Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : RagingBuddhist (65)  

Feedback:   All (901)  |   Reviews (31)  |   Comments (92)  |   Replies (778)

Other:   Replies Received (509)  |   Trust Ratings (61)

All Activity A summary of all the feedback from this user.
Shown : 1-25 of 904 Page :    Next Page >

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
Reply
1
Visit Lady Sonia

Lady Sonia
(1)
Reply of LPee23's Comment

"I am not interested in ANY explicit content at all myself..."

Yeah, we all know it's a business, but getting it thrown in your face like that... nice.


02-07-15  04:51pm

Reply
2
N/A Reply of pornwatcher's Poll

If the blowjob is going to end with the stupid facial, I'd much prefer to see the guy going down on her. I also don't like blowjob scenes where the girl is constantly looking at the camera and/or moaning like SHE'S getting off on it.

02-02-15  11:35am

Reply
3
Visit Club Seventeen

Club Seventeen
(1)
Reply of CaloNord's Comment

Good job, CaloNord! Love it when people call out issues like this. The problem with that is, the majority of the sites pulling this kind of crap give less than a damn and only worry about getting more signups. When I see an issue that I think needs attention, I'll send an (uncharacteristically polite) email directly to the webmaster. If that gets no response, I then invite them to reply to the comments here on PU. If it goes that far, and they still don't care to address the issue, it just means they really don't give a shit. Then it's just a nice red flag for PU members to avoid that site. Their loss.

01-22-15  11:15am

Comment
4
Visit I Feel Myself

I Feel Myself
(0)

The love/hate relationship continues

Yep - I'm back on the site and wondering what's going on with the download speeds and the use of download managers. Just tried to download a video using the same manager I've always used and it quickly ended, giving me a 52 k/b file. And the browser speed is horrendous, running from around 75 to 100 kb/s. Nothing like seeing 1 hour, 10 minutes to finish a 300 meg file...

Anyone else been here recently or currently who can relate their experience with downloads?

On the plus side (sort of), I saw a reference to their making changes in the lighting on some videos and I look forward to seeing what that's all about. Just wish it wasn't taking ages to see what that's all about. First file to be finished in 47 minutes...


***UPDATE 1-16-15***
And today, 10 meg speed. Took seconds to download a 315 meg file. Not sure what was up last night. I've seen a site have some variation in server speed from day to day, but nothing this radical.

***UPDATE 1-23-15***
Constant 75-150 kb/s speed. Been mostly slow all week, with very few spikes of real speed. I'm getting way better speeds using a flash recorder on YouTube. It's ridiculous spending money for this.

01-15-15  05:49pm

Replies (0)
Comment
5
Visit FEMJOY

FEMJOY
(1)

Free but not?

Curious if anyone else has seen an email offer for a free month of either Femjoy or Nubiles. I clicked to check it out and I see no option for a free signup - all I get is the usual selection of memberships and request for credit card info.

12-23-14  12:07pm

Replies (4)
Reply
6
Visit Net Video Girls

Net Video Girls
(0)
Reply of rearadmiral's Reply

That definitely helps, ra. Appreciate the long response. I was asking about this site because I've got free access to it as a bonus from Back Room Casting. But, as a bonus site, there are only tiny thumbnails and a flash video for each model. There are no details beyond that - no mention of file sizes or file type or anything. It turns out they're all mp4 of various bit rates and dimensions, some of which are pretty low quality. I was hoping the full access site was at least a little better detailed. From what you told me, it seems to be somewhat better, but not by much. Despite that, it looks like I'll be checking it out of these days... Thanks again for the reply.

10-28-14  09:43am

Comment
7
Visit Net Video Girls

Net Video Girls
(0)

Anybody since 2011?

Curious if anybody's been on this site since the last comments/reviews. I see on their signup page that they've remastered old videos but would like to get some member input on what's what before I consider jumping in.

10-23-14  09:51pm

Replies (3)
Review
8
Visit Busty Brits

Busty Brits
(1)

65.0
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: + 130 models
+ Excellent download speeds - average 3.5+ mb/s without a download manager
+ Lower than usual cost to join
+ Streaming previews for video
+ Zip files for newer picture sets
Cons: - 1990s layout
- split updates
- No search engine
- Some video quality really poor
- Lackluster and repetitive picture sets
- No set update schedule
- Only one file type for video - wmv
- Links that open to no content
Bottom Line: I know this site's been around for years so I knew I'd be looking at a lot of old video and pictures. The earliest content appears to date back to 2003 and I can't say I remember some of the video and picture quality being that bad back then. The newest video is a typical 1280 x 720 @ 4000+ kbps, well-lit, and look pretty good. But the older stuff is 640 x 480 @ 700+ kbps - those specs are somewhat deceiving because a lot of the old files are dim and blurry. Picture quality? The biggest are 1500 pixels on the long side. Meh. Going back in time gives you a not unexpected drop in size. And I've never been a fan of picture sets that contain portions that look like they were shot with a rapid fire shutter. Six, seven or more shots of a crotch that look like the model moved maybe an inch? WHY?

"What? No search function?"
"Split updates in this day and age?"
I think I actually said that out loud to myself when I first started running through the site. No excuse for that in 2014. There's also no excuse for links that open to blank and/or incomplete picture sets. I hit at least a dozen.

