Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : Dorsai6 (0)  

Feedback:   All (25)  |   Reviews (3)  |   Comments (9)  |   Replies (13)

Other:   Replies Received (11)  |   Trust Ratings (5)

All Activity A summary of all the feedback from this user.
Shown : 1-25 of 25  

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
Reply
1
Visit FEMJOY

FEMJOY
(1)
Reply of elephant's Reply

My connection is a 25 Mb/sec fiber optic line. I test it regularly and generally see results in the 23-25 Mb/sec range. I'm using Safari 7.0.5 on a new Mac Pro running OSX 10.9.4. Downloads from other sites generally show speeds in the 2-5 MB/sec range which I find acceptable. On FemJoy the first GB of downloads in a day is in that range and then the rate starts dropping. This is the only site where I've seen this behavior. Some other sites will lock you out for a while if you exceed some limit. This site seems to gradually throttle down the speed. I've seen it go as low as 20 KB/sec. I'm in touch with their tech support, but no resolution yet.

I haven't tried to use FireFox till now. I just downloaded two photo zips with FireFox. FirFox doesn't report the download speed. Activity Monitor seems to be reporting speeds similar to Safari.


07-30-14  07:56am

Comment
2
Visit FEMJOY

FEMJOY
(1)

Download Throttling

I've been on the site for about a week. It seems that the more you download, the slower things get. Up to about 1.5 GB of photos I was seeing download speeds for 2-3 MB/sec. After that the speed begins to decrease. At about 3 GB of photos the speed is down to about 200 KB/sec. Beyond that its slower still. You must wait 1-2 days before the system resets. I've seen this cycle repeat 4 times now. The slowest speed I've seen is 100 KB/sec.

07-25-14  07:25am

Replies (2)
Reply
3
Visit FEMJOY

FEMJOY
(1)
Reply of lk2fireone's Reply

The slow response has gone away. The site seems to be working fine now.

07-16-14  06:12am

Reply
4
Visit FEMJOY

FEMJOY
(1)
Reply of lk2fireone's Comment

I just got this offer and rejoined. The site is really slow. Right now I'm trying to see the list of photo sets for May 2012 (month chosen at random) and after more than 5 minutes nothing has appeared.

I have a 20 MBS fiber optic internet connection and a new Mac Pro with the latest OSX and Safari. I'm frustrated. I'll post again if I get this resolved.


07-13-14  07:09am

Reply
5
Visit Playboy Plus

Playboy Plus
(2)
Reply of nostromo's Reply

I just ended a one-month membership with Playboy Plus. I was able to do this via their on-line chat service. An email confirmation was automatically sent to me.

05-23-14  12:26pm

Reply
6
Visit Playboy Plus

Playboy Plus
(2)
Reply of Dorsai6's Comment

Well its been another 10 months. There is more content, but it seems they are still moving old material. Some of the multi-model sets now identify the models image by image, but many do not. If you like Playboy as I do, this is a worthwhile site but I wish they'd get it finished and fully organized. Nearly all the videos are now 1080p.

05-23-14  12:20pm

Comment
7
Visit Restrained Elegance

Restrained Elegance
(0)

My Favorite Bondage Site

5 Years ago I posted a review without enough facts to satisfy people. I won't try that again. I've been visiting this site for about 8 years now. I join for a month every 5 months since I can't afford to be a member continuously. The site keeps getting better with more models and higher quality photos and videos.

At present there are about 6 months of new material on the site at any one time. That's about 110 photo sets and 25 videos.

After the first 6 months, set and videos are archived. Archived material is randomly made available for download at the rate of about 10 sets and 2 videos per week. The public archives contain about 200 photo sets and 50 videos at any one time. Like the new material, the public archive items remain available for about 6 months after they are posted. It is also possible to buy archived items individually even if they are not posted for normal download.

On the few occasions that I've had technical problems response has been quick and effective. The site owner often responds personally. This is a high class operation in every way.

I think the PornUsers review is an accurate description of this great site, but I'd give it a higher score.

05-09-14  12:15pm

Replies (0)
Reply
8
Visit Playboy Girls

Playboy Girls
(1)
Reply of ex1am's Comment

At present, they want to charge extra for Playboy Girls after you have joined Playboy Plus. The one-time fee is quite high for a "dead" site.

04-22-14  11:01am

Comment
9
Visit VirtuaGirl

VirtuaGirl
(0)

Unique, enjoyable but expensive

I've been a member for about 6 months now. The product is unique and enjoyable. As the reviewer noted it can easily get expensive.

The software is free. They make money by selling shows which they call cards. A card consists of 15-20 individual clips all of the same model in the same costume. Each clip is from 15 seconds to about 3 minutes in length. Some clips are fully clothed. Some clips are strip tease. Some start naked. Some have props like a dance pole. Typically, they will hire one model to create 5-6 cards during a 2-3 day recording session. They release about 5 new cards every week. Most cards are solo acts, but they have a few pairs.

