Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : tcman (6)  

Feedback:   All (7)  |   Reviews (7)  |   Comments (0)  |   Replies (0)

Other:   Replies Received (2)  |   Trust Ratings (8)

All Activity A summary of all the feedback from this user.
Shown : 1-7 of 7  

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
Rating
1
Visit Met Art

Met Art
(1)

95.0
No Review.
01-28-07  05:18pm

Review
2
Visit Matt's Models

Matt's Models
(0)

92.0
Status: Was a member approx. 5 months prior to this review.
Pros: -Most of the models are very good looking.
-Over 700 models
-Large photo sets: approximately 100+ photos.
-Many behind the scenes and audition videos.
-Some compelling hardcore videos.
-Inexpensive: $14.95
Cons: -Many of the advertised amateurs are no longer amateurs.
-Most of the photos are only medium sized (711 x 1069).
-Not very many hardcore shoots/videos.
-The photo shoots are often low-budget (e.g., not lit very well). But, this can have its appeal as well.
Bottom Line: It’s actually very odd to describe Matt’s Models as an amateur site. This is because, many of the models are immediately recognizable as girls who have gone on to have great careers as nude models or pornstars. Do you recognize the names Courtney Simpson, Cytherea, Erica (Rose) Campbell, Jelena Jensen, Jesse Capelli, and Lela Star? If so, then gimme-five fellow porn fan! I can’t vouch for whether Matt was in fact the first to photograph these girls or not. But, either way the site has appeal as a source of early shoots for these ladies as well as many others. Personally, the photo sets of Adel Sharpe (Miller), and her mesmerizing hardcore b/g video were worth the cost of admission. In the end, I wouldn’t recommend this site as an amateur site. Rather I’d recommend it to people who like the low-fi look of amateur production, but also want to see gorgeous women normally found on professional sites.

01-28-07  06:07pm

Replies (0)
Review
3
Visit MC Nudes

MC Nudes
(2)

90.0
Status: Was a member approx. 6 months prior to this review.
Pros: -The photo sets are of a very high quality, with resolutions of up to 4000 pixels (although many are only 3000, or 2000 pixels)
-Good navigation with detailed search options.
-Some high-definition videos (1280 x 720 pixels)
-Some well known European glamour models like Anetta Keys (Aneta Šmrhová) and Markéta Belonohá.
Cons: -All of the shoots are softcore, but, not limited to Playboy angles ;)
-A relatively small collection (as of 6 months ago): approximately 20,000 pictures.
-Photo sets are relatively small: approximately 30 photos each.
Bottom Line: Most of the models are slender, European and 24 years of age or younger. If this is your taste then this site is a must. Personally, I was stunned by how gorgeous some of the girls presented here are. Despite the modest collection size, it will keep you busy for at least a month. So, as long as you aren't looking for hardcore only give it a look.

01-28-07  05:16pm

Replies (1)
Review
4
Visit Suze Randall

Suze Randall
(1)

87.0
Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros: -There are photo sets for many well known pornstars from both the past and present.
-There are lots of quality hardcore shoots.
-Recent photo sets are available in 1280 pixel resolution.
-Older sets are occasionally upgraded in quantity of photos and resolution.
Cons: -Only the most recent photo sets are zipped.
-Sets older than a few years are limited to a vertical resolution of 768 pixels.
-Navigation is only category based with no search capabilities.
-The photography is sometimes not particularly good; e.g., poorly framed, or generally lacking in creativity.
Bottom Line: I would recommend this site to anyone who is primarily interested in seeing pictures of well known pornstars, especially if interested in classic shoots of former stars like Chasey Lain, Lexus Locklear, and Ginger Lynn. For me, I enjoyed the convenience of downloading zip files of the more recent content. Having to rely on a downloading utility (GetRight) to pull down older sets was a bit tedious.

01-28-07  04:46pm

Replies (1)
Rating
5
Visit Dream Babes

Dream Babes
(0)

82.0
No Review.
01-28-07  05:22pm

Rating
6
Visit Sexy Babes

Sexy Babes
(0)

82.0
No Review.
01-28-07  05:19pm

Rating
7
Visit Euro Babes

Euro Babes
(0)

78.0
No Review.
01-28-07  05:22pm


Shown : 1-7 of 7  

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 1.36 seconds.