Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : cerebral (32)  

Feedback:   All (47)  |   Reviews (23)  |   Comments (14)  |   Replies (10)

Other:   Replies Received (12)  |   Trust Ratings (22)

All Activity A summary of all the feedback from this user.
Shown : 1-25 of 47 Page :    Next Page >

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
Reply
1
N/A Reply of Rick's Poll

Did trial subscription to Spider XXX. It allowed 40 to 50 second clips only. Tried calling them and got the brush off. Unless they have changed their practices to allow longer clips, users should be wary about their trial subscriptions.

02-02-07  11:02am

Reply
2
N/A Reply of PU Announcement on 01-20-07

Concur with your decision. It is a good policy and a positive step.
Regards,
Cereberal


01-20-07  12:13pm

Reply
3
N/A Reply of PU Announcement on 01-10-07

Kudos to Khan. He deserves the new role and responsibility. Wish him success.

01-10-07  12:29pm

Review
4
Visit All Over 30

All Over 30
(1)

79.0
Status: Was a member approx. 6 months prior to this review.
Pros: Good site with frequent updates. Quality of photography and videos is very good. Many of the models are gems, including a few in their 50s. Navigation is all right, and it's possible to download complete sessions, such as that with Bianca, a very erotic woman.
Cons: Come on, get real. This is basically a softcore site. Most of the photos and too many of the videos involve interviews of little interest, simple nude exposure and masturbation. Where's the meat? With the talent available their approach to great sex with older women is too staid.
Bottom Line: Price is OK, and quality of women and photo/video is fine. Large data base with regular updates. Navigation is just OK.
Somebody needs to light a fire under these people and get them to see that more explicit sex and opportunities for older women to perform different kinds of intercourse [DP, Anal, etc.]is what makes a great site. They are not there yet.

01-24-07  08:35pm

Replies (0)
Comment
5
Visit Beautiful Agony

Beautiful Agony
(0)

Unusual

This site is almost platonic. Views of people experiencing orgasms definitely has limited appeal. While the price is low, there are other sites that provide better images of actual and faked orgasms.

01-09-07  03:05pm

Replies (0)
Reply
6
Visit Brutal Dildos

Brutal Dildos
(0)
Reply of Rocker's Reply

Totally awesome to watch someone like Shannon Kelly play with those monster dildos! It just blows me away!

02-23-08  11:03am

Review
7
Visit Brutal Dildos

Brutal Dildos
(0)

80.0
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: Truly amazing scenes. Best site for insertions and toys around. Some of what these women take in the form of dildos is fascinating. Updates seem to come often, and their models are very attractive. Some like Shannon Kelly are a pleasure to watch over and over again.
Cons: Bonus sites are extensive, but quality is so, so. In a few, like their fetish bonus site, access to and navigation leave much to be desired.
Bottom Line: So much to see and enjoy in this site. It could be improved if restrains and the use of mechanical devices were used now and then. Also, a few models in their 30s and 40s would be welcome, along with a few hot Asian women.
Overall, a very entertaining site that provides memorable scenes of insertions with very good quality video and downloading capabilities.

02-09-07  03:38pm

Replies (4)
Reply
8
Visit Chanta's Bitches

Chanta's Bitches
(0)
Reply of Jay G's Reply

Howdy, Jay G:
Like your comments. Not to worry about minor disagreements. We all have different tastes.
What worries me most about this site is the lighting. Know that darkness evokes mystery and danger. But a little better lighting would improve viewer entertainment. Chanta is fine. Guess I like some of the female doms like Venus and Kym Wild.
Hope you enjoy the holidays.
Cerebral


12-25-07  12:15pm

Review
9
Visit Chanta's Bitches

Chanta's Bitches
(0)

88.0
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: A very good site for BDSM. Models are young and very attractive. With one or two exceptions, most are fit and trim. Downloads are in segments, but can be combined in a zip file. Quality of photos and videos is almost excellent. Variety of devices used for humiliation and punishment, especially the new slated board for stretching, is OK.
Cons: Lighting can be a problem, particularly in some of the downloads. They need to improve their use of lights and avoid shadows to avoid underexposure.
Humilitation and punishment could be improved. Agree with others that anal, including DP as on other sites, would be a big plus.
Chanta needs to lose some weight or do some exercise. Also, sometimes her voice can be squeaky and annoying.
Bottom Line: Now that they have reduced the price to $19.95, it is definitely worth a look. While often referred to as a "lesbian" site, it has much broader appeal.
Adding porno queens like Claudia Adkins - a real hottie who does anal with the best of them - and Wenona - with that great, tight body - would strengthen this site.
Better lighting, and some creative forms of punishment are needed.
As for Chanta, she could do with some humiliation, along with an exercise regimen to get into better "shape."

