Feedback History

Welcome GUEST! CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

Learn how you can participate in our weekly raffle for cash prizes!

Feedback History

A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.

User : Dorsai6 (0)

Feedback: All (9) | Reviews (3) | Comments (4) | Replies (2)

Other: Replies Received (4) | Trust Ratings (5)

All Activity

A summary of all the feedback from this user.

Shown : 1-9 of 9

Type

Site - Score

Feedback / Review

Date

Reply

1

House Of Gord (0)

Reply of rearadmiral's Reply

There is a lot of content on the site. For the past two years nearly all the videos have been 1280 X 720. There are about 100 sets of that size. Most of these video sets have 2 or 3 parts. (See to full site review here.) From 2007 thru 2010 most of the sets were 640 X 480. Earlier sets are even smaller.

Overall, I suggest that you join the site for one month and judge for yourself. I think you'll find enough to make at least one month's membership worthwhile. The content if varied. I found some of the sets very attractive and others were, for me, of no interest at all.

12-29-12 10:02am

Comment

2

House Of Gord (0)

Good, but

I visit this site about once a year and have visited for about 6 years. I'm mostly interested in still photos, not videos.

This is a very unusual site. The devices and their engineering are very impressive. The models are terrific. The bondage is imaginative. Now that they have merged with Naked Gord, they have a mix of both naked models and body suits. (I prefer skin.) They also have some very good comics.

I have two buts:

1. Still images generally run 100-200K in size. 5 years ago this was ok, but today I think 500K+ is a reasonable expectation. Image size is generally about 1200 pixels. Again more would be better.

2. The ziped photo sets are badly organized. Most of these sets tell a story, but many photos are out of order. If you want to view them is an organized sequence, you have to reorder them yourself and that takes a lot of time. Some sets have duplicates of the same image and some sets include images from other sets that don't belong.

12-10-12 06:25pm

Replies (3)

Comment

3

Bondage Cafe (0)

Good but expensive

I have mixed feelings about this site. At present I visit it regularly, 5 times a year. This is often enough to download all their photo sets and that's my problem. They only post 30 days of photo sets so a 1-month membership gets me a tad more than 2 months of images. At their monthly rate of $19.95 this costs me $134.00 per year or an average of $.89 per set. That more than twice the cost of the next most expensive site I visit. This is the best tight bondage site I visit (my opinion) but at this price I'm considering dropping out. Now if you are mainly interested in videos, the situation is much better since they seem to retain about 4 months of videos at a time.

11-29-12 01:21pm

Replies (0)

Comment

4

Playboy Plus (3)

Under Construction

I've been a member of Cyber Club on and off for about 10 years. Playboy Plus is the intended replacement for Cyber Club which still exists, but has not added content since Feb 2012. Playboy Plus is still under development. Some of the search features don't seem to work. When finished I think this will be an easier site to navigate than the Cyber Club. At this time the only download videos are MP4's. Some of them are 1080P HD, but many are lower resolution and lower resolution than what was on the Cyber Club site. They also have not yet moved the centerfolds to this site. Sets with multiple models do not name the models by photo. Some zips (1% ?) are damaged and won't unzip.

08-08-12 05:08am

Replies (0)

Comment

5

Jasmine Sinclair (0)

No longer blond

I think Jasmine is now a brunette. Still gorgeous.

07-29-11 06:17am

Replies (0)

Reply

6

Restrained Elegance (0)

Reply of Cybertoad's Reply

I can understand your concern. I am a new member and I don't know how the rating scheme works in practice. However, the system notes indicated that the 90-99 range was for an excellent site. I've visited a number of sites whose rating here was in the mid-90's and I feel that this site is better. It's my opinion and you certainly don't have to trust it. I did post what I think are the most relevant data both plus and minus. That was the most information I was willing to take the time to assemble. If the review was inadequate, I hope the owners of this site will pull it. On the other hand, I think it does describe the site fairly well.

10-17-08 04:36pm

Review

7

Restrained Elegance (0)

99.0

Status:	Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:	Daily updates Attractive models Excellent photography Lots of sets with the same models 90+ days of current sets pus another 90 of archives
Cons:	Mostly glamor bondage (I like that, but more variety would be better) More models would be better
Bottom Line:	The best around for this type of bondage. I've been rejoining for a month every quarter for about 3 years now. The site keeps getting better.

10-15-08 10:18am

Replies (3)

Review

8

Laurie Wallace (0)

70.0

Status:	Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:	Gorgeous full-figured blond Variety of poses and genres
Cons:	Mostly small images - less than 100 K each Photo quality of some sets is poor No information about update frequency
Bottom Line:	Don't join. The best quality sets are available on other sites at higher resolution.

10-15-08 10:03am

Replies (0)

Review

9

Absolute Adriana (0)

95.0

Status:	Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:	Excellent photo quality Med-Hi Resolution - 200-500 K per photo Gorgeous long-haired blond with natural breasts 100+ sets with 80-100 photos each
Cons:	No updates since April 2007 Most sets have the standard sequence of soft-core poses greater variety would have been a plus
Bottom Line:	Join for one month, she's worth it unless you insist on artificially augmented boobs.

10-15-08 09:56am

Replies (0)

Shown : 1-9 of 9

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.56 seconds.