Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : slutty (111)  

Feedback:   All (945)  |   Reviews (65)  |   Comments (64)  |   Replies (816)

Other:   Replies Received (459)  |   Trust Ratings (49)

All Activity A summary of all the feedback from this user.
Shown : 1-25 of 946 Page :    Next Page >

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
Review
1
Visit Naughty America

Naughty America
(9)

90.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Very large collection, with a pretty wide of content
-A good number of attractive ladies
-Excellent price when I subscribed ($5), but the TBP price is still great
-I like that many of the sites have some type of setup, rather than straight gonzo
-No DRM
-No download limits that I encountered
-Download speeds typically good, I got 1.5MB/s using a download manager which is my connection max
-Download managers work (I used DTA), the most I could seem to get was two concurrent downloads, although there are some issues, see cons.
-Good navigation, scenes are tagged, there is a search function that works better than most sites I have used, as well as comments (which seem rarely used), favorites, and forum
-Network updates frequently, 15 times in the last week, 65 times in the last month
-Camerawork is generally good, at least compared to their American competitors, not as many lingering closeups, long shots of the guy’s face, etc
-Cont. in BL
Cons: -As others have said, too many fake/large breasts
-Ads on login are annoying
-Lower price for the first month with a vastly increased price thereafter, seems to punish those that want to stay around for a while (or take advantage of those that forgot to cancel)
-Though the tags are nice, and being able to sort through all the scenes using their ‘Porn Finder’, they are a bit overly ambitious with some tags (petite as far as I know doesn’t just mean short)
-Download mangers work, but they do file location shifting so if you queue up too much stuff you will get file location errors
-Older videos are poor quality, although they appear to be remastering some of this content
Bottom Line: Pros Cont.
-Scenes are generally well done, little abusive male talent, not much jibber-jabber from the cameraman, they do well in this area where so many other hardcore American sites fail miserably

BL:
Though I generally dislike American hardcore porn sites these days, I think this might be the best of the bunch. Where so many others fail in so many ways (aweful camerawork, horribly annoying male talent, iffy business practices), this one seems to do a fair bit better than average in all of these areas. I think for the price, it is definitely one worth joining for at least a month now and again if you are into hardcore porn.

This site is somewhat softer than some might like, so if you are looking for a harder edge (more anal, more abusive behavior), you are probably better off trying a different site. But, I would imagine most that are in to this type of videos would be reasonably satisfied with their purchase.

There are a few things the site could do better, as listed in the cons. I found the tagging to be highly inconsistent, listing women with C-D cups as small breasted, a few that I am pretty sure have fake breasts are ‘natural’ (although I’m no expert), and general misuse of some categories – which is annoying for someone who is a fan of small framed models and keeps getting large breasted results. It would perhaps be nice if you could select more than one category (for example petite and natural would have been greatly appreciated) or if you could select a “not” category.

I did not experience any of the dead links messmer mentioned, so perhaps this is resolved, or perhaps it is only in the MILF sections (see his reply to my review).

If you are interested in hardcore American porn, I would probably join this network over any of the other options (BangBros, RK, PornPros), as with all of those, I have gotten so frustrated that I just let my subscription lapse without returning after the first week. While there are some areas they could improve, like having a bit more user interaction on scenes, labeling better, removing some of the ads, I think it is generally the best of the American hardcore networks.

01-20-13  10:59pm

Replies (5)
Review
2
Visit Wow Girls

Wow Girls
(5)

90.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -very attractive euro ladies
-decent variety of hardcore, softcore, and lesbian material
-videos are good quality, most up to full HD
-photos are of technically high quality, maximum resolution is 5600 long end, also available in 1000, 2000, and 4000 on most sets.
-multiple video download options, most have 1080p wmv and 1080, 720, 480 and 360 mp4. I typically downloaded the 720p video, as it was good enough for me (720p mp4 is about 3000 kbps and reasonably crisp).
-zip downloads of photosets, custom zips available
-download managers work, I used DTA
-download speeds are good, maxed my 15 Mb connection
-login timeouts are long, I don’t recall ever timing out
-decent price now, at $19.99
-respectable biller, I had ccbill
-updates with decent frequency, about 7 per week, the current photoset to video ratio on the site is 1.8:1, seems typical based on recent history
Cons: -smallish site, 142 videos and 252 photos at time of review. 47 total models.
-no bonus material
-little variety in model type, model ethnicity, the vast majority of the models are of the thin or athletic body types, and almost all are white. Not a good site to join if you are looking for curvier models, or a good mix of model ethnicities.
Bottom Line: Overall I think this is a very good site. I like the variety of hardcore and softcore, the camerawork on the videos is generally acceptable, although not the best. The material is pretty typical of euro sites these days, although production values are probably slightly higher, average model quality is certainly better, and there appears to be some attempt to make the scenes slightly more ‘erotic’. Like many euro sites, the main drawback is the focus is almost always on young, skinny, white girls. This is mostly fine with me, although I wouldn’t mind a little more variety from the site. If you are a fan of large breasts, this is definitely not the site for you, nor is it likely a good site for you if you prefer models with more curves.

It would be nice if this site were merged with the other Deisel media sties, as it uses the exact same interface, pretty much all of the same models, I am not really sure why it isn’t just a part of the network. But I guess it is intended to be a standalone competitor to the likes of orgasms.xxx and x-art, as it certainly has similar themes. The breakdown of material (for videos) is 48 hardcore (11 anal), 31 lesbian, and the remaining 63 videos a mix of softcore and midcore, mostly midcore (toy use and masturbation). These ratios look about the same for photosets.

I enjoyed this site more than I expected to, I figured it would more or less be a clone of sorts of the other Deisel sites that for some reason was split of as a standalone. However, it is a bit more unique, I suppose, than the other Deisel sites. The model quality is definitely top notch (if you are into the skinny athletic girls), and the material has a bit more erotic flair. There isn’t any of that annoying self-shot or POV stuff that appears on many of the other Deisel sites.

Generally, I think it is an excellent site if this is the type of material that you are interested in. It has a softer edge than most euro sites, and I definitely appreciate this style of material. I have grown very tired of gonzo-style sites. The main drawbacks being that it is a newer site, and thus a bit on the small side, and one should not expect a lot of diversity from this site (nor any of the Deisel sites).