09-18-07  11:23am

Replies (2)
Comment
10
Visit Device Bondage

Device Bondage
(1)

Drop in price for a fun site.

Howdy:
You need to change the information on your listing for Device Bondage. Instead of the higher figure, the cost is now $29.95 per month. Also, as part of the Kink.com system, a 30% discount is available on the cost of a second subscription to another of their sites.
Overall, the site is very entertaining, with attractive models, interesting forms of restraints, and a growing backfile.

03-19-08  10:15am

Replies (0)
Comment
11
Visit Devils Film

Devils Film
(3)

Mixed Bag

Budget site, with large archive. However, some of the best porn stars, like Aurora Snow and Claudia Adkins, are barely represented.
Quality of older films is average to poor. And download speeds are too slow. In fact they are ridiculous.
Bonus sites are so-so and their quality isn't very good.
To commend this site, many of the shoots, especially in the gangbang series are very entertaining, particularly the anal and double penetration scenes.
Overall, be careful in signing up for this site. Read all the fine print otherwise you'll get stuck with other costs that you did not want.

07-25-08  12:43pm

Replies (0)
Review
12
Visit Devils Film

Devils Film
(3)

89.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Extensive data base of hardcore films. Bonus sites add to the volume of films available. Actresses, for the most part, are very attractive; and some are real hotties. Quality of recent films is very good, even when they are expanded to a larger format. Downloads, particularly for newer films, yield clear and sharp images.
Cons: Some navigation problems, including slow downloads. Films are long, and should be presented in three or four segments. Early parts of most films are often throw-aways. Some older films, such as one of Mia in the mature category would be a classics if the quality was better. Wonder why stars like Claudia Adkins and Aurora Snow are absent or their films limited? BDSM and mature/MILf categories are too small.
Tranny and East Indian stuff may not be popular.
Bottom Line: For the money, this is a bargain. Hours and hours of films are available, including some of the most appealing hardcore scenes imaginable. The bonus sites are very good to mediocre. Too bad some of the Peter North films are not included.
Devils Film has produced impressive hardcore series like those for gangbangs, DP and anal. Films on teens is a bit misleading as some of the models are well beyond twenty.
Navigation can be slow, and considerable wait time is the norm, especially when doing a search in a category with multiple listings.
Overall this is an enormous reservoir of films and scenes that provide long term entertainment and viewer satisfaction. "Let the good times roll!"

09-11-07  02:36pm

Replies (0)
Comment
13
Visit Download Pass

Download Pass
(0)

Much to appreciate

Good site for variety and subject content. Hampered by so so quality of media.

01-08-07  04:12pm

Replies (0)
Review
14
Visit Exploited Moms

Exploited Moms
(0)

73.0
Status: Was a member approx. 4 months prior to this review.
Pros: Average site with OK appeal for anyone interested in mature women. Some of the women are attractive, but others will make most user skip to another chapter. Acting and enthusiasm by a few of the women can be impressive.
Cons: Quality of models is average to mediocre. Limited anal. Truncated clips are a nuisance, and updates are slow. Quality of videos is average. Site needs to improve its focus and allow the older women to exhibit increased hunger for active and "rougher" sex.
Bottom Line: Overall an OK site. Shame that it does not have a better standard for females selected. Numerous attractive older women are available that would significantly improve interest in this site. For the price, it is not a bargain, and the related bonus sites are not a plus. Navigation, longer scenes or entire chapters that can be downloaded would help.

01-24-07  08:22pm

Replies (0)
Review
15
Visit Extreme Castings

Extreme Castings
(0)

73.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Attempt at extreme hardcore that involves slapping, rough treatment of women, and forced sex. Updates seem to be regular. Female models, regardless of their age, are, for the most part, attractive and very good actresses. Some of the females on this site are genuine "hotties."
Cons: Very expensive. Even the trial cost is about $18.00 for three days. Clips are too short. Quality of clips can be a problem. Male dominator is muscular and imposing, but seems to have trouble maintaining an erection, and falters in penetrating and keeping an insertion. Looks like this guy took too many steriods and may need some viagra. Bonus materials are mainly humiliation and so - so.
Bottom Line: Looks like an interesting site, which does have some rough hardcore scenes. However, several things are distracting and disappointing. Most of the play involves slapping and spitting, with little in the form of rough sex. So far, no signs of forced anal sex.
Best part of the site is the variety of attractive females, regardless of their age. The acting by the women basically carry this site. As it is of European origin, for some, the language will be a problem. Anyone interested in extreme hardcore and rough forced sex will find the cost of this site along with the poor quality of some scenes an inducement to look elsehwere.

