing for a long time membership.
I was just watching the awfully short preview on their site and their sparse offerings of micro preview pictures. Can anybody confirm or dismiss my notion that this site is an awfully lot like Abby Winters?
Judging from their preview clips the girls are already at the edge of orgasm before touching their pussies. Is the majority of the content more "believable" or do they stick to the concept "start moaning from beginning to end"? This was the reason for cancelling my Sapphic Erotica membership a long time ago.
there is more torment here than just for the girls
Who doesn't own some Insex clips if one was/is into BDSM? This archive is what's left.
I am not sure why they rotate the content and add 2 clips per week until they reach 35 and then erase the oldest ones. The official reason is that "putting up ("everything") at one time is not viable from both economic and technical perspectives" which I don't want to comment.
I've seen so many clips I would be fond of, even if it's just the smallest resolution possible and .rm format but 60$ per month???
It's about time some other ingenious perverts continue an equal project like Insex...
Basically this is a compilation of videos and shoots which January had done over the years. There are some real treats here for January fans (like me) but I miss some essential videos which I consider great. They were probably left out because of copyright issues (I am talking about cbtandballbusting.com videos). The pricing is really fair though but this site has nothing to let you stick around for too long.
Yes, the videos are shot in HighDef. So the size is about 60MB for a two minute mp4 video. The biggest part are "Behind the Scenes" videos, some interviews and clips from photoshootings. Usually I am a friend of this concept but somehow it's not working for me here. The first problem is that most of the videos are really, really short (2-3 minutes). The second one is that they also feature PVC clothing which looks terrible on the models (maybe I am a bit biased because I don't like PVC or Plastic outfits). The third shortcoming is that some models are not a turn on for me. After all I was a member for a month or so and downloaded most of the videos but only watched them once. There is something amiss on this site, it just does not hit the spot.
I have looked at the recent review of TBP but when I visit the site I see a huge amount of real live penises fucking the girls in the previews. Why is the site sorted under the lesbian category? Am I missing something? Lesbian means no penises made of real flesh to me.
Just spotted this on the new site listing. Judging from the previews the camerawork is a little bit amateurish and the scenes pretty generic. But I noticed beautiful Kloe Kane which I've seen back at OnlyTease. The site itself is expensive, as usual.
Why the hype now about lower prices at TBP with even direct links to Met Art if most of the PU members disapprove their regional billing policy? Just wondering if there are conflicts of interest here...
Just read the review of this site and not sure if one should join it. From my point of view the rating looked suspiciously biased and gave a too high score. Judging from their previews I am concerned in two ways. First, I noticed that most of the mistresses looked worn out and with a ton of makeup in their faces. Secondly, the action is very generic with no innovation whatsoever. How often can you watch a girl tied up in mostly the same boring way and then get flogged and treated with a dildo anyway?
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.