Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : RagingBuddhist (63)  

Feedback:   All (872)  |   Reviews (30)  |   Comments (85)  |   Replies (757)

Other:   Replies Received (495)  |   Trust Ratings (64)

All Activity A summary of all the feedback from this user.
Shown : 51-75 of 875 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
Reply
51
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

8 if you count the ones actually in enclosures.
40 some if you count the bare drives that go into an eSATA dock.


06-18-13  01:43pm

Reply
52
Visit Met Art

Met Art
(4)
Reply of taken4granted's Comment

You can reach technical support without being a member. Try this link

06-16-13  11:18pm

Reply
53
Visit 21Sextury.com

21Sextury.com
(11)
Reply of Ed Freiland's Reply

Always nice to see the site take an interest in their customers' concerns. Thanks for chiming in, Ed!

06-14-13  03:18pm

Reply
54
Visit 21Sextury.com

21Sextury.com
(11)
Reply of Randyman's Comment

This is exactly the kind of thing that makes me email the site to question what's going on. And PU is a perfect place to post their response (or lack of one).

06-13-13  07:45pm

Reply
55
N/A Reply of lk2fireone's Poll

What gpl said

06-06-13  06:51pm

Reply
56
Visit I Dream Of Jo

I Dream Of Jo
(0)
Reply of thaavi's Reply

Ok - that's it - thaavi has made it clear that there's no longer any need to do reviews. TBP has all the information we need. Might as well shut PU down. On the plus side, we won't get 5 commercials for an obscure site in two days. I take that back - 4 commercials and one review.

06-03-13  07:19am

Reply
57
Visit I Dream Of Jo

I Dream Of Jo
(0)
Reply of messmer's Comment

Well, I'm the forever skeptic and, especially now that there's a fifth "review" up, I don't like what I see. Having someone associated with a site send their members to do reviews reeks of free advertising. And I doubt I'm the only one who's wondering if there's been any sort of compensation for putting up the high marks.

06-02-13  08:02pm

Reply
58
Visit I Dream Of Jo

I Dream Of Jo
(0)
Reply of thaavi's Reply

We're suspicious because you just confirmed the suspicions. Fine - it wasn't the mistress who sent you here, it was the site admin. I can't speak for anyone else, but I doubt I'm alone in thinking that there's something wrong with a site asking it's members to do reviews.

As far as the quality of the site goes, and like I mentioned to Elmien, try submitting a balanced review, consistent with the outline on this page and maybe you'll get a better reception from the people here.


06-01-13  08:21pm

Review
59
Visit Girls Out West

Girls Out West
(1)

60.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: + Lots of amateur content
+ Different file types available
+ Tabbed navigation
+ Pictures: 1026, 1280, 1600 pixels long side, Some available @ 2000
+ In browser flash video
+ Bonus material from Yanks and ATK Hairy
Cons: - File types are ridiculous to figure out
- File naming is another pain
- Split files in 2013?
- Minimal previews/ descriptions on videos
- Picture/video quality varies, often for the worse
- Site crashes while using Opera browser
- Not compatible with FreeDownloadManager
Bottom Line: I'll preface this by saying that this will be, without a doubt, the most disjointed bottom line I've ever written. I'm just going to call it, "Issues". Joining this site was a major disappointment and what follows might tell the story.

I will say that the speed issue I commented on was somewhat resolved. I still can't use FreeDownloadManager, but the "Save As" speed is up to 1.2 mb. Not great, but certainly better than the 200kb I saw in the beginning. Other than this being a strictly amateur site which I absolutely love, that pretty much ends the positives. Here we go...

Normally, I would go into detail about the various file types. GOW seems to go out of their way to make that confusing as hell. You get columns labeled mp4, mpg+wmv and wmv. Then, quite often, you face a cryptic list like this: Source MP4 1080p, Source MP4 720p, High (1024x576 @ 3200k), High (1024x576 @ 3200k), HD (1280x720 @ 4700k), HD (1280x720 @ 4700k), Low (512x288 @ 600K), Low (512x288 @ 600K). On top of that, there are sometimes 5 links that say the same exact thing (e.g. Medium (1920x1080 @ 1500K)) Seemingly duplicate links that link to different files? Same file with slightly different names? I have no clue. I'll just leave it as this - I tried to download only the highest resolution video and was frequently disappointed in the quality of even the newest scenes. Lighting quality, especially on the outdoor scenes was hit or miss.

File naming. Fine on pictures as the name of the model and the set are used. On video? Another nightmare. A lot of the B/G and G/G videos download using the couple's names with no mention of the scene/episode. So, even though a couple has done more than one video, each one has to be renamed so you can download the different videos.

Opened a solo girl video that showed it was the second of 3 parts. Went to the model index to get the other two parts and there were only two videos listed. WHERE'S THE THIRD? Guess I can browse the entire site to see if it's there.

Clicked on the thumbnail for part 3 of a video and the flash preview shows part 2

Picture sets showing up in the video section.

Thinking there might be a browser issue in how the site was displayed, I tried Opera. That kept crashing so I went back to Firefox.

It's pretty bad when the bonus sets are better quality than most of the host site's material - higher resolution and better lighting.

Preview thumbnails for several full length videos open to a page with no download links.

*********************
I actually got a headache trying to figure out how to write all of this, so I'm going to stop writing and just leave it at this - For such a well known site, it's a mess. If you really like amateurs, in all their non-glamorous glory, and don't mind digging for files and renaming almost every video, go for it. Otherwise, avoid this site.

