Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : hodayathink (18)  

Feedback:   All (324)  |   Reviews (10)  |   Comments (23)  |   Replies (291)

Other:   Replies Received (179)  |   Trust Ratings (33)

All Activity A summary of all the feedback from this user.
Shown : 26-50 of 324 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
Reply
26
N/A Reply of jberryl69's Reply

Yeah, that was easily the best fisting scene I've ever seen.

Though in general, I agree that it's done for the spectacle of it, and not because it's something that's particularly arousing to the person getting fisted.


04-13-13  12:26pm

Reply
27
Visit Bryci

Bryci
(2)
Reply of RustyJ's Reply

The point of taking photos doesn't really have to be to allow collectors to download them. If nothing else, photos make for much better promotional material than videos. They're much easier to distribute freely (a fact that pirates take advantage of), and you can use them as part of your website design (especially on the front page of the site). Not to mention the ability to use them to make advertisements with (from banner ads to preview pages). The truth is that the majority of video sites that make their own exclusive content (as opposed to licensing it from someone else) shoot at least some photos to go along with it, and there's a reason for that.

04-13-13  11:57am

Reply
28
Visit Bryci

Bryci
(2)
Reply of RustyJ's Reply

Makes perfect sense once you realize it's a self-fulfilling prophecy/feedback loop. The policy on photos means that people who prefer photos to videos aren't going to join in the first place, so when they survey their members on whether they prefer videos or photos, their members are going to overwhelming say videos.

Basically, it sounds like the photos on the site are more about people who like just looking at them as opposed to people who like collecting them. I don't really see a problem with that as long as you can know that ahead of time.


04-13-13  01:30am

Reply
29
N/A Reply of pat362's Reply

Yeah, the tech is there at this point, it's just that no one has fully put it all together, and then there's the price factor.

04-08-13  04:30pm

Reply
30
N/A Reply of jberryl69's Reply

Don't we all?

04-08-13  04:29pm

Reply
31
N/A Reply of jberryl69's Reply

Only if you tell it to.

04-08-13  06:42am

Reply
32
Visit Naughty America

Naughty America
(7)
Reply of Buckhead's Review

They do have 1080 on every video that's in HD. The bitrate isn't as high as some people would like, but it's there.

Other than that, I do agree with your basic points.


04-07-13  11:06pm

Reply
33
N/A Reply of pat362's Reply

I agree with this. It's possible (but pretty expensive) to put, for lack of a better word, moving fuckable parts on a life-sized doll right now. The only thing it's missing is some kind of AI/programming to control the parts (which shouldn't take long). Once someone does that, it's just about the cost coming down.

04-07-13  10:27pm

Reply
34
Visit Hot Movies

Hot Movies
(1)
Reply of Belthazar's Reply

Yeah, it looks like they've lowered it again to the point of being worthless now. Which sucks.

04-07-13  09:34pm

Reply
35
Visit Digital Playground

Digital Playground
(1)
Reply of lk2fireone's Comment

If the special were a few dollars lower, I'd actually consider it anyway. Mainly because there not being any download links doesn't mean you can't actually download scenes from the site, if you're resourceful enough.

04-01-13  05:52pm

Comment
36
Visit Naughty America

Naughty America
(7)

$5 special this weekend

For anyone who hasn't jumped on the last few deals, they're at $5 for the month this weekend. It recurs at higher than the normal rate, so be careful with staying for more than 1 month, but it's a great deal if you're just looking to get in and get out.

03-30-13  11:39pm

Replies (1)
Reply
37
Visit Twistys

Twistys
(4)
Reply of Dracula's Reply

I'm looking at it right now (I can still log in from an old membership) and I see two videos every day for the past week.

And to answer your question: I think when reviewing a site you should include all scenes that the site gives you access to.


03-24-13  10:13am

Reply
38
Visit Twistys

Twistys
(4)
Reply of Dracula's Review

I believe that the two videos a day include the solo masturbation videos. If you're only counting boy/girl and girl/girl videos, then it would be 2 a week (one b/g for Twisty's Hard, one g/g for When Girls Play).

03-24-13  09:44am

Reply
39
N/A Reply of graymane's Poll

There are some girls that I just like to hear talk and have their brain picked. For the ones that don't, there's always fast forwarding.

03-22-13  08:05pm

Reply
40
Visit Humiliatrix

Humiliatrix
(0)
Reply of RagingBuddhist's Reply

I feel like it's just the nature of the people that join sites like these and like them. They want to "please their mistress" so much that they are more than eager to do things like this for them.

03-22-13  10:47am

Reply
41
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I agree with the people that have said an attractive woman is an attractive woman even when she's pregnant. It doesn't specifically turn me on, though.

03-21-13  09:40pm

Reply
42
Visit Humiliatrix

Humiliatrix
(0)
Reply of RagingBuddhist's Comment

Is it just me, or does this seem to be more common with dominatrix sites than any other type of site?

03-21-13  09:38pm

Reply
43
N/A Reply of Colm4's Poll

I basically only join large sites, so it becomes nearly impossible to download everything there. So I focus on the good stuff, and then work my way outward/downward.

03-19-13  03:16pm

Reply
44
Visit VideosZ

VideosZ
(4)
Reply of benmar51's Reply

Which is why I would love to find a way to access their video content without joining their site. The idea that this place might have been that, even if I had to pay an extra fee on top of the normal membership, might have been enough to get me to join.

03-16-13  09:36pm

Reply
45
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Probably around a quarter to a half, varying dependent on whether I have actual work to do on the internet.

03-16-13  08:59am

Reply
46
Visit VideosZ

VideosZ
(4)
Reply of benmar51's Reply

Thank you, that is what I was looking for. I might just join here instead of my next VB subscription, just to take a look at it.

03-16-13  08:58am

Reply
47
Visit VideosZ

VideosZ
(4)
Reply of Dracula's Reply

The reason I'm asking is because I'm already a member at Videobox, and I wanted to know if VideosZ is worth a subscription in addition to/following that. I'm intrigued by the access to Hustler (which is a studio whose content I want, but whose website I do not want to join), but the idea of it being behind a three month paywall when I only wanted to join for a month is disappointing.

03-15-13  08:39pm

Reply
48
Visit VideosZ

VideosZ
(4)
Reply of Dracula's Review

How much content would you say is here that isn't on Videobox?

03-15-13  03:53pm

Reply
49
N/A Reply of Colm4's Poll

French accents get me every single solitary time.

03-15-13  03:51pm

Reply
50
Visit VideoBox

VideoBox
(8)
Reply of rearadmiral's Reply

I think that when they decide to license, they probably don't get to choose whether or not they get HD, whomever they're licensing it from does. For example, it looks like they've just started uploading scenes from Teen Fidelity/Porn Fidelity, but all those scenes are in standard definition, even though at least some of them are available in high definition on that site.

03-09-13  11:19pm


Shown : 26-50 of 324 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.63 seconds.