Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : Wittyguy (95)  

Feedback:   All (746)  |   Reviews (45)  |   Comments (87)  |   Replies (614)

Other:   Replies Received (373)  |   Trust Ratings (59)

All Activity A summary of all the feedback from this user.
Shown : 26-50 of 750 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
Reply
26
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

The day that I get the check promised from that Nigerian Prince is the day that I join an adult "date" site. At best, you meet someone and then negotiate the price. At worst ... use your imagination.

12-19-13  11:50am

Reply
27
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Not a surprising result. I'd say with the older demographics here at PU, and the fact that we're all pretty much collectors / hoarders and not casual viewers, it means we actually want to be able to see what's going on and take it seriously enough that privacy and setting aside time to view porn overrides the 7" or smaller screen set who probably make up a large amount of the viewing audience out there.

12-14-13  01:18pm

Review
28
Visit Brazzers

Brazzers
(4)

92.0
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: + A boat load of scenes and models (about 4500 scenes)
+ About 8-10 updates per week across a 27 site network
+ Excellent navigation, can search by model, site or across the network
+ All scenes have pics up to 2500x1600 with zips and multiple video options with true 1080 HD on scenes added since late 2009
+ Model directory (with actual info!)
+ Good price at $20 a month (I got in on a special $10 price)
+ Pretty much all hardcore across a variety of genres from teen to milf
+ Excellent production values and usually an attempt to build some story line into the scenes
+ Lots of ability for users to interact on the site (ratings, forum, comments, etc)
+ Good download speeds for me - consistently in the 500 or more MB/sec range across multiple channels
Cons: - As usual the older content (before mid 2009) lacks in quality (no HD video and only 900x600 pics)
- Tags are inconsistent so not a reliable way to do a comprehensive search
- Only about 14 sites update.
- Their motto might as well be "Home of big tits and bit tatts". The majority of models would make silicon valley envious but there is something for about everyone here except softcore.
- Cross sale on signup and advertising on the site and when you log in
- A slew of "bonus sites" that are just tube quality streaming videos
- Too many pics. Many scenes have over 1000 images which just means endless pics of the same thing.
- Although not really a negative, most all the models here are certified porn stars so if you're looking for fresh meat, you won't find it here.
- Nothing terribly original about the scenes so it can seem a bit stale after a while even across the wide genres they cover
Bottom Line: It's been almost 5 years since I was last here and I mostly stayed away because of the low quality pics and "bit tit, big ass, bit tattoos" theme that most of the sites focus on. However, I decided to jump in on a $10 a month special through TBP and have to say I was pretty impressed. There's a reason why this in one of the biggest and most popular porn sites out there. Here's the quick low down:

PICS: Older pics (before mid 2009) are only 900 to 1000 by 660. Since then, the size is great and so is the quality. You don't get download options though. My only beef is that there are too many pics with some scenes having over 2500 pics. A few sites have done better keeping them around 200-300 but most updates still have around 800. I'm glad they don't give you too few pics but I really don't need 15 shots of the same thing. With the large pic sizes, some zip files end up being 600 - 800 mb in size which is just unnecessary.

VIDS: As noted, before 2009 the vid quality is average at best. Since then the HD stuff looks really good. You get up to 7 download options (full HD to mobile sized), in browser streaming which works great (very little lag time), screen caps and 1 or 5 minute screen caps which appear just below the video to let you jump to the good stuff. Download speeds were fast and consistent. Vids range from 20 to 50 minutes. I found that I downloaded a lot of "SD mp4" files (lower rez but formatted with HD dimensions) which look pretty good on my 23" monitor and saved on the 2-5 GB full HD size.

NAVIGATION: The more I review and look at porn sites the more I see sites that just grow too big for their original navigation systems and become, at best, a chore to slog through. Since my last join here years ago they have completely revamped their navigation and it freakin' actually works well. Only a few clicks will get you where you want. You can browse through a 1000 pics and with two back button clicks you're out to update page for any site. You can search in various ways except really the tags because they're inconsistent but then I've never seen a really good tag system on a large site.

You can create favorite lists, the sites track the scenes you've looked at that you can easily access and there's lots of opportunity to give feedback and interact if you're into that. The model directory has actual info and lets you follow porn stars.

OVERALL: I'm not really into the big tit slutty porn star thing but I found that I downloaded about 500 photo sets and about 80 vids so I can't say I was disappointed. You got teens, milfs, uniforms, bit butts, big tits, squirting, etc. to choose from so unless you're into softcore or lez you should be able find a few goodies.

Production values since 2009 are great and you get a ton of models.

