Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : Ergo Proxy (21)  

Feedback:   All (163)  |   Reviews (12)  |   Comments (41)  |   Replies (110)

Other:   Replies Received (109)  |   Trust Ratings (32)

All Activity A summary of all the feedback from this user.
Shown : 51-75 of 163 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
Reply
51
Visit abbywinters

abbywinters
(0)
Reply of dracken's Review

I liked your review because you address many points I would have mentioned too and the final score seems fair. Have you ever considered to look at "I feel myself"? Personally I didn't like it much but in your case if you don't mind they have mostly solo scenes they do have decent video quality and usually the pacing is faster.

05-03-12  10:05am

Reply
52
Visit Kink On Demand

Kink On Demand
(0)
Reply of martinlongbow's Comment

Sorry to hear that. I am a regular customer there and never had this problem. Wait for the customer service to answer. Usually they are very concerned about customer problems.

05-01-12  11:39pm

Reply
53
Visit Beshine

Beshine
(0)
Reply of BadMrFrosty's Reply

That's right, but I really hope she visited a professional therapist before this procedure and had her psyche checked out. I still detest the surgeon for going through with this. Speaking about responsibility for the patient's health and well being etc...

05-01-12  03:22am

Reply
54
Visit Beshine

Beshine
(0)
Reply of BadMrFrosty's Comment

Sorry, my comment is not related to your discussion of her name changing. After looking at her site I am still at a loss of words...My suggestion is to find the surgeon and inject him with saline until he explodes.

04-30-12  08:42am

Review
55
Visit Rubber Tanja

Rubber Tanja
(0)

75.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -updates are currently quite frequent (about once every 2-5 days)

-high definition videos (.f4v, 1920x1080), version for mobile devices (.flv), sreaming option

-the models are very pretty with nice firm bodies

-vast range of different fetish outfits and settings
Cons: -only 5 galleries with pretty old sets

-no model list or background infos whatsoever

-only one video format, streaming option shows the whole picture only in full screen mode (strange)

-videos are split into many parts, unfortunately the video names are just numbers which makes it impossible to find the matching parts afterwards

-plain site with not much to explore
Bottom Line: At first I was impressed by their humongous range of fetish wear they are using in the shoots. They obviously use made to measure catsuits which fit the models perfectly (and are pricey), bizarre suits like the doll suit with condoms for each orifice, realistic doll masks, masks with dental dams, piss masks, gas masks, nurse outfits etc. It's also nice to see some of the girls dress up in the suits (from naked to completely rubberized). The scenes are usually two or three girls licking or caressing each other or using dildoes or strapons. There are also two pissing scenes if I am not mistaken.

Up to here it's all fine and I am quite happy that I have seen these beautiful girls dress up and polish their hot bodies. But there are some downsides which piled up after watching the videos.

First of all the splitting of the videos is awful. It feels like they did it to manipulate the update schedule since it naturally leads to more frequent updates. And, as I said, the videos are numbered so you have to sort them carefully by hand. I have already mentioned that the models usually look gorgeous but I have some problems with the shoots. I will give some representative examples.

First, most of the licking scenes are exhausting for the viewer because the active woman (mostly) BARELY touches the pussy with her tongue which in turn produces pre-orgasmic noises from the other woman. I don't exaggerate here. In one scene I was on the verge of a heart attack watching a string of saliva going back and forth but the tongue never touching anything.

Second, the slowness...usually I like shoots which are sensous and build up the tension with some steamy ending but in some scenes you have the feeling the video runs in slow-motion and (which is most problematic) the climax is missing. There is this huge contradiction between the kinky settings and the relatively tame action. If I have a smoking hot girl in the most kinky rubber outfit which sucks on a strapon I want her to deep throat it and not just lick the tip and pretend it's her most exciting moment. If I have a piss mask I want to see all the piss going in and give the girl some trouble breathing and not dribble out mostly at the sides.

I really missed the element of exhausted and satisfied girls after an orgy of ecstatic flesh (or rubber) here. All the ingredients are there but they are not combined in the right way. I had no problem with this if they would have stayed softcore but doing it like this it's neither flesh or fowl. I don't really blame the girls which appear to be amateurs and not pros, so maybe it's just a consequence of their inexperience or shyness. Maybe I had the wrong expectations here.

In conclusion if you want to watch some awesome girls dressing up in slick rubber and don't care if the action is limited and there are nearly no galleries or options this site could be for you. Since the site is very young it may turn out to be really great in the future. With these girls at hand I surely hope so. Until then I think "might recommend" is a fair rating.

