Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : DivBZero (13)  

Feedback:   All (84)  |   Reviews (17)  |   Comments (7)  |   Replies (60)

Other:   Replies Received (44)  |   Trust Ratings (18)

All Activity A summary of all the feedback from this user.
Shown : 1-25 of 84 Page :    Next Page >

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
Reply
1
N/A Reply of messmer's Poll

Lack of zip files is a real pain if you like images.

01-02-09  03:13am

Reply
2
N/A Reply of williamj's Poll

Should the question have been:

"Which category of Labia do you find particularly appealing?"

lhaved = shaved [probably]

Mostly MILFs have the range of labia type found in all women, not that I've checked too many.


12-01-08  11:39am

Reply
3
N/A Reply of Drooler's Poll

Latest updates first, however they are numbered .. that way youy should get the best quality

10-25-08  08:17am

Reply
4
N/A Reply of asmith12's Poll

2560x1600 I'd get a bigger monitor if I could!

10-25-08  08:14am

Reply
5
N/A Reply of Cybertoad's Poll

My main BIG peeve is lack of zip files of images !

10-25-08  08:11am

Reply
6
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

And the point of this question is ... ?

06-06-08  04:52am

Reply
7
N/A Reply of Vegas Ken's Poll

There are many sites out there that use bought in content of poor quality.

The home pages generally look good, have good design and promise ... inside its a cookie cutter site with CD content from years ago and those horrible javascript images 'reveals'

Sometime you can spot them by the home pages because they have a similar layout.

Hence the value of pornusers !


05-15-08  01:45am

Reply
8
N/A Reply of JBDICK's Poll

It really doesn't matter if its porn or not. Its only honest to return it.

It would need to be done with grace and no fuss so there's no embarrasment.


05-01-08  01:00pm

Reply
9
N/A Reply of Drooler's Poll

I cannot make a choice on this poll, because videos make very little difference to me. If you did have video, what resolution is it?

Furthermore - there is no concept of quality here, I'd say a minimum of one quality gallery every 2-3 days would be OK.

From here one has to think of the effort that has gone into the video/gallery. Is this a setup with multiple machines, camera angles and craftmen produced gold encrusted dildos, or is it a girl on a sofa?

Cheers


DivB


02-27-08  04:57am

Reply
10
N/A Reply of jd1961's Poll

As Drooler indicates ..

Amateur means that it is not their main source of income.

However, in the adult world the term can also mean a style of depiction and photography.


01-16-08  04:20am

Reply
11
N/A Reply of Vegas Ken's Poll

Well I probably commented on this type of poll/question every time.

I run a high resolution Apple monitor at 2560X1600 and there is no question that higher resolution images look better.

This trend of more and more pixels for monitors will increase, it would be good to know that an invested collection will look good if not better in the future.

The digital cameras used have huge resolutions, and I for one would like to see no loss twix camera and customer.

So bring on the pixels, the smiles and the well composed photos ..

DivB


01-04-08  10:45am

Reply
12
N/A Reply of nygiants03's Poll

Twenties, not too late, say 28yo, preferrable college or university educated and working in a senior admistrative roll;)

12-13-07  07:55am

Reply
13
N/A Reply of PinkPanther's Poll

If we mean better web design then this has definitely gone up. If we look at image and video quality then this has also gone up.

If we take into account lighting and posing, then this has generally gone down but with some sites its getting better. The number of models has gone up and digital photography has lowered the bar for site content creation.

Do we mean professionalism in terms of customer care and satisfaction? If we do then I rather peeved with sites that subdivide themselves into ever smaller niches and then charge per niche. We seem to live in a world where everything is a revenue opportunity!

PU of course is a good platform for customer comment. Social networking does change things for the better so high hopes for this industry.


12-11-07  09:40am

Reply
14
N/A Reply of Pinche Kankun's Reply

Confused of Europe here.

I followed the message trail, and no-one mentions a feet or foot fetish.

Pinche, are you feeling yourself today ?

Regards


DivBZero


11-30-07  08:08am

Reply
15
N/A Reply of nadiencendia's Poll

Hi There.

This is another case where we needed an "All of the above" option.

Regards


DivBZero


11-28-07  05:34am

Reply
16
N/A Reply of asmith12's Reply

Asmith

Check out:

http://www.apple.com/displays/specs.html

I have the 30" (sounds a bit rude doesn't it)

There are higher resolution monitors about:

http://www.mondale-its.com/products/Tech...olution_Monitors.htm

However I'll leave those until they are just expensive rather than ridculous!

Cheers


DivB


11-17-07  02:59am

Reply
17
N/A Reply of ace of aces's Reply

All the codecs are easy if you have a PC, but what about MAC and Linux users?

Cheers DivB


11-17-07  02:52am

Reply
18
N/A Reply of asmith12's Reply

Well, Sir,

As an image fan I would say that I've spent more on my monitor than my system and disks put together. I run at 2560x1600, and quite frankly if I thought there was a better monitor out there, I'd start saving!

Div


11-15-07  12:24pm

Reply
19
N/A Reply of asmith12's Reply

I think there are a number of factors.

a) Many vids start with industry chat, which might be interesting but not a good prelude for what is about to come (see SurburbanAmateurs for a good example of how to start off).

b) The progression is under the control of the videographer, not the viewer, you can speed and skip parts but this is not the same as an image set.

c) It tends to be a continuous performance, its very hard for a model to look at their best for every second.

d) Some models have a speaking voice that just shatters the illusion!

e) Images tend to have better resolution

Cheers Div


11-14-07  07:15am

Reply
20
N/A Reply of asmith12's Poll

I find the allure of video material way more than the erotic pleasure it delivers. I tire of it very quickly.

However a good image set is a thing of joy. I reckon this is down to the 'build-up' being tedious on video yet giving a damn good tease in images.

Of course this is photographer and lighting dependent. Set editting is an art that sites seem to understand better than video editting.

Another way to evaluate this could be Mb/Pleasure ratios although this would be irrelevant to those with huge internet pipes.


11-13-07  08:18am

Reply
21
N/A Reply of Pinche Kankun's Poll

Which way round are we to take "Female Insulting" ?? are the females doing the insulting or getting insulted. Either way round unpleasant, but would this affect the outcome of the poll?

11-05-07  01:48pm

Reply
22
N/A Reply of roseman's Poll

As an observation - no option for all of the above!

11-02-07  05:11am

Reply
23
N/A Reply of Vegas Ken's Poll

Can't answer this poll because I use VLC which is really good for streaming collections around the place.

It has much better support of codecs and good control of video parameters. This mean you can correct for dark and over saturated videos. For example f*machines tends towards the dark end and 1by-day always over saturate the colours so that skin takes on an almost tangerine tone.

VLC is also good at transcoding, so you can have a PC with very high resolution and a set top box connected to plasma screen. The set top box may only understand DIVX, yet you'd like a WMV movie played on it.


10-24-07  04:15am

Reply
24
N/A Reply of Jay G's Poll

Bandwidth is aways an issue:

a) for the providers
b) for us
c) for our hard disks

therefore selectivity is the key, although there are plenty of times when a download doesn't live up to its promise!

DivBZero


10-22-07  12:36am

Reply
25
N/A Reply of Drooler's Poll

This is clearly a set of combinational factors.

i) Screen Resolution
ii) Frame rate
iii) Video codec
iv) Compression applied

These are combined with the CPU and graphics capabilities of the viewing system.

The only way to really tell is to try the video, samples are of course helpful.

Cheers DivBZero


10-21-07  12:51pm


Shown : 1-25 of 84 Page :    Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.53 seconds.