Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : Douggie (8)  

Feedback:   All (33)  |   Reviews (11)  |   Comments (2)  |   Replies (20)

Other:   Replies Received (22)  |   Trust Ratings (11)

All Activity A summary of all the feedback from this user.
Shown : 1-25 of 33 Page :    Next Page >

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
Review
1
Visit Karup's Hometown Amateurs

Karup's Hometown Amateurs
(0)

96.0
Status: Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros: Easy navigation, plenty of updates.
Very professionally done site. A ton of nice looking eager beavers. The site is definately the top of the amature sites that feature female solo masturbation. They dont get too artsy like some of the others do. I dont know if youre like me. Simple is better....girl laying on bed...decides to get off....Actually gets off. Shes not shoving cucumbers in her snatch. Not pretending to get off on an over sized butt plug.
Cons: They need to work on the videos themselves. The rating would have been higher if this were the case. As with most amature sites....the video people move way too much....so much its almost sickening. Concentrating on this will bring them much more in terms of a viewing audience.
Bottom Line: The best amature site out there....doesnt have the artsy stuff that ftv does....doesnt do the sick and twisted stuff that als scans does. But does offer a little more then matts does.
I dont look at the photos so I couldnt grade that.

03-01-07  04:58pm

Replies (0)
Review
2
Visit San Diego Latinas

San Diego Latinas
(0)

90.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: 3 day trial
AWESOME solo videos (the only thing I surf for)
Several additional sites included, but mainly with the same content.
Cons: Trial is still on (3day) and Im outta downloads.
They need to desparately step up the solo content...it would be on its way to being a powerhouse.
How hard is it to find a hot chick a week?
Bottom Line: Wahoooo!
This is going to be a full text review. First, Im only interested in solo video. To date, I felt the best overall solo video was chantell from Matts models.
But man, Some of the girls from Sandiegolatinas are explosive! Ive been preaching to some sites out there on their solo video content for YEARS.
Some are comming around.
Keep up with fresh faces...keep up the work with the magic wand and maybe introduce the pocket ricket to the ones that cant handle the wand....I think youll be GIANT!

05-27-10  05:09pm

Replies (5)
Review
3
Visit Paul Markham Teens

Paul Markham Teens
(0)

90.0
Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros: Awsome site. Nice looking young amatures. great niches (well what Im looking for anyway). As I have stated in all my reviews this is for video only...I never look at pictures.
Paul has a forum that enables you to talk directly with him. He listens to what you have to say that can improve his site.
Cons: Updates are normally videos of models recirculated through.
Bottom Line: Good site. Good owner. Quite a few models. Some Im sure you have seen and remebered from other places.

03-01-07  09:17pm

Replies (1)
Review
4
Visit FTV Girls

FTV Girls
(5)

85.0
Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros: Tons of models. Professional site. Easy navigations. Whats better then watching a nice looking girl get herself off? Thats what this place has to offer.
Cons: scenarios way off. Too artsy. Needs to tone down a little, simple is better. FTV toy? Why? Personally I like to see sincere solo masturbation. I like to see the model get herself off....not just shove whatever is available in her snatch.
Bottom Line: They have a lot going for them. Tone it down a little. Maybe have the model do her solo on a bed instead of anywhere else. Dont be afraid of getting the snatch in view when shes cumming and you should have something big.

03-01-07  09:02pm

Replies (0)
Review
5
Visit Matt's Models

Matt's Models
(0)

85.0
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: Tons of models. Easy site navigation. Has a forum to talk with him directly. Has some good videos (I never look at pictures). Constantly updating.
Cons: video needs a ton of work for itself. Too much movement, bad angles ect. As explained to matt in his forum. Camera people dont make the best video people.
Bottom Line: I have recommended others to his site...specifically to see the chantell video....it sets itself apart from the rest. Although again the video work could have been better. He got everything into the shot.
The internet is bogged down with female solo videos of models just going through the motions. Web masters claiming they have more then whats really offered.
I noticed here recently that he was getting more involved with the solo performances. That doesnt make it solo and have my own term for it....one mans jollies. Keeping things natural as possible and actually as simple as possible is what the internet needs. Hes almost there.