04-29-12  12:40pm

Replies (8)
Reply
56
Visit Met Art

Met Art
(3)
Reply of PinkPanther's Reply

Yeah, it's probably like that. Anyway, it's cheaper than before, but unfairly distributed over the world.

04-26-12  11:51pm

Reply
57
N/A Reply of Drooler's Poll

No. The only underaged girls I got to see until now were Hentai and since it's no real person...I sometimes wonder though why the japanese are so obsessed with loli pictures. But OK, they also look at guro, so...

04-26-12  10:25am

Comment
58
Visit Met Art

Met Art
(3)

I don't get it...

Why the hype now about lower prices at TBP with even direct links to Met Art if most of the PU members disapprove their regional billing policy? Just wondering if there are conflicts of interest here...

04-26-12  10:19am

Replies (5)
Reply
59
Visit Lez Cuties

Lez Cuties
(0)
Reply of elephant's Reply

Oh, thanks, really appreciate the info!

04-25-12  12:08am

Comment
60
Visit Lez Cuties

Lez Cuties
(0)

"Lez" Cuties???

I have looked at the recent review of TBP but when I visit the site I see a huge amount of real live penises fucking the girls in the previews. Why is the site sorted under the lesbian category? Am I missing something? Lesbian means no penises made of real flesh to me.

04-24-12  01:55pm

Replies (6)
Reply
61
Visit Hegre Art

Hegre Art
(1)
Reply of elephant's Comment

Maybe the movies are some sort of "making of" from the shootings? I think one should join Hegre for the photos though, the movies are only a bonus.

04-23-12  04:57am

Reply
62
Visit Met Art

Met Art
(3)
Reply of BadMrFrosty's Reply

I will make a suggestion for such lists on PU and will be the first to participate, no problem. Seriously, has there ever been such a suggestion?

04-23-12  03:04am

Reply
63
Visit Met Art

Met Art
(3)
Reply of BadMrFrosty's Reply

The "substantial number of people" is the problem (and OK, this is the result of the attitude). I would happily boycott MetArt if I knew a substantial amount of users would do the same. There should be a list with participants and if the number goes up to a reasonable amount it would have the desired effect.

04-23-12  01:18am

Reply
64
Visit Met Art

Met Art
(3)
Reply of Denner's Reply

I really doubt it will change their pricing scheme if I join or not. Just like I wonn't save the planet if I turn my lights out overnight.

04-22-12  11:45pm

Reply
65
N/A Reply of Drooler's Reply

Maybe it's like you said it is but I think you underestimate the society and its influence on the individual's decisions. Even if one is unaware of it.

04-22-12  05:28am

Reply
66
N/A Reply of Ergo Proxy's Poll

I am happy to see my suggestion for a poll. To clarify the point "Maiming the concept of love", I was struggling to get the expression in the way I wanted it to appear (and this one is also meant ironically of course). I wanted to give a choice for differentiation here between social and sexual monogamy. Although most people see these concepts intrinsically linked to each other, they are not. So the number one reason for most people to say that someone is unable to be socially monogamous is sexual promiscuity. Social standards don't allow one to follow this combination. My point for this 4th option was, however, that (from my point of view) the level of commitment and trust one puts into his relationships should be viewed independently from his promiscuity. There are different levels of "love" and they shouldn't be discarded by social standards. I found a citation in an article which expresses my thoughts on this topic quite well:

"While monogamy is the perfect form of social organization, its pressure is eliminating all other options and putting aside the persons that are not capable of it and want to experiment other life styles."

http://hugocrispim.suite101.com/monogamo...ial-monogamy-a324570

So I polled for point four. Makes the most sense to me. There is so much love going around, I wouldn't want it restricted just by social standards or stigmata.


04-22-12  03:21am

Reply
67
Visit Met Art

Met Art
(3)
Reply of BadMrFrosty's Reply

Hmm, converting 19,97 to $ it's about 26$. It's a little bit cheaper than before, but not much though. It sucks that one has to be so attentive to the currency. So it's still the same. Living in the US, join, living in Europe don't.

04-22-12  12:12am

Reply
68
Visit Met Art

Met Art
(3)
Reply of Vegas Ken's Comment

"Well, fine, great for US-citizens.....across the Atlantic it's still regional pricing, so that offer means about $28....."

Maybe check again. When I tried, it said 19.97/month. I am seriously considering to join again.


04-21-12  01:56pm

Reply
69
Visit Girls Out West

Girls Out West
(1)
Reply of xexbot's Review

Thanks for the review. I can follow your score after the points mentioned. Said that I would not even give Abby Winters more than 70 points.

