Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : CactusJack2 (0)  

Feedback:   All (9)  |   Reviews (5)  |   Comments (2)  |   Replies (2)

Other:   Replies Received (2)  |   Trust Ratings (1)

All Activity A summary of all the feedback from this user.
Shown : 1-9 of 9  

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
Rating
1
Visit MC Nudes

MC Nudes
(2)

83.0
No Review.
03-08-09  07:34pm

Rating
2
Visit Hegre Art

Hegre Art
(0)

75.0
No Review.
03-08-09  09:01pm

Rating
3
Visit Harris Archives

Harris Archives
(0)

69.0
No Review.
03-08-09  01:32am

Rating
4
Visit Kara Duhe

Kara Duhe
(0)

69.0
No Review.
03-08-09  01:31am

Rating
5
Visit Ron Harris

Ron Harris
(0)

65.0
No Review.
02-26-09  11:54pm

Reply
6
N/A Reply of Andreas's News

Hey Andreas, why so super-duper softcore on your site?

I've saw multiple picture sets where the girl covers up all her private parts with her hands. What's up with that?


03-08-09  07:46pm

Comment
7
Visit MC Nudes

MC Nudes
(2)

Figured I'd give it a shot

The pictures seem a little better than they used to be. Last time I joined was back in '06. I didn't stick around because most of the pictures were really dark and the colors were overexposed. The HDV videos have always been good quality but like most have said they're really tame and not very erotic. It looks like the picture size and quality is starting to be on par with some of the better sites. Some of the larger pictures are still too blurry and grainy for my taste. They seem to do a semi-OK job of finding women who aren't all tatted up or have implants, which is probably hard to find these days, but they still have quite a few. I never had any problems with their download speeds, always averaged about 1.25 MB/s. It seems like MCN is on the right track with the picture sets being brighter and clearer and not over-saturated. The biggest drawback is how tame the whole site is. In some sets the girls don't even take off all their clothes, or they will have their hands covering up their private parts, or the girl will be turned sideways to the camera and not show anything. I'm not sure I understand what they think the huge secret with the female body is anymore in the year 2009.

03-08-09  07:33pm

Replies (1)
Reply
8
Visit ALS Scan

ALS Scan
(1)
Reply of turboshaft's Comment

I agree with everything that you said, but I've always been really mixed about this site.

Let's all get honest for a few minutes about the millions of photo sets and videos they are "remastering" (reselling back to us). Chances are that if you ever looked at any porn during the last decade, you subscribed to ALS and already download all this "old stuff" the first time around. If you think about it, most of all those models who were young and beautiful in the 90's are more than likely fat old housewives with a ton of kids now. Plus, the quality of the remasters really isn't that great, and is not even close in quality to 2009 technology. ALS just doesn't have the amount of material you'd expect someone to have for being in business for over a decade. The remasters to me are just a poor attempt to try and make it look like they have more material than they really do.

As for their new photo sets, the size and quality really can't be beat anywhere on the web, but again, they are so few and far between.

As for the new videos, the quality and download speeds are great but to me they get boring really fast. I mean how many videos of a girl sitting in a chair using a vibrator (that's louder than hell) can you really watch? Especially when most of the girls all look the same. Some of the Caribbean stuff is okay but to me like most of all the other sites they've just fallen into a rut. $100 says I can join a year from now and still see the exact same stuff I'm seeing today.

I swear one of these days I'm going to start my own damn porn site and show everyone how to do it right.


02-27-09  05:00am

Comment
9
Visit Ron Harris

Ron Harris
(0)

Ron needs to shut his piehole

I feel like I just got swindled out of $40. I really regret not finding these reviews sooner and not paying attention to my gut before hitting the join button. The whole time I'm previewing the site I'm thinking to myself why are there soooo many free video downloads on the teaser page? And why is the first month so expensive while the three and six month memberships are so massively discounted? And why aren't there any previews of a real photo set? The answer is deception.

Each photo set only has about a dozen pix or less, and most of them are with the girl in the same exact position. Plus the "life-size" pix are blurry, granulated and obviously Photochopped. Ron says on his site that the quality of his photography equipment isn't a priority...and it shows.

The site navigation just sucks, there's no other way to explain it. The video quality itself is pretty good, I'll have to give him that one, BUT HE NEVER SHUTS UP. He says on his site that he thinks the girls are insecure and need to be talked at constantly in order to feel safe enough to takeoff their clothes. Seriously. But even without his constant diarrhea-of-the-mouth, to me the bottom line is poor camera work, with an unsteady hand and a cockeyed point of view, plus they're just flat out repetitious and boring. Each girl uses this toothbrush vibrator thing while Ron rambles on and on trying to initiate these totally INANE conversations, plus his hyena laugh just grates on your nerves. Not good

02-26-09  11:18pm

Replies (0)

Shown : 1-9 of 9  

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.86 seconds.