| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
51
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Claypaws's Poll
Face is most important, then bone structure, then body-fat/athleticism, then fashion, then "specific body parts" - as in "which is best?". Voice & performance take time to appreciate, so those come last. The others take milliseconds to analyze, so they be first. I find good fashion can really help but not hugely hinder if the person wearing it is quite attractive. If they aren't, well then, fashion can make all the difference, in either direction.
|
09-03-12 01:27am
|
Reply
52
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Rick's Poll
I don't mind streaming only sites, but pay-per-minute or pay-per-view sites, while having a massive selection, are mostly a rip-off due to competition like Videobox. The only time they are good value is if you wanted to see a very particular scene or movie and didn't or couldn't buy the DVD of it - or only wanted to watch it once and the VOD is therefore cheaper.
|
09-01-12 02:36pm
|
Reply
53
|
Tokyo Hot
(0)
|
Reply of
My 2 cents's Reply
It appears you may be right. That is not good. This means the site uses both DRM and a token/credit system. Using tokens and a monthly membership is really not cool. This makes the site far less appealing.
However, if they allowed streaming but not downloading without the use of credits, I wouldn't mind as much. So sad. Good eye there 2 cents!
|
08-28-12 05:14pm
|
Reply
54
|
N/A
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Poll
Have and will again. Though I do love it when they put subtitles in - so few sites do that, but it is really appreciated! No dubbing, I hate when Hollywood does it, so I don't expect it in my porn either.
|
08-28-12 09:40am
|
Reply
55
|
Tokyo Hot
(0)
|
Reply of
gaypornolover's Reply
According to their Domain records, the site was registered in 2003 through GoDaddy.com and they are protecting the registration using DomainsByProxy. So there isn't an easy way for the Japanese government to prove that the website is not American (the Registration address is listed as Scottsdale, Arizona) which probably makes shutting it down more trouble than it is worth.
Also, the Japanese porn industry seems to be realizing there is an international market for their product, and that market doesn't require censorship (mostly).
Granted, this is largely speculation on my part. Probably need someone who has studied Japanese governmental law to really get down to the brass tacks.
|
08-28-12 09:37am
|
Reply
56
|
Tokyo Hot
(0)
|
Reply of
slategrey's Reply
My pleasure, will do :-) Maybe within a couple of months, there are a few other sites ahead of it on my short list, but it is a definite priority site.
|
08-27-12 10:08pm
|
Comment
57
|
Tokyo Hot
(0)
|
|
08-27-12 06:42pm
Replies (6)
|
Reply
58
|
N/A
|
Reply of
jberryl69's Poll
I don't know many people that haven't subscribed to videobox at one point or another. I know about 5 people that collect many 100s of gigs of porn, though only has broken the terabyte category.
|
08-20-12 01:06am
|
Reply
59
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
Oh, I burn it.
Burn it all.
That's why I buy Ikea; it is cheap enough that I don't really mind.
|
08-19-12 02:02am
|
Reply
60
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pornwatcher's Poll
I would choose cunnilingus, but honestly there is somewhat of a dearth of attractive male talent so the fact of the matter is I'd rather look at their penis than their face most of the time. There are exceptions of course, Eastern European porn has been getting some new male talent in their videos lately that actually seem to be under the age of 40 and have been chosen not just for the size of their member. In American porn, James Dean pops to mind. So, due to the restrictions of this survey, I have to choose fellatio, but in an ideal world I'd probably choose cunnilingus.
Sometimes it also just depends on the preferences of the day as well.
|
08-17-12 08:57am
|
Reply
61
|
ATK Natural & Hairy
(5)
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
No problem - I hope it works for ya :-)
|
08-17-12 08:18am
|
Reply
62
|
ATK Natural & Hairy
(5)
|
Reply of
Capn's Comment
Try this link:
http://refer.ccbill.com/cgi-bin/clicks.cgi?CA=903646-0000&PA=2294979&HTML=http://www.atkhairy.com/join?promo=pr1995&cc=2294979
It should equal a $19.95 per month sign-up.
|
08-16-12 10:46pm
|
Reply
63
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I never demanded one, but CCBill once gave me one on their own due to an inaccessible site. So that was kinda nifty.
|
08-14-12 06:59pm
|
Reply
64
|
N/A
|
Reply of
tangub's Reply
My thoughts exactly. I've been looking for a site that provides good glamour photography for Black women for a very long time. ATK Exotics tries, but it really is trying to keep that Amateur appeal. I want Hegre Art and MET-Art style photography brought to black models, but so far basically nobody is doing it. Hegre has exactly one black model.
Latin models are lacking coverage as well. At least there are some options for Asian models, though still not as thoroughly covered as European & American models are.
|
08-10-12 07:25pm
|
Reply
65
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
It really does depend on the model in specific for me. Some women really move well and present well despite being technically obese - most would describe them as voluptuous. If a model's fat pattern goes toward the hour-glass shape and pronounced bust, then obesity can really be a strength for her.
