Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : mudman (36)  

Feedback:   All (40)  |   Reviews (29)  |   Comments (0)  |   Replies (11)

Other:   Replies Received (17)  |   Trust Ratings (18)

All Activity A summary of all the feedback from this user.
Shown : 1-25 of 40 Page :    Next Page >

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
Review
1
Visit 8 Teenies

8 Teenies
(0)

76.0
Status: Was a member approx. 5 months prior to this review.
Pros: -Cute girls.
Cons: -Ordinary shoots.
-Ordinary site lay-out.
Bottom Line: The truth is, though I have a record of my having been a member, I remember little more than how blah and ordinary this site was. There's nothing from this site I kept, no fondness nor revulsion. It's a commercial site done for somebody, not you, to make money, without any heart or soul and not capable of offering anything memorable.

Spend you money on Nubiles or ATK or Infocus or TeenDreams. There are a lot of better choices out there.

03-21-07  10:46am

Replies (0)
Reply
2
Visit abbywinters

abbywinters
(0)
Reply of roseman's Reply

Roseman

Not going to get into any details here. If you read my reply to qualsite, I think you'll see that I covered what you're saying. These 100's just bug me.

Mudman


03-15-07  05:29am

Reply
3
Visit abbywinters

abbywinters
(0)
Reply of qualsite34's Reply

Please don't think I was just picking on you. These 100's have been bothering me for a while and yesterday was my day to snap on it.

Unless you can measure it with some sort of ruler, when isn't it subjective.

Anyway, I agree, Abby Winters is the benchmark, standard bearer, leader of the pack, for amateur sites and I'd go further and included commercial sites as well. There's not a better site out there considering all things. They do some much brilliantly, but they're not perfect. You said as much in your reply and gave Abby a 100. To me it's a 98.

Perhaps the real issue is this cancer of grading on a curve. Sure made a lot of parents and teachers happy, but it is to education what the Ford Mustangs of the late seventies are to the Mustang line and cars in general. An ill conceived inflation of a good idea.

So forgive me, but I just couldn't take it any more.

Mudman


03-15-07  05:25am

Reply
4
Visit abbywinters

abbywinters
(0)
Reply of qualsite34's Review

100% Give me a break.

I've been a member off and on and on again for years. True, Abby's one of the very best out there, if not the best, but 100 %? I just can't agree with any 100 % for any site. Sorry


03-14-07  08:12am

Reply
5
Visit abbywinters

abbywinters
(0)
Reply of abbywinters's Reply

Dear Abby:

I'm with ya on the break ups. I have DSL and I'm fine with it. What really would have me complaining, is downloading something 2 or three times bigger and finding it to be something I really don't care about.

I also like the letterbox videos and the quality. You offer some of the best .mpgs out there.

You've remained a benchmark for sites everywhere.


03-14-07  08:08am

Review
6
Visit abbywinters

abbywinters
(0)

93.0
Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros: -Quality photography. Large and in focus. To mention this with AbbyWinter is likely an insult to the site itself, but the fact remains that precious few of its competitors have found the camera's focus.
-Interesting and real videos.
-If you want genuine, then that's what you get here.
Cons: -Just a model a day, and if lucky, they might come back again in a couple months, but only once.
-the artist photographer runs amok from time to time. Love the light and dark, but helps to see what you're looking at.
-majority of the girls are from Australia of all places...okay, so that's not really a complaint, but it's true.
Bottom Line: -AbbyWinters is a fine site that spans both the erotic fine art site and general female porn site. You get high quality photos and excellent videos. All that is portrayed is genuine. For the uninitiated that means they really are doing what they do.
-Precious few sites, if any, measure up to AbbyWinters in being real and really good. It just would be nice, if after all these years, they could expand to more than one model a day.

