Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : Goldfish (67)  

Feedback:   All (261)  |   Reviews (37)  |   Comments (17)  |   Replies (207)

Other:   Replies Received (113)  |   Trust Ratings (45)

All Activity A summary of all the feedback from this user.
Shown : 1-25 of 269 Page :    Next Page >

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
Reply
1
Visit VideoBox

VideoBox
(7)
Reply of marcdc1's Reply

I also have some trouble with the filters. Once I apply a filter I can't undo it without reloading the page. I do enjoy the novel way to browse clips. They'll work the bugs out eventually.

09-19-12  03:08pm

Comment
2
Visit VideoBox

VideoBox
(7)

Flow Mode

I subscribed to VideoBox for the first time in over a year this week. They have a new(er) feature called "Flow Mode" that's an alternative way to browse random video clips. When you select Flow Mode rows of clips start scrolling across your screen. All the clips are playing (no volume) so you get a quick preview. If you click a clip it expands and starts playing from where it left off in Flow Mode. There is also a filter option that lets you use Flow Mode for a specific niche.

09-17-12  04:20am

Replies (3)
Reply
3
Visit Amateur Allure

Amateur Allure
(3)
Reply of nygiants03's Reply

They do fade into new scenes. I didn't notice the logo being inserted.

09-16-12  01:58pm

Reply
4
Visit 18 Only Girls

18 Only Girls
(0)
Reply of elephant's Reply

I agree. I recall finding the content wasn't totally exclusive between the sites so needing to join each individually wouldn't be worth it to me.

Wasn't network access $39 a month earlier this year? I don't think it was ever $29 for the whole network.

UPDATE: If you scroll down to my last review you'll see in the "Cons" that I mention network access was expensive at $34.97 a month.


09-16-12  07:32am

Review
5
Visit Amateur Allure

Amateur Allure
(3)

78.0
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: + Sexy model interviews at the beginning of each clip.
+ Full intercourse worked in between blowjobs.
+ Consistently attractive models.
+ Good download speeds/download manager friendly.
Cons: - A little pricey, especially considering the amount of content.
- Only one update a week.
- The Web site isn't intuitive.
- Scenes are repetitive. (It is a blowjob site so somewhat expected.)
- Girls in a state of full or partial dress during sex scenes.
Bottom Line: Amateur Allure delivers on the blowjob niche. If you want to see hot girls happily sucking cock, that's what you get!

The new video updates are published in 1080p. Slightly older videos are in 720p. If you really dig into the archive the clips are lower resolution/bit rate. The production quality is consistent throughout.

The monthly rate is a negative for this site. Considering the amount of content, number of updates (currently once a week) and lack of any network access make $36 a month a little pricey compared to the competition.

09-16-12  07:26am

Replies (3)
Reply
6
Visit 18 Only Girls

18 Only Girls
(0)
Reply of elephant's Comment

I've had a beef with this network since I found them a few years ago. They are always tinkering with the network access levels. At least with the one site now there is a good amount of content to make it worth a subscription.

09-16-12  06:41am

Reply
7
Visit X-Art

X-Art
(5)
Reply of BabyGetReal's Reply

Hey BGR, This site does a good job getting the most from every girl. I didn't see one clip where the girl seemed uncomfortable or stiff. As a disclaimer, there are some European girls on this site. It's a mix of Euro and American models.

Enjoy, if you sign up!


09-16-12  06:34am

Review
8
Visit X-Art

X-Art
(5)

94.0
Status: Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
Pros: + Strikingly beautiful models. (Tend to be young/natural looking)
+ Sex scenes are well produced/shot.
+ 3 content updates a week. (Mix of video/galleries)
+ Good monthly rate. $19.95 without a TBP discount.
+ Content appears to be exclusive.
+ A large portion of the video content is hardcore, boy/girl.
+ Good mix of Euro and American girls.
Cons: - videos start with music and credits rolling before the action starts.
- Struggled with using the download manager on this site.
- While the models are beautiful, they tend to have favorite girls that show up frequently in the updates. A little more variety would be nice.
Bottom Line: I enjoy the young, natural models and have become bored with the handful of European sites using the same models, doing the same old sex scenes. X-Art is a refreshing change.

X-Art delivers on their tag line "Beautiful erotica". Many sites choose beautiful models, as X-Art has done. They take it a step further using creativity in setting up sensual sex scenes and know how to use the camera to accentuate the models and the sex.

If you prefer rougher sex (slapping, spitting, anal, etc.) you may be a little bored with this site. Aside from that, the sex is definitely not softcore. Most of the boy/girl sex scenes have some combination of blowjobs, handjobs and intercourse from every angle. I'd say about two out of every three videos is boy/girl. The rest are a combination of lesbian and solo.