I would say most BBW sites unfortunately aren't hugely picky, so it isn't a genre I browse all that often.
|
08-08-12 10:43am
|
Reply
66
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
I know you asked "who really cares?" but I figured I'd note that Peaches is just a smidge over 5'10" (178cm). If she is exactly 178cm, then she actually is 5' 10-393/5000" (5'10.0786").
Sorry, I was bored.
|
08-06-12 07:06pm
|
Reply
67
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
I generally assume models are pretty small, between 5'1" (155cm) and 5'7" (170cm), but every once in a while I've been shocked to find out just how tall a model actually was. For example, Angel Long, as her name suggests, really is a whopping 6' (182cm) tall!
|
08-06-12 12:38pm
|
Reply
68
|
The Black Alley
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
I know the frustration, but since I use a download accelerator, I can actually set it to limit the amount of data it downloads in a 24 hour period, so that is a convenient work around. You just queue up a lot of shit and check back in a few days.
|
08-05-12 08:43pm
|
Reply
69
|
N/A
|
Reply of
BadMrFrosty's Reply
Had it said all that, then the answer for me would have been: "Nope, not a prob."
|
08-02-12 08:04pm
|
Reply
70
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
I think it would be mighty hypocritical of me to be as interested in porn as I am and then to turn around and condemn someone for performing in that industry - past or present.
That said, the vast majority of porn stars tend to have some rather significant issues. Sometimes its just simple emotional imbalances, which doesn't bother me much and sometimes can be very entertaining, but other times it is significant psychiatric problems and/or deficiencies (i.e. stupidity, to put it bluntly). I think Jim Powers once described most of the girls he worked with as "broken toys" and unable to hold down fast-food jobs. I know a few people that have tried to find a relationship through strip clubs and many have succeeded in dating strippers, but it basically always went a bit tits up, if you will. At least in the U.S., girls willing to enter such a taboo industry tend to generally not be quite right, sadly. That said, the old adage is that your girlfriend can be Hot, Intelligent, or Emotionally Stable - choose two. I'm willing to forgo emotional stability to a large extent.
|
08-02-12 12:20pm
|
Reply
71
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I generally find the pornstars that I like seem to have trouble connecting with the camera as they would if they were simply interacting directly with their costar. On the other hand, some stars really take to it and the video can be extremely immersive. In those few cases I keep the video around.
I must say that I am entertained and amused by the rare POV movies that feature a female star as the viewer's body.
|
07-31-12 11:33am
|
Reply
72
|
Mighty Mistress
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
I still have a membership with 21 Sextury entirely due to the fact that it is only 10 bucks a month. So that is probably still accurate. As I recall, when I joined, they knocked the price down each month, so it started at 20 bucks, then dropped to maybe 18 then 15 then 12, stopping at 10. Something like that. It is a large enough network that I usually feel they've well earned their 10 bucks. Plus, since everything streams quite well, I don't worry about actually downloading their content.
|
07-30-12 10:50pm
|
Reply
73
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
I don't mind, as I can't argue against much against the safety comments, though I think the kink factor is higher condom free. I also feel that porn performers are paid to perform acts of physical prowess under dangerous situations. Stunt Performers in the mainstream media are paid for nearly the same job description (usually more clothes are required) and yet the uproar is barely audible when one of them gets killed on the job. Though sometimes they do sue: http://www.imdb.com/news/ni32832678/
|
07-29-12 08:42pm
|
Reply
74
|
N/A
|
Reply of
messmer's Poll
I have no problem enjoying film stars that have died, nor do I have problems enjoying pornstars that have died. If you watch older porn, there is a high likelihood you'll run across stars that have since died. Marilyn Chambers, John Holmes, Jon Dough, et cetera. Even recent deaths like Haley Paige (btw Wikipedia implies it was an accidental Methadone overdose; her husband committed suicide approx. a month later) don't hugely bother me because the star lives on in the video and their absence isn't all that different than if they retired. Paige would have been 31 this year and quite likely retired from the industry at this point. I guess I don't really see any problem appreciating a performer who died any more than I see a problem appreciating a performer in their youth despite their now advanced age. Kathleen Turner was quite beautiful in "Romancing the Stone", the fact that she now hangs out with John Waters doesn't change that. (Photo: http://www.imdb.com/media/rm4240947712/nm0000678)
|
07-26-12 04:59pm
|
Reply
75
|
N/A
|
Reply of
HeatherMcXxx's Reply
Maybe he is thinking they have kegel muscles that are as strong as their biceps? Do people actually measure how much weight they can kegel? "You can bench 300? Meh... I can kegel 350."
|
07-24-12 08:31pm
|
