Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : Buckhead (13)  

Feedback:   All (41)  |   Reviews (7)  |   Comments (2)  |   Replies (32)

Other:   Replies Received (22)  |   Trust Ratings (12)

All Activity A summary of all the feedback from this user.
Shown : 1-25 of 41 Page :    Next Page >

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
Review
1
Visit Mile High Media

Mile High Media
(1)

94.0
Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros: +Variety
+Hot girls
+Reasonably-sized videos
+Exclusive Content (as a whole, not individual sites)
+Usually available for $5
Cons: -Search/Filter OK
Bottom Line: +This site is not the flashiest site that you will ever see, nor is it the most glamorous. It is, however, a very solid site for getting quality porn. There is a great variety of women, from 18+ to Milfs, Euros to Americans. I was able to find pretty much any type of woman that I felt like on a given day.
+In addition, there is a great variety of scenes. Just about every type of scene can be found on this site, from traditional, couple-friendly 1 on 1 to bi-sexual scenes. They do a nice job of catering to most tastes on this site.
+As I mentioned, there is a lot of exclusive mile-high media scenes. This means falls under the umbrella of the 4 sub-sites that this subscription incorporates: realityjunkies ("reality" porn with lots of teens and couples), sweetheartvideo (lesbian), sweet sinner (couples-friendly porn), and doghouse (harder porn). All of these sites are enjoyable and produce good-quality scenes.
+The videos look good and are only about 1.5Gb per 30 minutes.

-As I find with most sites, the search function is functional, if not exceptional. You can find scenes based on only one keyword, but they can still be found.

*As a note, while full HD, some scenes have almost a feel that they were shot with a lower HD camera. This may just be my perception and is not anything that is really an issue, just an observation.

It is a fairly short review, but this is simply a good porn site with no further explanation necessary. This is an even better deal when you consider the fact that $5 mailers come for this site.

03-23-14  08:25pm

Replies (0)
Review
2
Visit Evil Angel

Evil Angel
(5)

91.0
Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros: +Variety
+Lots of videos
+Lots of women (very good looking women)
+Plenty of updates
+Almost every kind of genre represented
+No DRM
Cons: -Some "HD" is 540p "Internet Hi-Def"
-Direction feels similar, regardless of the scene
-Search is mediocre
-Content is not always exclusive
Bottom Line: The positives from above (some combined):
+This site has a ton of variety and covers just about every type of scene imaginable. You have everything from from lesbian to trannies, so the likelihood of not finding something you like is quite small.
+This site has years of videos scenes. There was almost always new content to find if I wanted to look for it.
+Again, lots of women. Many of the women are European, but there a lot of American women are starting to show up. There is a lot of variety, too, from rail-thin to buxom and curvy. I would say that finding a BBW would be difficult/
+There are typically several updates a day, typically with good variety so you always have something new to watch. One downside is they sometimes block downloading until an entire DVD is available, but I did not see that too often.

The negatives:
-Probably my biggest gripe is their loose definition of hi-def. Unfortunately, most of the older videos are not in hi-def and there is another (far too) large group that are labeled as HD, but 540p "Internet Hi-Def" garbage.
-It seems that a good portion of most scenes are spent 2 inches away from the penetration. While I appreciate the action, it is sometimes nice to get the "whole picture" instead of a 5-minute intense closeup of the action.
-I will always complain if the site just offers a 1-option search, but there is almost no model search to speak of outside of knowing them by name.
-There are several evil angel sites that can be joined independently, plus a few other sites that can get Evil Angel videos, so those looking for a ton of exclusivity will feel left out.

Short of getting into more "niche" sites, I would say EvilAngel is the hardest of the mainstream sites. I liked the site, and appreciated the quality of girls and scenes.

*I forgot to mention. I originally had reservations about their privacy policy, but spam seems to be about the same levels as before I joined.

02-08-14  04:26pm

Replies (1)
Reply
3
N/A Reply of pornwatcher's Poll

Depends on the scene and the people

02-08-14  12:44pm

Reply
4
Visit Evil Angel

Evil Angel
(5)
Reply of jberryl69's Reply

Haven't looked here in a while. Thanks for the update to the review...I will probably be giving this a try soon.