08-27-12  11:47pm

Replies (9)
Review
3
Visit Teen Dreams

Teen Dreams
(1)

90.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Good price through TBP discount
-Many attractive ladies
-Huge site, and archives go back quite far
-Download speeds are good much of the time, maxed my 10 Mbps connection
-Updates are frequent, I count 24 in the last week - 9 movies and 15 photosets
-Nice variety of content, softcore-hardcore
-Photosets are generally well shot
-Zip downloads of photosets
-No DRM and download managers work (I used DTA)
-Didn't experience any login timeouts
-Helpful and reasonably active forum
-Have search function, model index, and model ratings
-Newer photos generally good, about 2600 long end was typical, older photos get a bit worse (1024 in 2006)
-Video quality is acceptable on newer videos (3000 kbps, 960x540 was the best I saw).
Cons: -Site is a bit disorganized, many models appear under multiple listings
-Content is semi-exclusive at best, there is a good amount of material that isn't "exlusif"
-Older photo and video quality is not the best
-Only one download option for videos (newer videos are all wmv, older are mpg), plus a flash player
-Only bonus content is some Viv Thomas videos, but it is pretty low quality (640x480 780 kbps wmv) and cam sites, although I didn't really check them out
-Per exotics comment, some of their advertising can be misleading
-Some videos are from DVDs
-Site can be slow during peak hours
Bottom Line: I think this is a very good site, and definitely one worth joining if you are into young ladies. While their content is not all exclusive, they do have plenty of quality material.

It would be nice if the site were a little better organized, and they could at least put all the sets for one model in the same location. The search function, and the search by category ability are nice, but I didn’t find them to be particularly effective. Perhaps that is because the site is so large. In general the navigation of the site just seems a bit outdated compared with their competition. The content is not all unique, and if you have been a member at sites like youngporn and smackmybitch I am sure you will see some scenes you recognize.

There is a good variety of content, from softcore to hardcore. I would say their content is not particularly ethnically diverse. However, with 13,500+ sets I'm sure most anyone could find something they would like here. There is also a refreshing lack of ridiculous fake breasts, I'm sure there are some, but I didn't see much.

I didn't have any experience with customer service, so I can't comment on that.

Overall, I think this is an excellent site, and definitely one worth joining. Particularly for someone who hasn't joined many sites in this niche, and even more so for those that are fans of photosets. While they do have videos, I still consider the photosets to be the best part of this site.

09-03-11  12:10am

Replies (5)
Review
4
Visit Viv Thomas Video

Viv Thomas Video
(0)

90.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Good sized collection - over 650 models
-Models are quite attractive, most of the popular euro models area available here
-Excellent download speeds (1.5 MB/sec)
-Download managers work
-Photosets downloadable in zips
-Video quality pretty good: 640x480, 2084 kbps
-Good variety of content
-Good camerawork on photography and videos
-Photo quality is acceptable, but not the best - newer stuff is 1280, older stuff worse
Cons: -Orginization could use some improvement. Not really sure what the purpose of listing the DVDs is, as all the scenes I saw on the DVDs were listed under the video section of that model anyways. A search function would be nice.
-I found some of the sets to be a bit heavy on the makeup, which is not really my thing - I prefer the more natural look
-Could improve photo and video quality
-No bonus sites
-A little pricy
Bottom Line: A pretty good site, definitely better than most. Certainly worth joining, even if like me, you aren't a fan of overly madeup girls as there are still plenty of good scenes.

The content is mostly solo and lesbian, in the video section there are:
50 Boy/Girl scenes
210 Solo scenes
440 Girl/Girl scenes
(The sort function doesn't work great, so these totals might be a bit off)

Although the boy/girl scenes they have are pretty good, if your main search is for boy/girl I might look elsewhere.

As Exotics has said many times, and I agree, this site has some of the best lesbian content on the net.

In summary, pretty much a top tier site that most people would probably find worth joining. If they improved video quality and picture quality a bit this site would probably be even higher on my list. If you are a fan of hot euro models, and especially lesbian content, you won't be disappointed here.

02-23-10  03:50pm

Replies (0)
Review
5
Visit Sapphic Erotica

Sapphic Erotica
(0)

88.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -attractive, mostly euro ladies
-excellent sized collection 2870 total sets (1114 of which are videos) at time of review
-zip downloads of photosets
-download managers work (DTA)
-good price through TBP
-OK download speeds, 500 KB/sec to Western US
-No DRM
-Video quality is decent, I mostly downloaded the 2000 kbps WMV, but newer videos also have a 4000 kbps mp4 which was better, but I didn't find it to be enough of an improvement to warrant the extra HD space.
-Good camerawork
Cons: -Listed as HD, but not the crispest you will find these days if you are stickler for these things.
-I personally am not a fan of ass-licking, and there was a surprising amount of this on the site.
-Most scenes have no real setup, just business
-No real bonus content
-Not a very wide variety of model types (body types, ethnicities)
Bottom Line: Overall, I think this is an excellent lesbian site, defintitely worth joining if you are into this type of material with euro ladies. The majority of which are of the younger/thinner variety.

The site design is pretty bland, but it gets the job done I suppose. There is a model index and a scene rating system, although that is about it. There are more adds than I would like to see, but not too bad. I like that they apparently went back and re-encoded some older material, or at least it looks better than the copies of it I had from before.

I should note that I found their content was frequently pretty "hard" lesbian material, a good amount of toys, fisting, anal play, strap-ons etc.

I think this site is definitely worth joining if you are into attractive euro ladies playing around with each other, while the site does have a few flaws, and the material can get a bit repetitive, the model quality for the most part is quite good and the price is great.