My negative impressions are mostly minor. A few broking links, the site bogged down my Firefox browser after 2 hours (probably need more ram), and even with all the sites and models the porn does get a little repetitive but then again this is a pretty mainstream porn network.

While I'm not ready to sell out and go sign myself up for life to the silicon boob of the day club I was pretty impressed with the site. If I were to score it just on content and production value it'd only be in the mid 80's but the well thought out navigation and ease of use are some of the best I've seen which bumps up the score to 92. At last, a pleasant surprise.

11-27-13  08:32pm

Replies (1)
Reply
29
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

While 1080 is the "best" I also consider file size since I don't want a bunch of externals sitting around so I usually opt for 720 since it has almost the same look as 1080.

11-27-13  12:13pm

Reply
30
N/A Reply of rearadmiral's Poll

Really just a question of whether you are a collector or a hoarder. Naturally, since I am a suave and couth sort of dude, I'm a collector.

11-21-13  12:23pm

Reply
31
N/A Reply of jberryl69's Poll

Never have. Might consider it if there was super cheap full access trial though.

11-09-13  03:53pm

Reply
32
N/A Reply of graymane's Poll

If you're smart, you retire from in front of the camera to work behind the camera in production which is where the long term money is at. Otherwise, hang it up when you're tired of it or aren't making any real money from it.

11-07-13  11:45am

Reply
33
Visit Brazzers

Brazzers
(4)
Reply of Vegas Ken's Comment

Thanks for the heads up. For anyone else interested in jumping into this one, I'll note that there is a prechecked cross sale on the sign up page so be aware.

10-31-13  04:41pm

Reply
34
N/A Reply of Thedebilman666's Poll

Curious that no one has entered a comment on this one. Too afraid to admit that we suddenly sobered up in the midst of shagging that bed troll we took home at closing time, realizing it wasn't such a good idea after all? What about the super introverts who fake the deed under a kleenex when they get tired of watching one of their favorite porn vids (don't want to leave bad ju-ju for the next go around)? So many questions, so few answers.

10-22-13  02:57pm

Comment
35
Visit Fame Digital

Fame Digital
(2)

Mini Review

Had a little free time last week so I hopped onto this one via the $3, 3 day full trial through TBP. I didn't spend a lot of time here and I think the recent reviews and comments pretty much cover it. Just a few notes of my own:

I made a mistake by failing to notice the "no zips" warnings regarding the photos. Major Bummer as this definitely hurts the site since they offer up to 500 pics on some sets. Most photo sets across the network have nothing of value because they only have 8 to 40 pics but there is no way of knowing how my photos are in a set until you click on the scene you want to see. The internet Stone Age applications continue if you actually go into see the pics (they are good sized at roughly 1200 x 2000) and click on the photo thumbnails. If you click on 6 thumbnails on a page and make the pics full size that means 12 or more back page clicks to navigate back to the previous page. You get the idea here, ignore the pics.

Vids are all over the board. If it has an update stamp before 2010/2011 then it's not worth viewing as it means the scene was probably shot a long time ago and is grainy even at 480x640 resolution. The "540p" or "web hd" is something different that comes up on some recent vids but I found it to only be marginally better than standard resolution (I've never seen a camera with "540p resolution" settings so they're just doing some compressing of an hd file or enlarging a standard vid). The most recent vids have HD (probably several hundred across the network) and all are pretty much professionally done.

There is a fair amount of overlap with most vids appearing on at least 2 sites. The updates are not indicative of when a scene was filmed, I saw some updates within the last year that feature girls who left porn a long time ago. Navigation involves a lot of clicking and really needs to be upgraded. Be aware that the porn star directory is not complete on some sites. Really the best way to get around is to go to an individual site and start cruising the dvd scenes using their search tags (unfortunately you can only search one tag / category at a time).

There is a wide variety of porn to suit just about anyones taste with about 16,000 vids in total, although I'd say only about 1000 scenes have hd standards. I like the look and feel of the Devil's Film, Daring Film and Low Art films as they seem to be offering up more than just standard shoots, actually some artistic thought and production went into the scenes they shoot.

Like I said, I didn't spend much time here and since I'm more of a pic guy the lack of zips pretty much dampened my mood right off. I'd probably score this site in the 82-85 range if I did a full on review.

10-16-13  09:34pm

Replies (2)
Reply
36
N/A Reply of Drooler's Reply

It would be great to know which relatives want which part of your collection - I didn't realize cousin Joey was such a big d.p. fan ;)

10-06-13  02:49pm

Reply
37
N/A Reply of messmer's Poll

Any color that doesn't feature a "skid mark".