The Web site is intuitive and easy to navigate. Videos can be sorted by update or most popular. The models can be sorted by popularity, newest model or model age. There doesn't seem to be a way to sort/filter picture galleries accept seeing them as they come in on the update tab or by finding a model and accessing the gallery through her page.

Overall a great site. Definitely a new favorite.

09-15-12  07:59am

Replies (2)
Review
9
Visit Nuru Massage

Nuru Massage
(3)

82.0
Status: Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
Pros: + Fantastic monthly rate if you include the TBP discount.
+ Beautiful women of various shades, colors and races. (Asian heavily represented but not exclusively.)
+ 3 network sites included. All sites in the massage category. (Soapy Massage, All Girl Massage and Massage Parlor)
+ Creative take on the massage/hardcore sex scene
Cons: - I'm a fan of massage with the oils but the goop they were using on this site was a little off-putting at times.
- A few too many fake boobs for my tastes.
- Scenes can get repetitive.
Bottom Line: Reading TBP's primary niche for this site made me laugh, "Wet N Messy Fetish". I saw it while writing this review and wanted to point it out.

On to the bottom line. Nuru Massage is a solid, hardcore porn site in the massage niche. If you enjoy the site of glistening, naked bodies rubbing together, this site is for you!

Nuru provides everything I'd expect from a porn site in 2012. Each video is streamed in a high quality Flash video. The videos are offered for download in wmv and mp4 format in 1080p HD quality. The download speed is acceptable. I'm not a picture guy but I assume they are of similar quality.

The content is broken up into the standard sorts. You can see them in update order. There is also the option to see the highest rated or most viewed. The user can also view the models and drill down to the content that way.

Overall Nuru Massage is a good site. As I mentioned above the goopy massage lube they used turned me off at times. Other than that I appreciated the novelty of lubed up naked bodies. Since the guy takes up some of the spotlight, I also appreciated they chose male models that were fit and not a distraction from the ladies.

09-15-12  07:02am

Replies (0)
Reply
10
Visit Sex Art

Sex Art
(4)
Reply of exotics4me's Review

After reading your review and looking at the "about" section on the SexArt home page I'm surprised TBP categorized this site under the hardcore category. I agree that the # of boy/girl videos is a big indicator if a site is "hardcore" or not. SexArt also sells the site as catering to women, which really isn't emphasized in the TBP description or review.

Thanks for the helpful review. I would have taken this site to be something different than it is without it! (Though the cheesy preview movie may have deterred me as well.)


09-15-12  06:17am

Reply
11
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

wmv were my go-to format for a long time but I find mpg or mp4 are usually smaller file sizes with similar video quality to a comparable wmv.

07-09-11  08:48pm

Reply
12
Visit Fucked Hard 18

Fucked Hard 18
(0)
Reply of Cryton's Reply

OK, I'll buy that.

02-08-11  08:06pm

Reply
13
Visit VideoBox

VideoBox
(7)
Reply of pornpearls's Comment

Can't you do that with any site really?

02-04-11  09:17pm

Reply
14
Visit VideoBox

VideoBox
(7)
Reply of messmer's Comment

Check out Club Sapphic. They are going heavy on the MILF lesbian thing lately.

02-02-11  07:41pm

Review
15
Visit Club Sapphic

Club Sapphic
(0)

70.0
Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros: + A storyline is incorporated into the scenes that is easy to buy into and sexy.
+ Decent video quality: 720 x 408/4mbps
+ TBP discount
+ Some great regular models that appear in scenes with varying themes.
Cons: - Somewhat misleading depiction of the content from the non-member Home page and tour pages
- Older video content of poorer quality.
- Some of the models looking a little ragged.
Bottom Line: This is my second time back to Club Sapphic. My previous subscription was about ten months ago. At the time I gave them a fairly positive review. Unfortunately my return to the site hasnít been as positive.

The biggest issue I have is a change in the content provided. The site is sold as a general lesbian site with young, attractive models. When I joined previously there was some variation in the model body types -- some were more amateur looking with a few imperfections, some were more modelesque, some were older, some were younger, etc. but generally there seemed to be no theme around bodytype or age.

When I returned to the site recently there appeared to be A LOT of MILF type models in younger/older scenarios. Also, there was generally more women with tattoos and bad boobs jobs (of any age).

With the decision to take the site in the MILF/younger-older direction, They should really consider re-branding the site. I still found some good clips but overall it was a disappointment because it isn't my favorite niche.

I was also a little annoyed because the splash page when you first visit the site displays all younger, pretty models with no mention or reference to the large amount of MILF content coming out in recent updates. (About three pages into the tour you start seeing some screen shots of more recent videos.)