05-17-11  10:37pm

Replies (2)
Review
6
Visit Teen Models

Teen Models
(0)

88.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Updated: 09-26-10  12:01am  (Update History)
Reason: Deleted note that bonus content may not be exclusive per webmaster's response
Pros: -Good variety of attractive ladies, mostly younger euro models
-Excellent download speeds (I averaged better than 1 MB/sec)
-Good quality photography, both size and general photography
-Zip downloads of photosets in 3 sizes
-Decent navigation
-Good bonus content
-Good price with PU discount
-Decent quality videos 1280x720 3000 kbps
-No DRM
-Some download mangers work, DTA did, GetRight didn't
-Ladies are natural from what I can tell, there are some tattoos but nothing too nasty
-Decent sized collection, 153 models with most having a few picture sets and a couple of videos at time of review
-Exclusive content as best I can tell
-Good update schedule, 4 photo sets and 3 videos on average
-Decent navigation, model index and search.
Cons: -Bills through netbilling, which I don't like, but I suppose this is personal preference
-While the models are attractive, most are pretty common, it'd be nice if they had some fresh faces
-Bonus content is a bit iffy, "HD" video has the HD frame size (1280x720), but has poor bitrate (2000 kbps or less).
-As exotics stated, it'd be nice if they named the files a little better.
-Not a huge site, still could use some more growth.
-A bit heavy on toy use/insertions for my tastes
Bottom Line: This is a pretty decent site, especially for those that like toy/masturbation content from young attractive european ladies. As with many of these types of sites I'd prefer there were more stripping and eroticism rather than just cramming stuff up in there, but it is a pretty well done site. The quality of the photography is pretty good and the model quality in general is outstanding.

The bonus content is pretty hit-or-miss. While it does provide some additional hardcore content for those that are looking for that type of material, the quality of the content is generally subpar and the navigation/use of the bonus sites isn't the best.

As Cap'n stated in his comment, if you are looking for a good quality softcore site, this isn't it. This site pretty much fits the definition of midcore.

Overall I'd say this is a pretty good site, it could use some improvement and expansion, but worth joining if you are into young fit european ladies, especially if you like harder lesbian and solo material.

09-25-10  02:46am

Replies (5)
Rating
7
Visit Mr. Skin

Mr. Skin
(1)

88.0
No Review.
06-29-10  12:28am

Review
8
Visit Teen Sex Mania

Teen Sex Mania
(0)

88.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Updated: 01-28-10  03:25pm  (Update History)
Reason: Deleted section about special price from PU, see comment and Khan's response
Pros: Some very attractive young euro models
Video quality is excellent:
-1280x720 High (typically), 4064 kbps
-860x480 Medium (max, varies somewhat), 2000 kbps
The scenes are generally pretty well filmed and lit, although obviously not really a story if you are into that.
Zips of pictures
Good download speed, maxes out my 9 Mbps connection
Decent sized collection, 175 scenes on the main site, many more on bonus.
It appears that they currently update about every 5 days (add one scene).
Download managers work, I use GetRight
Good, old school login system. No codes to enter, cookie based so you stay logged in.
Cons: Very poor organization, sometimes they use the same model and give her a different name (I saw 2 different names for Sasha Rose, neither of which were any of those used on eurobabeindex)
No real search function, and since the models and sets are poorly named, the only way to go through the site is one set at a time.
Picture quality is typically poor, several of the sets I downloaded were screencaps. Most I saw were typically the same resolution as the "High".
Video files are very large, most are 1 GB or so at high quality. Would not recommend if your connection is bad.
Poor set names, I prefer to have the models name in the video rather than high.wmv or some such thing.
Bottom Line: I think this is a really good site, particularly if you take into account the bonus content. The content all appeared to be euro, so you wont find much english in the videos, and if you a large breast fan I would look elsewhere. A lot of the scenes are shownin the preview section, and those model body types are typical to the site and most of the bonus sites.
You get access to:
teenstarsonly (70 sets, HC), atmovs.com (148 sets, HC), teensexmovs (457 sets, HC), privateteenvideo (128 sets; HC, SC), hometoyteens (73 sets, solo), aboutgirlslove (60 sets, les), gap-n-gape (55 sets, anal), old-n-young (81 sets, HC), teens3some (57 sets), boys-love18 (97 sets, gay), soloteensgirls (259 sets, solo), drunkenteenorgies (31 sets, mostly 3-some),
theydidntknow (45 sets, fake voyeur), elpornolatino (10 sets, HC latin) plus a bunch of other pretty crappy non-exclusive sites.
Most of the main sites (teenstars, teensexmovs, atmovs, soloteengirls) appear to be still updating pretty regularly. The video quality of the bonus sites is typically worse, the best quality is about the same quality as medium on teensexmania. I didn't really look at the anal or gay sites cause that isn't really my thing.
Definitely worth joining if you are a fan of:
Sasha Rose, Barbariska or Veronika J.
Bottom line: for the price ($30/month), it is definitely worth joining if you are a fan of any of the new young euro stars, but make sure you have a great connection and plent of HD space first!

01-09-10  09:09pm

Replies (4)
Review
9
Visit Sex And Submission

Sex And Submission
(2)

86.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -attractive, mostly American, ladies
-unique and exclusive material
-no DRM
-Download managers work (I used DTA)
-Decent download speeds, maxed out my 10 Mbit connection using a download manager, not quite so good with the browser
-decent sized site, 343 scenes at time of review
-acceptable update schedule at one per week, I am sure this type of content prevents a more frequent update schedule
-excellent video quality on newer scenes, I preferred the 1280x720 5000 kbps mp4
-zip downloads of photosets, although most I saw were split into parts
-active user feedback to scenes and forum
Cons: -price is a little high
-older videos not as good of quality, 640x480 1900 kbps wmv was the worst I saw
-scenes can be a bit long (I downloaded a few that were over 2 hours) and thus the file sizes can get quite big
-I found some of that material too rough for my tastes, although some might find this a pro
-navigation is not the best, click on a model’s name and it gives you all the scenes she is in on the kink network, although downloading from this index doesn’t seem possible
-logins appear to timeout after an hour or so
-it would be nice if they provided access to other kink sites, although they do give discounts
Bottom Line: Overall, I think this is a pretty good site for that that are into bondage that involves sex. Although be warned, some of the scenes are quite rough. I guess I am generally more a fan of lighter bondage, but felt like trying something new.

I think what the do well is get original content, many attractive (mostly American porn stars) to perform in their scenes. Some scenes tend to be a bit similar to others, but I am not sure exactly what they can do to change it.

The general setup is a brief interview where the guy talks to the girl about what kinks they like, usually followed by some lighter stuff, then sex, the a post scene interview.

As far as improvements, it would be nice if they included access to other sites, although I am sure this material is a bit more expensive to produce than a gonzo site, so I guess it might be cost prohibitive for them to do that. They could also do some work to fix the navigation and provide a functional model index. Personally I would have preferred more scenes that weren't quite as rough, I like the idea of tying a woman up, but I found some of the slapping and choking to be a bit excessive.