03-01-07  08:50pm

Replies (0)
Review
6
Visit The Female Orgasm

The Female Orgasm
(0)

70.0
Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros: * Exclusive content
* Easy Navagation
* Provides a Niche
* has forum to talk with site operators
* comming along...slowly
* they lower there monthly fee if you try to cancell
Cons: * updates are very slow
* Expensive (but pretty much the norm)
* small site (one website/software person, one video guy)
Bottom Line: Although I wish nothing but good things for the fellow. I have belonged off and on to the site since its conception. The site needs to really concentrate on updates. As it is now you may get a part of an update today...then wait days or even weeks to see the rest of the video. And thats it....nothing more.
They are trying different things. But nothing that will really make the site a true success.

I guess what Im trying to say is this:
I realize its hard to find women to do a specific niche like this. But they are out there. It has been suggested that they need to contract out some work. I suggested paul from paulmarkhamteens. We'll see how that works out.

Thats there one and only problem...updates. What man wouldnt want to see some cute girl masturbating til her snatch starts twitchin? Get the girls in and he could be a monster on the web.

06-14-07  05:25pm

Replies (0)
Review
7
Visit 18 Eighteen

18 Eighteen
(0)

68.0
Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros: *Exclusive girls
*Trial join
*pretty girls
* A euro site that actually has vibrators with batteries!
HUM
Cons: Hate to be negative but......

*Very Very limited video
*Formats to finding videos are crappy
*Very limited updates
*A lot of video unable to play (corruption error or weird format that cautions people when they try to install).
* There boasts about how often they update is B.S.
Bottom Line: My postings are about video only......and mainly solo female video....I dont look at pictures.

I belong to thefemaleorgasm.com. I frequesnt there forum and there are several running posts about random sites. I told them I would check this one out.....ppppffffttt I have been here before. There homepage threw me off for some reason.

Its been quite a while (I would say a couple of years) since I was last there. There wastn too much more being offered. I think they mainly update there photo section which is pretty common. Very limited video. Fewer yet videos that are solo. Glad they had a trial membership. I wouldnt pay much more even if it were monthly.

Its too bad.....with the models they get in. If they were to concentrate on solo video instead of pictures they would be a hit. Im not saying that cause Im a solo female fanatic.....but lets face it...there arent too many out there.

06-14-07  05:08pm

Replies (0)
Review
8
Visit In Focus Girls

In Focus Girls
(2)

68.0
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: Easy navigation. A lot of models. Very pretty women. as much as glamor as anythign else.
Cons: I dont look at pictures so this is for there videos only. They didnt stick to there site name as often as I would expect. Many shots were way out of focus...so much so I thought it was funny.
Very few videos and actually very few I would watch. normally the models would go through the motions and then they were done. Its typical of amature sites that offer solo masturbation.
Bottom Line: As with dozens more sites. I have this on my list to check out again later. I wouldnt recommend it right now.

03-01-07  09:10pm

Replies (0)
Review
9
Visit Ron Harris

Ron Harris
(0)

65.0
Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros: High end site. Personal touch. nice looking models.
Cons: I didnt feel he did his videos for his viewers. Almost like bubble girls, he did them just as much for himself (his own jollies) as he did for concerns that the video would be what people would pay to see.
Bottom Line: Theres a ton of amature places out there. Most are bad....this doesnt fall into that category. But he needs more updates and better scenarios to get me to return.