The content here really didn't do much for me. Some of the women are only busty because they're seriously overweight, some aren't all that well endowed and some (only a few that I saw) are siliconed. When I first joined, I jumped around the site a bit, ignoring the 1990 look to it, and downloaded maybe two dozen videos and a few dozen pictures, then I all but forgot about it until I got the email today that said my subscription was ending. Anyway, I went back, hit all the models' thumbs to see what else I might want and ended up with just under 100 videos and a few hundreds pics. Unfortunately, I can see me deleting a lot of files later as I really check 'em out. I also see that I'm going to have to break out the video editor to try to fix some color and lighting issues, even on some of the newer video.

I'm giving this site a 65 only because they're mostly true to their niche and because it's relatively cheap to join. All in all I see it as just another site that's probably best left as a one-time join for lovers o' the bigguns.

10-07-14  08:22pm

Replies (0)
Reply
9
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Very timely. Just joined Busty Brits. Even at $20, I'm not real happy with the 1990 feel to the site. A single small thumbnail preview for videos, no search function... Not a good purchase.

09-09-14  01:16am

Reply
10
Visit Euro Pornstars

Euro Pornstars
(0)
Reply of jook's Comment

Jook - This is what's known as "taking one for the team". I think everybody's joined a clunker at least once and that's where PU comes into play. You've already commented on your experience, now it might be good to actually review it to help warn other "victims" about what they might expect.

09-02-14  07:38pm

Reply
11
Visit Matt's Models

Matt's Models
(0)
Reply of anyonebutme's Reply

Gee... thanks for clarifying that for me.

08-26-14  02:13am

Reply
12
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Czech Casting immediately comes to mind. Their lack of zip files for their thousands of pictures is the only thing keeping me from joining the site.

08-24-14  01:15pm

Comment
13
Visit Matt's Models

Matt's Models
(0)

Well here's a first

I was going back over the list of my old reviews to see what was what with some old sites I'd signed up for. The old timers on here might remember the "exchange" I had with good ol' Matt so it wouldn't surprise them that I was chuckling a bit before I even clicked on the link for this one.

NO MONTHLY SIGNUPS? Is he serious? $49 for six months is the minimum. That's a money grab I've never seen before.

Disgusting.

08-20-14  08:15pm

Replies (2)
Reply
14
N/A Reply of Monahan's Poll

The only times I can remember that I've had access
blocked have been when I've gone over hidden bandwidth caps.


08-12-14  11:36pm

Reply
15
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Yes. But I'm decidedly biased on the subject.

08-08-14  01:16pm

Comment
16
Visit Creampie Angels

Creampie Angels
(0)

Why bother?

The action is hot, the creampies are not. Why bother advertising creampies when they're so blatantly fake? As much as I hate the pull-out-to-hurry-up-and-cum-on-her-face routine, this site would have been better off doing just that, using a different name.

07-19-14  11:28am

Replies (0)
Reply
17
N/A Reply of Drooler's Poll

Forgot to add:
Leave topiary art to trees and bushes other than pubic.


07-15-14  03:44pm

Reply
18
N/A Reply of Drooler's Poll

The proper term is, "stupid looking".

07-15-14  12:38pm

Reply
19
N/A Reply of Drooler's Poll

I think another way to put it is, do your older, low resolution videos look crappier on larger screens? And, what do you do with those files?

As much as I now go for the highest resolution files I can find, I come from what I like to call the VHS era. The resolutions weren't great back in the day but they were definitely watchable. I guess that's carried through to today for me. I've deleted very few videos over the years due to poor resolution. When I do play an early video and it doesn't look good full screen, I drop the player size 'til it looks decent enough to watch.


07-03-14  04:51pm

Reply
20
Visit Overdeveloped Amateurs

Overdeveloped Amateurs
(0)
Reply of nomas23's Review

I can see that absolutely nothing has changed here. You didn't mention it, but I can easily figure that those broken up videos are still in 1990 style resolution to go along with the 1990 website design.

That strange link you saw was another money grab from this greedy little site. Last I recall, you have to pay for each month of the archives you want to see.


06-21-14  05:46pm

Reply
21
Visit Haze Her

Haze Her
(1)
Reply of littlejoe's Reply

Definitely going to try that. Thanks!

05-31-14  10:10pm

Reply
22
Visit Haze Her

Haze Her
(1)
Reply of rearadmiral's Reply

I'm almost sorry you told me those were Bang Bros sites. I really wanted to check both of 'em out, but I refuse to deal with those crooks. Thanks for the heads up!

05-21-14  06:19pm

Reply
23
Visit Haze Her

Haze Her
(1)
Reply of RagingBuddhist's Comment

Hey Khan - Do you guys ever contact sites to point them to comments here? Like I said above, I wrote to these people and they never responded. Not a great first impression and maybe a harbinger of problems to come if I signed up, but I'm really curious about this lack of encryption.

05-21-14  02:59pm

Comment
24
Visit Haze Her

Haze Her
(1)

Same company that owns Dancing Bear

Stumbled onto this site and saw the same general layout as Dancing Bear. Clicked on the join link and - whaddaya know? No encryption. Do people really sign up for sites like this? It's risky enough putting in credit card information when there IS some security. My email to the company about the Dancing Bear site went unanswered, didn't bother with it again. It's a damn shame they have so much money that they don't need mine.

05-20-14  07:55pm

Replies (7)
Reply
25
Visit We Are Hairy

We Are Hairy
(1)
Reply of clark kent's Comment

I just noticed the price hike, too. Definitely a deal breaker!

05-17-14  07:43pm


Shown : 1-25 of 904 Page :    Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 1.02 seconds.