Good to hear from you. There is very little strip-tease or lingerie at this site, but the sex is mainly heartcore/glamcore, and if you check all the videos (and there are a lot), you might find some that are to your liking. You just have to keep looking, and the models are really pretty.
Some sites have poor preview pages, that show very little of what the site offers.
21sextury has a great preview pages.
The thumbnails show clearly what the models look like.
You have some really nice-looking models.
The videos look professionally shot.
You get to see short samples of the videos.
Reading the PU site reviews, scores range from 80s to 90s.
This is not directly in my comfort zone, as far as the type of sex action. I like a slower approach to sex. The sample videos I saw are like a bucking bronco at a rodeo.
Bu with a first month offer of $9.95, and a ton of gorgeous models, it's worth a try.
So I will sign up tomorrow.
OK. I signed up at 21sextury.
For some reason, the signup page rejected my Mastercard credit card 4 times.
I then tried a Visa card, and the signup page accepted that card.
The biller is Epoch.
After accepting my registration, I got a URL page that said, in part:
The first step of your purchase was successful.
Soon you'll receive a mail to your registered email address. Please click on the link you'll find inside the mail to finalize your registration.
In case you are logged in, don't forget to refresh the page to be able to see your new products.
In case you've provided an incorrect email address, you will still be able to log in for a single time with the username and password below, and correct the email address in your settings panel.
I checked my email, and found 2 emails from Epoch or 21Sextury.
One email said:
You received this message, because you (or someone else) have registered your email address on the 21Sextury Network page.
If you'd like to activate your free premium access, please click on the link below:
CLICK HERE TO WATCH YOUR FREE HD SCENE!
If you don't want to activate your email address, just simply ignore this message. If not activated, the registration will be deleted in 7 days.
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
-One of my favorite glamcore sites.
-The selection of models is outstanding. Most of the models are either attractive or gorgeous.
The photography and videos focus on making the models as attractive as possible, and it really shows.
-Easy login. Username and password can be saved. No captcha required.
-Good site design. Can search site by updates, models, or videos.
-Large thumbnails clearly show what the models look like, what models are in each video or photoset.
-Long time before site timeout.
-Content has date posted to site.
-No download limits.
-Fast download speeds. I get over 2.1 MB/sec, which is close to my max download speed.
-Download manager works. I use DownThemAll.
-Videos and photo sets are professionally shot. Excellent lighting, good colors, good sound control (no random extraneous noises), most of the photos and videos are well-focused.
-Good update rate. Last couple of weeks, they have been adding one video or photoset per day.
-The cons are basically minor. This is one of the best glamcore sites available. I'm basing that on the quality of the models (attractive to absolutely gorgeous), the high quality of the videos and photosets, how easy the site is to use).
-No search function if want to search by type of sex action, hair color of model, breast size, or other factors.
-If you don't like glamcore (some PU members call this heartcore), you won't like this site. There is no gonzo sex, no rough treatment of women.
-Many of the videos have brief moments where the video is slighty blurry. This is an "artistic effect", which I find stupid and annoying. I want my videos crystal clear, not crystal clear, with occasional blurry shots mixed in.
-Glamcore usually has soft "mood music" in the background. I prefer a video without any "mood music" or any background music.
-Models are white, late teens to early 20s. Some PU members might want a wider variety of models, different races, more of an age spread.
This is one of the best glamcore sites on the Internet. The models range from merely attractive to drop-dead gorgeous. The videos and photosets are high quality, professionally shot, to emphasize the beauty of the models. The sex is slow, sensuous, romantic.
There is a mix of solo, boy-girl, girl-girl. There are a few with 2 boys-1 girl, 1 boy-2 girls, 2 boys-2 girls.
I believe the site contents are exclusive. Although many of the models can be found at other sites, the videos and photosets at the site are exclusive.
There is a nice amount of content. The site has been around a number of years (2009 or earlier?). It used to be called "Beauty is Divine". When it first started, it was strictly a softcore teen glamor site. I don't believe it had any videos, only photosets. Each photoset had a small number of photos, and the models were uniformly lovely. The photography was high quality. Then the site name was changed to X-Art, and they started adding videos, and changing the approach from softcore to erotic glamor, which slowly evolved to glamcore, where the photosets and videos show actual sex.
