| All Activity |
A summary of all the feedback from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
26
|
Dancerbating
(1)
|
Reply of
dracken's Reply
Hi, dracken. The videos appear to me to be high resolution -- very crisp. Also generally the lighting is fine, and the videography seems good -- that is, no extreme closeups -- mostly views of whole body. In fact, sometimes they could zoom in a little more.
|
05-29-12 03:58pm
|
Reply
27
|
N/A
|
Reply of
williamj's Poll
I own a Fleshlight. Its nothing like the real thing, but feels good nonetheless, and its a nice alternative to self-pleasuring with hands. I've even taken it on a trip overseas, tho I wondered how it would go should customs open my suitcase and lift it out! (They didn't.)
|
07-12-10 07:12pm
|
Reply
28
|
N/A
|
Reply of
BabyGetReal's Poll
You're right, the units are screwed up. All the megabytes should be gigabytes. Sorry if I did that! And yes, RagingBuddhist, 100 megabytes is, of course, less than a single longish video!
|
07-10-10 02:14pm
|
Comment
29
|
Me And My GFs
(1)
|
|
06-20-10 07:28pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
30
|
College Fuck Fest
(0)
|
Reply of
BabyGetReal's Review
Continuing my review:
CFF#17 Nerds and Schoolgirls (April 2008): A pretty, gentle latina is fun to watch. She actually insists on a condom in the video -- hooray for her! And hooray for CFF for leaving that discussion in the video.
(Most of the sex scenes at CFF are without condoms.) Lo-res.
CFF#5 Tau Lamda Tau Party (Jan 2008): A young attractive couple enjoys sex, with the woman cumming several times and him cumming from real excitement. Both are slim; she's a brunette w/ real boobs. Lo-res.
[END of review]
|
06-19-10 08:43pm
|
Comment
31
|
All Elite Pass
(0)
|
|
06-19-10 07:33pm
Replies (2)
|
Reply
32
|
Oldje
(2)
|
Reply of
pinkerton's Reply
Thanks for your reply, pinkerton. I think your tastes and mine simply differ, which is fine of course. I don't think I was unfair, since tastes and opinions do differ. Price was not the main reason I gave it a low score, but rather for the other reasons I stated. If you look at my profile and my other reviews, you'll see what I personally am looking for and did not find at oldje, despite its uniqueness and potential. Anyway, thanks for your reply!
|
06-07-10 06:29pm
|
Reply
33
|
Oldje
(2)
|
Reply of
Gazette Risque's Reply
Dear magaman, Thanks for your comments and for naming a title that you like. I downloaded that one too. (It is laborious to find a specific title since there is no search mechanism provided at Oldje, and you can't even use the browser's find to look for a word in the title on the current page -- since the title is in a graphic!) Sorry, but there's nothing in "Working Girl" that seems better to me than in the others I've checked from Oldje. Anyway, I do appreciate your feedback!
|
05-26-10 05:54pm
|
Reply
34
|
Oldje
(2)
|
Reply of
Belthazar's Reply
Dear Belthazar, I really, really do appreciate your recommendations of specific titles -- something that too few PU reviewers bother to do. I downloaded and watched all of your recommended titles. I am sorry to say that none of them changed my opinion or seemed to me to deviate from the ~30 I had already seen. In "Burglar is paying" I agree that she is a little more real and less passionless than most, with some really nice hip movements, but still the woman seems in the main unresponsive -- just there to please the man. None of the women at Oldje seem genuinely horny or able to get real satisfaction from these men. The woman in "Hot seduction in the snow" was especially beautiful in the high-resolution of that video, and I saved that one even though she was unresponsive. Thanks for the titles!
|
05-24-10 08:09pm
|
Reply
35
|
Oldje
(2)
|
Reply of
BabyGetReal's Review
This is a continuation of my review because I ran out of room:
There were a couple of videos where I found the teasing and foreplay erotic (sunny side of noise, puzzle of lust) but once the sex started, it was boring and passionless.
The site has a large number of videos (29 pages with ~20/page, so at least several hundred). After downloading 30 and finding them very consistently unerotic, I ran out of patience and quit. I was hoping to find the occasional exception with chemistry, fun, arousal, orgasms, horny girls, but didn't. If someone else found such videos at this site, please tell me the TITLES -- I still have 28 days left of my subscription!
