Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : Mort (5)  

Feedback:   All (12)  |   Reviews (5)  |   Comments (2)  |   Replies (5)

Other:   Replies Received (9)  |   Trust Ratings (10)

All Activity A summary of all the feedback from this user.
Shown : 1-12 of 12  

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
Reply
1
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

There are now a few sites that limit the number of connections, and even lock you out if you use a manager, which is a big "con" to me. If they don't work, I tend not to renew.

01-06-11  04:58am

Comment
2
Visit ATK Natural & Hairy

ATK Natural & Hairy
(2)

Recent changes

Over the last couple of weeks, ATKHairy has started to increase picture sizes, and from a few photographers/studios they are of good quality, but most are still of a disappointing that does not do justice to the girls, and the sets and scenes are still repetitive and mostly boring.
The default pics now are too big to view comfortably on a monitor (even my 27" Dell) so are really not that useful, and with the poor depth of focus and digital artifacts (from too much jpeg compression?) they really are not worth viewing at their full resolution.
Videos are now sometimes available in more up-to-date formats, with the old WMV, and now SD MP4 nd HD MP4 formats available. Many of the links to the new formats do not work - as if they intended to put the files up, but something went wrong. Gradually improving though. Typical sizes from today's update: WMV 156MB, SD 189MB, HD 564MB to give you an idea. I have tried a few of the SD and HD videos, and they are a big improvment, but like the photographers, the videographers seem to be mostly just not quite expert enough to get the best out of the girls.

Most male orgasms in the "action" photo shoots are fake, very odd in a site that claims to be "natural"!

Overall, the better quality is an improvement, but it would be good to see fewer sets of pics and better quality, and videos that really get the best out of the girls.

01-06-11  04:40am

Replies (6)
Comment
3
Visit Blow And Swallow

Blow And Swallow
(0)

Not what the name says!

I joined this site recently, and tried a few videos. The name of the site is totally wrong - there is NO swallowing at all (unless by accident), and as well the video quality and resolution is nowhere near what it should be at this price per month.
Very disappointing! Stay away.

08-28-07  05:54am

Replies (0)
Rating
4
Visit Blow And Swallow

Blow And Swallow
(0)

55.0
No Review.
08-28-07  05:51am

Review
5
Visit Chimera Bondage

Chimera Bondage
(0)

85.0
Status: Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros: A very specialist site - female-only self-bondage. Good looking models, fairly good quality video, addresses the target niche well. The bondage is not too hard, and generally quite erotic, with some really excellent scenes to be found in the collection. Quite a few of the models seem to be genuinely "into" it, which is good to see and greatly improves the watchability.
Updates are regular, but only partial scenes, so you need to "save up" for several weeks to get the whole movie or set for a particular series.
There are some quite original ideas, though some do get repeated with different models.
Cons: Some older videos not such good quality. The site has a "rotating content" model, where scenes from previous years are made available, taking the place of quite recent content - that means that if you don't download and save a scene while it is up, you might miss it until next year! e.g. scenes from Jan-Mar this year are already (in August) unavailable "until next year".
The piecemeal updates mean that you can't download a whole set in one long movie file, meaning that playback is awkward and needs all the files to be queued in the video player.
Bottom Line: Overall, a good site if you are interested in the niche. Not too expensive, but the value for money is only "OK" due to the relatively slow rate of updates and the fact that too many are offline any particular time. Typically, you only get one complete scene or set per month, and the lowest price option is around $25 first month/$22 rebill.
For erotic bondage lovers, definitely worth a try.

08-18-11  01:00am

Replies (1)
Review
6
Visit Her Bedroom Window

Her Bedroom Window
(0)

60.0
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: A great idea for a solo girl site (at least,if you like the niche - solo girls shooting themselves in a variety of everyday activities as well as stripping, exhibitionism and masturbation scences).
- Attractive girls
- One of the best aspects to the site is how good it is to look at the camera angles they choose to use to display themselves. Several seem to find the act of recording themselves arousing.
- Some very erotic scenes, and most of the girls are clearly genuinely aroused in the masturbation scenes.
- Girls range from real girl-next-door types to tattooed/pierced "interesting" ones, and clearly "experienced" ones.
- Each girls video is downloadable in two files, so not too many parts to worry about. Total for each girl is about 2 hours of movie. Each file is about 500-600MB.
- Total of 20 girls
- No DRM on movies, download manager works
- Not too expensive (~$US22 per month).
- Subs via CCBill (very reliable and helpful when needed).
Cons: The site is let down by the relatively poor video quality. The home made nature of the videos means lighting etc is not perfect, but it would have been good to at least use a better quality codec for them.
To get an idea of video quality, the previews are 50% size compared to the actual movies, and if you view them at 200% the quality is very like the actual movies.
- No updates in the time I have been subscribed.
- Limited info (e.g. about updates) available before subscribing.
- Not really a "con", but there is a limit of 6GB of downloads per day.
Bottom Line: Overall, a really good idea, and most of the videos are actually filmed by the girls themselves (one or two use a boyfriend or similar - you can see the camera angles changing while the girl is no where near it). Some quite erotic scenes, but made less enjoyable by the poor quality.
Sadly, probably not worth the money, and I certainly won't renew, as the video quality does not do the material justice, and there have been no updates for more than a month. I signed up for this site with a lot of anticipation, as the genre is a really interesting one - sadly, the reality doesn't quite live up to my high hopes.
If there were some updates, in higher quality, it would definitely be worth a revisit.
I will just have to keep looking for a site that fills this niche with quality girls like these but does them justice with quality video.

