| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1
|
N/A
|
Reply of
BadMrFrosty's Reply
That can be equally as arousing. ;)
|
08-19-12 05:12pm
|
Reply
2
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pornwatcher's Poll
I like both, but a good cunnilinguist is always a pleasure to watch. :)
|
08-16-12 11:01am
|
Reply
3
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Claypaws's Reply
Very well said, Claypaws.
|
08-04-12 04:13am
|
Reply
4
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
I appreciate the necessity of it. It doesn't really change anything for me -- a good scene is a good scene regardless -- though I can understand why it might spoil the fantasy for some.
|
07-29-12 11:58am
|
Reply
5
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Dinodonnie's Reply
Huh?
|
07-24-12 06:12pm
|
Reply
6
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I don't find male bodybuilders appealing either.
|
07-23-12 03:30am
|
Reply
7
|
N/A
|
Reply of
hodayathink's Reply
Eloquently expressed, hodayathink. :)
|
07-22-12 01:15pm
|
Reply
8
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I wear nothing but cotton.
|
07-21-12 12:54pm
|
Reply
9
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I admit I've joined a couple -- with mixed results. My favorite experience was with a site that required me to fill out an extensive questionnaire first ... it probably took me 45 minutes to an hour because I was trying so hard to be precise. When I finished and clicked on the "Find My Matches" link, I was told the site couldn't help me. :\ Apparently, I'm not matchable.
|
07-17-12 03:39am
|
Reply
10
|
Suicide Girls
(1)
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
Well, it's softcore for sure, but the foundation is the photos and models (with a pronounced social focus), I'd say.
|
07-16-12 03:53pm
|
Reply
11
|
Suicide Girls
(1)
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
Ahoy, Capn - I'm not sure I'd say the site lacks focus or direction -- it seems mostly on topic, though you're correct that it's sprawling (and not all areas are active). Still, once you find those elements you enjoy, you can ignore the rest. SG has plenty of members, which suggests it's doing something right.
I appreciate your reply. :)
Heather
|
07-16-12 11:59am
|
Reply
12
|
Suicide Girls
(1)
|
Reply of
otoh's Reply
Hi otoh - I've taken a look at GodsGirls, and I joined Zivity for a month. Neither captured me, though I probably didn't put enough effort into appreciating either.
Honestly, if the SG look is your cup of java, it's probably worth the $48/year -- that's just $4/month, the cost of a latte at most places now. :)
Thanks for the reply. :)
Heather
|
07-16-12 11:53am
|
Review
13
|
Suicide Girls
(1)
65.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-- Lots of picture sets
-- An engaged community of models and members who participate in an abundance of groups both sexual and non-sexual
-- A well-organized home page allowing for easy navigation
-- Models representing lots of shapes and sizes, all of whom reflect different notions of beauty |
| Cons: |
-- Quality of pic sets varies markedly
-- Some models won't be to your liking, more so than on other sites where you find a more consistent level of beauty
-- Videos are brief and eclectic, not typically erotic (and, usually, superfluous)
-- Pic sets can't be downloaded |
| Bottom Line: |
Welcome to the post-Rigel era at Suicide Girls. Rigel was a popular model (and administrator) on the site until 2010, when conflicts at the company -- as well as a desire to return to school -- hastened her departure. She represented the ideal SG: gorgeous, shapely, inventive, and, of course, irresistible thanks to her stunning tattoos. A new Rigel set was an event -- you knew you'd get high-quality, erotic photos shaped around a creative concept. She was the best.
Her exit came after the site began expanding its model roster, and, given the influx of new talent, the quality of the photo sets diminished, and the models themselves became less compelling. Fewer and fewer captivate me now, and it's difficult to keep up with the ever-changing and expanding roster. (Only a handful of true stars, like Annalee, remain.) Many of the sets will leave you flat; others will have you scratching your head. Occasionally, you'll find a model and set that capture you. Quality control seems lacking, though part of the aim of the site, no doubt, is to be more democratic in who they feature. It is what is -- no more.
One of the advantages of SG is the active (and large) community, comprised of both models and members, who post to the site's board and who participate in an abundance of groups that cover sexuality, religion, philosophy, the arts, and pop culture. Many of the groups have active discussions. I suspect some members, like me, continue to buy a subscription merely to keep abreast of group goings-on.
On the topic of subscription rate, it's not expensive. You pay $49/year, and if you let your membership lapse, eventually you'll get an offer to renew at $29/year. So it's not a prohibitive investment, and, frankly, it's not worth any more than that, unless your fetish happens to involve tattooed and pierced women.
I've become bored with the photo sets -- they rarely have the charm that Rigel's sets (and those of other classic models) exhibited. But once in a while you're treated to a gem, and the community is always there to engage with. In addition to the pics and videos, you'll find blogs (by both models and members), interviews with well-known figures in the arts community, and a chat feature. |
|
07-15-12 06:45pm
Replies (8)
|
Reply
14
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
I do yoga. :)
|
07-13-12 03:31am
|
Reply
15
|
N/A
|
Reply of
jberryl69's Reply
Ha! I bet that skill came in handy when you began constructing ransom notes. :)
|
07-12-12 09:25am
|
Reply
16
|
N/A
|
Reply of
jberryl69's Reply
Is that like fast-forwarding through a porn scene? ;)
|
07-11-12 05:50pm
|
Reply
17
|
N/A
|
Reply of
jberryl69's Reply
Hi jberry - I wasn't necessarily referring to erotica when I mentioned reading. In truth, I've never been one for erotic fiction. The only naughty text I've ever enjoyed was "My Secret Garden," an old classic collection of women's fantasies. My older sister had a copy, and I swiped it when I was maybe 14 or 15. It was quite exciting ... introduced me to all sorts of new ideas. ;)
|
07-11-12 04:20am
|
Reply
18
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
I'd go with reading, too. I think we need to start a book club. :)
|
07-10-12 07:57am
|
Reply
19
|
N/A
|
Reply of
mbaya's Reply
Aw ... you're sweet, mbaya. I appreciate the compliment. :)
Hugs to you. - Heather
|
07-09-12 07:09pm
|
Reply
20
|
Rodney Moore
(2)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
Great review, mbaya -- thorough and fair.
|
07-08-12 02:47pm
|
Reply
21
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Reply
May I borrow some of those books you're not reading, graymane? :)
|
07-08-12 04:02am
|
Reply
22
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
The female contingent here is certainly in the top 10 percent. :p
|
07-07-12 05:19pm
|
Reply
23
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pinkerton's Poll
I'm pleasantly surprised -- and impressed -- that "On or inside her pussy" is, at this juncture, topping the poll. My faith in males is restored (temporarily). :)
|
07-05-12 12:11pm
|
Reply
24
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
So I guess the external drive has replaced the collection of dirty magazines as a man's porn stash. This is all very educational.
|
06-25-12 11:09am
|
Reply
25
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
Maybe I should begin flirting with men by saying, "I'm a different kind of girl." How do you think that'll play? :)
|
06-20-12 04:01pm
|