Overall I think this is a decent site, with attractive ladies doing some very interesting stuff. If you like bondage involving sex, it is certainly worth a look, althogh be warned it can get a bit rough here.

08-07-11  12:47am

Replies (0)
Review
10
Visit 18 Only Girls

18 Only Girls
(2)

86.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -attractive, mostly euro ladies
-good variety of content, ranging from very softcore to group
-reasonable update schedule usually 1 photo or video set per day
-good navigation, search, tags, model index, ratings
-custom zip downloads of photosets
-no DRM
-download managers work
-no apparent download limit
-largely original content, the newer stuff appears entirely original
-decent sized site, 308 models at the time of this review
-video quality decent, downloadable in 3 sizes for the newer videos HD wmv, high mp4, and low mp4. I usually just downloaded the high mp4 which is typically 640x360 3700 kbps and reasonably crisp.
-photo quality is good, newer photos are 4032x6048 and reasonably well photographed
Cons: -not a fan of accessing through the deisel access site
-no bonus content unless you pay extra
-if you pay extra for the bonus content, there is a lot of duplicate scenes across the network
-some of the paid bonus sites are no longer updating
-site can load sort of slow at times, even though download speeds were always better than 1 MB/sec
-since some of the material appears to be self produced by the talent, the video and photo camerawork can get a bit iffy at times
Bottom Line: Overall I think this site is pretty decent, my only hesitation with the site is whether or not it is worth the extra $10 to join the network.

Given that Policeman.net, Kamilla18.com, thespermlover.com, sashafucksdasha.com, and laythekat.com all appear to be no longer updating, it is probably not worth joining the network if you have been a member of it before. However, if you haven't it is probably worth considering spending the extra $10. While there is duplicate content all over the network, there are some unique scenes to each site, especially on the individual model sites.

Bottom line, I like the variety of the site, and that generally the photography is pretty good, especially with the softcore material. It would be nice if they could get some of the models to do more work in the studio with professional photographers, especially with the hardcore material. They could also do some work to fix some of their website load issues. Even with the sites drawbacks, I still think it is worth joining for a month if you are into attractive young ladies.

12-08-10  10:06pm

Replies (8)
Review
11
Visit Reality Kings

Reality Kings
(6)

86.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Vast amount of content
-Regular updates on most of the main sites
-Download managers work, I tried DTA and GetRight
-Decent download speeds, I averaged about 800 KB/sec
-Good price for the amount of content you get
-Excellent variety, pretty much everything is here except hard fetishes
-No DRM
-Zip Downloads of photosets
-MP4 and WMV video quality were good, but not great, both at 768x432 1500 kbps. I thought the MP4 looked better, but neither were super crisp at full screen.
-In-browser video player is pretty good, can seek easily without excessive buffering.
Cons: -I find there to be a few too many ads, ads when you login, pop-ups
-Website can be glitchy, In The VIP has been disabled for video downloads for almost a week.
-Older content often in three parts still
-Navigation could use some improvement, sorting is a bit odd.
-A bit heavy on the large breasted women for my tastes, but there is plenty for anyone
-They advertise it as HD, but this is only available in streaming format. I would say the streamed HD content is mediocre as far as HD material I have seen (not sure how to check the specs on this).
Bottom Line: I think this site is pretty excellent, although to me not quite the best out there - as they advertise. There is a wide variety of content, although the primary focus of most of the sites is hardcore material of some sort. If you are looking for solo material, this isn't the place to look.

I do enjoy that the site has model interviews, and other such activities instead of jumping straight to the action. I see this type of thing as a positive, I suppose others might not like this, or consider it a waste of HD space and download time.

To me this site appears to be another site that is focussing a bit too much on quantity over quality. Compared to the last time I was a full-access member here a couple of years ago, I found that a lot of their newer content was not up to the quality standards of previous years.

The other main drawbacks to this site are the sites general practices. Advertising on the homepage that video is in HD, but not allowing people to download said video is a bit iffy in my opinion. Also, excessive advertising, and pop-ups are a bit much. I often get a popup to that fling.com place when I go straight to the member page.

All in all, a pretty decent site if you are into hardcore material. If you are looking for downloadable HD content or solo material I would probably look elsewhere. If the site could improve the quality of some of the recent material as well as improve some of the navigation/site issues, it could in fact be the best porn site on the net.

07-21-10  01:18pm

Replies (5)
Review
12
Visit Brain Pass

Brain Pass
(0)

86.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Good collection of videos
Decent download speeds, I have been almost maxing my 7MB connection. I am not sure what the problem was with the guy that commented he was only getting 80kb/sec
Good price for the quantity of content
The site has a good organization concept, I liked being able to search by nationality. I don't think I've seen that anywhere before.
No DRM on videos
Cons: Not many photos, if that is your thing. and most are screen caps.
Video quality is not always great. Most is 720x480, the older stuff is 480x360 or worse.
I don't think a lot of the content is exclusive, as most is pulled from DVDs or other old websites (BrunoB for example)
Some of the star facts are flat out wrong, but that isn't such a big deal I guess.
Bottom Line: Overall I think it is a really good site. It had some hardcore stuff by Sophie Moon, Aneta Keys, Mia Stone and Eve Angel I hadn't seen before. Has a pretty good collection of porn stars from all over.
They could use some work on organizing it right, some stars info and nationalities are wrong. But I think (especially with euro stars) there is a lot of conflicting info out there.
I believe if you go to pornstarnetwork.com you can preview the whole site before joining (like videobox).
Definitely worth joining for a month, especially for $19.99

10-24-09  12:41pm

Replies (0)
Review
13
Visit X-Art

X-Art
(10)

85.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Beautiful ladies from all over
-Good photography and videography
-Good download speeds
-Download managers work
-No DRM
-Zip downloads of photosets
-Decent navigation, model index, and update index, model ratings.
-Photo quality is decent, typically available in three sizes (1200, 2000, 4000)
-Videos are not huge (edited, yay!)
-Video quality is decent (960x540 3500 kbps SD, 1920x1080 16000 kbps HD) SD is pretty crips, HD is very nice. Either Quicktime or wmv.
-3 updates per week, has been very consistent since I've been here
Cons: -Smallish site, 99 models at time of review with typically a couple of photosets per model, not as many of the models have videos - maybe 50% or so.
-Photosets can be short, espicially older sets. Although, in some cases this could be seen as a positive if they removed duplicates and whatnot.
-Videos can also be short, which is probably a con for some, but for the post part I consider it a good thing.
-No bonus content
-No real forum, but you can post comments on sets and there is a blog.
-A lot of toy use in the softcore sets, and not stripping to speak of, many sets start out pretty much nude.
Bottom Line: Overall I think this site is pretty decent. The models are very attractive for the most part and I like the mix of hardcore and softcore materails on a site that focuses a little bit more on eroticism. I definitely like the style of the shoots. I could see how some might complain that the sets are too short of the vidoes are edited pretty substantially, however I find this quite refreshing. Most sites these days post ridiculously long videos with too many closeups and way too much repetitive or unnecessary material (that just ends up wasting hard drive space or wasting my time editing the crap out). So in my opinion it is nice to see a site where they appear to be attempting to trim the sets to the material they think is best.

