Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : RagingBuddhist (65)  

Feedback:   All (908)  |   Reviews (31)  |   Comments (96)  |   Replies (781)

Other:   Replies Received (514)  |   Trust Ratings (61)

All Activity A summary of all the feedback from this user.
Shown : 1-25 of 911 Page :    Next Page >

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
Comment
1
Visit Candy Girl Video

Candy Girl Video
(0)

Quick wrap up

At $20 a month, the price is right and the 1920 x 1080 video looks good. But that about the best news here. There's a real 1999 look to the site. One simple thumbnail preview for each video superimposed on a candy wrapper with a sometimes hard to read font. The pictures are nothing but screen caps with a large watermark added. Nothing is dated and there doesn't seem to be any kind of update schedule. The files download with an abbreviated file name which made for tedious renaming as I downloaded each file. On top of all of that, there's music over the majority of the videos (as in no live sound) and some of the latest videos reverted back to 720 x 480 resolution.

I like solo girl content so I wouldn't call this my worst signup, but it certainly doesn't rank high on my list. With an updated layout and regular updates, this would be a much better site.

08-08-15  07:35pm

Replies (0)
Reply
2
Visit G Queen

G Queen
(0)
Reply of smegma11's Review

On the Download button, right click and "Save As", or "Save Target As" (depending on your browser). If it still doesn't work, try another browser.

08-08-15  07:09pm

Reply
3
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

A timely poll for me as I just asked about Czech Casting. The site's been on the back burner here forever, waiting for the day they offer zip files. I'd love to join - but I'm not right clicking on thousands of pictures. The only thing I can think of as to why they don't offer zips is to conserve bandwidth. In my mind there's got to be plenty of people like myself, holding out for easier downloading. I think they'd get more signups.

07-09-15  03:28pm

Comment
4
Visit Czech Casting

Czech Casting
(1)

Still no zip files?

Can anyone verify this? I can't imagine a site with so many pictures wouldn't offer them.

07-04-15  07:49am

Replies (0)
Reply
5
Visit Met Art

Met Art
(1)
Reply of lk2fireone's Reply

I'm basically a video person myself. But, every once in a while I'll join a picture site just for a change of pace. I agree - the videos here aren't all that.

I have a 42" LCD television as my main monitor but I'm well aware that the resolution isn't as good as an actual computer monitor. But I also have a 27" monitor and the problem, as I see it anyway, still shows up. No, not so much when I'm viewing a whole picture on either screen, but when I zoom in a bit, there are the distortions.


07-03-15  12:13am

Comment
6
Visit Met Art

Met Art
(1)

Not impressed

I could go ahead and write a review that goes over what everyone else says about the site... tons of content, lots of pretty women, etc. But the one thing that stands out as I go through the hundreds and hundreds of models is how many pictures look blurry, upscaled (as in pixelated) or otherwise distorted. I'm only interested in downloading the highest resolution pictures and it really amazes me just how many aren't worth saving. I tried to nail it down to particular photographers or shoot settings where the problem shows up but there's nothing constant to nail it down - it's just throughout the site. Touting how many megapixels your pictures are doesn't mean much to me unless they're clean and clear.

Don't get me wrong - there's still a lot of great content here. But, at the same time, it'll be a long time before I re-up here, if ever.

07-02-15  07:02pm

Replies (6)
Comment
7
Visit Casting Couch X

Casting Couch X
(1)

Upsells and spam

Damn... even the login page asks if you want to buy into their network of sites. $69.95 for access to all their sites. Funny that this supposedly 24-hour sale for their members has been going on for the entire week I've been signed up.

Next, every video you look at has a list of every video that model has done on sites you don't have access to. "BUY ME! BUY ME!"

And what a coincidence it is that, ever since I signed up, my email is suddenly filled with spam - all with similar subject lines.

Yeah - we all know porn is a business. Does it really have to include bullshit like this?

03-20-15  10:49pm

Replies (0)
Reply
8
Visit Lady Sonia

Lady Sonia
(1)
Reply of LPee23's Comment

"I am not interested in ANY explicit content at all myself..."

