Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : DigglerFL (17)  

Feedback:   All (44)  |   Reviews (20)  |   Comments (4)  |   Replies (20)

Other:   Replies Received (42)  |   Trust Ratings (25)

All Activity A summary of all the feedback from this user.
Shown : 26-45 of 45 Page :    < Previous Page

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
Reply
26
Visit 1 By Day

1 By Day
(0)
Reply of Drooler's Reply

Well if they "decided" to scale back on their content, then they need to scale back on their pricing as well. If Mercedes decided to cut back on leather and AC, you'd expect them to adjust their price accordingly.

The value test is not necessarily how good something is, its how good it is compared to what you can get spending your money elsewhere. Dollar for dollar, this site is simply not worth the price, because you can get more and better content elsewhere for less money.


10-05-08  05:12am

Reply
27
Visit MC Nudes

MC Nudes
(2)
Reply of Mayvary's Reply

I'm a professional photographer, and you're obviously some horny dude who has probably never seen a real women naked. So who is incompetent?

You can't download just the photos you want in high resolution. You have to download the entire tarball. Or at least you did when I wasted my money on the site.


05-31-08  08:48am

Reply
28
Visit MC Nudes

MC Nudes
(2)
Reply of Mayvary's Reply

Clearly you know nothing about modeling or photography. The photos are amateurish and the models aren't models because they don't know how to pose. Most of the sets don't have a single quality shot. Its a site for horny losers. 97 implies that it could not be better, which is clearly not the case.

05-17-08  03:14pm

Reply
29
Visit Fling.com

Fling.com
(0)
Reply of stargazinc's Reply

This is clearly a spam "reply". It would be good to have a way to report such things.

03-16-08  08:01am

Reply
30
Visit MC Nudes

MC Nudes
(2)
Reply of Mayvary's Review

Is this a plant? Fess up. 97? Surely you jest.

02-25-08  09:41am

Reply
31
Visit Ox Pass

Ox Pass
(0)
Reply of Bletch's Comment

This is one of my peeves about BangBros in general. All of their "sites" say "access to ALL of our sites". But its just not the case.

02-16-08  07:04am

Comment
32
Visit VideoBox

VideoBox
(6)

Discount not working

Videobox doesn't seem to be giving the discount currently.

12-25-07  12:21pm

Replies (2)
Reply
33
Visit MILF Hunter

MILF Hunter
(0)
Reply of OUMarcus's Comment

I find the "new" sites completely useless. VIP has been part of the "Milfhunter" network for a long time.

12-03-07  06:42am

Reply
34
Visit MILF Hunter

MILF Hunter
(0)
Reply of mediafan's Reply

So your argument is that because its better than sites that really, really suck, its a 95? 90s ratings imply the site is the best that it can be. There's no HD or DVD quality content, slow downloads (VERY slow when you reviewed it) and an archaic password scheme. At least read what the ratings mean. A 95 implies that you don't think the site can be improved. The fact that they completely revamped the interface and got more bandwidth AFTER your review implies that even Reality Kings didn't agree with you, or they wouldn't have bothered.

11-21-07  08:57am

Reply
35
Visit MILF Hunter

MILF Hunter
(0)
Reply of mediafan's Review

I assume you've never been on any modern porn sites? Giving a site with so many problems a 95 is just plain irresponsible.

11-16-07  05:58am

Reply
36
Visit Matt's Models

Matt's Models
(0)
Reply of Drooler's Reply

Ok, well I "ass"ume he shot digitally, and he used a 1024 save-size or maybe just used a 1 megapixel camera. SLR multi-megapixel cams were mega-bucks until recently. I doubt he shoots with film or a point and shoot.

09-22-07  11:41am

Reply
37
Visit Matt's Models

Matt's Models
(0)
Reply of Denner's Comment

Its business. Notice they have a special price?

The concept that Matt's "couldn't be better" is patently absurd, so getting 4 90s completely discredits EVERY ONE of TBP's reviews. They should consider what these deal's are doing to the integrity of their site. A good review site MUST be detached from doing business with the sites they are reviewing. While getting special deals for their readers is a good thing, the price they pay: the believability of their reviews, might be a bad financial move in the long run. They should learn a lesson from Rodney.


09-22-07  11:23am

Reply
38
Visit Matt's Models

Matt's Models
(0)
Reply of Drooler's Reply

what I meant, is that you can't convert 1024 pixel photos to 1600 without stretching them. You can't add detail. So its just not a reasonable expectation. He'd have to reshoot.

09-22-07  10:23am

Reply
39
Visit Matt's Models

Matt's Models
(0)
Reply of Drooler's Comment

how can he "re-publish" in 1600px? Do you want bigger, blurry pixelated photos?

09-22-07  08:26am

Reply
40
Visit Monsters of Cock

Monsters of Cock
(0)
Reply of uscue's Reply

I wrote them multiple times. Perhaps they've learned from their evil ways, but at the time you only got access to 6 sites and they stated "you get access to all of our sites". So I stand by my review.

08-09-07  07:38pm

Comment
41
Visit Monsters of Cock

Monsters of Cock
(0)

Bang Brothers

I haven't joined a BB site for awhile. I found their marketing to be quite deceiving. They say " you get access to ALL the bang brother's sites", but then you only get access to 6 of them. The quality is always a bit worse than other sites, and that annoying guy talks way too much. I'm not spending any more $$$ on them, so I can't give recent reviews.

08-08-07  03:52pm

Replies (4)
Reply
42
Visit VideoBox

VideoBox
(6)
Reply of videobox's Reply

And May's list:

Handjobs
upskirt diaries
Wrestle with the Devil
Dicks and Dildos
Lacta-mania
Chunky on the 4th of July
Ebony Cream Pies
Black Cream Pis
booty quake
thick black and stacked
Dude, where's my dildo


There's an old business adage - decide what you want to be and be the best at it - When you try to cater to everyone you dilute the customer base that made you successful in the first place. I'm sure you know how it affects your bottom line better than I do, but be aware that there are people who want a certain type of content, and they'd rather join a site where they know that the updates will be something that interests them. I cancelled my membership after a week where there were maybe 3 scenes that interested me.

I didn't trash your site. You have a lot of good content. But if only 1/3 of the content is of interest to any given individual, then its certainly worthy of note.


07-17-07  07:32am

Comment
43
Visit Freaks Of Cock

Freaks Of Cock
(0)

Why bother?

Who would pay money to watch girls pretend that a dildo is a big black cock? c'mon now.

07-13-07  07:17pm

Replies (3)
Reply
44
Visit Vivid

Vivid
(1)
Reply of nadiencendia's Reply

Its fine to say you like the site, but giving a site with such terrible quality videos a 90 is simply wrong. You've totally ignored something that should be a key criteria. Obviously vivid has the capability to put up high quality videos. They don't do so on purpose. Its not like its some garage dude who can't afford a good camera. The videos aren't just not that good. They are terrible. Its a disgrace.

06-28-07  04:27pm

Reply
45
Visit Vivid

Vivid
(1)
Reply of nadiencendia's Review

I really don't see how you can give a 90 score to this site. If all Vivid content were available in good quaility it might get that score, but its simply not the case. The "new" videos are not good quality either, in fact I found that many of the older videos had better quality. But finding them is nearly impossible. This site is a waste of money unless you're viewing the videos on an ipod.

06-23-07  01:03pm


Shown : 26-45 of 45 Page :    < Previous Page

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.54 seconds.