Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : messmer (137)  

Feedback:   All (2160)  |   Reviews (75)  |   Comments (238)  |   Replies (1847)

Other:   Replies Received (1284)  |   Trust Ratings (77)

All Activity A summary of all the feedback from this user.
Shown : 51-75 of 2174 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
Reply
51
N/A Reply of pat362's Reply

I've reached that point, Pat, and it is frustrating, to say the least. :-(

06-17-13  10:26am

Reply
52
N/A Reply of Capn's Reply

Ditto, Cap'n. I haven't subscribed to a new site in months because I simply can't find one that would suit my taste. Most of my former regulars have become "ho-hum!"

06-17-13  10:24am

Reply
53
N/A Reply of Wittyguy's Poll

I would say, no, it wasn't for the money. However, my winnings provoked a "loyalty" response where I left many email offers untouched and went to PU or TBP to subscribe through them instead.

06-16-13  10:23am

Reply
54
N/A Reply of Cybertoad's Poll

At the moment I am completely into books until I find MY site. If only I could spend some of my money through this site but all my formerly favorite sites have changed for the worse and there still aren't any softcore, solo EXTENSIVE strip sites available. And with strip I don't mean ladies dancing on poles. :-) The "Only" sites come close to my ideal but they not only stop short of full nudity but also don't feature more mature women.

06-14-13  10:29am

Reply
55
N/A Reply of graymane's Poll

I have never had a casual sex partner. It is psychologically impossible for me. I tried a few times in my youth .. but without love or emotional bond, there can be no sex for me.

06-10-13  10:39am

Comment
56
Visit We Are Hairy

We Are Hairy
(1)

Too bad .. no more freebie previews!

One thing I used to like about this site was that you could look at a whole set (at least the thumbs) of pictures, or a short video preview, and make up your mind, based on the teasers, if you wanted to join or not. It's gone. All you get now is a quick trip to the sign-up page. Really too bad because it was those previews of whole sets (and glimpses of a video) that made the site different and classy.

06-08-13  02:36pm

Replies (0)
Reply
57
N/A Reply of RustyJ's Poll

Normal clothes WITH lingerie. Normal, these days, sometimes just means three items or so of clothing, that's why the qualifier.

06-08-13  01:09pm

Reply
58
Visit I Dream Of Jo

I Dream Of Jo
(0)
Reply of pat362's Reply

I agree about the last review, Pat!

06-02-13  10:10pm

Reply
59
Visit I Dream Of Jo

I Dream Of Jo
(0)
Reply of RagingBuddhist's Reply

No doubt Abby Winters wanted some free advertising at the time but I was a willing participant and no, I never expected compensation nor did I get any. I was just glad to spread the Gospel of, what I thought was a great site at the time. I do agree, however, that a flood of extremely short, favourable reviews, might make one suspicious!

06-02-13  10:06pm

Reply
60
Visit I Dream Of Jo

I Dream Of Jo
(0)
Reply of pat362's Reply

Oops, you know I had no idea that I did a review, Pat. I thought it was a comment. Must go back to see what I wrote at the time! :-) In any case, I agree, when I saw all those very short reviews with high marks .. for ONE site ... my suspicion meter went way up as well. I'm just saying that fans of a site, in their enthusiasm for it, may write a very inadequate review at the suggestion of a web master without being shills. Just sincerely in love with it.

06-02-13  12:28pm

Comment
61
Visit I Dream Of Jo

I Dream Of Jo
(0)

In defense of the Jo fans!

They remind me of myself, five years ago. I had subscribed to an erotic site for the first time and it blew me away. I let the webmaster know how much I liked her (his) site and Abby (Winters) suggested that I publish my high opinion in Porn Users. Of course, I did not do a review but made a comment instead. I did not see myself as a shill for the site and saw nothing wrong with it. If I remember right, quite a few climbed all over me for that. BTW, I am still grateful to Abby Winters for sending me here.

06-02-13  11:23am

Replies (6)
Reply
62
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Yes, I've done it a few times but stopped doing it after some idiot added something offensive to what I had written, making it look as if it came from me.

06-02-13  11:05am

Reply
63
Visit Wicked.com

Wicked.com
(0)
Reply of PinkPanther's Reply

I was just guessing, based on what they showed on Canadian HBO, PP. I got so incredibly sick of seeing Jessica Drake. Every movie they showed: Jessica Drake, Kaylani Lei .. Kaylani I loved but Jessica Drake I couldn't stand so I stopped watching altogether eventually. Same with their stable of male contract stars. Randy Spears I liked .. but did he have to be in just about every movie? But as I said that might have been a decision by HBO!

