Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : RagingBuddhist (63)  

Feedback:   All (886)  |   Reviews (30)  |   Comments (88)  |   Replies (768)

Other:   Replies Received (501)  |   Trust Ratings (64)

All Activity A summary of all the feedback from this user.
Shown : 51-75 of 889 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
Reply
51
N/A Reply of Randyman's Reply

I didn't ask for that crap. Looks to me like you might want to do some more research on the subject rather than listen to your "expert".

07-22-13  11:48pm

Reply
52
N/A Reply of Randyman's Reply

OK - so I dated a freak. If you ever find yourself with someone pissing milk, I'd consult another doctor.

07-22-13  11:30pm

Reply
53
N/A Reply of Randyman's Reply

Yes, I've seen movies where women play off urinating as squirting. But I've also had the pleasure to have seen a squirter firsthand. The fluid is a different viscosity than urine and is slightly milky in color. And it didn't come from her urethra. If I have to be graphic about it, I knew it wasn't coming from her urethra because she was wide open at the time and I would have easily seen it.

Unfortunately, the only scene I can think of that shows what I saw is on a site I don't recommend joining. Venus on mature.nl lets loose several times.


07-22-13  10:51pm

Reply
54
N/A Reply of Randyman's Reply

http://www.askmen.com/dating/dzimmer/55_love_answers.html

07-22-13  07:34pm

Reply
55
N/A Reply of Randyman's Poll

As much as I love to watch porn, I'd still recommend therapy for anyone who goes 12+ hours a day on it.

07-20-13  02:52pm

Reply
56
Visit Pink Visual Pass

Pink Visual Pass
(0)
Reply of MargulisAZ's Comment

Joke is a major understatement.
Is there any mention of that policy in their terms of service?


07-17-13  11:19pm

Reply
57
N/A Reply of Colm4's Poll

It's 105 degrees out. If I want to see scantily clad women, all I have to do is drive to one of the tourist attractions around town. No $29.95 necessary.

07-17-13  02:35pm

Reply
58
N/A Reply of Colm4's Poll

No.

07-16-13  02:19pm

Reply
59
N/A Reply of Colm4's Poll

I think so - but not in the way most here are probably thinking.
http://s23.postimg.org/5by3vi1kr/Desktop_Pic.png


07-12-13  10:07pm

Reply
60
N/A Reply of Denner's Poll

By reading one of my reviews, of course :P

Seriously - I go for a user review before anything else.


06-30-13  12:13am

Comment
61
Visit Girls Out West

Girls Out West
(1)

No access

I haven't been able to access the site for over a day now so there's no way to contact the site to find out what's what. Hopefully they'll chime in here. All in all, a surprisngly disappointing experience...

06-29-13  09:40am

Replies (0)
Reply
62
N/A Reply of Drooler's Poll

Since I rarely allow a re-up, I usually cancel immediately after joining.

06-28-13  07:07pm

Comment
63
Visit Met Art Network

Met Art Network
(0)

It looks like a great deal, but...

Am I the only one who thinks you'd have to spend every waking hour surfing the network to get your money's worth? Sixty bucks is pretty steep, even for these top-notch sites.

06-28-13  07:04pm

Replies (2)
Reply
64
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I don't know about other types, I've seen some small advancements in the quality of red/cyan 3D in the last couple years. I wasn't looking to invest a lot of money on expensive equipment but did find a pair of red/cyan glasses at a local dollar store. I bought 'em "just in case" and have found the 3D effect fairly interesting.

06-26-13  02:29pm

Reply
65
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

8 if you count the ones actually in enclosures.
40 some if you count the bare drives that go into an eSATA dock.


06-18-13  01:43pm

Reply
66
Visit Met Art

Met Art
(3)
Reply of taken4granted's Comment

You can reach technical support without being a member. Try this link

06-16-13  11:18pm

Reply
67
Visit 21Sextury.com

21Sextury.com
(11)
Reply of Ed Freiland's Reply

Always nice to see the site take an interest in their customers' concerns. Thanks for chiming in, Ed!

06-14-13  03:18pm

Reply
68
Visit 21Sextury.com

21Sextury.com
(11)
Reply of Randyman's Comment

This is exactly the kind of thing that makes me email the site to question what's going on. And PU is a perfect place to post their response (or lack of one).

06-13-13  07:45pm

Reply
69
N/A Reply of lk2fireone's Poll

What gpl said

06-06-13  06:51pm

Reply
70
Visit I Dream Of Jo

I Dream Of Jo
(0)
Reply of thaavi's Reply

Ok - that's it - thaavi has made it clear that there's no longer any need to do reviews. TBP has all the information we need. Might as well shut PU down. On the plus side, we won't get 5 commercials for an obscure site in two days. I take that back - 4 commercials and one review.

06-03-13  07:19am

Reply
71
Visit I Dream Of Jo

I Dream Of Jo
(0)
Reply of messmer's Comment

Well, I'm the forever skeptic and, especially now that there's a fifth "review" up, I don't like what I see. Having someone associated with a site send their members to do reviews reeks of free advertising. And I doubt I'm the only one who's wondering if there's been any sort of compensation for putting up the high marks.