03-01-07  08:40pm

Replies (0)
Review
10
Visit CD Girls

CD Girls
(0)

64.0
Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros: ** They have a ton of resourses.
** A lot of nice look women.
** Nice looking site
** stay in contact with previous members
** a lot to offer
Cons: ** Terrible video work
** Solo content needs a lot of help
** Too complicated viewing
Bottom Line: CD girls was one of the first professional sites I joined. HEHE that was in my younger days....I was so into it I traced there IP and talked with there software guy for sometime....he was shocked. I discontinued then joined again...then dropped and joined again...and finally dropped.
The time before the last I actually spoke with the guy in charge and we talked about there video work. HE agreed they needed a lot of help and was looking for a new video person....it never happend and the last time I joined heard the familiar british accent in the back ground.

Well for one thing I know they allocate too much for what is really needed.
**Seems like they use 3-4 video cameras when all they need is one.
** Too many side shots
** too many out of focus shots
** too many drifting shots

I guess it could be the fault of the person doing the mixing of the video they get.

I know I could take one camera and get 80% better video then what they get with 3 or 4.
Its so disappointing to see these nice looking girls either doing there premiere video or possibly there only. Left to the hands of people that may have shot a lot of video but shot it all the same....WRONG!

Well, I had an old hd I dl'd a lot of video from cd girls. But deleted most of it. Dont get me wrong....sometimes there is a fluke and they do get it partly right and it happens to make a decent solo video. But for the most part....its nothing different then you can find anywhere else on the net.

07-18-07  02:45pm

Replies (2)
Rating
11
Visit I Feel Myself

I Feel Myself
(0)

55.0
No Review.
03-17-09  02:09pm

Reply
12
Visit San Diego Latinas

San Diego Latinas
(0)
Reply of Douggie's Review

Well, I just singed up for another trial and guess what?
Not one single update.
Going to downgrade my score to 83.
Douggie


03-13-11  01:40am

Reply
13
N/A Reply of Advent's News

Wow, Was looking forward to knocking out several reviews but figured I should give your company the benefit of the doubt and wait.

I have been a member for less than a week and only had 1 evening that your site worked. Its been down all weekend...sent several messages with no reply.

I tried to join your forum so I could let you guys know that way and the required verification email never came through.

I noticed your site says its running with a beta program....ehem, almost 2 years? What is the three stooges your tech people?

To be honest and the reason for my delay in rating is this....
The ATK movie site...2 year beta testing or not. Is the worse site I have ever been to. I can deal with the expense part. I have never been to a site that runs, is set up or has been out of commission like this. All this BS from a high fee site? EVERY free site features better streams, Better search functions and 100% more reliability.

The pros:
It has a video only format
Lots of videos

Cons:

The site is SLOW...Im not talking "Man I wish this site were faster" slow...Im talking Pounding my head on the desk screaming "WTF is this so damn slow" Slow.

Mega gateway Errors. YUP...havent seen them for years. But get them numerous times from this site.

Almost 2 years of Beta testing? Common!

Only offer (and the customer pays a lot for) stream. The problem is the download is so slow that theres a little black rebuffering box that is on the video 1/2 the time.

Tech Support....Well that goes along with the overal site..Its been over 4 days and I havent heard back from you...site has been down 4 out of 5 days now.

Search engine...There is a ton of work that needs to be done with it.
OVERALL, I cant justify your fees. Inshort (out of space) Its the WORSE site I have ever been to. With possibilites of being one of the best. But that being said...will it happen in this millenia?


02-15-11  01:02am

Reply
14
N/A Reply of Advent's News

Hello melissa,

I just previewed this site and it looks interesting.
A few thing I noticed that couls use improvement.

1) To be honest, the fees are rather high. If I were to go with the minimum. I would be able to watch aproximately 5 movies. Granted most are exclusive. But Ive seen some that arent. With the little detail given whats to say the video Im about to watch is what Im actually looking for?

2) The search engine is less than mediocre. You either have the ability to look at a very broad search...like for instance masturbation. You end up with more then just what youre searching for. Or hope that its in the title....my search was vibrator (5 pages) what I know theres a ton more. magic wand Which pulled up one. Or massager that pulled up about 5.

