Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : atrapat (112)  

Feedback:   All (431)  |   Reviews (58)  |   Comments (72)  |   Replies (301)

Other:   Replies Received (262)  |   Trust Ratings (54)

All Activity A summary of all the feedback from this user.
Shown : 26-50 of 432 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
Reply
26
N/A Reply of Capn's Reply

So right! I also have recurring memberships but I answered past 60 days because I haven't joined any during the last month.

04-28-12  03:57pm

Reply
27
Visit Disgraced 18

Disgraced 18
(0)
Reply of BadMrFrosty's Reply

It's true it was never BDSM but the couple of recent scenes in the new style have maybe a tiny bit of clumsily applied tape or blindfolds at most. To me, it looks almost ridiculous while, in the past, despite being overdone, had a much more definite and appealing look.

It's like this new shooting style has made all the sites lose its soul. They all look the same to me. At Deep Throat Love the deep throat is, with luck, a short segment. Here, the "disgracing" is only in the site title. It looks like any scene in this new style could be placed on any of the now soul-less sites and it would still fit.


04-28-12  11:58am

Reply
28
Visit Disgraced 18

Disgraced 18
(0)
Reply of BadMrFrosty's Comment

What do you think about the change in style in the new scenes? It looks like a much much tamer version of what this site used to be. They are doing similarly at Deep Throat Love.

04-27-12  02:47pm

Reply
29
Visit Deep Throat Love

Deep Throat Love
(0)
Reply of jberryl69's Reply

Absolutely. This site has moved from the Deep Throat niche to the same grey (or white) area all new scenes in this network fall into.

I'm more and more confused every day by this switch in style by Porn Pros Network. The more I think about it, the less I understand why they keep updating the same sites but with completely different styles or, like in DTL case, betraying their previous history.


04-23-12  02:17pm

Reply
30
N/A Reply of lk2fireone's Poll

I've had very few issues. What I've always found to work when nothing else work are the chat systems. I've got no clue about who is on the other end but they can make things happen for sure.

04-21-12  02:09pm

Reply
31
Visit Deep Throat Love

Deep Throat Love
(0)
Reply of jberryl69's Reply

I'm totally with you in being disappointed :) I've been a member of Porn Pros Network on and off mostly for this site and only because everything revolved around the deepthroat. I even posted a review here back in 2008.

At least, they keep releasing scenes. Even if there's just a short deep throat segment, it's something. It's highly unlikely those who like Jurassic Cock will get a scene in the new shooting style :)


04-21-12  01:40am

Reply
32
Visit Deep Throat Love

Deep Throat Love
(0)
Reply of jberryl69's Comment

It's probably because of the new shooting style. Check Passion HD or Porn Pros Network recent comments. All scenes look the same and the differences between sites in the network is little.

It looks like scenes in the new shooting style get added to Deep Throat Love when the model is able to deepthroat but it doesn't mean the scene revolves solely around her abilities as it used to be. Just a regular scene.


04-20-12  03:33pm

Reply
33
Visit Cum Louder

Cum Louder
(1)
Reply of slategrey's Reply

Thanks a lot for you reply. Looks like so far they've made little towards helping non-Spanish speakers understand their site. I've only seen the trailers but I was very much under the impression even those who understand Spanish would be lost with all the references to Spain's culture they made. Good to know they no longer recycle.

04-20-12  12:48pm

Reply
34
Visit Cum Louder

Cum Louder
(1)
Reply of enditnow's Review

Is there some kind of subtitles in English so those who don't speak Spanish may understand what goes on? Has the members forum an English section too? If that's not the case, it could be a con for users who don't understand Spanish.

I used to come by the site to check the trailers back a couple years ago and I remember most of the scenes were in Spanish except for a few that were shot in the US with US porn stars and, even though, they used to ask the model to speak in Spanish or there was Marco Banderas, speaking in Spanish all the time. But I'd say the vast majority of scenes were in Spanish only.

Also, the free tour was recycling scenes quite often. Since you seem to be a long time member, did you notice any scene recycling recently?


04-10-12  03:09am

Comment
35
Visit Sexy Venera

Sexy Venera
(0)

Official site of a natural big busted cam model

This is the official site of popular big boobed cam model Sexy Venera. Natural H cups, according to some sources. Site was launched on March 2012. Samples look like professionally shot softcore; she wasn't shy of using toys in private shows, though. Worth mentioning that she doesn't seem to be wearing her trademark black glasses in any of the sets.