01-23-07  03:57pm

Replies (0)
Review
7
Visit All Over 30

All Over 30
(1)

92.0
Status: Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros: -Generally excellent photography and getting better.
-Most importantly, models are featured as attractive mature women and not walking and talking social dregs.
-Wide range of models 30 years and older: black/white, large/small, mostly naturally endowed and genuinely pleased to be modeling.
-Wide variety from nasty to a bit naughty
-Very good videos and fun interviews
-Easy to navigate. Updates six days a week. Interested and responsive webmasters.
Cons: -A few photo sets don't live up to the quality which the site has established and need to disappear.
-Video types need to be defined better, especially with the site's growth.
-Models' page needs to become Models' pages.
Bottom Line: AllOver30 is a mature site that somebody should have started years ago. As shameful as that may be, thankfully it's here now.
AllOver30 goes about their business very, very well, though not perfectly yet. They feature attractive sensual and sexual women, not dependant upon yet another cheerleader's uniform (though it could happen). My personal favorite is Elegant Ladies. Imagine New Year's Eve and seeing that "wow" woman dressed to the 9s. Imagine seeing her both in and out of her clothing. AllOver30 offers you a visualization. If you want someone from the "trailer park" of life, you'll have to go elsewhere.
-The hardest thing to deal with on this site, is Sunday, since that's the one day they don't update. Monday's are a bit more special.
-If you like mature women, you need to check out AllOver30 and enjoy yourself. If you've never seen the beauty of older women, you need to check out AllOver30 and be converted.

01-18-07  08:36am

Replies (0)
Review
8
Visit Amateur Allure

Amateur Allure
(2)

79.0
Status: Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
Pros: -Visually of a high quality. If you wish to see it, are looking at it, then it is and clearly. The images are clean and in focus, not blurry, amber and god knows what. SInce what is looked at can actually be seen, maybe this isn't porn at all.
Cons: -photo could be really, really good, but are halfass.
-once a week uploads. Sounds like one a year memberships.
-suffers from the same old same old that comes with such a niche focus.
Bottom Line: I really liked the clarity of the images both photographic and video, but that doesn't same the site from the sameness of itself and the once a week update. A nice site to join and then leave after a month. Don't worry, there are no surprise here, so you won't miss things if you aren't a member for a while.

01-23-07  04:47pm

Replies (0)
Reply
9
Visit Ass Traffic

Ass Traffic
(0)
Reply of roseman's Reply

Roseman:

Now I'm lost. Which cut in stone web site are you referencing. You've review 27 of them.

Every site needs to offer a basic basis of quality. Every member or potential member deserves this much. Videos need to accessible to all and photos need to be clear, seeable, large enough and somewhat appealing. This certainly places some constraints upon artistry, but not unreasonably so.

Are you suggesting that anything goes, if the particular site's subject matter agreed with your or whomever interest, is okay? Seems an insufficent standard to me. Everything out there need to live up to more, as the majority is falling way short. We user/members feed this beast with our subsciptions, our money, so we should get quality regardless of the site. So I find so problem on not addressing any one failing site over another. The problem is in the system. It wants us to accept too much mediocrity as some form of quality. "Here's a great site, now spend you money and be unhappy with it."

I don't think I'm opposing you, but we may not be being as clear with each other as would be desireable.

mudman


02-06-07  10:29am

Reply
10
Visit Ass Traffic

Ass Traffic
(0)
Reply of roseman's Review

Roseman_

You've hit me, so here's my inquiry.

What do you find wothwhile when it comes to photography? What size of image and what quality? Do you have interests in lighting or not?

Are there photographers you are impressed with or are you being ignored here?

With regards to videos, regardless of subject matter what isues to you have? Every site should offer enough formats for all to enjoy, and every video should be clear enough for anyone to see and appreciate. Since I'm even mentioning this, it's not something we've been burderned with. Which sites, in your opinion, serve us viewers as we should be served?