Doing a younger/older site is fine, just sell it that way!

01-26-11  07:20pm

Replies (1)
Reply
16
Visit Teen Mega World

Teen Mega World
(3)
Reply of pat362's Review

I've had plenty of issues with this network in the past but things are becoming gradually better, I have to admit. They also have some great talent.

01-22-11  08:55pm

Reply
17
Visit VideoBox

VideoBox
(7)
Reply of petefountain's Review

Sticking up for software engineers everywhere, it's usually the marketing team that has that annoying desire to change something that works -- we just do what we're paid for. LOL.

01-22-11  08:51pm

Reply
18
Visit Fucked Hard 18

Fucked Hard 18
(0)
Reply of Cryton's Reply

I disagree. 720p is considered HD by the cable industry, why not here?

01-21-11  05:11am

Reply
19
Visit Fucked Hard 18

Fucked Hard 18
(0)
Reply of squirrel's Review

Wow, the proverbial 100! LOL. I was recently a member of this site and I can see how you give it such high marks. Great quality video, super sexy girls in great sex scenes.

Good review!


01-10-11  08:26pm

Reply
20
Visit Teen Mega World

Teen Mega World
(3)
Reply of Denner's Review

I agree, this is a solid network. I've had my complaints since the first visit but I've also seen progress. The large number of downloaded video on my harddrive speaks for itself.

01-10-11  08:22pm

Reply
21
N/A Reply of JBDICK's Poll

No and walk away. If I just declined a girl I'd feel awkward hanging out with her. LOL.

01-10-11  08:17pm

Reply
22
Visit Young Legal Porn

Young Legal Porn
(3)
Reply of hugow's Review

Did you try contacting the Web master?

01-02-11  02:15pm

Comment
23
Visit Fucked Hard 18

Fucked Hard 18
(0)

Great site

I was a member of this site back in the spring so I decided another review would be overkill. I joined again after seeing the TBP review. Fucked Hard 18 is still producing some great hardcore sex with stunning models. They recently started publishing in full HD: 1280x720/3 Mbps.

The updates are infrequent for my tastes (once a week) and the sex scene can get a bit monotonous.

Overall this site is a winner.

01-02-11  02:14pm

Replies (4)
Review
24
Visit Sapphic Erotica

Sapphic Erotica
(0)

92.0
Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros: + New content released as 1280 x 720 MP4s.
+ Recently updated a large portion of their collection to 1280 x 720 resolution, MP4 format.
+ Video also available as 640 x 480 MP4 and a smaller version for smartphones. All video options can either be downloaded or streamed in a pop-up window.
+ Large amount of content going back to early 00's.
+ Truly beautiful European women.
+ Daily updates (alternating between pics and video updates.)
+ Exclusive content.
+ Good site navigation and filtering options.
Cons: - The site design hasn't been updated in years. It's not horrible, just a peeve.
- Older content of lower quality.
Bottom Line: I usually make an annual visit to this site. Honestly, I was expecting to knock down my previous rating a couple points a few days into my subscription but then I ran into a couple pleasant surprises that inspired me to bump it up five!

Surprise #1 was the talent. During my visit in '09 Sapphic Erotica was still holding a high standard for the models in their lesbian sex scenes but I was finding more average looking girls in not-so exciting sex scenes -- still high quality but not the "wow" factor I had on my previous visit.

During my recent subscription to the site I discovered some great new models, as well as old favorites making new videos. The passion and excitement seemed to be back.

My second surprise was a site upgrade that occurred during my subscription month. (Fortunately, only a few days in.) The Web master upgraded the video downloads, all the way back to about 2005, to 1280 x 720 MP4s. (Previously wmv's of various resolutions.) When you get back to the video in 2005-04, the video is still decent 640 x 480 resolution.

That is a HUGE amount of HD content for any site. I preferred the MP4's to the WMV files that were previously available so I went back and downloaded all my favorites.

Overall this is a great lesbian site. There is a large library of supremely attractive models performing lesbian sex. (No solo or B/G available.) The sex is as "hardcore" as you can get without having a guy involved. They do take the high road with the action. There is no rough sex or extreme kinkiness. There is use of toys on occasion and some fisting.

01-01-11  01:39pm

Replies (0)
Reply
25
Visit My Pickup Girls

My Pickup Girls
(0)
Reply of pat362's Review

Thanks for the review Pat. The girls on this network look hot. I can see how the scenarios are a little contrived. I also have issue with the sex outside and in cars, etc. -- it tends to be a distraction for me.

01-01-11  12:32pm


Shown : 1-25 of 269 Page :    Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 1.17 seconds.