09-20-13  02:26pm

Reply
38
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

We already know that the government knows our porn passwords and secretly criticizes our taste in porn so the only potential failing to using your own password is that you pick something so blatantly obvious that your grandma could hack into the site using your login info. Otherwise, all these troubling security features like assigned passwords and captcha's are just theater that do little to stop true hacking threats.

09-06-13  12:21pm

Reply
39
N/A Reply of careylowell's Poll

It's probably going to be about the same: pics and vids. Maybe some more 3-D stuff but no game changers until virtual reality and holograms get good. Looking back 10 years ago, we didn't have large networks and vids were still in their infancy (at least size-wise) and we didn't have zips but not a lot has changed in my mind anyway.

08-13-13  03:25pm

Reply
40
Visit Viv Thomas

Viv Thomas
(0)
Reply of RLane's Comment

Just checked the preview again. Yes, they are recycling some content but can't say it's all recycled. FYI.

08-01-13  11:48am

Reply
41
Visit Viv Thomas

Viv Thomas
(0)
Reply of RLane's Comment

I haven't been a member in a while but I recently checked out the tour. The quality will be better at the other sites you listed (both in terms of vids and pics) since Viv has been around for so long. I should note that Viv seems to just be recycling old content now. If you've never joined it does have some good stuff to see but not at the same level. The other sites you listed are also more "heartcore" in terms of the sex being pretty tame while Viv is more standard hardcore in approach. Hope this helps.

07-31-13  12:07pm

Reply
42
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Mostly but that's because of security issues (not including the NSA of course), not convenience. It still irks me that I have to keep several browsers on hand because of the frequency in which porn sites seem unable to accommodate Firefox or other non MS Exploder browsers.

07-26-13  11:58am

Reply
43
N/A Reply of turboshaft's Reply

I agree that personal info is far more worrisome than a hard drive full of cracks and cleavage. I doubt there are many techs who haven't seen a machine full of porn and I assume that most of the time if they are rescuing a hard drive they're not really paying attention to contents: put the download on auto pilot and go do something else. The cost of trying to save a drive can be pretty expensive so I'd probably just go with the important nonporn stuff and focus on rebuilding the collection later; you'd probably save money doing this but not time.

07-18-13  02:18pm

Reply
44
Visit New Sensations Network

New Sensations Network
(2)
Reply of graymane's Reply

Thanks for the positive feedback. I wish more webmasters would take our reviews to heart (at least the non newbie reviews anyway) but I doubt that will happen here. My instincts tell me that this is now just a place holder site and that most of the marketing and money at NS is going into their parody productions. While it's disappointing from a consumer's perspective it perversely makes good business sense ... if you can't or don't want to compete with what's out there today just keep doing what you're doing until it doesn't pay any more.

07-17-13  11:39am

Review
45
Visit New Sensations Network

New Sensations Network
(2)

77.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: + Access to 26 site network (no access to their parody porn site which they are best known for today)
+ Thousands of scenes available
+ Mostly exclusive content (some DDF and lesser known site scenes tossed in)
+ Decent price of $15 month through TBP
+ Almost no download failures
+ Network updates about 4 to 5x a week but only on a few sites
+ Lots of good looking, mostly American girls
+ Mostly good lighting and professional shooting
+ Videos have screen caps, all scenes have zip download option
+ Bills thru Epoch, no cross sales on signup and easy cancellation
Cons: - Lots of recycling of content between various sites and some recycling of older content. A lot of content can be found as updates on 2 - 3 different sites in the network.
- All but a couple of sites are dead or infrequently updated
- No real ability to search, no model directory, updates are rarely dated
- No HD vids, all are 640 x 480
- Download speeds vary from 800 KB/sec to about 50 KB/sec depending on time of day but was mostly around 100 to 200 KB/sec
- No stream options in screen but you can watch a stream via a media player but it's almost impossible to jump ahead or back except at lowest band width.
- Pics only come in at 1020 x 680 but there are zips
- Too much use of fish eye lenses, especially on pov shoots (vertigo here we come).
- Very repetitive in terms of scene layout
- Network feels lost, not really a pic or video network, just a compilation of stuff that hasn't changed in years.
Bottom Line: There was PU poll question this week asking about the first porn site you ever joined. While this wasn't the first for me, it was certainly a staple for me back in the late 90's and early 00's when 800x600 pics and postage stamp sized vids were standard issue. Unfortunately time has passed this site by and this is probably my last visit here. For uninitiated, this network is 90% hardcore with a few lez and solo shoots tossed in. Here's the overall skinny:

PICS: I primarily joined this time since I'm more of a pic guy. Although the pics going to back 2007 are 1020 by 680 I still get good resolution on my 24" monitor with them. The oldest content is 600x800 and is functionally useless. Most sets have 100 to 200 pics. The bad news is that they seem to be cutting back to only a few dozen so-so quality pics per scene in the last year. There is a fair amount of fish eye lens use on some sites which hurts after a while.

