| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
There's probably some psychological term that better fits than "fantasy", but that's probably the closest choice for most mes, I think.
If you watch a movie, or read a fictional book, is that a fantasy?
Or is there a better way to describe it?
|
05-19-13 07:27am
|
Reply
2
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
Not my thing. In between "I don't really care about it" and "I don't like it at all".
|
05-17-13 08:37am
|
Reply
3
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I'm leaning between "Yes" and "Undecided". Can anyone give me examples where sites display cropped thumbnails?
|
05-14-13 03:30pm
|
Reply
4
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
If there are a very few, and they offer a nice discount, then, ok, I don't mind too much. But there are some sites where it's hard to tell the ads from the site contents, and the pages get so cluttered, it's hard to navigate.
I know sites need to make money. But I already paid my membership fee, so I don't want to have to slog through a bunch of ads I don't need to see.
|
05-14-13 03:27pm
|
Reply
5
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
My guess is that most women haven't heard of the sexual revolution, where men and women are supposed to be equal. Or maybe it's because men are still stuck in the cave-man era, where only men are interested in porn.
I would think, though, that glamcore/heartcore porn would make more women interested in porn, if they come across it.
|
05-09-13 03:05pm
|
Reply
6
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I usually look over the archived reviews.
|
05-07-13 05:11pm
|
Reply
7
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Lionheart's Poll
Agree with Capn. Depends on the girl, depends on the style of glasses.
|
05-07-13 05:09pm
|
Reply
8
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I tried a pop-blocker, and was happy at first. But then it seemed to mess up the computer somehow. I don't remember the details, but my browser (Firefox) started developing problems. So I deleted the pop-up program from my PC.
|
05-01-13 05:33am
|
Reply
9
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Barefoot is best. I've never gotten used to walking in high heels.
|
04-30-13 03:07pm
|
Reply
10
|
N/A
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Poll
I've had good and bad responses from tech support. Mainly bad.
|
04-30-13 03:04pm
|
Reply
11
|
N/A
|
Reply of
jberryl69's Reply
I am currently a member of Met-art.
I don't know whether the photo set you are referring to is still at Metart, or whether it was deleted.
If you do a search for a model named Claire at Metart, the search returns "There is no model named Claire."
Possibly she is listed under another name.
If you look at the photo sets of the photographer named "Peter Dominic", it does show there are 7 sets by him, but none of those sets have a posting date of June 14, 2003, and none of the sets have the title "Her Best Friend".
Trying to search for photo sets in the archives section (2004 and earlier) is not as simple as checking sets posted from 2005 and later.
My guess is that this set was probably at the site at one time, but was subsequently deleted, for one reason or another.
|
04-25-13 03:13pm
|
Reply
12
|
N/A
|
Reply of
jberryl69's Reply
As a major softcore site, I'm sure Met-art tries to follow the age guidelines for most of the world's countries. That only makes business-sense.
After Grigori Galitsin had legal problems in Russia, all of Galitsin's photosets at Met-art were deleted, whether the models were of legal age or not.
Galitsin used to be one of the first, and main, photographers at Met-art.
|
04-25-13 09:26am
|
Reply
13
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
I have a hard time trying to tell the age of a model, in general. And there are some models that, for years, look far younger than their actual age.
But I have deleted vids and pics where I thought the model did look too young. Not recently. But when I had a newsgroup subscription, you could download lots of material, and who knew where most of it came from, and there was very little way of knowing who some of the models were.
With pay porn sites, at least you have the assurance that they are checking on the age of the models for you.
|
04-25-13 12:13am
|
Reply
14
|
N/A
|
Reply of
plan b's Poll
None of the above. If I had to choose, I vote for sitting in my chair, surfing the net.
|
04-23-13 03:45pm
|
Reply
15
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Most of the site contents are its archives. So updates are just a small part of what the site is offering.
|
04-19-13 03:41am
|
Reply
16
|
N/A
|
Reply of
GCode's Poll
Well designed tours can be useful, especially if they gave nice thumbnails of the site models, some indication of the site content (sample video previews, sample pictures, etc.).
But like Cybertoad stated, a good PU review gives a better idea of what the site is like, it's plus and minus points, etc.
So normally I want a PU review to check, before I join a site. Unless I think the site has some models that I really like, because I am a sucker for a pretty face.
|
04-17-13 07:51am
|
Reply
17
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I grew up on Playboy, so I don't mind some airbrushing. Some flaws can be distracting. And almost all women use cosmetics to increase their appeal. I don't like heavy make-up, but if you are doing a photoshoot or a video, then at least some make-up is needed for the camera, even for a "natural look".
|
04-16-13 05:37pm
|
Reply
18
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I've seen very little fisting. To be honest, I don't even recall a single scene. Maybe I haven't really seen any.
|
04-14-13 07:05am
|
Reply
19
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
I don't think there is one factor that is the most important. There are several factors that are important, including quality of site contents, amount of content, how easy to site is to use, update rate, price, etc.
Maybe those factors aren't strictly related to the tour pages, but the tour is only part of what decides if I want to join a site or not.
|
04-11-13 05:24pm
|
Reply
20
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I think Cybertoad said it best: a site has to be worth the cost. It's that simple.
There are many different ways you can value a site:
Amount of content, quality of content, ease of use.
But the price of a site is definitely one of the main factors, whether it's mentioned in the review or not.
|
04-09-13 07:56pm
|
Reply
21
|
N/A
|
Reply of
roseman's Poll
I like to read the reviews at PU to get a sense of whether the site might be worthwhile joining.
But I also like a site to have a useful public tour pages, where they show the site models, and hopefully give some preview shots of the photography and videos the site features.
The preview pages at some sites are just about worthless. No model listings, no information on the site contents, other than saying they have gorgeous models and the most exciting videos.
|
04-05-13 04:47am
|
Reply
22
|
N/A
|
Reply of
messmer's Poll
I haven't used a sledgehammer on my computer, but I did slap my laptop a few times until it quite working on me. True story. I don't know if the slaps were what broke the fucker.
|
04-03-13 06:27am
|
Reply
23
|
N/A
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Poll
Is this some kind of philosophical question? I'm kind of groping in the dark, where most of the replies seem to imply the people know what the fuck is going on.
|
04-01-13 04:15am
|
Reply
24
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
I'm wondering how many poll respondents are differentiating between MB and Mb.
1 MB = 8 Mbit
The poll asks for MB speed.
I upgraded to 17.40 Mbps recently, which is 2.175 MB/sec.
Most of the poll replies are in the 11-30 MB/sec range, which seems very high to me.
|
03-28-13 09:02pm
|
Reply
25
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
I use a different URL to test my computer, and the results seem different:
http://www.dslextreme.com/support/speedtest
Latency: 17 ms
(as far as I can tell, Ping and Latency are interchangeable terms. But maybe on a technical level there might be differences in the two terms).
Download speed: 8634 Kb/s
Upload speed: 1303 Kb/s
|
03-28-13 09:51am
|