06-02-13  08:02pm

Reply
72
Visit I Dream Of Jo

I Dream Of Jo
(0)
Reply of thaavi's Reply

We're suspicious because you just confirmed the suspicions. Fine - it wasn't the mistress who sent you here, it was the site admin. I can't speak for anyone else, but I doubt I'm alone in thinking that there's something wrong with a site asking it's members to do reviews.

As far as the quality of the site goes, and like I mentioned to Elmien, try submitting a balanced review, consistent with the outline on this page and maybe you'll get a better reception from the people here.


06-01-13  08:21pm

Review
73
Visit Girls Out West

Girls Out West
(1)

60.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: + Lots of amateur content
+ Different file types available
+ Tabbed navigation
+ Pictures: 1026, 1280, 1600 pixels long side, Some available @ 2000
+ In browser flash video
+ Bonus material from Yanks and ATK Hairy
Cons: - File types are ridiculous to figure out
- File naming is another pain
- Split files in 2013?
- Minimal previews/ descriptions on videos
- Picture/video quality varies, often for the worse
- Site crashes while using Opera browser
- Not compatible with FreeDownloadManager
Bottom Line: I'll preface this by saying that this will be, without a doubt, the most disjointed bottom line I've ever written. I'm just going to call it, "Issues". Joining this site was a major disappointment and what follows might tell the story.

I will say that the speed issue I commented on was somewhat resolved. I still can't use FreeDownloadManager, but the "Save As" speed is up to 1.2 mb. Not great, but certainly better than the 200kb I saw in the beginning. Other than this being a strictly amateur site which I absolutely love, that pretty much ends the positives. Here we go...

Normally, I would go into detail about the various file types. GOW seems to go out of their way to make that confusing as hell. You get columns labeled mp4, mpg+wmv and wmv. Then, quite often, you face a cryptic list like this: Source MP4 1080p, Source MP4 720p, High (1024x576 @ 3200k), High (1024x576 @ 3200k), HD (1280x720 @ 4700k), HD (1280x720 @ 4700k), Low (512x288 @ 600K), Low (512x288 @ 600K). On top of that, there are sometimes 5 links that say the same exact thing (e.g. Medium (1920x1080 @ 1500K)) Seemingly duplicate links that link to different files? Same file with slightly different names? I have no clue. I'll just leave it as this - I tried to download only the highest resolution video and was frequently disappointed in the quality of even the newest scenes. Lighting quality, especially on the outdoor scenes was hit or miss.

File naming. Fine on pictures as the name of the model and the set are used. On video? Another nightmare. A lot of the B/G and G/G videos download using the couple's names with no mention of the scene/episode. So, even though a couple has done more than one video, each one has to be renamed so you can download the different videos.

Opened a solo girl video that showed it was the second of 3 parts. Went to the model index to get the other two parts and there were only two videos listed. WHERE'S THE THIRD? Guess I can browse the entire site to see if it's there.

Clicked on the thumbnail for part 3 of a video and the flash preview shows part 2

Picture sets showing up in the video section.

Thinking there might be a browser issue in how the site was displayed, I tried Opera. That kept crashing so I went back to Firefox.

It's pretty bad when the bonus sets are better quality than most of the host site's material - higher resolution and better lighting.

Preview thumbnails for several full length videos open to a page with no download links.

*********************
I actually got a headache trying to figure out how to write all of this, so I'm going to stop writing and just leave it at this - For such a well known site, it's a mess. If you really like amateurs, in all their non-glamorous glory, and don't mind digging for files and renaming almost every video, go for it. Otherwise, avoid this site.

06-01-13  12:41pm

Replies (1)
Reply
74
Visit I Dream Of Jo

I Dream Of Jo
(0)
Reply of Elmien's Reply

[And to get to the review posting guide lines....
I've never been good at following it...]

Very few of us have written the kind of review that's expected here when we first started writing them. It takes time and a little patience to get them together.

[How do you choose a certain amount of good qualities if there is so many?]

List them in order of importance until you hit the character limit.

[And the cons? What cons? I call it space to improve... Not cons...]

If there is room for improvement, that is, indeed, a con

[Sorry but by writing a review is not to follow guide line but to express your experience and knowledge of the site...]

That's where the balance factor comes in. We all write review to let people know about our experience with a site and there is quite naturally a bit of subjectivity in what we write. But, again, to rave about the webmistress without giving us any details about the rest of the site doesn't tell us anything about the total experience.


06-01-13  11:06am

Reply
75
Visit I Dream Of Jo

I Dream Of Jo
(0)
Reply of pat362's Reply

In my mind, one of two things is happening. Either the mistress is sending people here (which HAS happened in the past) or some members are talking amongst themselves and are telling people to come here to rave about the site. In either case, it doesn't help the site's standing here in the world of reviews.

06-01-13  10:56am


Shown : 51-75 of 889 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.59 seconds.