Yeah, we all know it's a business, but getting it thrown in your face like that... nice.


02-07-15  04:51pm

Reply
9
N/A Reply of pornwatcher's Poll

If the blowjob is going to end with the stupid facial, I'd much prefer to see the guy going down on her. I also don't like blowjob scenes where the girl is constantly looking at the camera and/or moaning like SHE'S getting off on it.

02-02-15  11:35am

Reply
10
Visit Club Seventeen

Club Seventeen
(1)
Reply of CaloNord's Comment

Good job, CaloNord! Love it when people call out issues like this. The problem with that is, the majority of the sites pulling this kind of crap give less than a damn and only worry about getting more signups. When I see an issue that I think needs attention, I'll send an (uncharacteristically polite) email directly to the webmaster. If that gets no response, I then invite them to reply to the comments here on PU. If it goes that far, and they still don't care to address the issue, it just means they really don't give a shit. Then it's just a nice red flag for PU members to avoid that site. Their loss.

01-22-15  11:15am

Comment
11
Visit I Feel Myself

I Feel Myself
(0)

The love/hate relationship continues

Yep - I'm back on the site and wondering what's going on with the download speeds and the use of download managers. Just tried to download a video using the same manager I've always used and it quickly ended, giving me a 52 k/b file. And the browser speed is horrendous, running from around 75 to 100 kb/s. Nothing like seeing 1 hour, 10 minutes to finish a 300 meg file...

Anyone else been here recently or currently who can relate their experience with downloads?

On the plus side (sort of), I saw a reference to their making changes in the lighting on some videos and I look forward to seeing what that's all about. Just wish it wasn't taking ages to see what that's all about. First file to be finished in 47 minutes...


***UPDATE 1-16-15***
And today, 10 meg speed. Took seconds to download a 315 meg file. Not sure what was up last night. I've seen a site have some variation in server speed from day to day, but nothing this radical.

***UPDATE 1-23-15***
Constant 75-150 kb/s speed. Been mostly slow all week, with very few spikes of real speed. I'm getting way better speeds using a flash recorder on YouTube. It's ridiculous spending money for this.

01-15-15  05:49pm

Replies (0)
Comment
12
Visit FEMJOY

FEMJOY
(1)

Free but not?

Curious if anyone else has seen an email offer for a free month of either Femjoy or Nubiles. I clicked to check it out and I see no option for a free signup - all I get is the usual selection of memberships and request for credit card info.

12-23-14  12:07pm

Replies (4)
Reply
13
Visit Net Video Girls

Net Video Girls
(0)
Reply of rearadmiral's Reply

That definitely helps, ra. Appreciate the long response. I was asking about this site because I've got free access to it as a bonus from Back Room Casting. But, as a bonus site, there are only tiny thumbnails and a flash video for each model. There are no details beyond that - no mention of file sizes or file type or anything. It turns out they're all mp4 of various bit rates and dimensions, some of which are pretty low quality. I was hoping the full access site was at least a little better detailed. From what you told me, it seems to be somewhat better, but not by much. Despite that, it looks like I'll be checking it out of these days... Thanks again for the reply.

10-28-14  09:43am

Comment
14
Visit Net Video Girls

Net Video Girls
(0)

Anybody since 2011?

Curious if anybody's been on this site since the last comments/reviews. I see on their signup page that they've remastered old videos but would like to get some member input on what's what before I consider jumping in.

10-23-14  09:51pm

Replies (3)
Review
15
Visit Busty Brits

Busty Brits
(1)

65.0
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: + 130 models
+ Excellent download speeds - average 3.5+ mb/s without a download manager
+ Lower than usual cost to join
+ Streaming previews for video
+ Zip files for newer picture sets
Cons: - 1990s layout
- split updates
- No search engine
- Some video quality really poor
- Lackluster and repetitive picture sets
- No set update schedule
- Only one file type for video - wmv
- Links that open to no content
Bottom Line: I know this site's been around for years so I knew I'd be looking at a lot of old video and pictures. The earliest content appears to date back to 2003 and I can't say I remember some of the video and picture quality being that bad back then. The newest video is a typical 1280 x 720 @ 4000+ kbps, well-lit, and look pretty good. But the older stuff is 640 x 480 @ 700+ kbps - those specs are somewhat deceiving because a lot of the old files are dim and blurry. Picture quality? The biggest are 1500 pixels on the long side. Meh. Going back in time gives you a not unexpected drop in size. And I've never been a fan of picture sets that contain portions that look like they were shot with a rapid fire shutter. Six, seven or more shots of a crotch that look like the model moved maybe an inch? WHY?