02-05-07  10:59am

Review
11
Visit AT Kingdom

AT Kingdom
(0)

88.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -volume. There's a lot here of all types. 6 days a week.
-excellent photographers who get the acknowledgement they deserve.
-clear images you can actually see.
-Even if there wasn't so much here, they still would make the vast majority of sites look like amateurs in a pro world.
-though a very small part of the site, may be the most reliable pregnant photo source.
Cons: -Just increased the size of their photos this month. The volume of ATK is in small photos.
-Vidoes are good, but good only, not very good and certainly not excellent, but there is variety.
-an unnerving formula feel to the photos.
Bottom Line: If you are to stand any chance of clearing judging sites you need to start here. This is a very good site and all site should be at least as good, but aren't. You also get value, and you can't argue with that. To have ATK and whatever other site you wish in your porn portfolio is good. But...and this is big...they just this month upped the size of their photos. They've been the bread and butter, but for a year and a half others have been outdoing them.

01-23-07  03:26pm

Replies (0)
Review
12
Visit ATK Natural & Hairy

ATK Natural & Hairy
(2)

83.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -volume. Hard to get more bang for your buck overall.
-generally very skilled photogrphers.
-a wide range of women from 18 to 40ish, though the vast majority are in the 18 to 23 range.
-very easy to get around the site. Why others aren't this easy, is beyond me.
Cons: -not the best videos, but they are okay.
-some photographers are questionable. Sean R being one of them. Not good when a member wishes he could buy a new camera for a site photographer.
-mostly smallish photos on the site. Hard to believe that such a standard bearer has waited until this january to increase its photo sizes.
Bottom Line: AtkHairy remains the best hairy site out there in cyberspace. It doesn't mean they don't need to do more, 'cause they do. Their preeminence could quickly evaporate with lacking attention, but they still remain the place to start.

01-23-07  03:06pm

Replies (1)
Review
13
Visit Aunt Judy's

Aunt Judy's
(0)

79.0
Status: Was a member approx. 6 months prior to this review.
Pros: -A lot of pictures.
Cons: -Quality is unreliable. Can be very good. Can be very bad.
-One size fits all.
-Layout a bore.
-Updates way too few for the price.
Bottom Line: If you're over 30, then you must be ugly. God help us all, if this is true. This seems to be the bread and butter of AuntJudy's. Frankly, it's a site whose time has come and gone. Just about any new mature site stands a really good chance of eclipsing AuntJudy's on everything but volume. If you need lots of so-so undersized pictures, then go there. It's your money.

01-18-07  09:16am

Replies (0)
Review
14
Visit Bunnies Club

Bunnies Club
(0)

76.0
Status: Was a member approx. 5 months prior to this review.
Pros: -Nice models
-Nice Videos
Cons: -Another just ordinary site.
-Though the models are pretty, the subject matter is dull and dismissable.
Bottom Line: The Bunnies Club is a distant also-ran in the glamor model race. Much better choices out there. Everything I looked at left me wanting more, but not for the right reason. Nothing compells you to come back. It's just...nice.

A full access one week membership is all you'd ever need or want.

03-21-07  10:54am

Replies (0)
Review
15
Visit Defloration.tv

Defloration.tv
(0)

70.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -attractive models and fine photography.
-leader and maybe truly the only one in its group.
-quality vidoes.
Cons: -one update once a month at best. Way, way too little. You join and nothing happens.
-Photography is really good, but not enough by a long shot, and certainly very little as regards their theme.
-lay-out is okay. Easy enough to get around, but easily could be so much better. Feels like a nice idea, they don't really care that much about.
-only one video choice. So second rate it's not funny/
Bottom Line: Defloration.tv (there's also defloration.com listed, but don't expect anything but one and the same) is a nice idea and a true niche, but dances on the razor's edge of worth it. If you join, do it for a month and then wait 2 years. This site is nothing more than a means of selling dvds. If the dvds are like the site; then, if you must, save you money and be a site member for one month and one month only. Pass on the rest. The other option is to not join at all, and you won't be missing much.
-a shame really, but there's so much better out there.

