This site remains on my to-join list since it features a number of models I like - although a bit tempered by some of the download issues folk have had and I'm not sure if there are still restrictions.
However, it's worth noting that if you like the style - and UK models - the photographer's work seems to be featured quite heavily on at least 3 other sites I know of:
I joined here on a whim, due to the very good TBP price. It's nothing revolutionary, but it's a solid site with lots of content - my review to follow. But for such a big, high-profile site, the members area is a little disappointing. Page loads are slow and there are frequent errors when loading pages (sometimes have to load 2-3 times to get a page to work).
As noted in a recent review, the advanced search - which is essential for a site of this size - is AWOL, so just paging through the models is the best way to browse. And although you can add photographers as favourites, there doesn't seem to be a way to click through and see all their material.
Granted it's a bit churlish to complain for the price! But a site like this should be more on top of this stuff...
This site is currently not accepting new members - presumably in preparation for the switch to being managed by Met Art? I'm hoping that's soon - I'm quite a fan and as I am a long-term member at TLE, I can join any other network site for $10 :)
Interestingly, Holly's other sites, like Holly Core and Forever Vamp are still taking members - there is some overlap in the material here with her main site so I wonder what is/isn't happening with these?
I signed up for this site (taking care to avoid the heavily biased regional pricing) and overall it's good - I'll review it shortly. However, I just found one odd thing that bothered me.
Watching the videos of Jodi Taylor, she has a prominent birthmark on her thigh, and another smaller one above her pussy. They are part of who she is and do not at all detract from how pretty she is - I'd actually say it enhances it, as not trying to cover them shows a little more personality. But they are both notably absent in the corresponding photo sets - which is kind of jarring, especially as the pictures do not otherwise seem heavily photoshopped.
I'd understand if perhaps she asked for them to be removed, but I'm guessing she's not self-conscious about them otherwise she wouldn't be doing porn in the first place! This is wholly unnecessary and I hope it is not an emerging pattern.
I'm not hugely into the schoolgirl niche, although St Mackenzies is vaguely on my list, both because most of the models are very obviously more than schoolgirl age and I'm a fan of the photographer - of Breath Takers and Girlfolio.
However, I do like a girl in uniform or workwear - especially a dominant one (in the milder sense) - so the teachers and matrons here should make it worth watching, hopefully there will be some more material soon!
Continuing the saga of regional pricing on this site...
It seems to persist, by way of the $25 site being €25 in Europe. BUT with the new TBP discount - I received it in the PU newsletter and it seems the same when clicking through from the site - the $15 offer seems to apply even in the UK.
This is a great site - for me it slightly wins out over it's closest competitor, X-Art - and worth joining at this price.
Following my recent glowing review, this site continues to impress with its creative scenarios, great photography and atmospheric, high-production-values videography. Eg:
* I just found an older update in which the model sneaks off to a secluded location somewhere; laughs off and ignores an incoming call from a presumed boyfriend, and starts to enjoy herself. Later on, the phone rings again and she proceeds to use it to masturbate with in some detail (presumably the vibrating ring was on...)
* A recent video was titled 'Sex Art' - I figured they were just copping out and reusing a video from sister site Sex Art. As it happens, the video showed the model on bed with a laptop, watching a Sex Art video - then getting aroused and reenacting the blowjob she was watching with a dildo. Toys generally aren't my thing - but, like close-ups - here they manage use them without being run of the mill porn.
This is proper, erotic stuff that's both explicit yet still evocative. Recommended!
Just noticed this as a new listing on TBP - it's from the same folks as Orgasms.xxx so uses some of the same models and a similar setup. The former is on my list of heartcore sites to try - and as I generally prefer slightly older models, it looks perhaps a better bet than the fake boobs of Pure Mature I spotted a while back. Would be interesting to see any reviews of this one!
Just saw Spencer's new review of this site and it's a shame it seems to have stopped updating - it's one of my favourite sites in terms of material. It's rarely much, if any, more explicit that Met Art but somehow it puts more atmosphere and context into the photos, and makes them more appealing/arousing.
Interestingly, a quick look at Girlfolio, which has a large overlap with this site - the same photographer and locations, and many of the same models, shows it is still updating. That bumps it up my list a bit...