I realize its about making money. But for 20.00 I would expect to have the ability to search and play for most an evening. Although you have a ton of content and this style of billing may work at other sites. I think your company would be better off billing a 30-40.00 monthly fee.

Im sure youve heard this before....The site is slow. I read somewhere that youve combined all your sites to one server. That wouldnt be an issue if I had a whole month to view the movies.

Overall I think youre site is on the right track. That is without actually viewing the content. At this point, Im kind of scared to join. With billing like that, I could see myself dropping 100.00 an evening.

Any discounted deals going on? Like the first time mebers get 40 crowns with the 20.00 purchase?


02-07-11  11:31pm

Reply
15
Visit San Diego Latinas

San Diego Latinas
(0)
Reply of Denner's Reply

I hear ya.
Thanks for your input.


05-30-10  07:41am

Reply
16
Visit San Diego Latinas

San Diego Latinas
(0)
Reply of Denner's Reply

Sorry you feel that way.
As stated in my post. My rating and review was for Solo video only.
I dont look at pictures and dont care to see another guys dick.
If you would take the time to check em out you would see what I mean. Its stuff you dont see anywhere else that I can think of.
If you get a chance watch these solo videos:
Indira
Zeda
ginger
izzy
sivone

Then decide for yourself.
I can decide in the first ten minutes if a site is worth a crap or not.
As for the exclusitivity, I surf quite a bit Thats the only place I've ssen with these models.
Douggie


05-29-10  06:26pm

Reply
17
Visit Matt's Models

Matt's Models
(0)
Reply of RagingBuddhist's Reply

I hear ya. I was just trying to give constructive criticism. The way I look at it now is just like he said. Its his site and he will run it the way he wants (right or wrong). Ill just join when I feel the need to blow 14.00.
I better be careful of what I say...last time he threatened his lawyers on me. LMAO. good luck! want my address?

Nohing personal against the guy. I just see it way too often...the producers/camera people are way more amaturish then the models are. But hey like I said, its his business.


05-02-09  02:50pm

Reply
18
Visit Matt's Models

Matt's Models
(0)
Reply of Matt Frackas's Reply

You have a screw loose dude.
I made an entire post and it got deleted......
I tried your site several times and it wouldnt come up....seems to me it was down


07-04-08  10:29pm

Reply
19
Visit Matt's Models

Matt's Models
(0)
Reply of Matt Frackas's Reply

Wow you got a screw loose dude.

07-04-08  08:55pm

Reply
20
Visit Matt's Models

Matt's Models
(0)
Reply of pornmaster's Reply

I just found what matt is so upset about:

A lot of what he said was taken out of context.

using your analogy tho,
Matt's Models IS the Ford of porn.
(we should use that haha)

That is funny. I think theres something better then that out there for the site though.

Thailand is cool. Ive been to bankok well been all over asia.
You seem a little more level headed then Matt....

Laa


07-04-08  06:26pm

Reply
21
Visit Matt's Models

Matt's Models
(0)
Reply of pornmaster's Reply

what i can't figure out
is why you keep rebilling
if u dont like the content?


As stated I joined because of the discount. I never rebilled cause its the same old style.

i'm not a goon.
i'm just a webmaster that sees
hundreds of members join or rebill daily.

they must all hate the style too LOL


thats cool. Im glad ur not a goon. Im just trying to express my opionion at a site that was made for it. If matt were to send his forum goon in thats when the bitching and whining would have started.
As stated a million times. I wrote his and several other critiques based on what I felt about the site. I made them IRT the solo videos only. If matt were to look I did say positive things about most of the site but did leave it open for there own interpretation by stating I only watch the solo videos ...I dont look at pictures or girl/boy...girl/girl videos.
Although there are hundreds of website out there. There are only a handful (at best) that have a schedualed and/or consistent turn arround of models. Comparing your site (which has a good turn arround of models) to nearly all of the other sites is irrelevant. Thats like saying a Ford is a better car then a Lambroghini because they sell more of them.