My main complaint with the site is that it still a little small, and has no bonus content. However, for the price with the PU discount, I think the site is definitely worth joining for a month if you are into well photographed, athletic, young women.

The mix of hardocre and midcore is nice, it would be nice to see a litttle more stripping in the midcore/softcore sets, and given that they have models from all over the place a little more ethnic diversity might be nice as well. While I did like their hardcore material, if this is the only thing you are looking for, this site probably isn't worth joining as there isn't that much of it.

Bottom line for me, with the decent price, I found this site to be worth joining, probably just for a month every now and again, but definitely worth considering.

12-28-10  10:37am

Replies (2)
Review
14
Visit Wicked Pictures

Wicked Pictures
(2)

85.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Great price with the PU discount
-No DRM
-Download managers work
-Newer videos are full HD, 1280x720 3000 kbps was the best of what I downloaded. Pretty crisp even though the bitrate is kind of low for HD
-Most videos are "DVD resolution" 640x480 1500 kbps, pretty crisp even at this resolution although the older the material the worse it gets.
-Scenes for the most part have a story, this is a plus for me, some might find it a negative since often only 50% of the scene involves sex.
-Can download DVD in full for most movies
-Pretty decent sized collection, over 400 DVDs and 3000 photosets (although some of the photsets I looked at were empty)
-Photo quality is okay, most is 600x900
-zip downloads of the photosets
Cons: -Inconsitent download speads, rarely faster than 600 kb/sec
-Site can be slow to load
-Odd navigation
-A bit too focussed on large breasted women for my tastes, but there is a reasonable variety
-Some videos not downloadable, although I would say most I tried were
-Behind the scenes stuff is streaming only
-While they have a lot of stars, the vast majority only have a couple of scenes with a select few having 10 or more scenes.
-mp4 is the only available download format
-Not much in the way of photos (even though they have 3000 sets), many girls don't have any listed and most are the same scenes as the videos
-Infrequent updates, only about 1 DVD a week and a couple of photo sets a week since I've been a member
Bottom Line: While one might think my score is a bit high given all the cons, I think for the PU discount price, this site is definitely worth joining. It surely has its share of problems, but clearly it is a work in progress - and actually a lot better than I thought it would be given the other reviews I read here.

The site certainly has navigation issues. There is a search function available, but it is just a text search. Browsing by model can get a bit frustrating, as the model page loads a streaming movie of the most recent video by that model at the top, and loads all the DVDs, Movies, Galleries, and Promotional shoots available at the bottom, but you have to click through this list which can get annoying if the star has a ton of available content (like Kaylani Lei). One other nuisance is sometimes if you go straight to a scene no download option is available, but there is one at the page for that DVD - unfortunately the DVD download tab just lists the downloadable scenes by number so you have to remember which scene you are downloading.

One good part of the nagivation is that every scene lists a good bit of information tagged to each scene: who is in it, what action is involved, costume, positions, type of tits (natural/fake), location, body details (tats, piercings, shaved, etc.) and cumshot location. Most of these tags are clickable, however when you click them it just brings up a list of all the DVDs (not scenes) that have this tag, so clicking "natural" tits is pretty useless. Interesting concept though, if implemented a little better it could be very useful.

I didn't have any experience with customer service, so can't comment on that, the biller was CCBill for me.

Overall I'd say this site is pretty good, especially if you are a fan of any of the Wicked girls, as there is a good bit of content for all of them, the main reason I joined was price and their vast collection of Kaylani Lei videos - and the price. I found the vast majority of the content on their site to be downloadable, and not streaming only - although I am not sure how much of their archive is actually on the site. The oldest movie I saw was from 1991 (Maddams Family) and it was downloadable - although I didn't download it, so I can't comment on quality. There are 436 DVDs listed on the site at the time of this review.

Even though the site has its flaws, and far too many fake breasts, I'd still say it is worth joining for a month. I'm sure almost any user could find some content they liked that would make it worth the small price to join. However, due to the infrequent updates, I doubt it is worth being a member for more than a month.

04-10-10  05:38pm

Replies (1)
Review
15
Visit Idols 69

Idols 69
(0)

85.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: *Pretty large collection, about 450 photos sets (typically around 100 pics/set), 600 uncensored videos, 800 total videos
*The site also lists 360 or so dvds, but I believe these are where most of the videos listed come from.
*Beautiful japanese women
*Zip downloads of photos
*Decent quality photos, 1200x800, pretty good photography
*Good quality videos, 720x480 2000kbps was the best I saw
*Good download speeds, I got over 800 k/s
*Download managers work
Cons: *Some videos are censored, like most Japanese AV sites the hottest models tend to be censored
*Photos are softcore, not usually censored, but photographed to only show bush
*Like all Japanese porn, some of the content is a little odd
*Poor navigation
Bottom Line: I think this is a pretty good site, similar content-wise to JSexNetwork, although has more uncensored videos and has zips of all photo sets. I think JSexNetwork had slightly better photos, although they didn't have zips of most of their sets.

The site comes with four bonus sites:
*Puuko - an anime site, barely has any content
*analnippon - a video site with about 550 videos, mostly uncensored, obviously mostly anal - but often just with toys. Seems like a decent site, although anal isn't really my cup of tea so I didn't look around too much
*ocreampies - a video site with 600 uncensored videos mainly focused on cum related sex activities; creampie, bondage, bukkake mostly.
*bigtitstokyo - 250 videos big tits and large japanese women, looked uncensored but didn't look too much at this site

I am a big fan of asian ladies, and I think this site has a lot to offer. I find the quality of the photography on sites like these to be much more erotic than a lot of other (American/Euro) sites these days. I would recommend joining if you are a fan of Japanese porn. Just be aware, they always show the most attractive ladies in previews - and many of them only do softcore or edited content.