VIDS: Let's face facts, this is not a video site. Your only option is 640x480 .wmv downloads (or the same for ipad/psp). The psuedo stream function is marginal at best. Some of the vids even look sort of bad this level of resolution but everything going back to 2008 looks decent. Downloading is a chore given the slow speeds present for most of the day (it's currently taking me over an hour to DL two 450mb vids).

NAV: Navigation on the network was apparently developed during the internet stone age. Each site comes up in a new window. No search engine period. You can only look up models for each individual site. I frequently found myself digging through my download file to see if I had nabbed the same scene off of a different site on the network because of the recycling of content within the network. A number of sites stopped listing dates on updates to make it seem like they're not dead.

OVERALL: The only sites that continue to update regularly are Freshoutofhighschool, Newsensations, UnlimitedMILFs and Jizzbomb. The main emphasis on them (except the milf site) is younger porn stars. There is a fair amount of uniform and other outfit shoots which I like as a nice change of pace from the usual porn offerings today. The action is usually pretty good, the girls are pretty good looking and there is a lot of content provided you are willing to deal with what is now average at best quality. That's why I gave the network a score of 77.

However, this network just seems to be treading water until the owners can no longer make money offering what they have been doing for so long. I see no reason why a network that's been around for so long can't make the leap into the 21st century by offering HD vids (some of the nonexclusive DDF material can be had in HD on the DDF sites) and bigger pics (a few sets do offer 1500x1080 sizes here, apparently someone forgot to "dumb them down"). Like I noted above, this network just seems lost given the lack of high quality vids and the new found emphasis on limiting the number of pics per set. The lack of navigation and search adds to the sense that this place is just going through the motions in hopes of grinding out a buck or two. For those PU readers who hold on to a sense of nostalgia about the "good old days of porn", I offer up this network as an example that the good old days weren't always so good in comparison to what's out there today.

07-16-13  02:29pm

Replies (5)
Reply
46
Visit Brandi Love

Brandi Love
(1)
Reply of pat362's Review

I almost did the 3 day trial but after digging through the tour I decided it wasn't worth it. Small pix and not a lot of them in each set. No HD movies. Etc. I have to agree the site is not quite sure what it wants to be but whatever it "is" needs updating. While I agree she is hot what content that is coming out seems to be pale as opposed to content that could / should be coming out.

Forgot to note that "yes" there are pix and video from 3rd party sites that she has appeared on.


07-07-13  07:54pm

Reply
47
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Probably not for another decade which I assume is about how long for 3-D to get realistic and of high quality without all the expensive extra gear. It's pretty much a novelty act right now.

06-26-13  12:24pm

Reply
48
N/A Reply of lk2fireone's Poll

I don't know what it means, we should ask the Dos Equis Most Interesting Man in the World as I'm sure he's faced multiple fates worse than death .... but did he like it?

06-06-13  08:12pm

Review
49
Visit Babes Network.com

Babes Network.com
(7)

82.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: + Exclusive content that updates 5x a week.
+ Good $10, 30 day membership through TBP.
+ Great 2500 x 1700 pics with zips and true 1080 HD vids with good download speeds. 4 DL options for vids including mobile device sized. Also streaming available with good speeds and ability to jump within a scene.
+ Smallish watermarks
+ Attractive girls (18 - 30 range) with few "enhancements". A good mix between porn stars and more unknowns, at least to me.
+ A unique site in terms of the artistic and hardcore factors it tries to combine.
+ A good mix of content (about 40% HC, 40% solo, and 20% lez).
+ User ratings and comments sections and social media connections.
Cons: - Tags / search engine is poor.
- Navigation needs an overhaul.
- Some ads on main page and when logging in.
- Prechecked cross sale on signup.
- The "artistic" feel the site is trying to convey gets lost with bad lighting, bad composition and iffy camera / cropping work.
- Very few positions shown for all scenes.
- Has a model directory but with very little info.
- You get timed out somewhat quickly and there are capcha's every time you log in.
- A fair amount of photoshopping and post production effects going on.
- More complicated than usual cancellation process. Web based cancel system doesn't seem to work (call or use email -- aka: don't wait until the end before trying to cancel). Also, must cancel at least 7 days before end of 30 days to keep from getting rebilled.
Bottom Line: This is my first voyage into the world of "heartcore" / "lovecore" figuring it looked like it had great quality and would be something different. True, it was different. You won't find anal, dp's, gagging and the like here which is fine by me. I'd like to think that years of overexposure to gonzo porn and too much degrading porn (sort of the default it seems) has made me so jaded to my inner sensitive new age guy. However, even using that standard of measure this site just didn't seem to add up for me. Here's the lowdown:

PICS: The setup looked good. Site has about 125 HC, 56 lez, and 106 solo sets (all have 100 or more pics) and the pics are quite large with zips. However, it quickly broke down. When viewing in browser, the default setting is for a slideshow but you can click to a thumbnail layout. If you click on a thumbnail and go back a page you get the slideshow again. Way too much clicking. You can only view the full sized pics by DL'ing the zips; the inbrowser view is only 800x550. Additionally, you can't even see all the thumbnails and the way the thumbnails are laid out (horizontal as opposed to the usual vertical) you have to use their in browser "forward arrow" which is clunky at best.

There are several photographers working here and most seem to be too damn artsy for their own good. Lots of scenes use natural lighting which results in dark pics and lots of shadows. Also the default seems to be to have the camera in a fixed position which limits the angles and views we're used to seeing.

For hardcore, there is a big focus on foreplay which results in only about 2 positions for actual sex. Given that the camera seems trapped in a fixed position for many scenes the result is that it often feels like your watching a scene from some 1980's Hustler where they couldn't show actual penetration, you just sorta know they're doing it. The lack of positions comes across in the lez and solo stuff too. I guess I like more variety as opposed to just soaking in what's in front of me.

While you get about a lot of pics per set, most of it seems to be a mosaic masterclass - here's a pose but in one frame you get a head, another the torso, another a leg, here's another with some artistic blurriness, etc. The vids are better in this respect but it does gets frustrating regarding the pics. I guess when I think artsy I think of some originality and professional output. A lot of these scenes feel more like someone who knows photography but hasn't shot porn before and isn't quite up to it.

VIDS: About 130 HC, 120 solo, and 60 lez. In browser stream works great and the HD is real HD which looks great ... meaning it's only as great as the way the scene was shot. My main complaint with the vids is their composition and artsy feel which is mostly identical to the issues I outlined in the "pics" section above. A lot of the vids have music in the beginning, some music go throughout.

NAV: Yet another site that built a navigation system when they were small and it no longer works for beans once they've grown. I already groused about the in browser pic issues. The scenes have tags but they are limited. If you search under tags, say "brunette", you'll get a result saying there are 182 scenes. However, it will only bring up 30: there is no way I can see to show them all. The tags are too few (some scenes are mistagged too) and too generic given the number of scenes they have.

If you poke around under their 3 general categories of HC, solo, and lez you'll find that recent updates aren't included. The only way to look at everything is to go through every page of updates - which only lets you jump back or ahead a few pages at a time.

I give this site an 82 because of the quality, the amount of content and the hot girls. However, for me they missed the boat on what they were trying to achieve. This is not porn for women since the focus seems mostly centered on the girls and there is no real talking or kissing-centric theme and the HC ends with a body or facial cumshot. The softer artistic side of porn put forth here seems to get washed over by the crop / framing jobs, low lighting and one position camera angles in many scenes. Those who like artsy porn may be interested in this but I think that for most the HC isn't the hardcore we're used to seeing (and not just the gonzo / rough sex stuff, just the composition in general). The softcore / lez stuff with an artsy feel is done much better by places like HegreArt, MetArt and the like.

I guess I went into this with my hopes set a bit too high. I think this site would work best for someone who digs softcore and art photography and might be looking to try some hardcore. If, like me, you have more of a hardcore background then you're more likely to walk away disappointed.

06-06-13  04:03pm

Replies (1)
Comment
50
Visit Viv Thomas Video

Viv Thomas Video
(0)

Lots of recycled content?

Saw the new TBP review today and, being that I haven't seen this site in a few years after having a previous member, thought I'd take a quick gander at the preview pages. Uggghhh! The pic updates page showed nothing but content that's been circulating in the web ether for years. In fact I didn't see anything of interest that hasn't been on my hard drive for a long time. The videos looked a little fresher but that may just be because it was mostly solo and lez content which I don't pay as much attention to. Seems like Viv peaked and is riding out the game at this point. No subscription coming up from me.

05-20-13  11:35am

Replies (0)

Shown : 26-50 of 750 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 1.02 seconds.