I found no mention on the free tour to her webcam experience but the home page intro says Live Chats are to be added soon to the site. AFAIK, she still works regularly on Live Jasmin and Streamate.com. She has two accounts with the same name on both sites: SexyVenera and SexyVeneraX. Given that she already works with Streamate.com, it would be fairly easy to schedule members-only webcam shows on a regular basis using their platform.

She has been working as a cam model for several years but only recently did she start shooting solo sets for adult companies. The first one I noticed was a picture set and video for Scoreland at the end of 2011. She has kept appearing at their magazines since then. Afterwards, she has also shot with DDF Busty.

It's interesting to see a cam girl launching a membership site. The free tour was somewhat slow for me but the samples do look promising. I just wish the free tour gave more information, specially regarding videos.

04-08-12  03:42am

Replies (0)
Reply
36
N/A Reply of Cybertoad's Poll

I said living room, where the good old sofa is. But I was thinking there are a couple houses in LA that, if they weren't booked 24/7 for porn shoots, could make some money by offering guided tours to porn fans.

04-07-12  04:41am

Reply
37
Visit College Sugarbabes

College Sugarbabes
(0)
Reply of hodayathink's Reply

Thanks indeed for the info and for listing the other sites. Tonight's Girlfriend was also on my radar. I know some other big US networks have a second network with slightly different sites but guess Naughty America prefers the separate sites approach.

04-02-12  10:47pm

Comment
38
Visit College Sugarbabes

College Sugarbabes
(0)

Is it part of Naughty America Network?

The list of sites at the main Naughty America site currently doesn't list this as one of the 34 network sites. TBP facts doesn't say you get access to other sites with the membership to this one either. So I'm wondering if Naughty America has launched this a separate site or if it's just a glitch: the site was launched very recently.

Even though the site doesn't show trailers, I found some of their sample galleries and I thought it could be a clone of Naughty Bookworms or some other teen site from them. But I'm pretty sure it's not the case because none of what I saw matched a scene from another Naughty America site.

It's about time I join back Naughty America but any insider info will be appreciated.

04-02-12  11:07am

Replies (2)
Reply
39
Visit Porn Pros Network

Porn Pros Network
(0)
Reply of RustyJ's Comment

They are marketing all these new scenes in a separate site, Passion HD, even though it looks like all the scenes are also available on Porn Pros Network.

03-24-12  10:51am

Reply
40
Visit Live Gonzo

Live Gonzo
(0)
Reply of PinkPanther's Reply

Thanks indeed for your reply. I got comfort in knowing I'm not the only one who is confused about that sign up page. Looks like a very interesting site but it's a pity they don't realize what they are doing wrong.

03-19-12  03:29pm

Comment
41
Visit Live Gonzo

Live Gonzo
(0)

Confusing membership types

I personally find confusing the wording of the memberships at this site. There are three types listed that are described in the least encouraging way possible. They must have realised it’s a mess because there’s a “more info...” link at the end of each membership type that opens a pop up but it just adds more confusion.

I guess the “Live Show Membership for only $8,95 per month recurring (gives you access to ALL live Shows)” one lets you watch all the shootings live but, since there’s no mention to chat or archive access, I assume you don’t get to interact with the performers or see recorded shows.

I’m lost with the second one: “VIP Access for only $15,95 per month recurring (you get 16% discount for full features membership + BONUS of $29,95 value = one time Interactive Live Chat Access)”. Does it mean you get some sort of ticket to enter the Interactive Live Chat for just one chat and, when you’ve used it, you only get to watch the live shootings as if you had the 8,95$ membership? Do you get access but for just one month? How do you buy the "full features membership" if it’s not listed anywhere?

There’s a third type but they look like non-recurring multi-month versions of the second.

After reading the lengthy texts, it looks like this site has three features: 1) live streaming of the shows, 2) interactive chat during the shows and 3) access to recorded shows and photos. It would make a lot of sense if, instead of the blabber, they put up a 3x3 table displaying what each membership type gets you, for how long and whether it’s recurring or not.

On a side note, on the top right corner of the home page there’s a link to an interesting 9 minutes video of CEO Raul Cristian discussing his vision with the company and how he believes live shootings are the way to cope with piracy. Someone should tell him that confusing sign up pages are the way to losing potential customers.