01-31-07  10:10am

Replies (0)
Review
16
Visit Foxy 40

Foxy 40
(0)

50.0
Status: Was a member approx. 4 months prior to this review.
Pros: -nice looking models
Cons: -photo are way small and outdated.
-Updates are recycled old stuff.
-Too little, too little.
Bottom Line: -There are models that look great, but the site offers nothing. Everything offered is so 1995. In fact, if you join, you may indeed be joining such a cyber ghost.
-Only recommendation is to avoid. There's nothing here, except offering nothing over and over again.
-They should pay people for joining and not the other way around. Sad really.

01-31-07  10:35am

Replies (0)
Review
17
Visit FTV Girls

FTV Girls
(5)

84.0
Status: Was a member approx. 4 months prior to this review.
Pros: -Both photographic and video images are clear. Can't argue with high resolution anything.
-Good looking models, no matter where you come from or where you are going, they are good looking.
-Interesting out and about the town shoots.
Cons: -Though the photos are quality, they are too few and way, way too small. They offer a febble large size grab-bag of some sets, but your guess is as good as mine as to what you get.
-Like some half-ass minor site they offer only one video format choice. Are they getting kickbacks, a member of a club, or do they just not care.
Bottom Line: FTV has been a good site a while, in fact, it was a trend setter when it started. Not any more. They offer no choices for their members from their photos to their video formats, Seems if you're serious about what you offer, it doesn't take much to give the sizes and varied formats the public wants. Maybe FTV isn't that serious. It's still a good site in the marketplace, but doesn't seem to be moving forward.
If you like small clear photos and presently standard videos in one format, then you'll be happy here. Otherwise, hit and run or wait.

01-25-07  11:39am

Replies (0)
Review
18
Visit Girls Bottom

Girls Bottom
(0)

65.0
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: -girls bottoms
Cons: -a messy site to navigate.
-only 5% of the pix are worth looking at.
-just a very, very big blah.
Bottom Line: A great idea and subject matter, but GirlsBottom couldn't abuse such promise more than it has. With any luck, this effort will evaporate into forgotten oblivion. They need to do olympic back flips to get this site into any worthwhile state. Give value to the money I spent by saving your money and avoiding this site.

02-16-07  10:17am

Replies (0)
Review
19
Visit Hairy Pussy Cuties

Hairy Pussy Cuties
(0)

72.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -There aren't many here other than the site complies with the premise of being hairy.
-There are some nice models.
Cons: -The photo sizes are odrinary as is the quality. Any self-respecting site these days need to offer 1000X 1500 pix. Anything less is not worth the trouble of looking at. This site offers small, outdated pix.
Bottom Line: This is such an ordinary site. it's not funny. There's nothing to gain by joiing this site. If you want hairy, go to atk, you 'll be loads happier.

03-19-07  12:16pm

Replies (0)
Review
20
Visit Helen Volga

Helen Volga
(0)

72.0
Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros: -some good photos.
-apparent experience.
-little to never seen before models.
Cons: -not very impressive at all.
-too expensive, by far, for what's offered.
Bottom Line: The feel you get from from Helen Volga, is another site from someone who's been in the business, who's cashing in on what they've done before they cash out. There's nothing exciting here. True, it's not likely what you've seen (not licenced or such), but you'll only end up seeing a style and approach which you could have seen elsewhere and for a better value. Not worth the price of admission, but certainly not the worse or least responsive site out there. They just have a long way to go before becoming worthwhile.

02-01-07  10:20am

Replies (0)
Reply
21
Visit Hot Wives And Girlfriends

Hot Wives And Girlfriends
(0)
Reply of roseman's Reply

I mean just that. There's nothing to write home about here. It nice, as far as company flash camera work goes, but why should I care. It's not personal, not ground breaking, certainly not good and vertainly not excellent in the context of photographic skill. In fact, I'm thinking less of it the more I think about it. It's a psuedo-amateur site that needs members to buy into its pitch in order to have any chance at all. The more reviewed, the worst the chances for this site.

As regards the models...I wish lots better.


