Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : HeatherMcXxx (10)  

Feedback:   All (98)  |   Reviews (9)  |   Comments (2)  |   Replies (87)

Other:   Replies Received (63)  |   Trust Ratings (39)

All Activity A summary of all the feedback from this user.
Shown : 26-50 of 99 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
Reply
26
N/A Reply of graymane's Poll

I like the honesty of the reviews, and I like to better understand what excites guys. I didn't even know this place had a forum. :)

06-18-12  06:28pm

Reply
27
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

B is the only way to go. (That may be because I'm a B.) Actually, I appreciate all sizes as long as they're natural. Natural breasts are beautiful no matter the size or shape. I'm aware that many men would not agree with me. :)

06-02-12  05:52pm

Reply
28
N/A Reply of messmer's Reply

No need to apologize -- I get where you're coming from -- but these are generalizations that are applicable only to a percentage of women. I can turn the scenario around and say that perhaps you were attracted, as a younger man, only to women who liked bad boys. It cuts both ways. I have a lots of female friends -- mostly educated, I grant you -- and I've never once heard one of them compliment on a man on his bank account or claim they were attracted to a man because of his notoriety. Plenty of us have a much healthier attitude than that, but I should also add that it's difficult to find men who are truly worthy of our devotion. :) And yes, now *I'm* generalizing. :)

02-25-12  12:19pm

Reply
29
N/A Reply of graymane's Poll

If I may offer a female perspective ... I've known rich guys who are lousy tippers, and that says everything I need to know about their character. A big bank account does *not* make you sexier -- at least to most women. It's much more important that you be a decent person ... one who's thoughtful, respectful and not self-centered -- and, above all, honest. We all make judgments based on appearance, but those judgments are re-evaluated once we get to know each other. So while there will always be women drawn to superficial characteristics, they do not represent the gender as a whole. So my recommendation would be to leave behind the generalizations about what women want: don't try to impress us with stuff that we can easily see through, and just be yourself -- assuming that self is a good person interested in learning about another soul.

02-16-12  05:23pm

Reply
30
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I prefer guys who shave -- or at least trim. Coincidentally, that's how guys prefer me. :) So don't let your razor be a stranger to your nether regions -- thus improving the appearance and appeal. Just be careful with the razor. ;)

09-09-11  04:12am

Reply
31
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I'm a Mac girl. Safari here. But I also use Camino. Seems I'm the odd woman out here. :)

08-13-11  01:30pm

Reply
32
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I find it extremely erotic when done well -- the gradual build-up in intensity, the subtle movements of the receiver as she receives pleasure, the naughtiness of being privy to something that's so private. Now, if the scene is long, it can get tedious and monotonous ... it needs some skillful editing to sustain the momentum.

08-10-11  09:00am

Reply
33
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

As a Mac girl, I lean toward mpg files. The less I have to worry about getting a video to play, the better. :)

07-09-11  12:32pm

Reply
34
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I like an attractive design -- if a site is appealing, I'll likely spend more time checking it out (assuming its content reflects my tastes). But what's most important is ease of navigation.

06-03-11  04:34am

Reply
35
N/A Reply of graymane's Poll

Kissing is king for the queen. Everything else are just details.

05-26-11  07:00pm

Reply
36
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I will always be small, natural, and proud. :)

05-24-11  07:17am

Reply
37
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

It puts all the focus on the model. If she's compelling -- and if the scene isn't too lengthy -- it's a decent alternative to traditional filming.

05-23-11  05:40pm

Reply
38
N/A Reply of RustyJ's Poll

The advent of the Internet has made it more difficult for us to discover our boyfriend's porn stash. Damn you, Internet! :)

05-21-11  12:07pm

Reply
39
N/A Reply of BenThruston's Reply

Thanks for the thoughtful response. I appreciate it. :)

05-19-11  05:29pm

Reply
40
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

As a porn star (who didn't do anal) once stated, "My butt is exit only." 'Nuff said. :)

05-19-11  12:12pm

Reply
41
N/A Reply of turboshaft's Reply

Ha! I can assure you that you're accurate on that point. :) Thanks for the reply -- I appreciate it! :)

05-19-11  12:08pm

Reply
42
Visit Amateur Allure

Amateur Allure
(2)
Reply of Drooler's Reply

Pray tell ... what's the joke? Or should I figure it out from context? Good to hear from you ... that dog is cute as ever! :)

05-18-11  04:06pm

Review
43
Visit Amateur Allure

Amateur Allure
(2)

76.0
Status: Was a member approx. 5 months prior to this review.
Pros: The strength of this site is the attractiveness of the models, though in the two years since I last subscribed the quality has fallen somewhat. Thomas recruits some impressive girl-next-door types -- fully clothed at the start -- to stop by and visit. While the site is obviously dedicated to oral, many models engage in intercourse, and these tend to be the most erotic scenes, with camera angles that include a close-up of the model's face. The site is easy to navigate, and if a particular model interests you, you can link to her other performances from the current scene.
Cons: Thomas seems like a fairly likable guy, but as he becomes aroused, he can get rather annoying, constantly referring to the models with terms like "silly girl." (Ay caramba!) Also, the plot of these scenes rarely changes, which is disappointing because the model typically doesn't reveal her nude body -- of interest to me -- until after the first Thomas climax. Also, as with similar sites, there's that insistence that the girl "show us" what she's about to swallow (sigh), and there are few facials. Finally, the girl-next-door trope is often an illusion, since so many of the models are porn starlets pretending to be unknowns.
Bottom Line: Look, if oral is your thing, you won't be disappointed with a one-month subscription to this site. But you'll probably find no reason to stick around longer than that, because you'll have seen what the site has to offer, and that can be stimulating only for so long. (I'm surprised this site keeps going, frankly.)