03-17-12  04:49am

Replies (2)
Comment
42
Visit XPeeps

XPeeps
(0)

Social network transitioning into cam site

Back in the day when the USA porn industry social media activity focused mainly on myspace (around 2008, I guess), a few performers and producers were also using the xpeeps social network. It kind of mimicked myspace but with no restrictions on adult content. I gave it a try for some time but stopped using it shortly after, tired of seeing all male members using pictures of their erect members as profile pictures. It looks like most performers also got fed up with this or something else and ended up not coming any more.

I recently saw they have become a cam site. Even though the listing shows models that work at other sites, the pricing structure makes me think it’s not a clone of an existing one. They seem to go for the same prices for all models. A private is 40 tokens a minute and spying it costs 20. Groups cost 10 tokens a minute and, guess what, you need three users to start it. Contrary to what other sites do, there are no discounts for bulk purchases so you get 10 tokens per USD whether you buy 100 or 900 tokens at a time. Worth noting that models may sell videos through the site.

I had never seen any model online until today. TBP facts say there is one model online at a time at most. One model. When I tried to enter her chat room, I was asked to install the newest new version of Flash. Never ever had that message come up at me on any cam site. Asking for the ultimate flash version doesn’t make much sense. They say they are in beta, though.

The social network is still available in a separate subdomain, aptly named “classic”. My username and password from a couple years ago still worked on the social network but not on the cam site. Doesn’t make any sense that they are forcing separate registrations. Doubt there is anything worth paying attention in the xpeeps social network nowadays but, if the cam site gets any traction, the social network could be an interesting bonus.

03-10-12  11:57am

Replies (0)
Reply
43
Visit Playboy.com

Playboy.com
(0)
Reply of Gazette Risque's Comment

I doubt it. Never been a member but was a member of sister site Playboy Cyberclub some years ago. I don't remember any such thing when I was a member though it's something I would surely have looked into.

As far as I know, Playboy magazine is published as a franchise in many countries: they get the brand for the magazine and get to publish photo sets from the various USA editions but also do their own original content. So this site is unlikely to hold the rights (or be remotely interested in holding them) for a photo set from a celebrity that posed nude in an international edition.

Back in the day, Playboy Cyberclub would only get you a small portion from Playboy's archives and very small pictures. Things may have changed because I see that this site is now run by Brazzers Network. But I still doubt they publish anything not produced for the USA edition.


03-10-12  10:01am

Reply
44
Visit Cara Brett

Cara Brett
(0)
Reply of Denner's Reply

Melissa Debling is certainly a looker. Site stopped updating but, according to the free tour, you now get access to 5 more sites from this company : Emma Frain.co.uk, Georgie Darby, Hannah May Rose, Kelly Andrews.co.uk and Rhian Marie Sugden (this last one is currently down, though). My guess is they've made a pack with all the sites that are no longer updating. 5 non-updating sites at the price of one might be worth a try.

03-06-12  11:03am

Reply
45
Visit Cara Brett

Cara Brett
(0)
Reply of Denner's Review

Thanks for the review. I was in fact browsing the free tour a couple days ago. What you describe doesn't look much different from what I saw at the other couple sites from this company I reviewed: Melissa Debling and Official Lindsey Strutt. The settings don't look much different either. All the models are extraordinarily good looking but feels like they have only a couple locations to shoot at and fewer ideas.

03-05-12  02:26pm

Reply
46
N/A Reply of Colm4's Poll

The first time I ever saw a cumswap scene is the first that came to mind. It was a long time ago and now, I really don't mind.

As others have mentioned, I am disgusted by abusive behavior and extreme anal.


03-05-12  02:12pm

Reply
47
Visit Sexy Soccer Panties

Sexy Soccer Panties
(0)
Reply of elephant's Reply

I'm not a member so everything I wrote was from thoroughly checking the free tour. The irony is that the samples make me think that, more than a panty site, it caters to bottomless (panties off, shirt kept on rolled up throughout the set) and knee-high socks (plus soccer shoes).

03-04-12  11:21am

Comment
48
Visit Sexy Soccer Panties

Sexy Soccer Panties
(0)

Recycling galleries from 2006 World Cup

Turns out the same company that runs 90s Panties came up with another creative way to recycle old galleries. You just can't get away with passing as new 32 galleries that were obviously made for the 2006 soccer World Cup in Germany (that was the only time when Trinidad & Tobago took part in the last-32 stage of the World Cup).