A few changes at PP over the past six months or more. They went through a bit of a phase of models who, for some reason, didn't do much for me - perhaps too glam, losing the intimacy or voyeurism that made the material so appealing.
Things seem to have picked up a bit now, with very attractive, recent models, and again more intimate themes and sets - getting dressed, make-up and the like, which work for me.
Note, though, that updates are less frequent - from daily down to every 3 days at the moment. That's still pretty good for a $15 site and is still good value but if I re-review it, my score may drop a couple of points for that reason.
Finally got round to joining this site - of photographer Richard Kern - a review will follow. One weird thing, though - based on the webmaster program, and Petter Hegre's name appearing on the video clips here, this seems to be aligned somehow with Hegre-Art.
Hegre's all about flawless beauty, technical excellence, perfect studio shots - which leave me a bit cold. Kern's images are of amateur girls, grainy looking, not particularly technical, often poor lighting and messy apartments. But more erotic :)
Perhaps it's nothing more than he and Kern are friends - but interesting because the two styles couldn't be further apart; I couldn't imagine them working together!
As a panty fan, I just noticed this site listed - it's from, and includes, Vintage Flash, Pantyhosed4U and a couple of others. Makes this network seem even more appealing and pushes it up my list a bit!
Some of the models here are up to $12/min (yikes!), so I'd hope they are indeed classy. Or not classy, if that's what you're after.
I'm not directly comparing, since I guess this works for some folk... but if it were your thing, I suspect you could spend a night with a very lovely and willing partner for the price of an hour here...
Taking a look at the samples on this site, it seems like a great idea - the X-Art/Joymii etc formula of well-shot, sensitive hardcore, but featuring slightly older models - I tend to find girls in their 30s very attractive.
Just a shame that many of them seem to have fake boobs... I know many here agree with me, but we seem to be in the minority in the industry!
Kinky to me means maybe some fetishwear, some light bondage, etc. So I took a quick visit here... it's rather more than that. The eponymous Jo seems to get involved in some quite extreme activities; I confess watching the trailer video made my eyes water and the one phrase that sticks in my mind is 'elbow deep'.
Anyway it seems worth a look for those of a (considerably) less sensitive disposition than me :)
I'd like to join this site - it's exactly the sort of content that appeals to me. Some well-known porn stars, but in a glam-fetish/underground style - it seems similar to, say, Foot Factory, Juliland or perhaps Stagg Street - all sites I am fond of.
However... from Spencer's review, it seems there are no downloads of anything at all. I've joined sites without zips, but usually it's simple to get DTA to fetch sets; but when shown in a flash slideshow, it's unlikely to be able to do that.
If this is still the case, that's definitely a deal-breaker; sites should solicit repeat custom by providing new content, not by making you pay to see what you saw already...
Although updates haven't quite been daily lately, this remains one of my favourite sites, and the only one I have a recurring subscription to. It's just had a bit of a facelift - looks good, and although there are still a couple of glitches to iron out, I particularly like the new model listing
Not seen anything quite like it. Also, the filtering facilities here remain exemplary - allowing you to search models and sets by many criteria - build, breast size, ethnicity, age, explicitness. Other sites would do well to take note!
Entirely brilliant opening line in Spencer's TBP review today:
‘Brutal Fisting is up for review today, and I don't know if there's technically a distinction between brutal and non-brutal fisting, since most fisting seems pretty brutal to me, but there you have it.’
Fisting really isn't my thing, but that kind of writeup does bring a smile to my face...
Just saw this newly listed at TBP and it's intriguing. I'm definitely a nylon fan, and IMO the more layers the better... as long as they come off eventually!
I've never been tempted by OT - I like the T but I think I'd find the O merely frustrating. Would be interesting to see how explicit this site is and whether it leaves us wanting... just a shame the preview is fairly poor compared to the other OT sites, there is little sample material to see.
Just spotted this listed at TBP, and it's the kind of subtle, atmospheric, a bit-arty-but-explicit material that I really like. The site still seems small at the moment with only a few sets and videos, but if it grows, it's definitely one I'll join. Until then, however, Angel Afterlife is higher up on my list...
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.