04-13-07  02:42pm

Replies (0)
Reply
16
Visit Fucked And Bound

Fucked And Bound
(1)
Reply of asmith12's Reply

You are right on target. A few of the older segments are really very good, but the quality of the videos is not very good. Too bad the downloading issues have not been resolved.

02-23-08  11:07am

Reply
17
Visit Fucked And Bound

Fucked And Bound
(1)
Reply of asmith12's Review

Very thoughtful review, with important comparisons noted. Like the attention to detail in this review.
Relationship to sister sites is important, as they share facilities, photographers and models.
Overall, a valuable review.


12-16-07  11:45am

Review
18
Visit Fucked And Bound

Fucked And Bound
(1)

86.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Very entertaining site, especially for those interested in bondage, stimulation and fucking. Most models are attractive, with several excellent actresses, making their experience seem real and in a few cases pleasurable. Quality of films is very good, and navigation is excellent. Use of props is limited. Photos are okay and easy to download separately or as a group. Cost of site is low, at the moment.
Cons: Lighting needs to be improved. Difficult at times to get clear shots of submissives. Photography needs to improve so that we see less male assholes and more shots of women actually being penetrated. Models tend to be ones used in their sister sites. More variety in models recruited is desirable.
Bottom Line: A bargain site for anyone interested in female bondage, forced orgasms and intercourse. Wonder about legal aspects of bondage/torture and fucking. Interesting competitor for other sites such as Sex and Submission. They need to be more creative in their bondage, torture, and humiliation of female subjects. Also, their approach to punishment and intercourse is too formulaic.
Small site at the moment. They need to add a few bonus shoots each month.
Would like to see greater variety in models, such as the recruitment of porn stars like Nina Hartley, Harley Raines, Claudia Adkins, and Harley Davis, to name but a few. Now that Nina Hartley is doing anal, doing a nude, DP and anal scene with her would be welcome.

12-16-07  11:40am

Replies (0)
Comment
19
Visit Hardcore Training

Hardcore Training
(0)

Needs Improvement

Small site. Bonus sites are limited. Overall, a good site, but one that needs to grow and get better.

01-08-07  04:32pm

Replies (0)
Review
20
Visit Hardtied

Hardtied
(0)

80.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Extreme site with various types of bondage and stimulation of models provided. Most models are very attractive, and some moderately attractive, like Melody who is very enjoyable to watch when stimulated. Different forms of punishment and forced orgasms are very entertaining. Updates do come once a week, and some models such as Cherry Torn, Calico and Pinky have several shoots. Most recent shoot of Wenona is a keeper.
Dowload speeds are excellent and it's possible to load multiple clips at the same time to a PC or iPod. Photography is okay.
Cons: Expensive at $35.00 per month. Navigation can be a problem. No way to gain direct access to a particular model other than scrolling through the different shoots. Lighting in some scenes is dark and could be improved. No bonus sites or materials. A discount to one of their other sites like Infernal Restraints would be worthwhile, or at least the ability to purchase individual clips like Kink.com is currently doing. They should consider doing some electrical stimulation such as on the nipples and labia as is done on other BDSM site that use electricity.
Photos are just okay, with too many of them shot at bad angles, and some missing the best part of the model's predicament.
Bottom Line: Overall, a very good site that needs to grow and provide bonus materials. Cost is high, and for that amount of money, a few extras would be welcome.
For the connoisseur of BDSM, this is a site worth looking at. Some of the scenes, such as with Mei, Kali, Anna Rose and a few others are excellent and well worth dowloading and keeping. Older materials include such well known models as Shannon Kelly, Kitty Langdon and Jade Marxx, to name but a few. Variety of bondage positions, including anal and double penetration along with electrified clit stimulators is extensive.
Hardtied might provide, as a bonus, some of their older clips from the Insex Archives. Then this would be a terrific site.