Like I said Im sorry if it hurts Matts feelings. I made an offer to him that would have totally cleared the air.....just one video of the hundreds he has made.
I do realize its an amature site. But normally thats to describe the models...not the staff and from what I have seen here the management.

I also tried to sooth him down by letting him know I have directly sent at least 100 people to his site just for the chantelle video. But he consistantly threw a fit about the fact that I posted something I feel is true on a site that was made for criticism. The fact still remains that there were a lot of people that agreed with me on his forum about the videos.
It seems to me he feels this is a personal attack. IT isnt. Or that Im trying to hurt his business...Im not. In my very first post in his forum. I just offerd some suggestions that may improve the solo videos. I will always feel the same about the suggestions.
Anyway, Have a good 4th.....time to go party!


07-04-08  11:01am

Reply
22
Visit Matt's Models

Matt's Models
(0)
Reply of Matt Frackas's Reply

Your credibility as a porn producer or even a fair critic of comparing adult sites is zip. Your opinion is just that, your opinion, and marred by your jealous, hostile NON FACTS.
Put down your crack pipe and listen. I NEVER suggested to anyone I was a porn producer. I never claimed to be a critic. This site was made to allow patrons of adult websites give there opionions. Thats all I did. Jealous of WHAT? Dude, you need to get a grip. Youre the only one calling names and getting hostile. Im sorry if I hurt your feelings. Welcome to the life of being in business.

I took the Forums down in my members area years ago mainly because of SPAM and because I had MEMBERS ARGUING with each other (sound familiar?). I'm sorry your lost your VOICE OF AUTHORITY there :( Are you still mad about that? Frankly I don't need "experts" like you spamming other sites and pissing off other members. If I wanted to start a site like that I'd start a site like PU.
I never tried to be a voice of authority. As explained in many of my posts I would like your place to be successful or more successful. But In my opionion it needs work. I had just as many members agreeing with me as your forum goons disagreeing. Even so, thats not what Im about.
If our members have complaints, we have a help forum and support email. They dont try to make a career out of it like you. (FYI....ALL ADULT SITES HAVE DISGRUNTLED MEMBERS. Ive spoken with the owner of more than one of the top rated sites and they tell me they have to deal with "whiners and moaners" all the time.
Again, Im not digruntled about anything. Just stateing things the way I see em. All business's have people who try to help them...or in your words whiners and moaners.
I run an "Amateurs Nude Models Pay Site" which is for the thousands of people who enjoy it for what it is. I realized my job is to provide our customers what they have been coming back for every year. It's not for the few dissatisfied who get all up in arms because it doesnt meet THEIR PARTICULAR VISION.
Again, Its my opionion. Youre the only one up in arms here. The same thing happend at your forum. All I did is give a suggestion as to how I think it could be a better solo video place...as stated because of the turnarroun of models. Then you and your goons cut me down and closed the post.
There's only about 6,000 adult websites reviewed by TBP and thousands more on the net. There's a niche & site for EVERYBODY and PLENTY sites you can THROW YOUR MONEY AWAY ON DUE TO DIRTY TRICKS LIKE LIMITED TRIALS AND OTHER DECEPTIVE PRACTICES. Ive run a solid, honest website since 1999.
I never even hinted your site was shady. Just that the SOLO VIDEOS need work.
Once again, the fact that you keep signing up only to disappoint yourself makes one wonder :)
As stated prior, the discount and in the hopes youve changed your style.


07-03-08  06:35pm

Reply
23
Visit Matt's Models

Matt's Models
(0)
Reply of Matt Frackas's Reply

My company is successful and has been for 10 years...and Ive done it SINGLE HANDEDLY.
Maybe thats what the problem is.

By the way check out our line of DVD's distributed by Vivid Video.
I suppose they distribute our DVD's and make the Pro Am charts because they suck? lol


Theres only a few companies out there dude. It would look really bad if they didnt.

and FYI I dont even shoot all the solo videos myself now...we have other great shooters helping out. So I guess they ALL suck too?