11-07-13  09:13pm

Review
5
Visit Reality Kings

Reality Kings
(4)

90.0
Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros: +Lots of sites
+Good video quality
+Plenty of female variety
+Lots of different genres
Cons: -File sizes are huge
-Lots of ads
-Some sites update almost randomly
-OK search function
-(partial) Download limits *not a problem for me*
Bottom Line: Pros:
+One thing I will say about RK is that they leave few stones unturned when it comes to porn. They have the standard sites that you would expect from a network like this, but they throw in a few surprises like a squirting site, "joke" site (It's Real) and even a tranny site if you want something outside of the typical offerings.

+All of the videos are filmed very well and the quality of the downloads is very high. Some of the POV scenes are a little rough and/or poorly lit, but I imagine that is part of the "look." The videos also do a nice job of putting forth enough of a "story" to make it entertaining, but not losing sight of the fact that it is porn.

+There are lots of attractive women on this site that cross quite a range. I was able to find most of my Euro favorites from previous memberships to those sites as well as many American women as well. There is a fair amount of silicone (which is not necessarily my cup of tea) on the MILF models, but it is not very widespread through all of the models.

Cons
-The file sizes are large. I know space is cheap, but the shortest videos are 25ish minutes and those take up 2GB. After being a member of other sites with equivalent video quality at half the size, I believe this is something that can be improved.

-While I normally anticipate ads when joining a site, one of the things that annoyed me about RK was that they would put in scenes for other sites mixed in with some of their scenes. More than once, I clicked on an update to be redirected to a "join" page for a partner site.

-Some of the sites are on a monthly or a "whenever" update schedule, which is disappointing and frustrating. They might have 20 active sites, but only 7-10 update in a way that you know you will have a weekly update.

-Search function is nothing special. For a general search (click on a type), you can pick one element and go from there. Their "Search" function (type in something) is nice if you know the name, as it will auto-fill, but you have to have a good idea of the name.

-The big gorilla: download limits. The TOS has a data limit of (I believe) 5GB OR 15 "Big" movies. A "big" movie from what I saw is an HD movie of 720 or 1080 quality, as the filename is "blahblah_big.avi," so you can download 15 of those in a day. I am not a site ripper, but instead download movies that I like, so I never had an issue with the download limits and never received a message that I went over my limit despite downloading over 400GB over the course of a month.

While it appears that the cons outweigh the pros, I found most of the cons to be fairly minor in comparison to the high-quality porn that this site provided. This site is top 2 when it comes to downloaded videos over the course of a month and I have not "tired" of them as I have with some of the other sites. I definitely recommend this site, especially with some of the deals that can be had.

11-03-13  07:39pm

Replies (0)
Reply
6
Visit Reality Kings

Reality Kings
(4)
Reply of rearadmiral's Comment

I am about to add a review that will go into this as well, but their HD movies (from what I saw 720 & 1080) are called "Filename_big.avi" when you download them, hence the "big" movie. My understanding of the TOS is that you can download up to 15 of those per day. I was a member for a month and downloaded over 500GB from them and never got a message that I was over my limit.

11-03-13  07:05pm

Reply
7
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Other, because...NIPPLES!

11-03-13  06:58pm

Reply
8
N/A Reply of atrapat's Poll

87.3, but I am picky about which site I join and am usually pretty happy with my choices.

11-03-13  06:58pm

Reply
9
N/A Reply of messmer's Poll

I picked other because "None" was not an option...

09-21-13  09:12pm

Reply
10
N/A Reply of Monahan's Poll

I want to find my stuff!

09-16-13  07:38pm

Reply
11
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

If I cared about pics, I would want the zip.

08-26-13  08:54pm

Reply
12
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I care if it seems sketchy.