Photosets can be viewed online, or downloaded.
Photosets from the last few years have about 100+ photos per set.
The earliest photosets had 25 or fewer photos per set.
Download options include a zip file in three definitions:
Videos can be streamed online or downloaded.
Download options have choice of many definitions:
The download choices for one recent video include:
MP4 (all devices and mobile)
1920x1080 HD (1431 MB)
1280x720 HD (784 MB)
960x540 SD (549 MB)
640x360 SD (152 MB)
1920x1080 HD (1431 MB)
1280x720 HD (784 MB)
960x540 SD (549 MB)
640x360 SD (152 MB)
1920x1080 HD (1478 MB)
1280x720 HD (867 MB)
960x540 SD (589 MB)
640x360 SD (158 MB)
If you like tender young teens, in gorgeously photographed photos and videos, then this site is worth visiting.
As I said, this is one of my favorite glamcore teen sites.
At My Horny Asians (part of the 21sextury network), they advertise $9.95 Month.
You click on the hot link, and you get 3 options to sign up:
1. 1 year, no rebill, $9.95/month, billed at one installment of $119.40 at one time.
2. 1 month, rebill at $9.95 after 4th months. In the first four months you pay $19.95/month.
3. 3 month, rebill at $19.98/month. Recurring at $59.95 every 90 days.
So I don't see any option to sign up for $9.95 for the first month, whether it's one-time only, or $9.95 for first month, and a higher price for succeeding months.
I've seen a similar advertisement at another site, where they advertise $9.95/month, but it turns out, when you go to the signup page, that is the rate for a 1-year subscription.
Which seems slightly deceptive to me.
If they advertise $9.95/month, and at the signup page it turns out that $9.95/month is only available with a 1-year subscription, I wonder if that is legal.
There are supposed to be "Truth in advertising laws".
FTC Resources for Reporters
Truth in Advertising and Marketing
When consumers see or hear an advertisement, whether it’s on the Internet, radio or television, or anywhere else, federal law says that ad must be truthful, not misleading, and, when appropriate, backed by scientific evidence. The Federal Trade Commission enforces these truth-in-advertising laws, and it applies the same standards no matter where an ad appears – in newspapers and magazines, online, in the mail, or on billboards or buses. The FTC looks especially closely at advertising claims that can affect consumers’ health or their pocketbooks – claims about food, over-the-counter drugs, dietary supplements, alcohol, and tobacco and on conduct related to high-tech products and the Internet, such as the dissemination of spyware. The FTC also monitors and writes reports about ad industry practices regarding marketing of food, violent movies, music, and electronic games to children.
When the FTC finds a case of fraud perpetrated on consumers, the agency files actions in federal district court for immediate and permanent orders to stop scams; prevent fraudsters from perpetrating scams in the future; freeze their assets; and get compensation for victims.
But internet sites advertise $9.95 month, and then at the signup page, it turns out that only applies with a 1-year subscription.
So I guess it's misleading, but legal.
Edit01: If you use the PU link to 21sextury, you can join that network for $9.95 for the first month, recurring at $29.95 every 30 days.
The 21sextury network includes access to My Horny Asians. So there are sometimes work-arounds to getting a cheaper subscription price.
I tried a pop-blocker, and was happy at first. But then it seemed to mess up the computer somehow. I don't remember the details, but my browser (Firefox) started developing problems. So I deleted the pop-up program from my PC.
I have the "Diamond" membership, but they haven't bothered to tell me what that means, or how I got it.
I do have access to all 11 sites in the Diesel Access network.
I posted at PU, and also at the Diesel Access network forum, asking them to clearly spell out what the rules are for each membership, to gain access to the different sites.
They said they would do that, sometime in the future.
If you like glamcore/heartcore, I think you will enjoy the Diesel Acess network. X-Art and the Diesel Access network are two fine example of that niche.
But if you don't like glamcore, you might find those sites disappointing.
