Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : BabyGetReal (32)  

Feedback:   All (66)  |   Reviews (23)  |   Comments (19)  |   Replies (24)

Other:   Replies Received (47)  |   Trust Ratings (30)

All Activity A summary of all the feedback from this user.
Shown : 26-50 of 66 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
Comment
26
Visit Dare Dorm

Dare Dorm
(0)

Still excellent in 2015

I resubscribed to DareDorm this month (June 2015) after subscribing two years ago. It is still one of my favorite sites. I think my review from two years ago is still accurate. If you like scenes of college students watching a few of their more daring friends fuck in front of everyone -- open acceptance of sexuality in groups -- this is for you. There were 52 videos since 2 years ago, so about 2 new ones per month. Still streaming only (which worked fine) with no downloads (unless you have special tools). I thought 3 were very hot (female orgasms in go-team-go, hot-mess, and team-work), 9 were hot (lick-lick-bang-bang, luau-party, lust-fest, my-first-time, pajama-party, pranks, pussy-to-go, study-group, and truth-or-dare), and 8 were less so but still fun. Camera work still very jerky and amateurish. There is a bonus site "Muffia" with videos of men getting massages with extras. In six of those, the women really get into it and have multiple orgasms, and there were 7 others that I thought were hot.

06-28-15  04:08pm

Replies (0)
Comment
27
Visit Massage Room Seduction

Massage Room Seduction
(0)

Waste of Time

MassageRoomSeduction has only promo videos from FuckedHard18. The videos are mostly 5-15 min long and all the good parts are edited out. You can easily find these same promo videos at free sites that require no login. I joined the combo offer, paying for one month at RealitySexNetwork, mostly because of my interest in MassageRoomSeduction. It was a waste of time and money. There is nothing at RealitySexNetwork that interests me. If you like the promos, join FuckedHard18 instead.

03-20-13  07:25am

Replies (0)
Reply
28
Visit Massage Rooms

Massage Rooms
(0)
Reply of BabyGetReal's Review

CONTINUATION OF MY REVIEW -- FAVORITES:

George on Angel. Angel is the most responsive of the women. She squirms and writhes with arousal. After two hot orgasms, she does cameltoe slide on George which is wonderful. Then she does some energetic and urgent cowgirl on him. Finally, George pulls out and fires away, no hands -- clearly the genuine arousal of fucking Angel was quite enough to make him explode!

Lola on Eufrat. Here I go again with a girl on girl. Lola brings Eufrat to a hard, bucking orgasm, and then Eufrat licks Lola off. Lovely!

George on Kristine. He finger fucks her to her first orgasm. Then while they are fucking, she rubs her clit and cums #2. Then she has a powerful orgasm after vigorous cowgirl fucking. At the end it looks like she cums #4 and George canít hold back and cums inside her -- we can see his cock pulsing as he pumps her full!


03-10-13  09:00pm

Reply
29
Visit Czech Mega Swingers

Czech Mega Swingers
(0)
Reply of oldguy's Review

Do the women ever show clear arousal and orgasms? What kinds of male cumshots are there? Internal, over the butt or tits, or only on the face of the woman?

03-07-13  09:39pm

Reply
30
Visit X-Art

X-Art
(3)
Reply of Goldfish's Review

Thanks for the helpful review, Goldfish. I've noticed that Eastern European girls, though beautiful, tend to be inhibited and passive in sex scenes, either not getting excited, or hiding their excitement/orgasms. I much prefer girls who show an interest in sex, are active participants, enjoy the scene, and let us know when they are cumming. How do the X-Art models do in these respects?

09-15-12  05:51pm

Reply
31
Visit Dancerbating

Dancerbating
(0)
Reply of dracken's Reply

Hi, dracken. The videos appear to me to be high resolution -- very crisp. Also generally the lighting is fine, and the videography seems good -- that is, no extreme closeups -- mostly views of whole body. In fact, sometimes they could zoom in a little more.

05-29-12  03:58pm

Reply
32
N/A Reply of williamj's Poll

I own a Fleshlight. Its nothing like the real thing, but feels good nonetheless, and its a nice alternative to self-pleasuring with hands. I've even taken it on a trip overseas, tho I wondered how it would go should customs open my suitcase and lift it out! (They didn't.)