06-01-13  12:41pm

Replies (1)
Reply
60
Visit I Dream Of Jo

I Dream Of Jo
(0)
Reply of Elmien's Reply

[And to get to the review posting guide lines....
I've never been good at following it...]

Very few of us have written the kind of review that's expected here when we first started writing them. It takes time and a little patience to get them together.

[How do you choose a certain amount of good qualities if there is so many?]

List them in order of importance until you hit the character limit.

[And the cons? What cons? I call it space to improve... Not cons...]

If there is room for improvement, that is, indeed, a con

[Sorry but by writing a review is not to follow guide line but to express your experience and knowledge of the site...]

That's where the balance factor comes in. We all write review to let people know about our experience with a site and there is quite naturally a bit of subjectivity in what we write. But, again, to rave about the webmistress without giving us any details about the rest of the site doesn't tell us anything about the total experience.


06-01-13  11:06am

Reply
61
Visit I Dream Of Jo

I Dream Of Jo
(0)
Reply of pat362's Reply

In my mind, one of two things is happening. Either the mistress is sending people here (which HAS happened in the past) or some members are talking amongst themselves and are telling people to come here to rave about the site. In either case, it doesn't help the site's standing here in the world of reviews.

06-01-13  10:56am

Comment
62
Visit I Dream Of Jo

I Dream Of Jo
(0)

Why?

Why does it always seem to be a "mistress site" that gets a flood of glowing reports from new PU members?

06-01-13  08:27am

Replies (17)
Reply
63
Visit I Dream Of Jo

I Dream Of Jo
(0)
Reply of Elmien's Reply

No, I'm not kidding you. Compare what you and thaavi have written against the majority of the reviews on here. Neither of you have included much of anything in the way of details but both of you have raved about the webmistress. That lacks the balance that we're looking for in reviews. It also doesn't help that two people have come in on the same day to give perfect and near-perfect scores for a relatively obscure site. The regulars here have seen this way too many times before and it's why the scores from new members to PornUsers aren't factored into the sites overall score.

I'll invite you to check out this page to see what reviews are supposed to contain, paying particular attention to #3.


05-31-13  11:45pm

Comment
64
Visit Girls Out West

Girls Out West
(1)

What download manager works here?

OK - I just joined the site and so far I am NOT happy. I've never had an issue with FreeDownloadManager on any site before and this 200kb average speed is busting my balls. I don't LIKE 2 1/2 hours to download a single HD scene. On top of that, the site just crashed Opera. I went to that because the signup didn't work on Firefox.

Not a good start!

05-31-13  07:07pm

Replies (0)
Reply
65
Visit I Dream Of Jo

I Dream Of Jo
(0)
Reply of marcdc1's Reply

No, I don't mean two reviews that look like commercials. They couldn't be that, could they?

05-31-13  06:44pm

Reply
66
Visit I Dream Of Jo

I Dream Of Jo
(0)
Reply of Elmien's Review

Here we go again. A relatively unknown site, a perfect and damn near perfect score back to back. Nothing coincidental about that...

05-31-13  03:47pm

Reply
67
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Anything natural that doesn't flop around like a bag of water?

05-26-13  03:46pm

Reply
68
N/A Reply of Drooler's Poll

In the rare instance that I do branch out and join a new site, thumbnails definitely help me make the decision. But to really nail it down, I like to see some technicals - number of pictures/videos, resolutions and update schedule.

05-26-13  03:45pm

Comment
69
Visit Anilos

Anilos
(0)

A 2 for 1 offer

Former members of either site - Check your email (including the spam folder) for a two for one offer. Anilos and AuntJudys $29.32 a month for both sites - with no limits on how long you can stay at that price.

05-25-13  01:18pm

Replies (0)
Reply
70
Visit Nude In SF

Nude In SF
(1)
Reply of rearadmiral's Review

Wow! I joined here 2-3 years ago and, going by your review, nothing much has changed - not even the amount of content (by much). If it's still a small site, something's really wrong.

04-29-13  09:43pm

Reply
71
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Figures... So far I'm the only one who says anything BUT high heels. No wonder they're in damn near every scene.

04-29-13  12:56pm

Reply
72
Visit Silvia Saint

Silvia Saint
(1)
Reply of lk2fireone's Review

Fantastic review, lk
I have to say I was surprised to see Silvia's name while scrolling through the reviews. I figured she'd be long gone from the screen by now. If she's still looking good, she's got to know something others in the industry don't. I've seen women looking worn out after only a few years in the biz.


04-28-13  07:10pm

Reply
73
N/A Reply of lk2fireone's Poll

Definitely site dependent.
I've had everything from quick responses with offers of subscription extensions, to being told every problem was my fault, to (of course) no response at all.


04-27-13  03:28pm

Reply
74
N/A Reply of Drooler's Poll

I have enough years behind me that a good number of the 20-somethings look too young to me. If a model looks really young, enough to make me question her legal status, I just check the 2257 declaration and I'm good with it. But that thought doesn't really cross my mind with major studios and websites.

04-25-13  06:00pm

Reply
75
N/A Reply of plan b's Poll

With all the rabid football fans in Baltimore, Maryland, I revived an old interest in the Washington Redskins - but it's really just to piss people off. I couldn't care less who wins or loses. I wear maroon and gold in the land of purple and black just to see the reactions of people who take the game WAY too seriously. The real sport I'm dedicated to is trying to land a spot on the Olympic Downloading Team.

04-24-13  02:16am


Shown : 51-75 of 875 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.31 seconds.