Also, both X-Art and Diesel focus on teens. So if you want a broad range of ages, or slow-strip tease, or something else, you could be disappointed.
Having said that, there is plenty of hardcore action at these sites, with some models that are absolutely stunning or even beautiful. They are truly a feast for the eyes, and fingers, and any other body parts you can imagine.
The point I was making is that, because the site owners/operators/managers are foreign, they don't understand English that well. (They might disagree, because almost everyone thinks he or she is perfect.)
But the webmaster does not clearly state exactly what the rules are for gaining access to all the sites.
The price for joining any of the sites in the network is currently the same, no matter what site you join through.
On the 18 Onbly Girls signup page, it clearyly states that each memb membership option gives you access to 18 Only Girls plus 11 bonus sites.
Actually, that is a mistake. You get 10 bonus sites, plus the 18 Only Girls site, which makes 11 sites total.
(Like I said, because they are foreign, it's easy for simple mistake to creep in, because they think they know what they are saying. If they advertised in Russian or whatever their native language is, they would probably not make the mistakes, but a lot of members don't understand Russian or whatever their native language is.)
On the Wow sites (Wow Girls, Wow Porn), the membership options are priced the same as for a membership to 18 Only Girls. But the access to the bonus sites is not mentioned on the signup page.
So, to be safe, join through 18 Only Girls, and that way, you are sure (because it's in writing on the signup page) that you get access to all 11 sites in the network, which includes Wow Girls and Wow Porn.
If you join through Wow Girls or Wow Porn, you should still get access to all 11 sites. But it's not spelled out on the signup page. And sometimes, in real life, things don't make sense. So it's possible, although unlikely, that you wouldn't get access to all 11 bonus sites, if you join through one of the Wow sites, even though you are paying the same price as if you signed up through 18 Only Girls.
If you have joined a lot of porn sites, sometimes, you will see that joining a network through one site instead of a different site in the same network, can charge you more money for the membership, and give you access to less sites in the network.
I am frustrated that the webmasters at some sites don't clearly spell out what sites you get access to, depending on what site you join through.
For years, Teen Mega World did not spell out what sites you got when you joined through each individual site in the network. Recently, they did show a simple join page, that clearly showed what access you were getting. But that took them many years, and many request that they ignored.
Maybe I am biased, or prejudiced. But sometimes foreigners think differently. Or they think something is obvious, when it's not really clearly spelled out.
I don't know whether the photo set you are referring to is still at Metart, or whether it was deleted.
If you do a search for a model named Claire at Metart, the search returns "There is no model named Claire."
Possibly she is listed under another name.
If you look at the photo sets of the photographer named "Peter Dominic", it does show there are 7 sets by him, but none of those sets have a posting date of June 14, 2003, and none of the sets have the title "Her Best Friend".
Trying to search for photo sets in the archives section (2004 and earlier) is not as simple as checking sets posted from 2005 and later.
My guess is that this set was probably at the site at one time, but was subsequently deleted, for one reason or another.
Vika Nymph does not update regularly like the above mentioned sites do. The last video update for Vika Nymph was 2012-05-15, titled "I do it everywhere". But the site does have a lot of videos that are worth watching.
Vika is a slender East European teen, who can put on a really hot show. Most of her videos are solo, or Vika with a girlfriend, or 2 girlfriends. But occasionally she will have a boy, for variety.
I have a hard time trying to tell the age of a model, in general. And there are some models that, for years, look far younger than their actual age.
But I have deleted vids and pics where I thought the model did look too young. Not recently. But when I had a newsgroup subscription, you could download lots of material, and who knew where most of it came from, and there was very little way of knowing who some of the models were.
With pay porn sites, at least you have the assurance that they are checking on the age of the models for you.
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
-Easy login. No captcha.
-Long time before site timeout.
-High quality videos and photosets. Professionally shot: good lighting, good colors, good sound control, really nice technical control.
-Large number of attractive or gorgeous teen models.
-Easy site navigation.
-Can stream or download videos.
-Streaming options: 360p, 480p, 720p, 1080p.