Some interesting facts just from watching the free tour:
- All 32 models are depicted in the free tour from the chest up. You have to click on them to get a glimpse of the panties.
- Samples show, though, that models get rid of the panties almost immediately but keep the shirts on. This is a panty themed network, so naming the site "Sexy Soccer Shirts" was not an option.
- Models pose with the official ball of the tournament but none of the shirts remotely resembles an official one. All panties look exactly the same except for the color.
- The Czech Republic girl seems to be Sylvia Saint. I'm sure PUs more versed in Euro porn will recognize more models.
- The Italy girl has a nice big rack. She doesn't look at all like Materazzi so it's highly unlikely this site had anything to do with Zidane headbutting the Italian defender.

03-03-12  02:24pm

Replies (2)
Reply
49
Visit 90s Panties

90s Panties
(0)
Reply of otoh's Comment

Regardless of 90s being retro or not, the title seems a clever idea for recycling photos shot in the 90s. Guess it's reached a point where the same old galleries seen a 100 times no longer pass as new so why not recycle them as vintage?

03-02-12  07:57am

Review
50
Visit Pornpros Mobile

Pornpros Mobile
(0)

80.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Mobile version of Porn Pros Network.
- Accessible with main network membership.
- Big buttons, clean layout, simple structure.
- Two layout versions : light and regular.
- Images are 480x320. 8-10 per scene. All landscape.
- Mobile-friendly image slideshow implementation.
- Videos: MP4 400x224 (800 & 300bps), 3gp 352x288 (300bps).
- All videos also available in 8 parts (highest resolution only).
- Video parts have representative thumbnails.
- Links to mobile versions of official blog and twitter.
- Scenes grouped by site, category, stars or date order.
- Ads for other sites don't get in the way.
- No need to login on every visit.
Cons: - They claim 6,000+ scenes but “only” have around 2,200.
- Fixed 320px site width. May look small on newest devices.
- Only 10 images per scene.
- Older scenes have no pictures or not all video formats.
- No scene trailers but mobile free tour has them.
- Search function doesn’t work for model names.
- On scene page, no info on which site it comes from.
- Video and images resolutions may be too low for newest devices.
- Several minor bugs make the experience less pleasing.
- Pictures don't work in light version.
- Nags as in main site: scene recycling, model identification, etc.
Bottom Line: This is the mobile version of US reality porn site Porn Pros Network. It’s a simple yet complete site, good for checking new updates and for the occasional viewing. Things go increasingly bad in older scenes: as you go backwards in time, you start finding scenes with no photos, videos or any content at all. As I've said in the past speaking of mobile porn sites from other networks, I don’t think it’s worth signing up just for the mobile site but it's a nice addition to the main membership.

The picture part is remarkable even though they offer 10 images per scene at most. Instead of mimicking what’s usually available in non-mobile sites (hundreds of images, many of them almost identical, in a thumbnail gallery) they go for a slideshow with the most representative landscape ones. A single orientation is good because you don’t have to keep rotating your phone to make the most of your screen real estate. Images don’t seem to be picked at random and I was under the impression that not all images were also available in the main site. Next image is automatically preloaded and clicking next loads image without refreshing page, so getting an idea of what kind of images the scene has is fast. You may get back to the main scene page by a simple back button click. All around, a simple but thought-out functionality.

Video viewing is fairly well done. I’d appreciate getting trailers, tough. Just as viewing 10 images serves great for sampling the pictures from an update, it would make sense if they offered in the members section the trailers that are already available in the mobile free tour. Trailers are also available inside main members area.

Flaws from the main site crept into the mobile version. Scenes that the main site recycles get recycled here too. My pet peeve is the lack of proper model identification. They only have room for one model name; with luck, one of the models gets her name entered but some scenes get just two first names. The mobile site has flaws and bugs of its own, like some weird issues with the numbering in galleries and failing to identify in a scene page what site it comes from.

There are some extras that make sense in a mobile site. There’s a twitter feed of the most recent tweets from PornPros official account, although there’s something wrong with its integration with the official Twitter App. They also have a mobile optimized version of their blog and the BTS videos played without issues on my phone.

01-22-12  02:39pm

Replies (0)

Shown : 26-50 of 432 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.72 seconds.