07-25-08  12:32pm

Replies (0)
Review
21
Visit Hog Tied

Hog Tied
(0)

89.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: A primo BDSM site that has set the standard for others. Large backfile with weekly updates. Recent episodes have very good quality pictures and videos which can be dowloaded in WMV, RealVideo and IPod/PSP formats. No DRM. Older videos look better in RealVideo format.
Models are very attractive and have different body styles. Forms of abuse are definitely intriguing and entertaining.
Message board yields fascinating comments about scenes and models. Opportunity for suggestions.
Cons: There are some minor navigation issues, especially for access to older episodes. Repetitive use of some models. They need to bring in different types of subject from other porn genre, like Daphne Rosen.
Less time devoted to tying up models with ropes and knots would be welcome.
Quality of older videos could be improved.
Actions/responses to message board and suggestions needs to be improved.
Bottom Line: Overall, a very entertaining site for BDSM lovers. It is definitely a standard in the BDSM niche. Viewers are treated to a variety of techniques used to dominate and stimulate very attractive models. They could stand to attract more porno queens from other categories, like Aurora Snow and Claudia Adkins. Also, recruiting very attractive milfs like Nina Hartley and Harley Davis would be terrific.
Discount for subscribing to a second Kink.com site can be up to 30% and should encourage subscribers to consider other Kink.com sites.
Hog Tied is a visual treat for subcribers and continues to find new ways to titillate viewers.

01-05-08  11:20am

Replies (0)
Review
22
Visit Hot Mom Next Door

Hot Mom Next Door
(0)

77.0
Status: Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
Pros: Real bargain at $15.00. Many of the women are attractive, popular and seen on other sites. Newer vids and pictures are very good quality. A few episodes have been shared with other sites.
Large number of links to other sites, and an amusing game of strip poker. One scene with Nicky is memorable and worth looking at often.
Cons: Older vids are of lesser quality. Some of the linked sites do not respond easily and skip or flutter as they are played. Not much head provided, and much of the sex is by the numbers, fondle, sniff, suck, lick, and then fuck in three positions only. Some models seem bored and do little to draw attention to their scenes.
Bottom Line: Can't go wrong for $15.00. Updates are slow, but keep coming. Quality of newer vids and pictures is very good. Models are, for the most part, attractive, even though some of them look less than enthusiastic.
Overall, for the low price and the wide range of choices offered, this is a bargain.

03-23-07  04:36pm

Replies (0)
Comment
23
Visit Insex Archives

Insex Archives
(0)

Missing the Boat

Insex Archives has a large and very unique data base of extreme BDSM episodes. Shame that the price for this is so high, $69 per month. Some of the episodes are fascinating to watch and the models endure considerable punishment with all the appropriate grimaces and sounds, e.g. Kassy in Maine Visit.
Owners of this site should consider selling downloads of multiple episodes viewers may want to stream or purchase. By doing this, they will probably increase their sales and income.

02-27-08  09:36am

Replies (0)
Comment
24
Visit Knot Nice

Knot Nice
(0)

Knot Nice Alive?

Has anyone seen any updates to Knot Nice since August of 2007? Site had been given high marks, but started to slip. However, it would be nice for potential viewers to know whether or not this site is still active and worth joining.

02-27-08  09:23am

Replies (0)
Review
25
Visit Milf Seeker

Milf Seeker
(0)

81.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Very good site for MILFS, perhaps in the top 15. Models are not grannies, more like 35 to about 45, some being real hotties. Some like Adriana are "hot." And even an older model like Ivy Love comes across as sexy and fun to watch. Free bonus sites are extensive. Most of them produce their own content. Newer episodes in HD are terrific and navigating them and downloading is much improved over the older stuff. They do update enough to keep any viewer happy. And failing that, updates to the bonus sites prove more than enough scenes to keep someone hard!
Cons: Quality of older expisodes is fair, and some are not well photographed. Downloads of the older scenes could be better. Some models have very visible scars from breast implants and lower body surgery. For some, this can be a distraction or a turn-off. Additional anal and DP would be welcome. Shame to have a hot babe like Ava Devine not do DP and anal when she is one of the best at doing it. A few more interracial scenes would be welcome.
Bottom Line: Easily one of the better MILF sites, with plenty to see and enjoy. Large data base is easy to access, even if the older materials are not in the best quality. Newer HD scenes really spoil the viewer.
The bonus sections are easy to access. Scenes from the different sites can be added to favorites for rapid access. Some of the models, like Tara in the bonus link are very appealing, especially when the director tells her to express herself and go ahead and have those orgasms. Too bad the lighting in this shoot is so dark.
But other than a few minor criticisms, this is a fun site to enjoy attractive MILFs in action. The reduced cost, at this time, makes this site with access to a plethora of other bonus material a very good buy.

02-23-08  12:27pm

Replies (1)

Shown : 1-25 of 47 Page :    Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.49 seconds.