02-01-07  01:20pm

Review
22
Visit Hot Wives And Girlfriends

Hot Wives And Girlfriends
(0)

76.0
Status: Was a member approx. 4 months prior to this review.
Pros: -An interesting amatuer feel.
-part of a network, so there's some choice here.
Cons: -Though it's fun a first view, it's nothing more than the same old same old.
-Videos are okay, but not exceptional.
-Photos are just okay at best.
Bottom Line: -Any review of one site, is a review of all as they include all when you join.
-When you look at Wives and Girlfriends, you're looking at a a collection of sites. Within this collection are a fair number of repeats or duplications. The sites offer creampies, but sadly once you're seen one, you've seen all of them.
-If there's a model you've been following, then you may want to join for a month.
-If you've been looking to see some amatuer style creampie action, you may want to join for a month.
-If you want to find an interesting site with something new to offer from time to time, then you don't want to join.

02-01-07  10:32am

Replies (3)
Reply
23
Visit I Shot Myself

I Shot Myself
(0)
Reply of BostonPJR's Reply

Boston:

Thanks for the compliment. Nobody need agree with me all the time, but to be apreciated just means so much to me and....oh dear, I said I wasn't going to do this. Give me a second.

Okay, as regards your question:

I never tried the lesser memberships with I Feel Myself or I Shot Myself or AbbyWinters. They are money savers, but you the user end up missing stuff. I'm not completely sure I understand why a site would offer partical memberships in the first place, unless it's their alternative to the trial membership. All of that group's Australian sites are good at what they do, including Girls Out West, though AbbyWinters is by far the most popular. And as regards Beautiful Agony, I doubt I'll ever check the site out. Though I like head shots as a part of the whole experience, I am a guy and there's more that i want to see.

With I Feel Myself, you get more. It's like an extention of AbbyWinter's Intimate Moments, but with multiple camera angles. Whereas AbbyWinter's using one camera top shoot the gal getting off, I Feel Myself typically uses three or more, including closer shots of the naughty bites action.

But anyway, with all these sites, I have never tried and wouldn't tried the lesser memberships. It would be too frustrating to long in and not be able to access what's being offered that day, so it's all or nothing for me.

Mudman


03-21-07  04:19am

Reply
24
Visit I Shot Myself

I Shot Myself
(0)
Reply of SnowDude's Reply

Snowdude:

I Shot Myself gets a an 84 from me, because it is shot by the girls themselves. It's unique and fun and suprisingly good. There's a wonderful fresh difference and honesty to the whole thing. So removed from the "oh Babe, oh babe" approach to porn or adult nakeness. The pictures and videos are clear, largely crisp and unigue.

The site also gets an 84 from me because it is shot by themselves and the photo option have their limits due to the lengths of the girls' arms. It makes for some fun and great close ups, but the varied of angles and distance is physically limited. The site is also relatively young and therefor doesn't have the volume of major sites, but it is a gas.

So, high on the imaginative and low on the limitations of one's reach. It's a good and fun site to be experienced at least once and for at least one month, just not a great site.

I think it could be considered a great site. if it actually partner up with it's sister site, I Feel Myself. If it were, I Shot and Felt Myself, that would be a 90's cool.


03-12-07  05:41am

Review
25
Visit I Shot Myself

I Shot Myself
(0)

84.0
Status: Was a member approx. 4 months prior to this review.
Pros: -Genuine. This is a big, big plus for any site of any type. Being what you really are about.
-Young women you might know....with luck
-Quality videos and photos.
-the shot angle.
Cons: -the premise is a certain sameness. It's not a bad sameness, but it struggles to have legs.
-the shot angle.
Bottom Line: IShotMyself really is a nice site, with true photos and vidoes, but it's hard to stay here for long. You certainly want to come back, but we're talking a focused theme here. It's a good one, but a good one for visiting. If my opinion matters, then it's join for a month and come back a couple or so months later.

01-23-07  05:01pm

Replies (5)

Shown : 1-25 of 40 Page :    Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.51 seconds.