04-21-12  04:53am

Reply
70
Visit Met Art

Met Art
(3)
Reply of gyang79's Reply

I get it that everyone has his own views of beauty, but by all fair means finding the women of Metart that repugnant? And where comes the following from?

"If you like women that look like they have been starved nearly to death then thats you"

In what possible way on holy mother's earth are the models there "nearly starved to death"? I was making an "effort" here and dug out my MetArt folder and skimmed through a bunch of galleries and couldn't find a single model which can be suspected of bulimia. Anyway I don't want to argue that much anymore.
But I really want to know, did you subscribe to FTV and are you satisfied there? Just curious.


04-18-12  07:53am

Reply
71
Visit Met Art

Met Art
(3)
Reply of gyang79's Comment

Your comment has some flaws:

1. East european models are the most beautiful women there are and they don't look the same, maybe look closer.
2. The human body has only a limited number of poses. What do you expect? If you apply this criterion the galleries would turn into boring after the 3rd set or so.
3. Blank stares??? Maybe you joined the wrong site.
4. MetArt has the most diversified shooting locations one can think of.

I admit that the newer sets are all glamour and polished, not like the old sets from 2002-200x but they are still worthwile. It sounds like a rant here but I think you are just pissed that you joined and did not get what you wanted but from their previews it should have been pretty clear to you what to expect. I am just puzzled from your reaction.


04-16-12  03:11pm

Reply
72
Visit Fetish Bunker

Fetish Bunker
(0)
Reply of RustyJ's Reply

Nope.

04-14-12  12:03am

Reply
73
Visit Fetish Bunker

Fetish Bunker
(0)
Reply of RustyJ's Reply

You are right. I didn't intend to push them into the shady area. They did some awesome work there and I had even some contact via email with them a while ago. It's really painful to see the site age with no activity whatsoever.

04-13-12  12:08pm

Comment
74
Visit Fetish Bunker

Fetish Bunker
(0)

"dead" site

No updates since November 2010 here. I am not sure why they still offer recurring memberships and don't mention that the site is in stasis.

04-12-12  09:39am

Replies (4)
Review
75
Visit Latex Veronica

Latex Veronica
(0)

80.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Previews for non members show absolutely all available galleries, 10 videos can be watched for about 1 minute each, that's nice

-The new galleries feature extensive and hot descriptions from Veronica with nice insights into her kinky mind, quite a turn on to read them

-All videos in HD, old ones 1280x720, new ones 1920x1080, currently a total of 30 vids available, running times vary between 7-30 min.

-Galleries have resolutions of 1067x1600, zip files for each gallery, average of 90 pics/gallery (varies from 40-160)

-Some guest galleries with 20 pics each (modest resolutions, no updates here), Ancilla Tilia, Bianca Beauchamp, Susan Wayland, Manuela from Rubbervita

-Some interactive content with votings for new shootings or outfits

-Plans to do custom videos?(it's announced on their main page)
Cons: -Only one video format (.wmv), no streaming, some videos contain music (maybe a pro or con, depends)

-Galleries could use a higher resolution, there was no change here since the site started

-Download speeds are rather modest

-Updates are coming slow (about one update in 2 weeks)

-Site has a very basic design

-No hardcore scenes (like at Rubber Passion for example)
Bottom Line: Since the site changed its name my old review got obsolete but at least this one is a chance to look at some improvements they made. I really liked it that they offer .zip files for the galleries now! As I remember I downloaded the old ones per hand and all the filenames where random with no order whatsoever. Also the new HD video format is quite nice. The rest is basically the same as before. You will see colourful and rubbery pictures of Veronica doing sports like skiing, diving, cycling and swimming. There are also nice sets with dressing scenes or applying shiny silicone oil on her suit. Most scenes are shot outdoors. Furthermore you get to see her wearing casual clothes over her latex suits which gives a sweet touch to it (the hiking gallery for example is quite adorable). The main focus lies on catsuits which is after my fancy. But there are also some slightly more kinky galleries like bondage and ballgags. The most recent one features a ballhood and bondage mittens which is always cool to look at. After all, the site didn't lose its original character and charm. Veronica is quite the rubber gal and it seems she is comfortable about doing her modeling in latex attire. The main shortcoming is (as usual) the slow update schedule. I quit some time ago and didn't miss really much since then. But the actual galleries are quite an eye-catcher. Because of their improvements I give a slightly higher rating than before (which was 75).

04-05-12  02:54am

Replies (0)

Shown : 51-75 of 163 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.68 seconds.