-Download options: 360p, 480p, 720p, 1080p.
-You can select different parts of a video scene to stream or download.
-Nice mix of solo, boy-girl, girl-girl, or group sex.
-There is usually background music for the videos, but it's kept soft, so less distracting
than many music backgrounds.
-DownThemAll download manager works at this site.
-Good download speeds. I usually get over 2MB/sec, which is close to my max download
-Access to live chat shows that feature a few of the models from the Diesel sites. The models are friendly, strip, masturbate, sometimes have a boyfriend that performs with them (fucking, in other words). Those shows are completely free.
-Content has a posting date.
-Files download with the name of the model and the title of the video, so you don't have
to rename the files.
Cons are basically minor. Wow Porn is a high quality glamcore site.
-Most of the videos are shot indoors. very few videos are shot outdoors, at the beach, in a park or field. Some people might want more variety in the locations, but I thought the locations were very nice, no cheap apartment setting, no cheap clothing, just a really nice look and feel to the videos.
-Sometimes toys are used. Some PU members don't like toys.
-This is a glamcore site. Some PU members might like a more gonzo approach.
Wow Porn and Wow Girls are the newest sites in the Diesel Access network. Starting in early March of 2013, those two sites, which used to be separate from the Diesel Access network, are now included in the network.
I would consider 18 Only Girls, Young Legal Porn, Wow Girls, and Wow Porn to be glamcore/heartcore porn. Those sites use many of the same models. The video and photo style is basically the same for all 4 sites. You get gorgeous teen models that show off their tight bodies, and many of them engage in hardcore sex, with boys, with other girls, or by themselves (some PU members consider masturbation softcore or midcore, but I think it's hardcore, especially if they are showing close-up views of the vagina, ass, etc.)
The videos and photos are high quality, in terms of definition, focus, lighting, colors, camera-work, etc.
My favorite glamcore/heartcore sites are X-Art and some of the Diesel Access network sites. That's because of the high quality videos and photosets, and the large number of very attractive to really gorgeous models these sites have.
Met-art is my favorite teen softcore glamor site. Again, that is because of the huge number of very attractive to really gorgeous models, and the outstanding quality of their photosets.
If you have access to all the sites in the Diesel Acess network, that means 11 sites in all. They have dropped (eliminated) several of the old sites that stopped updating years ago, and that mainly contained older, lower quality videos and photos (lower definition, lower production values). So they are showcasing the higher quality of their current offerings.
The sites they have eliminated include:
Lay The Kat
Sasha Fucks Dasha
The Sperm Lover
Wow Porn is an excellent site by itself. Access to the rest of the sites in the network make this a high quality glamcore offering with lots of very attractive teen models.
It's really hard to give this site a fair score. By itself, I'm giving it a 92. If you include the other sites in the network, I'd give it a 95 or more. This is really a high-end glamcore offering.
But some PU members have wondered what are the exact details in how you get access to all the sites in the network.
The web master replied that he would post details on how the membership works, to get total access. But that hasn't happened yet, that I could find.
From the sign-up page to 18 Only Girls, you see the following plans:
$0.97/day, 18OnlyGirls.Com Recurring 30 Days Membership & bonus access to 11 sites.
$0.67/day, 18OnlyGirls.Com Recurring 5 Months Membership & bonus access to 11 sites.
This is a 5 month, recurring membership.
$1.33/day 18OnlyGirls.Com Non-Recurring 30 Days Membership & bonus access to 11 sites.
The above choices are slightly different from the way the webmaster explained it before.
He said a while back, that if you join one of the sites, and re-new your membership, you would then have access to all the sites in the network (he didn't specify how long you would have to be a member before you gained access to all the sites).
The Wow Porn sign-up page has the same three plans listed above, but they only mention membership/access to the Wow Porn site. I assume that is because the site has a problem with English, and that they are not specifying the access to the other sites in the network because they don't realize the omission.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
-Site has a faq on how Silvia Saint got into the porn business, a little on her history.
It's straight-forward facts, not a lot of bullshit.
-Site also has a bio page, with short facts on her personal history and physical likes.
