| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1
|
N/A
|
Reply of
messmer's Poll
Lack of zip files is a real pain if you like images.
|
01-02-09 03:13am
|
Reply
2
|
N/A
|
Reply of
williamj's Poll
Should the question have been:
"Which category of Labia do you find particularly appealing?"
lhaved = shaved [probably]
Mostly MILFs have the range of labia type found in all women, not that I've checked too many.
|
12-01-08 11:39am
|
Reply
3
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
Latest updates first, however they are numbered .. that way youy should get the best quality
|
10-25-08 08:17am
|
Reply
4
|
N/A
|
Reply of
asmith12's Poll
2560x1600 I'd get a bigger monitor if I could!
|
10-25-08 08:14am
|
Reply
5
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
My main BIG peeve is lack of zip files of images !
|
10-25-08 08:11am
|
Reply
6
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
And the point of this question is ... ?
|
06-06-08 04:52am
|
Reply
7
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
There are many sites out there that use bought in content of poor quality.
The home pages generally look good, have good design and promise ... inside its a cookie cutter site with CD content from years ago and those horrible javascript images 'reveals'
Sometime you can spot them by the home pages because they have a similar layout.
Hence the value of pornusers !
|
05-15-08 01:45am
|
Reply
8
|
N/A
|
Reply of
JBDICK's Poll
It really doesn't matter if its porn or not. Its only honest to return it.
It would need to be done with grace and no fuss so there's no embarrasment.
|
05-01-08 01:00pm
|
Reply
9
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
I cannot make a choice on this poll, because videos make very little difference to me. If you did have video, what resolution is it?
Furthermore - there is no concept of quality here, I'd say a minimum of one quality gallery every 2-3 days would be OK.
From here one has to think of the effort that has gone into the video/gallery. Is this a setup with multiple machines, camera angles and craftmen produced gold encrusted dildos, or is it a girl on a sofa?
Cheers
DivB
|
02-27-08 04:57am
|
Reply
10
|
N/A
|
Reply of
jd1961's Poll
As Drooler indicates ..
Amateur means that it is not their main source of income.
However, in the adult world the term can also mean a style of depiction and photography.
|
01-16-08 04:20am
|
Reply
11
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
Well I probably commented on this type of poll/question every time.
I run a high resolution Apple monitor at 2560X1600 and there is no question that higher resolution images look better.
This trend of more and more pixels for monitors will increase, it would be good to know that an invested collection will look good if not better in the future.
The digital cameras used have huge resolutions, and I for one would like to see no loss twix camera and customer.
So bring on the pixels, the smiles and the well composed photos ..
DivB
|
01-04-08 10:45am
|
Reply
12
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Poll
Twenties, not too late, say 28yo, preferrable college or university educated and working in a senior admistrative roll;)
|
12-13-07 07:55am
|
Reply
13
|
N/A
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Poll
If we mean better web design then this has definitely gone up. If we look at image and video quality then this has also gone up.
If we take into account lighting and posing, then this has generally gone down but with some sites its getting better. The number of models has gone up and digital photography has lowered the bar for site content creation.
Do we mean professionalism in terms of customer care and satisfaction? If we do then I rather peeved with sites that subdivide themselves into ever smaller niches and then charge per niche. We seem to live in a world where everything is a revenue opportunity!
PU of course is a good platform for customer comment. Social networking does change things for the better so high hopes for this industry.
|
12-11-07 09:40am
|
Reply
14
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Pinche Kankun's Reply
Confused of Europe here.
I followed the message trail, and no-one mentions a feet or foot fetish.
Pinche, are you feeling yourself today ?
Regards
DivBZero
|
11-30-07 08:08am
|
Reply
15
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nadiencendia's Poll
Hi There.
This is another case where we needed an "All of the above" option.
Regards
DivBZero
|
11-28-07 05:34am
|
Reply
16
|
N/A
|
Reply of
asmith12's Reply
Asmith
Check out:
http://www.apple.com/displays/specs.html
I have the 30" (sounds a bit rude doesn't it)
There are higher resolution monitors about:
http://www.mondale-its.com/products/Tech...olution_Monitors.htm
However I'll leave those until they are just expensive rather than ridculous!
Cheers
DivB
|
11-17-07 02:59am
|
Reply
17
|
N/A
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Reply
All the codecs are easy if you have a PC, but what about MAC and Linux users?
Cheers DivB
|
11-17-07 02:52am
|
Reply
18
|
N/A
|
Reply of
asmith12's Reply
Well, Sir,
As an image fan I would say that I've spent more on my monitor than my system and disks put together. I run at 2560x1600, and quite frankly if I thought there was a better monitor out there, I'd start saving!
Div
|
11-15-07 12:24pm
|
Reply
19
|
N/A
|
Reply of
asmith12's Reply
I think there are a number of factors.
a) Many vids start with industry chat, which might be interesting but not a good prelude for what is about to come (see SurburbanAmateurs for a good example of how to start off).
b) The progression is under the control of the videographer, not the viewer, you can speed and skip parts but this is not the same as an image set.
c) It tends to be a continuous performance, its very hard for a model to look at their best for every second.
d) Some models have a speaking voice that just shatters the illusion!
e) Images tend to have better resolution
Cheers Div
|
11-14-07 07:15am
|
Reply
20
|
N/A
|
Reply of
asmith12's Poll
I find the allure of video material way more than the erotic pleasure it delivers. I tire of it very quickly.
However a good image set is a thing of joy. I reckon this is down to the 'build-up' being tedious on video yet giving a damn good tease in images.
Of course this is photographer and lighting dependent. Set editting is an art that sites seem to understand better than video editting.
Another way to evaluate this could be Mb/Pleasure ratios although this would be irrelevant to those with huge internet pipes.
|
11-13-07 08:18am
|
Reply
21
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Pinche Kankun's Poll
Which way round are we to take "Female Insulting" ?? are the females doing the insulting or getting insulted. Either way round unpleasant, but would this affect the outcome of the poll?
|
11-05-07 01:48pm
|
Reply
22
|
N/A
|
Reply of
roseman's Poll
As an observation - no option for all of the above!
|
11-02-07 05:11am
|
Reply
23
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
Can't answer this poll because I use VLC which is really good for streaming collections around the place.
It has much better support of codecs and good control of video parameters. This mean you can correct for dark and over saturated videos. For example f*machines tends towards the dark end and 1by-day always over saturate the colours so that skin takes on an almost tangerine tone.
VLC is also good at transcoding, so you can have a PC with very high resolution and a set top box connected to plasma screen. The set top box may only understand DIVX, yet you'd like a WMV movie played on it.
|
10-24-07 04:15am
|
Reply
24
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Jay G's Poll
Bandwidth is aways an issue:
a) for the providers
b) for us
c) for our hard disks
therefore selectivity is the key, although there are plenty of times when a download doesn't live up to its promise!
DivBZero
|
10-22-07 12:36am
|
Reply
25
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
This is clearly a set of combinational factors.
i) Screen Resolution
ii) Frame rate
iii) Video codec
iv) Compression applied
These are combined with the CPU and graphics capabilities of the viewing system.
The only way to really tell is to try the video, samples are of course helpful.
Cheers DivBZero
|
10-21-07 12:51pm
|