05-29-13  10:47am

Reply
64
N/A Reply of Cybertoad's Poll

I always put everything into a folder marked "Downloads" and when I am finished I sort the material to their proper destiny.

05-27-13  10:01am

Reply
65
Visit Wicked.com

Wicked.com
(0)
Reply of rearadmiral's Comment

Maybe they are trying to hide the fact that they use a handful of models over and over again, rearadmiral. HBO carried one or two late night Wicked movies every day and it was always the same faces. It seemed to me at times that they had about 10 contract "stars" and that was about it. But maybe that was just HBO's choice?

05-26-13  09:53am

Reply
66
Visit Bangbros Network

Bangbros Network
(5)
Reply of Ozark's Reply

Hi Ozark, mp4 could be all kinds of resolutions. When it comes to HD it could be 720p or 1080p. They do offer the 720p mp4s but I have yet to come across the advertised 1080p, that's why my negative opinion of them. And I don't remember getting an offer for any extra sites .. I might have, but don't remember. I just remember my upset when I clicked on some of the updates and found they belonged to sites I would have to subscribe to first. It's the kind of sneakiness that is new to them and disturbed me greatly.

05-26-13  09:48am

Reply
67
Visit Art-Lingerie

Art-Lingerie
(0)
Reply of OnlyAllSites's Reply

Thank you for clarifying this for me! I shall return.

05-23-13  06:03pm

Reply
68
Visit Art-Lingerie

Art-Lingerie
(0)
Reply of OnlyAllSites's Reply

Sounds promising, thank you! Last time we talked you still had to put contents on the site that had been produced before your decision to have no post production, as you pointed out above as well. So I just wanted to see how far I could go back in the updates before I got to the first stretch of pure unretouched content. Have you had any flack from those who preferred things the old way? I know that I shall be back.

05-23-13  06:01pm

Reply
69
Visit Art-Lingerie

Art-Lingerie
(0)
Reply of OnlyAllSites's Reply

Can I sneak in another question, Matt? Some sites have switched to streaming only so when you say "337 videos released and available to view" does that mean viewing only or could I still download all the videos? Thanks.

05-23-13  11:23am

Reply
70
N/A Reply of GCode's Poll

I enjoy the polls and also like them because they create a certain feeling of involvement with this site and its active users.

05-23-13  11:16am

Reply
71
Visit Art-Lingerie

Art-Lingerie
(0)
Reply of OnlyAllSites's Reply

Thank you, Matt. That is good news. When did you start uploading the new content to your site?

05-23-13  11:11am

Reply
72
Visit VideoBox

VideoBox
(8)
Reply of TheSquirrel's Reply

You wrote: "Nowadays I don't download a lot, but at the current price I suppose VB is still a bargain."

That's what I thought when I subscribed long term but I won't renew once the year (10 months?) is up because I, too, have not been downloading much.

I have been a member on and off for years and have all the old stuff that interested me then. Actually I don't because I deleted all 640x480p videos that weren't sharp enough for my taste. HD has spoiled me.

The new stuff is mostly run of the mill to me. And since I don't download anything BUT HD contents there's usually a long wait between downloads. I wish I were as undemanding as most, who don't seem to mind to look at yesterday's quality.


05-21-13  02:39pm

Reply
73
Visit VideoBox

VideoBox
(8)
Reply of TheSquirrel's Reply

Hey Squirrel, I normally don't stream all that often, most of the time I just do it for the first minute or so of a video to see how it starts, but the jerkiness has been very obvious right from the start of a scene. At first I blamed my ISP but all other sites streamed and downloaded at their usual speed so it had to be VB. Re. downloads, I normally get my full speed (2.35MB/s) out of VB but it seems to have been cut in half. Today I couldn't get better than 1.00MB/s. Their popularity might do them in yet!

05-21-13  02:02pm

Comment
74
Visit VideoBox

VideoBox
(8)

VB struggling with problems.

One thing is that many videos just give you a green screen when streaming, another problem is that the streaming has been unusually jerky for days. The download speed as well has been well below average for the past few days, No, no other sites do this to me. Maybe a bigger server is finally required? The reason I comment here is because VB have not responded to the complaints about these issues when they were brought up on the site.

05-21-13  10:35am

Replies (4)
Reply
75
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

All of the above as long as they are natural.

05-21-13  09:51am


Shown : 51-75 of 2174 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 2.01 seconds.