-Part of the netFameSolutions network. One of the main sites in the network, based on quantity of content, quality of content.
-Silvia Saint is a very attractive blonde, blue-eyed model, great shape,
-PU discount $14.95/month (recurring).
-This site tries to be more accurate, or factual, than the normal porn site. In videos, if
the model is interviewed, she gives her actual age, rather than trying to appear as a teenager. In the categories page, they list 5 scenes at Teen: 5 scenes out of 737 total scenes at the site.
-Models mainly appear natural. Not a lot of implants. The girls with big breasts appear to
be natural, not plastic.
-In the interviews, the girls come across as real people, not putting on airs, not using a lot of fake moans and groans and fake excitement when they masturbate.
-Can watch scenes streaming or download.
-Videos have posting date.
-Female models are listed for each scene.
-Includes network access to the netFameSolutions network, which has massive, good quality DVDs covering many categories.
-DownThemAll download manager works at this site.
-Good download speeds. I regularly got about 2.06MB/sec, which is close to my maximum
download speed (My max download speed is about 2.16 MB/sec).
-No download limits.
-Lots of attractive models.
-Same username and password work for all the sites in the network you have access to. Or
you can use the dropdown box to switch among your bonus sites.
-Pre-checked cross-sell at signup.
-Many blank thumbnails for the model listings.
-No low-cost longer term (3 month or more) membership option.
-No zip files for photo shoots.
-I don't like their software mechanism for viewing the photos online. The viewer seems slow and clunky to switch from one pic to the next.
-Have to use drop-down lists to select model, category, scene. A simple blank search box would be easier to use, more flexible to use (if they paid a site designer to implement a software search system).
Silvia Saint is one of the major porn stars. She was Penthouse Pet of the Year in 1996 in the Czech edition. She has probably appeared in over 300 adult films. The site has a large collection of Silvia Saint videos and photosets, as well as featuring many other attractive porn models. The site gives access to Silvia Saint's personal blog, which is updated at least weekly. So if you are a fan of hers, you can read personal messages from her, and read what she is doing and thinking recently. I honestly don't know how many PU members would be interested in this blog. She writes in a simple, friendly style, calling
her fans "darling", blowing them hugs and kisses. So in a sense, if you read the blog, and
you're in the right frame of mind, that could save you a few visits to a hooker, if you
can accept the substitution. The blog also has lots of small pics of many of the models
Silvia is currently working with.
HD Movies (283)
Older movies (scenes) might have more limited definitions for stream and download:
Streaming: 240p, 480p.
Download: 240p, 480p.
Newer videos have multiple definitions available for streaming and download.
Steaming: 160p, 240p, 360p, 480p, 540p.
Download: 160p, 240p, 360p, 480p, 540p, 720p, 1080p.
I think that the Silvia Saint site is a fine addition to the netFameSolutions network. The
site has a large amount of hardcore DVD content, but the vibe of the site is different from the Devils Film, Rocco Siffredi, or Peter North sites. The site features a nice mix of male-female and lesbian videos, with and without toys.
The interview videos, titled "casting" videos, seem to offer a glimpsle of the models as
real people, not overly glamorized or putting on a fake show, but giving a realistic interview with some nudity thrown in, maybe some masturbation as well.
I enjoyed the site. Silvia Saint is a very attractive model, she seems to enjoy sex, is very open, and the site, although hardcore, just seems like a friendly place to visit.
It's hard to rate this site. A lot of the appeal depends on how much you like Silvia Saint. If you are fan of hers, obviously, the site would get a much higher score. If you don't think she's attractive (people can have widely differing tastes), then your personal score would be lower.
I'm giving the site a score of 88. But if you factor in the access to the tons of hardcore DVD material you get at other sites in the Fame network, you could bump the score to the low 90s.
Thanks for checking on Barbariska, slutty. There are so many models out there, and a few of them look so similar, that it's sometimes hard to tell them apart. But she is a really cute girl, who has appeared in hardcore in many sites, and she sure looked familiar. But like I say, some models can look very similar to other models, and the look on some models can change over time in just a few years.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.