"What? No search function?"
"Split updates in this day and age?"
I think I actually said that out loud to myself when I first started running through the site. No excuse for that in 2014. There's also no excuse for links that open to blank and/or incomplete picture sets. I hit at least a dozen.

The content here really didn't do much for me. Some of the women are only busty because they're seriously overweight, some aren't all that well endowed and some (only a few that I saw) are siliconed. When I first joined, I jumped around the site a bit, ignoring the 1990 look to it, and downloaded maybe two dozen videos and a few dozen pictures, then I all but forgot about it until I got the email today that said my subscription was ending. Anyway, I went back, hit all the models' thumbs to see what else I might want and ended up with just under 100 videos and a few hundreds pics. Unfortunately, I can see me deleting a lot of files later as I really check 'em out. I also see that I'm going to have to break out the video editor to try to fix some color and lighting issues, even on some of the newer video.

I'm giving this site a 65 only because they're mostly true to their niche and because it's relatively cheap to join. All in all I see it as just another site that's probably best left as a one-time join for lovers o' the bigguns.

10-07-14  08:22pm

Replies (0)
Reply
16
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Very timely. Just joined Busty Brits. Even at $20, I'm not real happy with the 1990 feel to the site. A single small thumbnail preview for videos, no search function... Not a good purchase.

09-09-14  01:16am

Reply
17
Visit Euro Pornstars

Euro Pornstars
(0)
Reply of jook's Comment

Jook - This is what's known as "taking one for the team". I think everybody's joined a clunker at least once and that's where PU comes into play. You've already commented on your experience, now it might be good to actually review it to help warn other "victims" about what they might expect.

09-02-14  07:38pm

Reply
18
Visit Matt's Models

Matt's Models
(0)
Reply of anyonebutme's Reply

Gee... thanks for clarifying that for me.

08-26-14  02:13am

Reply
19
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Czech Casting immediately comes to mind. Their lack of zip files for their thousands of pictures is the only thing keeping me from joining the site.

08-24-14  01:15pm

Comment
20
Visit Matt's Models

Matt's Models
(0)

Well here's a first

I was going back over the list of my old reviews to see what was what with some old sites I'd signed up for. The old timers on here might remember the "exchange" I had with good ol' Matt so it wouldn't surprise them that I was chuckling a bit before I even clicked on the link for this one.

NO MONTHLY SIGNUPS? Is he serious? $49 for six months is the minimum. That's a money grab I've never seen before.

Disgusting.

08-20-14  08:15pm

Replies (2)
Reply
21
N/A Reply of Monahan's Poll

The only times I can remember that I've had access
blocked have been when I've gone over hidden bandwidth caps.


08-12-14  11:36pm

Reply
22
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Yes. But I'm decidedly biased on the subject.

08-08-14  01:16pm

Comment
23
Visit Creampie Angels

Creampie Angels
(0)

Why bother?

The action is hot, the creampies are not. Why bother advertising creampies when they're so blatantly fake? As much as I hate the pull-out-to-hurry-up-and-cum-on-her-face routine, this site would have been better off doing just that, using a different name.

07-19-14  11:28am

Replies (0)
Reply
24
N/A Reply of Drooler's Poll

Forgot to add:
Leave topiary art to trees and bushes other than pubic.


07-15-14  03:44pm

Reply
25
N/A Reply of Drooler's Poll

The proper term is, "stupid looking".

07-15-14  12:38pm


Shown : 1-25 of 911 Page :    Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 3 seconds.