Must be a site style then.....

Why would someone (YOU) supposedly STILL be a member of my site, only to come on here to REGULARLY tell people how bad things are?
I think thats a question, smart porn consumers will be asking you. :)


I belong to several sites....not to hurt your feelings...but I signed up for yours again...because of the discount. I was hoping you improved your shoots.
Ill reference one that was hideous, well was going to look up her name but your site is down. Recent model, done 2 solos back to back...real pretty. They were shot beautiful agony style. The first one was well may be she only agreed to R rated. Then you posted another one, I thought well maybe they knew they messed up and are going to try and recoop there efforts. But then it was the same thing.

I dont know matt. Trust me arguing about this isnt going to sway anything. It just shows your bad taste and bad business. This site is here for personal opionions.

I answered all your question but one. Ill get to that in a minute.
But mind answering one question for me?
How can something so simple be messed up so continuously?

PS...and hows your porn producer career going?

Its not. I never claimed to be one. Besides, I have too many other things I need to concentrate on right now. But if and/or when I do get the time and models. Ill take the time to make sure theyre worth watching.


07-03-08  12:19pm

Reply
24
Visit Matt's Models

Matt's Models
(0)
Reply of Matt Frackas's Reply

Wow matt, bad day? Im sorry but you have it all wrong. As I said from the original post on your forum. Im am trying to offer suggestions and help. I would like to see your company successful.

The truth is your video work isnt that great to say the least. You dont know how to shoot a solo video and no matter how many times you do it, it doesnt seem to be improving.
You move camera and positioning way too much.
Shooting style backwords.
Thumping arround when moving with the camera.
Its more like youre just trying to get it over with.
Nothing personal. Like I have always told you. Camera people usually dont make good video people.

Of course things are going good for your company. Youre one of the few amature porn sites that have regular updates of models. (although it didnt appear so when I joined previously, 1 solo model for the month). I just think improving it (or trying) will make you and your company all the more sucessful.

(Douggie comes on here to try get my goat...and apparently he thinks TBP, PU and his own comments have some effect on the success of adult websites)
Uh Hem, thats what this website is all about dude...with the exception of getting your goat...and Im not.

The statement "someones balls" is referring to boy/girl videos. I dont remember how it was worded but I was trying to explain that I only view solo girl videos and thats it.
Douggie was a member of MattsModels for who knows how long?
I am currently a member. But have to say I am sticking to my comments about your video style (there is none). I think I also joined back in Novemebr or so...

Let me ask you Matt, Why did you take down your forum? I know I wasnt the only one trying to convince you that you need to concentrate on what youre doing more when youre shooting.
I know how these forums and such work. Youre going to contact your "guys" and send them here to bash me and my post. More power to em.

You reference 1 video that was shot properly (solo video) and Ill take back anything you think is negative and refer to you as the "king of porn" from now on. But, If you make the same misteak more then 3 times during the shoot...you owe me nothing.

Apparently you dont care about what your paying patrons think. The fact is the internet is still pretty much in its infancy. Have I ever belonged to a site for more then a year...a few of them. Was I personally satisifed with there contact....for the most part ..no.

You may not know this. But I have referred a lot (probably hundreds) of people to your site. For one single video. Chantelles video. (Im sure you remember me mentioning that before). I think its one of the best solo videos out there.


07-03-08  11:23am

Comment
25
Visit Matt's Models

Matt's Models
(0)

solo's only

I dont know what to say. Im only reviewing the solo video's. I dont pay for high speed to view pictures and not interested in seeing someones balls.

But man, Is Matt going out of business? I was a member the month before last and decided to wait just incase it was a fluke. One update the entire month.
Looks like Matt's isnt the place to see some good solo's....looks like it never will be either.

05-04-08  09:48pm

Replies (19)

Shown : 1-25 of 33 Page :    Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.49 seconds.