02-03-10  06:29pm

Replies (0)
Rating
16
Visit Mike's Apartment

Mike's Apartment
(0)

85.0
No Review.
10-24-09  02:25pm

Review
17
Visit Only Cuties

Only Cuties
(0)

85.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Very attractive women
Good quality photos
Good quality videos
Zip archives of all photosets
Good navigation
Site is categorized very well
Reasonably priced
Bonus site hanna's honeypot, good if you like that girl - as the whole site is her, with some lesbian stuff with other women
Cons: While video quality is good, the file sizes can be very large (make sure you have a big hard drive)
The site is not huge, the collection is good, but not nearly as large as a site like 1byday or twistys.
Site is not very fast, sometimes you can only download/load one file at a time
A minor issue, but the model names do not match the model names most other sites use
Bottom Line: Good site to join for a month. The content is mostly the eastern european models you probably have seen on other sites. I believe most of the content is exclusive, I haven't seen any of it before anywhere.
The updates are several times a week and the organization of the site is very good. I like the girl hanna, so that bonus site was particulary good for me, but I'm sure others wouldn't like her super-skinny style.
Most of the content is solo, but there is a decent amount of girl/girl and guy/girl action.
It would be nice if the site had more a full preview as other sites do, and increased speed would be nice.

03-30-09  08:35pm

Replies (0)
Review
18
Visit Asia Movie Pass

Asia Movie Pass
(2)

84.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Very large site
-Lots of attractive Japanese ladies in a pretty wide variety of content
-No DRM
-Download managers work (DTA)
-Full access trial, get option for a month for $10 when you cancel
-Good download speeds, maxed my 15 Mbit connection
-Video quality is generally good, most are only 1000 kbps bitrate, but encoded well
Cons: -Navigation is a bit hard for people that don't know what they are looking for
-A model index would be nice, you can click on model names to get other material by them from within a video, but if there is more than one model on the video I often have a hard time figuring out who is who and have to google all of them to find the one I liked
-File sizes are pretty large, most over 1 GB
-Most are full DVD only, would nice to have download by scene
-Little uncensored content if that is a big deal, almost all has mosaic
-Some scenes have no model names
-Comment section provided, but rarely used. Seems like the only places people commented was the bukkake videos, which I don't care for (and there are a lot of, if that's your thing)
Bottom Line: I generally enjoy Japanese porn, typically more so than American porn. Though it can often be a little strange, and there is heavy use of toys in much of it, aside from the bukkake portions it seems much less gonzo than other porn styles.

Though I enjoy it, I can't say that I can really name many of the stars off the top of my head, so this site can be somewhat difficult, given its size, to find the material you like. There are dvd ratings and comments, and the more common stars typically have linked dvds, so once you find a girl you like it is pretty easy to get all of her stuff, my main problem was finding the girls I liked.

Overall, I think it is a site worth joining for most, especially given the full access trial and the discount offered on cancelling. Of course, if the mosaic is a total deal breaker for you, I would probably look elsewhere. Regardless, it is a very large site, with a wide variety of material, in niches that are often not covered well in American porn - for example I think cosplay is very sexy, but in American porn it is just so overdone and slutty it ruins it, somehow the Japanese version of the schoolgirl outfit works (when it just seems stupid on an American site). Most costumes are somewhat more typical to real life, albeit a little slutty, where American cosplay stuff always looks like it is straight from the trashy Halloween costume shop.

If you are into Japanese porn, I would definitely check this place out, I just wish they did a better job with navigation, as I just don't have the time to dig through it all.

06-22-13  09:22pm

Replies (3)
Review
19
Visit ATK Premium

ATK Premium
(2)

84.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Many attractive models
-Decent sized site overall
-Navigation is good
-Good variety of softcore, lesbian, hardcore
-Camerawork is generally good
-Zips of photosets, newer ones in 3 quality levels
-Newer videos are of respectable quality, typically 4 options available (SD wmv, HD mp4, SD mp4, and portable), I generally downloaded SD mp4
-No DRM, download managers work, respectable biller
-Most girls are natural
-Frequent updates, generally a photo and video set every day
Cons: -Sort of expensive
-No network access, no bonus sites
-Older videos and photos are substandard quality and older movies are often split in parts
-Not a lot of diversity in model body type or ethnicity
-HD scenes seem larger file-size wise than they have to be
-A fair amount (maybe 1/5 or so) of the video material is "behind the scenes" type of stuff, I don't mind it, but could be a negative for some
-Some material is not exclusive
Bottom Line: Generally I think this site is pretty good, but not great. I sort of don't get the whole setup of all the ATK sites, what makes this one premium, is this site exclusively the hot girls? In general, I guess this is the case compared to some of their other sites as the hot/wtf ratio seems to be a good bit higher.

I liked the material here for the most part, but for some reason felt a bit disappointed here. Can't really put my finger on why. Most sites I join, I spend a fair amount more time poking around and checking things out, but I got tired of this one pretty fast for some reason. That isn't to say that they don't have some good material here, they certainly do, I just wasn't super-excited by it I guess.

As for the site itself, the navigation is pretty good: model index, scene ratings, scene tags, it is pretty easy to get around. The girls are generally of the thinner more natural body types, and they have both American and Euro stars.

Overall, I think I would recommend joining this site to those that never had before, but I don't know that I would recommend it as a repeat join even given the update schedule. They seem to do most things very well, and the models are generally quite attractive, so it is certainly worth a look.