There are a variety of ways to buy cards. A subscription will get you a random choice of cards each week, not simply the newest. This is the cheapest per card, but you have no choice. The most expensive way to get cards is to buy them at full price, $2 per. There is a middle ground. All cards eventually rotate through a demo area where you can sample some short fully clothed clips and buy the cards a half price. I've bought most of my cards through the demo route.

One of the other comments here was that customer service is nonexistent. That's not quite right, but it is not very responsive. However, the forum on the web site has very helpful moderators. Before you spend a lot of money, visit the forum and read some of the message threads. The web site also lists all the available models and shows so you can get a good idea of what's out there.

Over the years, they have improved the technical quality of the cards. The original cards were 480p of vertical resolution. These are now essentially obsolete, but some "best of" collections are still available as "classic" cards. The oldest regular cards are 720p. For the past 2 years all cards were recorded in 1080p. These start at about card 600. However, they were released at 720p. Since about card 900, all new cards have been released at both 720 and 1080. They are now reediting and rereleasing the cards between 600 and 900 in 1080p. They claim and the newest cards have been recorded at about 1600p and that they will be releasing 1600p versions of those cards real soon now.

Other than improving the resolution of the cards, they have been very slow to add new features. The web forum is full of requests and recommendations for improving the product, but very little seems to have been done over the 6 month's I've been present. However, as a software developer myself, I must admit that adding new functions and testing them is time consuming. It is clear to me that they have a very limiting software development staff.

The software essentially presents clips (not cards) in random order. It is possible to make playlists of selected cards to control what you see, but not much more. However, there is third-party software that will let you create multi-clip shows to more exactly suit your tastes.

04-19-14  09:03am

Replies (0)
Reply
10
Visit VirtuaGirl

VirtuaGirl
(0)
Reply of Drooler's Reply

Over the past 6 months, I've earned a variety of free credits and other upgrades. All have been delivered on time and as promised. I agree that tech support leaves a lot to be desired.

04-19-14  09:00am

Comment
11
Visit Mac and Bumble

Mac and Bumble
(0)

Dead Site?

Over 2 weeks on the site I've seen no updates. I sent a message to their support about some bad links and haven't received a reply.

I'm using Safari on a Mac and the interview videos are either duplicates of some of the regular videos or invalid links. The interview videos do not match the thumbnail images on the interview pages. I suspect someone did a sloppy job setting up the interview pages, but why haven't they fixed it?

It's been almost a month now and no updates. No replies to my support requests either. I'm about to drop my membership and it is unlikely I'll join this site again.

01-14-14  04:58am

Replies (0)
Comment
12
Visit Sydney Moon

Sydney Moon
(0)

Small photos, no zips

Sydney Moon is a fine looking woman. This site is not so good. The photos are small, from 500 X 763 to 687 X 1000. File size rarely exceeds 200 KB. The best sets are often found in higher resolution on other sites. Without zips you must download the images one-by-one. There are about 800 sets on the site. About half are Sydney. The rest are girlfriends.

01-12-14  01:52pm

Replies (0)
Reply
13
Visit Playboy Plus

Playboy Plus
(2)
Reply of Dorsai6's Comment

One day later -- It seems I was wrong about the old content. They seem to be still moving older material from CyberClub to Playboy Plus. It the past two days I've noticed about 20 sets added with much older posting dates. I've also been checking some of the videos. In some cases, about a dozen so far, I've noticed that they've posted a 1990's video that was originally a 320 X 240 QuickTime movie as a 1920 X 1080 MP4. However, the new version seems to be the same as the old with no better resolution, but a much larger file. I can understand their wanting to post the old sets, some of them are great, but the higher resolution just wastes disk space and bandwidth.

07-08-13  08:02pm

Reply
14
Visit Playboy Plus

Playboy Plus
(2)
Reply of Dorsai6's Comment

It's been about a year and I rejoined Playboy Plus. They've finished moving all the material from the CyberClub and there is a lot to see. I still have one major complaint. About 25% of their photo sets consist of solo shots of more than one model. About 25% of these identify the models in each image, but the rest leave you to guess who is who. In the CyberClub nearly all the photos were identified by model. Since most of the unidentified images came from the CyberClub, I guess they just don't care to expend the effort.

07-07-13  03:09pm

Reply
15
Visit MPL Studios

MPL Studios
(3)
Reply of Dorsai6's Reply

This is to update my previous comment. I was not locked out at 177 downloads. It seems they have occasional server interruptions that I thought was a lock-out. I've found that when I get a "Server Not Found" message, if I try again in a few minutes I'll get through. However, there is a 300 zip per day limit as stated in their terms of service and that is enforced.

05-23-13  03:07pm

Reply
16
Visit MPL Studios

MPL Studios
(3)
Reply of Horndog's Comment

The problem is still there. I joined yesterday. They say there is a daily limit of 300 zips or 20GB. I downloaded 177 zips (7GB) and found myself locked out. On the plus side many of the models are outstanding.