01-06-11  04:15am

Replies (0)
Review
7
Visit Mad Porn

Mad Porn
(1)

60.0
Status: Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros: Fairly good range of images and videos, many have a "real" amateur appearance, which I like - that was what prompted me to join, originally.
Cons: Quality of pics and videos is not up to current standards. Lighting and production are often so amateur as to make it hard to appreciate the content.
Recently (actually, for some months now), all the "updates" have been regurgitated content from some time ago - I had a few videos saved, and when I went to download what looked like interesting new ones found they were identical, but are being promoted on the front page as "latest updates".
Bottom Line: OK, but that's all I could say in fairness to all the other members here who have steered me right in the past. After I went to cancel was offered the opportunity to continue membership at a 96% discount (down to $1.96 per month, I think), which is about all it is worth now that there are no new updates. My memory isn't perfect, but I think the "NEW" headlines on the home page have been the same since I first joined nearly 12 months ago.
Sad to say, no longer worth it.

03-02-13  06:04pm

Replies (3)
Review
8
Visit Mature Erotic

Mature Erotic
(0)

60.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Good idea for content. Unique models (AFAIK), good variety, from soft through to semi-hard solo scenes.
Does include "discounted" membership to two sister sites, mature-underwear.com and cupsclub.com, again, sites with a "good idea" for their content.
Cons: Quality is WAY out of date - videos are small, low quality, and often poorly lit. They are listed as having sizes of small, medium, large, and very large, but "very large" is quite small by today's standards on the main "Mature Erotic" site. On the other two sites it is smaller, and the quality is generally worse.
Navigation is dreadful - models appear in a long list with no names or identifying information, and as videos are posted in parts (and separated by other models) it is put luck as to whether you can get the whole video. Only the main site has a "search" function, and that is only useful after you work out the models name from a video.
Videos all appear in maximized pop ups, and whenever a link is clicked the original page resets to the top, so you lose your place.
From the dates the video files were created (no dates are given on the update page), there is a new segment about every two weeks. Makes it a long time to get a full 4 part movie!
Bottom Line: Good idea for content, and if the quality of the videos and navigation lived up to the "idea" of the videos, it would be great.
As it is, it is more frustrating than satisfying, and the price is too high for the low quality of content and dreadful navigation. Downloading the videos is harder than it needs to be as well.
So, while I would have really liked to have enjoyed this site and passed it on as a place to go for mature amateurs, overall, it is not worth it.

05-13-12  04:12am

Replies (1)
Reply
9
Visit Reality Kings

Reality Kings
(3)
Reply of Khan's Reply

Thanks Khan - better to ask in advnace, than to have to ask forgiveness. Now I know :)
I had noticed your warning about pre-checked cross sells, but I guess I thought it was worth noting a further comment in case others missed it first. Probably because those things annoy me so much I wanted to say it again!


01-19-11  03:49am

Reply
10
Visit Reality Kings

Reality Kings
(3)
Reply of messmer's Review

Good review, thanks Messmer.
Just a warning about this one.
I just noticed when looking to subscribe that this has one of those annoying subscription pages that includes an already ticked box saying that you want a 3 day paid trial that automatically converts to a full subscription to a very expensive garbage site you have never heard of. And it is in faint gray text on a gray background.
Beware if considering subscribing!
On another note, there is a link they make available in emails to previous subscribers that gets you a cheaper subscription deal. Are such things appropriate to share here?


01-09-11  07:28pm

Reply
11
Visit Ron Harris

Ron Harris
(0)
Reply of Drooler's Reply

Yes, I have also just made the mistake of re-joining for another look, and am even more disappointed than a few years ago. Really boring photosets - the latest look like 20 or so shots of almost identical poses (perhaps a hand moved?) and the girls are way too made up or photoshopped for any of their natural appeal to show.
A site to avoid if you are looking for anything with lasting interest in pics, and the videos are no better.
Oh well, I won't be renewing or getting caught again.


09-18-12  02:30am

Reply
12
Visit Yanks.com

Yanks.com
(1)
Reply of RagingBuddhist's Reply

Great review, and agree with just about everything you have said.
As a further update, about a month after the RagingBuddhist's last comment, there are still a fair few "updates" that are not really updates, and I have just discovered that they have some sort of software running to limit downloads and image viewing. I logged a job about it, and got a reply that says the limit on viewing images is 500 per hour. However, if I worked flat out on my relatively slow connection, there is no way I could hit 500 full size images in an hour. It also complains you are trying to open too many images at once if you pop up images in a tab, even when only one image at a time is downloading. So, beware of the undeclared limits, and the dodgy limit-checking software they are running.


05-19-13  12:57am


Shown : 1-12 of 12  

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.62 seconds.