03-23-13  01:05am

Replies (2)
Review
20
Visit VideoBox

VideoBox
(8)

84.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Vast amount of content
-Decent price, one of the few sites I have ever seen where it is cheaper to join by renewing free trial membership than by joining outright, although probably a mistake on their part
-Plenty of variety, although some niches aren't as well represented
-Download managers work
-Download speeds are decent, I averaged 900 KB/s
-Excellent member interaction with reviews and opinions of videos and scenes
-Frequent updates
-Ability to creat custom clips, so you only have to download what you want.
Cons: -Site navigation is mediocre. For a smaller site, their style might be great, but for a site this large it just doesn't work
-Search function often returns a mixed bag of seemingly random stuff, or doesn't work at all
-Model labels are often incorrect. I can accept that they can't be held responsible for what is on the DVD, but when the members comment that the model name is incorrect, would it be that difficult to fix it?
-Video quality is mediocre in this age, and the file size of newer videos seems quite large given the quality of video
-Site bills directly rather than using a 3rd party biller
-Quality of videos is very hit-or-miss, with most in my opinion being miss.
Bottom Line: I know there are tons of reviews of this particular site, and I am sure that everyone at PU has been or will be a member eventually. This site used to be one of the best if not the best porn site on the net. However, lately I feel like they are focussing on stupid little user interface issues rather than resolving major issues with the site. How many times have they redesigned the front page? While adding user costum edited clips is interesting, who has the time to dig through that shit?

They should focus more on fixing the problems with the site. Get quality rather than quantity. They already have a huge archive, I don't think many would be dissappointed with 4-5 updates per week if they were good updates. Also, a site this large needs better navigation. The videos can easily be tagged with more info than gonzo and one on one. Tags for tats, breast size (other than large), and body type would be nice. If they don't want to do it, let the users tag the scenes - I'm sure plenty will.

This overall is a good site, and there is a reason it is so popular, but they could certainly take a cue from sites like American Vice that unfortunately failed. Like I said, everyone here should and will become a member here at some point or another, but that doesn't mean videobox doesn't have plenty of issues to resolve.

08-27-10  12:47am

Replies (9)
Review
21
Visit Hustler

Hustler
(1)

84.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Huge archive of videos
-Many videos actually have stories, albeit most are pretty stupid, it is nice to see this amongst all the drop your pants and fuck kind of sites.
-Many attractive women
-Pretty good download speeds, although somewhat variable given time of day (1MB/sec max, 700KB/sec average)
-Download managers work
-Pictures are pretty decent quality, newer photos are about 1500x1000
-No DRM anymore
-Access to barelylegal.com as well, although a lot of the content on barelylegal is also on Hustler.
-Good quality photography and videography
-Good price with TBP discount
Cons: -Navigation is mediocre. You can sort by star, dvd title, and other things, but with an archive this large it would be nice to have more sorting options and a search ability.
-Navigating for photosets is particularly annoying, very difficult to just browse.
-Video quality is mediocre to poor. The best I downloaded was 640x360 1700kbps. They even commically call some of the videos of this ilk "HD".
-Video quality for older DVDs is poor, as low as 700kbps in highest quality.
-No zips for photosets
-While download managers work, they can be a bit glitchy as the path to files change, so you can only really queue up a few files
-Some videos aren't available for download, most are, it seemed like most of the videos that couldn't be downloaded were newer additions
-Some videos were a bit glitchy - 2 scenes in one, the ending missing, etc.
Bottom Line: I think this site gets somewhat of a bad rap, as historically it was a horrible site with streaming only options and terrible navigation. I think it is much better now than it was in the past (even though the only change I noticed was getting rid of DRM). Maybe I just have a soft spot for Hustler since the first DVDs I ever bought were Barely Legal DVDs.

If they improved the video quality, added some better navigation, and provided zip downloads of photosets this would probably be one of my highest rated sites.

The archive is quite large, 830 DVDs on Hustler, and 346 on barelylegal. Even with some overlap, that is a nice sized archive.

I particularly enjoy the style of many of Hustler's videos and enjoy that many of them have a story - which seems less and less common these days. They appear to also have a large magazine archive, although I didn't have the patience to sort through it.

I would definitely recommend the site for a month, especially for $20/month. Even with the mediocre video quality, I still enjoy a lot of the scenes I downloaded here more than HD content on other sites. I'd be surprised if anyone couldn't find some material they like on this site. However, if you are a fan of photos, this probably isn't the best site to join.

02-18-10  08:51pm

Replies (0)
Review
22
Visit Fame Digital

Fame Digital
(2)

83.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Excellent price through TBP, $9.95
-Download managers work (DTA)
-No DRM
-Huge archive, 10726 straight scenes across network (1374 are HD but streaming only). 2614 photosets.
-Wide variety of content, from euro ladies to grannies to indian
-Video quality is acceptable, best I saw was 720x400 2000 kbps wmv
-Download speeds are decent, I typically got 1 MB/s using DTA
-Have scene ratings, favorites, and user comments
-Scenes have tags, but not exactly useful for a site this large
-Decent update schedule, about 1 DVD per day it seems
Cons: -Older content is of variable quality
-Navigation can be a bit annoying, a lot of scenes duplicated across titles. Not sure if they are counting the duplicates in their total.
-No zip downloads of phototsets that I found
-Not sure why the even bother having the multiple sites. I guess it is just for organization
-Few users seem to participate in the comments, or ratings. I have yet to see a comment on any of the scenes.
-Search function consists of pull-down menus with long lists of model names, movie names, etc. Not particularly functional
-No HD video downloads, streaming only
-Largely gonzo porn, although there are some parodies to be found, and some scenes with plots.
-Material can get repetitive, and is almost entirely hardcore.
Bottom Line: This site is definitely worth visiting, especially for the price, however its main drawback is the same as for many sites of this nature like Videobox and VideosZ, it is big and there is a lot of junk to sort through. Generally I like the content they produce, although I wouldn't suspect many would download more than 1% of it unless they had a boatload of time on their hands.

Overall I consider this a site worth joining at least once, definitely given the price. It would be nice if they made some improvements to navigation and added a more robust search function. It would be nice if more users participated with comments like on Videobox, but I guess there isn't really anything they can do to force the issue.

I generally find the model quality on this site to be slightly above their DVD competitors, but I consider their video quality to be slightly worse. The HD looked nice when streaming, but I am really not one for streaming so didn't watch too much of it. I particularly like that the model type is somewhat more variable than on similar sites, although it isn't super ethnically diverse.

If you haven't been a member before and have time to dig through it all, it is definitely a place to consider if you are into hardcore DVD content.