07-12-10  07:12pm

Reply
33
N/A Reply of BabyGetReal's Poll

You're right, the units are screwed up. All the megabytes should be gigabytes. Sorry if I did that! And yes, RagingBuddhist, 100 megabytes is, of course, less than a single longish video!

07-10-10  02:14pm

Comment
34
Visit Me And My GFs

Me And My GFs
(0)

Downloads work fine.

Not sure what happened to jeppegut -- when I was a member in June 2010, I was able to download on several different days with no problems whatsoever. The video links were clearly labeled "Download". Like most sites, you need to RIGHT CLICK on the link to the video, then select SAVE. Instructions to do just that are right above the links. Simply clicking on the link streams the video. Each video was available in WMV or MPG.

06-20-10  07:28pm

Replies (0)
Reply
35
Visit College Fuck Fest

College Fuck Fest
(0)
Reply of BabyGetReal's Review

Continuing my review:

CFF#17 Nerds and Schoolgirls (April 2008): A pretty, gentle latina is fun to watch. She actually insists on a condom in the video -- hooray for her! And hooray for CFF for leaving that discussion in the video.
(Most of the sex scenes at CFF are without condoms.) Lo-res.

CFF#5 Tau Lamda Tau Party (Jan 2008): A young attractive couple enjoys sex, with the woman cumming several times and him cumming from real excitement. Both are slim; she's a brunette w/ real boobs. Lo-res.

[END of review]


06-19-10  08:43pm

Comment
36
Visit All Elite Pass

All Elite Pass
(0)

They Don't Care About Their Reputation

See my review of this site. While I was a member, on June 3 2010, I sent an email to the only email addresses I could find, support@cypherhelp.com and support@correcthelp.com. (support@allelitepass.com bounced.) The subject was "Reputation of allelitepass". I called attention to the comments on PU "claiming scams, deception, or inappropriate billing experiences" (my wording). I received a reply from support@correcthelp.com signed confusingly mitzashelp.com, with the name Mark Sanders, Support Team. The reply stated "Regarding the the deception and inappropriate billing reports including refund process this is being taking care of, in order for the member be satisfied on the service that we are offering.". However, no new comments appeared on the AllElitePass page of PU. So I contacted commenters maki and mbaya via PU email. (bjorn7 has disabled his PU email. I did not contact bigman because that account has zero points and zero trusts.) I received a reply from mbaya saying that nobody from AllElitePass had contacted him, and "This was my worst ever experience with any website. I remember sarcastic answers and a terribly negative attitude." Unless we hear from them, I conclude that they don't care about their reputation among the nearly 10,000 PU members and non-member readers!

06-19-10  07:33pm

Replies (2)
Reply
37
Visit Oldje

Oldje
(0)
Reply of pinkerton's Reply

Thanks for your reply, pinkerton. I think your tastes and mine simply differ, which is fine of course. I don't think I was unfair, since tastes and opinions do differ. Price was not the main reason I gave it a low score, but rather for the other reasons I stated. If you look at my profile and my other reviews, you'll see what I personally am looking for and did not find at oldje, despite its uniqueness and potential. Anyway, thanks for your reply!

06-07-10  06:29pm

Reply
38
Visit Oldje

Oldje
(0)
Reply of Gazette Risque's Reply

Dear magaman, Thanks for your comments and for naming a title that you like. I downloaded that one too. (It is laborious to find a specific title since there is no search mechanism provided at Oldje, and you can't even use the browser's find to look for a word in the title on the current page -- since the title is in a graphic!) Sorry, but there's nothing in "Working Girl" that seems better to me than in the others I've checked from Oldje. Anyway, I do appreciate your feedback!

05-26-10  05:54pm

Reply
39
Visit Oldje

Oldje
(0)
Reply of Belthazar's Reply

Dear Belthazar, I really, really do appreciate your recommendations of specific titles -- something that too few PU reviewers bother to do. I downloaded and watched all of your recommended titles. I am sorry to say that none of them changed my opinion or seemed to me to deviate from the ~30 I had already seen. In "Burglar is paying" I agree that she is a little more real and less passionless than most, with some really nice hip movements, but still the woman seems in the main unresponsive -- just there to please the man. None of the women at Oldje seem genuinely horny or able to get real satisfaction from these men. The woman in "Hot seduction in the snow" was especially beautiful in the high-resolution of that video, and I saved that one even though she was unresponsive. Thanks for the titles!