05-21-13  08:21am

Reply
17
Visit House Of Gord

House Of Gord
(0)
Reply of rearadmiral's Reply

There is a lot of content on the site. For the past two years nearly all the videos have been 1280 X 720. There are about 100 sets of that size. Most of these video sets have 2 or 3 parts. (See to full site review here.) From 2007 thru 2010 most of the sets were 640 X 480. Earlier sets are even smaller.

Overall, I suggest that you join the site for one month and judge for yourself. I think you'll find enough to make at least one month's membership worthwhile. The content if varied. I found some of the sets very attractive and others were, for me, of no interest at all.


12-29-12  10:02am

Comment
18
Visit House Of Gord

House Of Gord
(0)

Good, but

I visit this site about once a year and have visited for about 6 years. I'm mostly interested in still photos, not videos.

This is a very unusual site. The devices and their engineering are very impressive. The models are terrific. The bondage is imaginative. Now that they have merged with Naked Gord, they have a mix of both naked models and body suits. (I prefer skin.) They also have some very good comics.

I have two buts:

1. Still images generally run 100-200K in size. 5 years ago this was ok, but today I think 500K+ is a reasonable expectation. Image size is generally about 1200 pixels. Again more would be better.

2. The ziped photo sets are badly organized. Most of these sets tell a story, but many photos are out of order. If you want to view them is an organized sequence, you have to reorder them yourself and that takes a lot of time. Some sets have duplicates of the same image and some sets include images from other sets that don't belong.

12-10-12  06:25pm

Replies (3)
Comment
19
Visit Bondage Cafe

Bondage Cafe
(0)

Good but expensive

I have mixed feelings about this site. At present I visit it regularly, 5 times a year. This is often enough to download all their photo sets and that's my problem. They only post 30 days of photo sets so a 1-month membership gets me a tad more than 2 months of images. At their monthly rate of $19.95 this costs me $134.00 per year or an average of $.89 per set. That more than twice the cost of the next most expensive site I visit. This is the best tight bondage site I visit (my opinion) but at this price I'm considering dropping out. Now if you are mainly interested in videos, the situation is much better since they seem to retain about 4 months of videos at a time.

11-29-12  01:21pm

Replies (0)
Comment
20
Visit Playboy Plus

Playboy Plus
(2)

Under Construction

I've been a member of Cyber Club on and off for about 10 years. Playboy Plus is the intended replacement for Cyber Club which still exists, but has not added content since Feb 2012. Playboy Plus is still under development. Some of the search features don't seem to work. When finished I think this will be an easier site to navigate than the Cyber Club. At this time the only download videos are MP4's. Some of them are 1080P HD, but many are lower resolution and lower resolution than what was on the Cyber Club site. They also have not yet moved the centerfolds to this site. Sets with multiple models do not name the models by photo. Some zips (1% ?) are damaged and won't unzip.

08-08-12  05:08am

Replies (3)
Comment
21
Visit Jasmine Sinclair

Jasmine Sinclair
(0)

No longer blond

I think Jasmine is now a brunette. Still gorgeous.

07-29-11  06:17am

Replies (0)
Reply
22
Visit Restrained Elegance

Restrained Elegance
(0)
Reply of Cybertoad's Reply

I can understand your concern. I am a new member and I don't know how the rating scheme works in practice. However, the system notes indicated that the 90-99 range was for an excellent site. I've visited a number of sites whose rating here was in the mid-90's and I feel that this site is better. It's my opinion and you certainly don't have to trust it. I did post what I think are the most relevant data both plus and minus. That was the most information I was willing to take the time to assemble. If the review was inadequate, I hope the owners of this site will pull it. On the other hand, I think it does describe the site fairly well.

10-17-08  04:36pm

Review
23
Visit Restrained Elegance

Restrained Elegance
(0)

99.0
Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros: Daily updates
Attractive models
Excellent photography
Lots of sets with the same models
90+ days of current sets pus another 90 of archives
Cons: Mostly glamor bondage (I like that, but more variety would be better)
More models would be better
Bottom Line: The best around for this type of bondage. I've been rejoining for a month every quarter for about 3 years now. The site keeps getting better.

10-15-08  10:18am

Replies (3)
Review
24
Visit Laurie Wallace

Laurie Wallace
(0)

70.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Gorgeous full-figured blond
Variety of poses and genres
Cons: Mostly small images - less than 100 K each
Photo quality of some sets is poor
No information about update frequency
Bottom Line: Don't join. The best quality sets are available on other sites at higher resolution.

10-15-08  10:03am

Replies (0)
Review
25
Visit Absolute Adriana

Absolute Adriana
(0)

95.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Excellent photo quality
Med-Hi Resolution - 200-500 K per photo
Gorgeous long-haired blond with natural breasts
100+ sets with 80-100 photos each
Cons: No updates since April 2007
Most sets have the standard sequence of soft-core poses greater variety would have been a plus
Bottom Line: Join for one month, she's worth it unless you insist on artificially augmented boobs.

10-15-08  09:56am

Replies (0)

Shown : 1-25 of 25  

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.47 seconds.