06-09-11  11:52pm

Replies (4)
Review
23
Visit Woodman Casting X

Woodman Casting X
(2)

82.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Many attractive mostly euro young ladies
-Good sized site: 356 hardcore scenes (plus an additional 103 "beahind the scenes" hardcore sets), 1160 total castings.
-Good forum, webmaster is actually pretty active and answers questions from users
-newer movie quality is good from a technical standpoint - 1280x720 2500 kbps was the best I saw
-zip downloads of photosets, although there aren't a ton of photos
-download managers work
-no DRM
Cons: -large watermark on videos
-expensive
-no bonus content aside from access to some of the casting DVDs
-download speeds are inconsistent, best I got was 500 KB/sec
-some models don't get naked for very long, a few don't get naked at all
-poor navigation, although I am not sure how it could be easily improved on a site like this
-photo quality is mediocre, and only about 10% of the castings have photosets
-uses a biller I am not familiar with
-some content is available elsewhere
Bottom Line: Overall this site is pretty good and I'd recommend joining if you are a fan of casting syle videos. However, bear in mind that a lot of these videos are 90% chit-chat, 10% nudity. Some of them have sex in the casting, but the camerawork in these is pretty poor (single camera on a tripod).

His update schedule seems pretty regular, although I am not sure how long he holds onto some of these scenes before releasing them. He has a recent update of an Evelyn/Faith scene, that I would assume is several years old - although can't be sure.

The forum is quite interesting, and I believe you can access it for free. It is often curious what he says about a given model - although the forum is bilingual, with some comments in french and some in english. Either way, rare interaction you don't really see from most sites.

Overall I think this site is pretty good, Woodman definitely has a talent for getting very attractive ladies to take their clothes off - and for some to do hardcore. However, if you are not a fan of casting style videos, or are searching for particularly erotic scenes, this probably isn't the site for you.

10-07-10  09:03pm

Replies (4)
Review
24
Visit Devils Film

Devils Film
(3)

82.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Large selection
Some very attractive women
Quite cheap, they had a $10 per month deal for "spring break"
Some harder to find models not on other video sites like videobox (aneta keys doing hardcore, older cassidey rae stuff, etc.)
No DRM
Something like 10 bonus sites
Cons: Video quality is pretty mediocre, the low quality is downright poor, but I guess that is to be expected.
The file size for the supposed DVD quality video is large for the quality (most of the high quality videos I saw were 720x528, but I didn't download any of the really huge files)
Connection is spotty, typically pretty slow
Site organization and navigation is pretty crappy. Unless you know specifically what you are looking for it can be pretty annoying.
Some of the DVDs are not complete (scenes missing, some were even missing the scene with the DVD cover girl)
Bottom Line: Worth joining for a month. You can view the full site and all the videos they have prior to joining, so it is definitely worth a look. If your preference is for American porn stars with large fake breasts, this is probably not the site for you - as the models are largely european.
All of the sites are almost entirely videos from DVDs, they do have screencaps of most scenes.
Most of the bonus sites didn't interest me, so I don't really have much to add about them. But I did look around on the Peter North site and the Rocco site and they seemed decent. They all have basically the same setup.
If the site were faster and the navigation better I would probably give it an 88.

03-16-09  07:24pm

Replies (0)
Review
25
Visit Amour Babes

Amour Babes
(0)

81.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Relatively large network of sites 24 sites, 801 models on the network, and over 1000 total sets on this site alone.
-Many attractive, euro ladies
-Price is not bad if you join the network through this site, not sure why it is more expensive via other entry points
-Good download speeds, maxed my connection at 2MB/s
-Decent variety, hardcore, some midcore, anal, and a bit of lesbian
-Download managers work (DTA), no DRM, logins don't appear to timeout very fast if at all
-Zip downloads of photosets
-Video quality is mediocre-to-good depending on age of the scene, worst I saw was a pretty old Zuzana Z scene that was 384x288 1400 kbps wmv, best 1920x1088 8000 kbps wmv
-Billed through Epoch for me
Cons: -At least partially not exclusive, seen some of these scenes at other euro sites
-Browsing is pretty bland, there are some site glitches
-Set ratings are provided, but participation isn't high. For some reason when I rated a set or listed it as a favorite, I got logged out, so I stopped doing it
-Older videos have substandard video quality
-Update schedule is inconsistent across the network, and it seems like they may be recycling content
-Photo quality is substandard for most sets I looked at, 1200 pix long end was typical
-Only one video size available for download, on newer HQ scenes file sizes can get quite large, and I would have liked a 720 option that was smaller.
Bottom Line: Overall, I think this is a decent site, it could definitely use some improvements, but may be worth looking into if you are into mostly younger euro ladies. I would like to note that this review is for the entire network, not just this site (as it is dead, I would probably give this site along a 70), and I am just posting it here since it is the cheapest entry point into the network at this time, and there is no "main site" that I am aware of.

The network itself has a decent variety of material, including old/young, lesbian, group, anal, and even some pegging (I think, I didn't look to close). Most of them are pretty straightforward euro-style gonzo porn, some sites have a bit of setup (like a teacher talking to a student in Tricky Old Teacher, or a dude breaking into an apartment in Horny Thief).

Several of the '24' network sites here appear to be dead, the only sites that have scheduled updates are She Made Us Lesbians and Horny Thief Tales (once a month); Tricky Old Teacher, Spoiled Virgins, Young Anal Tryouts, and 18 Virgin Sex (all twice a month). Most of the rest of the sites haven't updated in almost a year if not longer, including this one (Amour Babes).

I think it is worth considering if you haven't been here before, although the update schedule would prevent most from hanging around past a month, and the non-exclusivity would likely prevent many from joining again. I enjoyed many of the scenes, like a Pinky June one who is my new favorite no I suppose, and will be adding them to my favorites, although I wouldn't be surprised if I run across them elsewhere further down the line.

If they improved video quality on the older sets, updated their photo quality, and improved navigation and user interaction, it could be a very good site (though not great).

Network Statistics:
I Fucked Her Finally - 78 combined photo/video sets (156 total)
18 Virgin - 223 combined sets
Amour Babes - 1000 total sets
Creampied Sweeties - 68 combined sets
Dirty A2M - 20 combined sets
Horny Thief - 44 combined sets
Spoiled Virgins - 211 combined sets
Tricky Old - 128 combined sets
Most of the other sites were 20-30 sets of primarily non-exclusive content so I didn't look at them too closely.

03-21-12  05:03pm

Replies (0)

Shown : 1-25 of 946 Page :    Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.4 seconds.