05-24-10  08:09pm

Reply
40
Visit Oldje

Oldje
(0)
Reply of BabyGetReal's Review

This is a continuation of my review because I ran out of room:

There were a couple of videos where I found the teasing and foreplay erotic (sunny side of noise, puzzle of lust) but once the sex started, it was boring and passionless.

The site has a large number of videos (29 pages with ~20/page, so at least several hundred). After downloading 30 and finding them very consistently unerotic, I ran out of patience and quit. I was hoping to find the occasional exception with chemistry, fun, arousal, orgasms, horny girls, but didn't. If someone else found such videos at this site, please tell me the TITLES -- I still have 28 days left of my subscription!


05-21-10  07:13pm

Comment
41
Visit Young Models

Young Models
(0)

Old videos continue to be released as new.

I'm sad to say that 6 months after my last report, it appears that probably none of the sites in this group have any new videos. They continue to label old videos as new updates. At YoungModels, the latest "updates" were Felicia Flynt "Added May 10, 2010", Renee "Added May 3, 2010", and Madison Monroe "Added April 26, 2010". I had downloaded all of these in June, 2009. On to some bonus sites. At Interracial Sluts, recent "updates" were Christie Lee "March 25, 2010" and Lisa Marie "February 24, 2010". I had downloaded these in March, 2009. At Creampie Fucking, Lorena Sanchez "May 5, 2010" I had downloaded in March, 2009. At Amateur Couples, I found Dana Marie & Tony "April 27, 2010" and Kasey Kox & Johnny "April 13, 2010", which I had downloaded in March, 2009. In conclusion, while these sites have some worthwhile videos, they are apparently a fixed set with no real updates. I'm knocking 10 points off the score of my review. Well, I would if I could. I'm up against the PU rule that you can't edit a review more than 6 months old. Seems to me this is a case where I should be able to!

05-10-10  07:14pm

Replies (2)
Comment
42
Visit Stroke My Dick Now

Stroke My Dick Now
(0)

Whaaa ... socked with $80 more?

WATCH OUT! The pre-checked cross-sells will bill you $40 + $40 after a "one day free trial". Although this site advertises >100 bonus sites, these are not really bonus sites, but the cross sells!

05-10-10  03:03pm

Replies (1)
Comment
43
Visit Fucking Gamble

Fucking Gamble
(0)

Sex w/o excitement, again

Intrigued by the reviews, I took a look at the demo clip (which is unusually long and hires). The game idea is cool, but the models look like pros (sex is boring to them) and there seemed to be no arousal, plus too much emphasis on anal, double penetration, etc. Tho it has very little content, I like DareRing much better, where the game participants seem genuinely excited by the uncertanties in the game, reacted with real personalities (not plastic ones), were a little scared sometimes, a little embarrassed, and where some people really got off.

02-19-10  11:06am

Replies (1)
Comment
44
Visit Yes-Movies

Yes-Movies
(1)

All couples?

Dear oogles: Are the videos all man/woman couples? That is, did you find any of the more creative Japanese type videos with many women and one man, bath houses, massage leading to sex, pick-up on the street, one initially shy girl watching a couple and then getting into it, etc.?

12-03-09  11:32am

Replies (0)
Comment
45
Visit Fucked Hard 18

Fucked Hard 18
(0)

Support? Orgasms?

OK, Drooler, nice review! Two questions. Did you run into any of the locked-out/support issues that Sandfly encountered? And, do some of the girls get excited and cum, or do they all just lie there with their (according to Sandfly) large plastic tits (I prefer natural) while getting boned from behind?

12-03-09  07:39am

Replies (3)
Comment
46
Visit Young Models

Young Models
(0)

Old videos released as new.

I returned to this site in November, hoping for some good new boy/girl videos. I was surprised and disappointed to find many old videos that I had downloaded months earlier being represented as updates in October or November! Many of those videos are quite good (to my taste) but still, it is dishonest to represent them as new. Destiny & Drifter, "added Nov 23, 2009", Madison & Derrick "added Nov 16, 2009", and Sabrina & Lucky, "added Oct 20, 2009": I had downloaded these videos when I was a member in June, 2009! Even worse, I had downloaded videos featuring Ginger, Sammy Cruz, and Aubrey (represented as recently added) in March, 2009. Although I kept no record of the site from which these were downloaded, the video filenames begin with "ym_" for YoungModels. Also, YoungModels is releasing content from their other sites, e.g. MacKenzie and Daisy/Nick which I had downloaded in March from AmateurCouples. That would be OK if they were not labeled as exclusive content. As you can tell from my review, I thought this was one of the better sites, so I am really disappointed to see what is happening there.