In that month, you'll enjoy lots of attractive girls on their knees, beginning fully clothed (which I'm a fan of), then gradually disrobing throughout the scene. (That's not as erotic as it sounds, although it could be if more care were taken with this element of the performances.) You'll get lots of awkward smiles from the models as they respond to Thomas' dumb and obvious queries. (Thomas: "What are you going to do now?" Model on her knees: "Suck your cock?")

Thomas occasionally mixes it up with straight sex scenes (always erotic, especially given the focus on the model's face and body), but it almost always ends with the patented deposit in the mouth, which, I assume, is why most subscribers pay the monthly fee.

The music fascinates me, because while the models are recruited (clearly) for their innocent looks and youthful personalities -- in truth, some seem not to be into the sex, though they can be a pleasure to look at -- the music has this dark, seamy quality about it, which casts an aura over the scene that, for me, creates a delightfully sinful mood.

05-18-11  09:56am

Replies (7)
Reply
44
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I've never understood the appeal of anal to men. Perhaps someone can enlighten me.

05-18-11  09:33am

Reply
45
Visit Live Jasmin

Live Jasmin
(0)
Reply of mbaya's Reply

Thanks so much, mbaya. I'm a grad student, so my funds are limited, but I'll surely submit additional reviews as my pocketbook allows. =)

08-14-10  12:12pm

Reply
46
Visit Live Jasmin

Live Jasmin
(0)
Reply of Jay G's Reply

Hi Jay - From what I've heard iFriends is a legitimate competitor to Live Jasmin. It has many more American performers -- not sure why that is -- but it's also more expensive and a bit sneaky in the way it charges customers. If you're accustomed to LJ's "free chat" area before you commit to paying a fee, you might be surprised that on iFriends, a similar experience begins charging you immediately, and if you opt for a private session, the fees only increase from here. So be careful -- read the very fine print on iFriends before you do anything. Thanks for replying! =)

08-05-10  05:50am

Reply
47
Visit Live Jasmin

Live Jasmin
(0)
Reply of surferman's Reply

Hi surferman - I gave it a 60 because it does offer a lot of performer options, and if you're someone with plenty of disposable income, it can certainly serve to satisfy your needs. Didn't seem fair to give it a failing grade. =) Thanks for replying!

08-05-10  05:47am

Comment
48
Visit Amateur Allure

Amateur Allure
(2)

Professional Allure?

No need to harp on the monotony of this site it is what it is but one thing I've noticed is that while in A.Allure's early days, many of the models were indeed amateurs and new (and worked only on the site), now the models are almost always pros, which detracts from the fantasy of the cute girl next door being naughty (and contradicts the site's name).

If the repetition of the scenes doesn't bug you enough, surely the guy's inane comments to the girls will. If I ever agree to shoot an A.Allure scene, I'm bringing ear plugs.

08-04-10  06:23pm

Replies (0)
Review
49
Visit Live Jasmin

Live Jasmin
(0)

60.0
Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros: At any given time, you can find plenty of models in a variety of categories. The site does a good job providing an abundance of categories so you can focus in on your particular desire (assuming you have one). Non-members can also sample a model chat room anonymously and contribute to the conversation. (This is a double-edged sword, however, since some of the guests dominate the chat with rude comments, silly talk, etc.)
Cons: Many negatives: (1) the site doesn't allow negative reviews or comments, so it's difficult to know how good a performer is; (2) members can't communicate with each other directly -- only through a forum that's heavily edited so no negative comments about the site are ever posted; (3) you need to purchase a membership on top of the live chat fees if you wish to communicate with a model via a private message, save lots of favorites, etc.; (4) many models either don't speak English well or can't type, so they pretend to type during a private session while someone else in the room (off-camera) does the actual typing; (5) model profiles usually aren't written by the models themselves (the site uses cut-and-paste to fill in profile answers) and are rarely accurate; (6) the site has HORRIBLE customer service when a private session is poor. Even the best members have to haggle to get even a partial refund from a botched session (i.e., when the performer didn't realize you were in the room).
Bottom Line: The site isn't worth the cost. While a few models are available for 0.98 per minute, quality models are at least $1.99/minute and higher. (The best amateur models can be as high as $3.99/minute; porn stars can be $5.99/minute.) In short, a 10-minute session is usually a minimum of $20, and the models are trained effectively to try and engage in small talk in the private sessions to stall for time and run up the bill. This can get VERY expensive if you wish to relax and have fun with a model.

While the site frequently tries to improve (by adding superficial features), the fundamental flaws noted above are never addressed. And given the sizable investment necessary to take advantage of the site, users should be allowed access to better information (i.e., honest reviews shouldn't be edited or deleted) about performers, and they should be able to communicate with each other (member to member) to discuss the site and share info.

Instead, Live Jasmin is intent on squelching any honest communication on the site that isn't positive. And for all its censorship, some performers still admit in private that they're not treated well, though that probably comes with the territory and isn't necessarily systemic.

All in all, I'd avoid this place unless you have a ton of cash to dispose of. Of course, you can't really avoid this place because it makes so much money that it advertises EVERYWHERE. But it's no more than a mediocre business that, at least in some respects, is very poorly run.

08-04-10  06:06pm

Replies (10)
Reply
50
N/A Reply of asmith12's Poll

I vote "No, Because I'm afraid it will be Ron Jeremy."

=)


06-21-08  07:14pm


Shown : 26-50 of 99 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.93 seconds.