|
05-21-10 07:13pm
|
Comment
36
|
Young Models
(0)
|
|
05-10-10 07:14pm
Replies (2)
|
Comment
37
|
Stroke My Dick Now
(0)
|
|
05-10-10 03:03pm
Replies (1)
|
Comment
38
|
Fucking Gamble
(10)
|
|
02-19-10 11:06am
Replies (1)
|
Comment
39
|
Yes-Movies
(1)
|
|
12-03-09 11:32am
Replies (0)
|
Comment
40
|
Fucked Hard 18
(3)
|
|
12-03-09 07:39am
Replies (3)
|
Comment
41
|
Young Models
(0)
|
|
12-02-09 05:28pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
42
|
N/A
|
Reply of
OneMan's Poll
None of the things on the poll list are my biggest turn offs. They are:
1. Facials! And yes, the guy finishing himself off.
2. Anal sex.
3. Implants and porn stars that look like plastic dolls.
4. Lack of genuine excitement, chemistry, female orgasms. Both parties being mechanical and bored by the whole thing. Fake moans. Women flirting with the camera when they should be in ecstasy with their eyes closed, or looking at their partner.
5. Fast and hard fucking with little or no foreplay. For me, genuine arousal with the clothes on and slow dry humping are a lot more erotic than most porn.
6. The guy holding off way too long. When they guy comes in a normal amount of time, and then maybe again later, it is much better. Holding off goes hand in hand with spending most of the video fucking hard instead of caressing gently, arousing with body, lips, and hands and getting the woman off a few times that way before the fucking starts.
7. The same actions in every video and/or the same stunt cock who has no personality and nothing to offer the woman except his cock.
8. Closeups that are too close and last way too long.
9. Lack of creativity. Directors that force every couple to do the same boring stuff.
And oh yes, for me, condoms are a relief, not a turn off. Their biggest problem for me is that they preclude creampies. But they don't preclude yanking the condom off and cumming over the woman's belly or butt, both of which I like provided it happens from genuine excitement, not from the guy jacking for a minute or longer.
|
12-02-09 05:08pm
|
Comment
43
|
Girls Got Cream
(0)
|
|
11-30-09 09:26pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
44
|
Velvet Ecstasy
(0)
|
Reply of
BabyGetReal's Review
CONS CONTINUED:
-There are many key terms for searching, but female orgasms is not one of them. I've asked Victor to add it and he said he's working on it.
-Most of the girls are not as young and gorgeous as at other sites. That would be OK if they were genuinely aroused, but most aren't. In some early videos, they have matted disgusting hair.
-Many of the recent videos are split into intro, main, and aftermath. I don't see the point of having to download 3 pieces when the intro and aftermath are very short, yet add significantly to the main video.
-Navigation problem: when you find a video by actress or title, you can't find out the action keywords, or what year it was made.
-They limit you to 5 gigs/day. Once, this caused me to be blocked for 24 hours, but for the most part, it isn't a problem.
-Although less than half of the videos have anal (which I could do without), Victor seems to love it and makes a big deal of a girl's first anal, also her first facial. I dislike the emphasis that this site puts on those, but YMMV. None of the anal was with condom, which makes it worse.
-In the early years, still photos appear to have been taken during video shoots, not separate modeling sessions. Generally, I find them much less erotic than those at other sites where there are separate sessions optimized for still shots. Also, there are typically just a handful of full body shots, then dozens and dozens of blowjob and facial shots. Not to my taste at all. There are way too many closeups in the still photos. Even when I find the actress quite attractive, in the early years of the site, usually I can't find a single still that I want to keep! In the last few years, stills went to 1600 pixels, and many are of better quality and some are more erotic. Still not as good as the stills on many sites.
|
11-20-09 03:21pm
|
Comment
45
|
Young Models
(0)
|
|
10-02-09 09:54am
Replies (2)
|
Reply
46
|
Young Models
(0)
|
Reply of
khf2004's Reply
Dear khf2004, I cannot find the message you sent me via PU. I don't know where to look for it, I guess. However, I did receive your message at my yahoo email, and replied there. Thanks for dealing with this issue!
|
09-29-09 03:04pm
|
Comment
47
|
Young Models
(0)
|
|
09-28-09 08:05pm
Replies (4)
|
Comment
48
|
Young Libertines
(2)
|
|
09-28-09 07:51pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
49
|
Young Libertines
(2)
|
Reply of
BabyGetReal's Review
Cons continued because I ran out of room:
- Infrequent updates, about one/week while I was watching.
- The “top visited” and “top rated” lists are relatively useless: they list only 10 each (a mix of photosets and videos, so less than 10 in each category), and the number of ratings are low.
- Dialog is in Russian(?), and there are no subtitles.
(END OF CONS)
|
09-28-09 07:44pm
|
Comment
50
|
Teen Sex Movs
(1)
|
|
09-28-09 06:26pm
Replies (1)
|
Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories
- Forum
Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters
 |
Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
|
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.
Loaded in 0.88 seconds.
|
|