12-02-09  05:28pm

Replies (0)
Reply
47
N/A Reply of OneMan's Poll

None of the things on the poll list are my biggest turn offs. They are:
1. Facials! And yes, the guy finishing himself off.
2. Anal sex.
3. Implants and porn stars that look like plastic dolls.
4. Lack of genuine excitement, chemistry, female orgasms. Both parties being mechanical and bored by the whole thing. Fake moans. Women flirting with the camera when they should be in ecstasy with their eyes closed, or looking at their partner.
5. Fast and hard fucking with little or no foreplay. For me, genuine arousal with the clothes on and slow dry humping are a lot more erotic than most porn.
6. The guy holding off way too long. When they guy comes in a normal amount of time, and then maybe again later, it is much better. Holding off goes hand in hand with spending most of the video fucking hard instead of caressing gently, arousing with body, lips, and hands and getting the woman off a few times that way before the fucking starts.
7. The same actions in every video and/or the same stunt cock who has no personality and nothing to offer the woman except his cock.
8. Closeups that are too close and last way too long.
9. Lack of creativity. Directors that force every couple to do the same boring stuff.

And oh yes, for me, condoms are a relief, not a turn off. Their biggest problem for me is that they preclude creampies. But they don't preclude yanking the condom off and cumming over the woman's belly or butt, both of which I like provided it happens from genuine excitement, not from the guy jacking for a minute or longer.


12-02-09  05:08pm

Comment
48
Visit Girls Got Cream

Girls Got Cream
(0)

Fake creampies?

Several of the early reviews up to 2008 say the creampies are fake. Are there real creampies with male climaxes in the past year or so?

11-30-09  09:26pm

Replies (0)
Reply
49
Visit Velvet Ecstasy

Velvet Ecstasy
(0)
Reply of BabyGetReal's Review

CONS CONTINUED:

-There are many key terms for searching, but female orgasms is not one of them. I've asked Victor to add it and he said he's working on it.
-Most of the girls are not as young and gorgeous as at other sites. That would be OK if they were genuinely aroused, but most aren't. In some early videos, they have matted disgusting hair.
-Many of the recent videos are split into intro, main, and aftermath. I don't see the point of having to download 3 pieces when the intro and aftermath are very short, yet add significantly to the main video.
-Navigation problem: when you find a video by actress or title, you can't find out the action keywords, or what year it was made.
-They limit you to 5 gigs/day. Once, this caused me to be blocked for 24 hours, but for the most part, it isn't a problem.
-Although less than half of the videos have anal (which I could do without), Victor seems to love it and makes a big deal of a girl's first anal, also her first facial. I dislike the emphasis that this site puts on those, but YMMV. None of the anal was with condom, which makes it worse.
-In the early years, still photos appear to have been taken during video shoots, not separate modeling sessions. Generally, I find them much less erotic than those at other sites where there are separate sessions optimized for still shots. Also, there are typically just a handful of full body shots, then dozens and dozens of blowjob and facial shots. Not to my taste at all. There are way too many closeups in the still photos. Even when I find the actress quite attractive, in the early years of the site, usually I can't find a single still that I want to keep! In the last few years, stills went to 1600 pixels, and many are of better quality and some are more erotic. Still not as good as the stills on many sites.


11-20-09  03:21pm

Comment
50
Visit Young Models

Young Models
(0)

Erroneous Charges Refunded!

This is the followup to my previous comment about YoungModels titled "Warning: Fraudulent/Erroneous Charges!". Immediately upon complaining, I received a direct email response from a YoungModels staffer, who is also a PU member, khf2004. He promptly refunded the two erroneous monthly charges to my Visa account, and the erroneous membership was canceled. Further, he gave me a bonus gift. Therefore, I consider that this error was resolved promptly, courteously, professionally, and to my full satisfaction.

10-02-09  09:54am

Replies (2)

Shown : 26-50 of 66 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.78 seconds.