08-19-13  07:41pm

Review
13
Visit Fame Digital

Fame Digital
(2)

88.0
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: +Lots of scenes
+Lots of models
+Lots of variety
+Easy to link to new models
Cons: -Search functionality is limited
-Loose definition of HD
-HD can be spotty
Bottom Line: Pros:
+This site has a ton of scenes. It represents multiple studios each with their own variants of hardcore. The only problem for those who care is that there does not appear to be a ton of exclusive content, as many of the scenes are from DVD's that are readily available.

There are also scenes for everyone. Scenes range from elegant, gentle lesbian sex to hard gangbang and bukkake videos. Most of the stuff falls in between but it definitely trends to the "harder" side of hardcore. One of the things that you see on this site that is not many others is the reverse gang bang if you are in to that sort of thing.

+This site has a ton of models as well. Most trend to the European look and body time, but there are plenty of American and other minorities of stars on the site. You will find no shortage of beautiful women willing to do all kinds of dirty deeds on this site.

+The site does a very good job linking similar models, so it can be easy to find new girls and/or similar scenes

Cons:
-Search functionality is lacking. You only get to look for one tag in a scene search, which is frustrating if you want to be specific in your search. The model searches are much the same way. I actually had better success knowing models that I liked from other sites, looking them up directly, and then using the "similar scene/model" links at the bottom to find new starlets.

-In this site, they call 540p "Web HD" and tag them as HD videos. It can be very frustrating to see the HD tag and only have a 540p option.

-HD availability could be a mixed bag. Sometimes newer scenes that I would expect to be in 1080p would be in a lower HD (and sometimes not at all) while older scenes have HD options.

Bottom line:
I feel that this is a very short review for me, but there is nothing complicated about this site. While this site is nothing special when it comes to searching and navigation, the scenes are very well produced and the models are hot. The beautiful girls and enjoyable sex definitely make this site worth the (discounted) price of admission.

08-14-13  08:41pm

Replies (0)
Reply
14
N/A Reply of careylowell's Poll

Another other, as I do not agree with any of the options. I have a feeling that "SkiniMax" may be showing hardcore similar to today's Playboy channel, but I do not think it will be on prime time.

It is interesting though...I occasionally watch the late night Cinemax shows/movies for the humor of it. Several of the "raunchy" cable shows were regularly showing direct vagina shots (and a penis or two) a year or two ago and I thought we were easing towards more hardcore on premium channels. However, the stuff produced this year seems to be a lot more "tame" and just be back to "boobs n bush."


08-13-13  08:32pm

Reply
15
Visit Reality Kings

Reality Kings
(4)
Reply of scharrukin's Comment

According to their new terms, it says that it is now 10GB (standard) or they can allow 15 "big" movies at their discretion (maybe they heard the complaints?)

Has this been your experience recently?


08-10-13  10:00pm

Reply
16
N/A Reply of Denner's Poll

I prefer 24, but will allow for 48.

08-09-13  07:04pm

Reply
17
Visit GF Revenge

GF Revenge
(0)
Reply of taken4granted's Review

Thanks for the review. I was about to use the same deal and was able to save the money.

08-08-13  07:58pm

Reply
18
N/A Reply of graymane's Poll

Look on the bright side, they are most likely barely used!

No thanks for me, though.


08-07-13  08:52pm

Reply
19
N/A Reply of surferman's Poll

There are things other than people?

08-07-13  08:50pm

Reply
20
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

As always, it depends on the person...

08-04-13  09:54pm

Reply
21
Visit DDF Network

DDF Network
(6)
Reply of TheSquirrel's Reply

I understand your comments and just wanted to add my experience.

I usually miss the pre-checked cross sales in my reviews because I am anal and double-check everything before signing up. It is almost like the "Click to Skip" commercials on YouTube - I expect them so I am not surprised when they come. It is definitely annoying though.

My membership cancellation was easy, which I found surprising based on a lot of the comments (and no, I am not a shill). I actually started the process a few days earlier than normal because I was expecting an issue and there was complete a lack of drama (maybe due to the site redesign?).


07-29-13  08:41pm

Reply
22
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

The razor was invented for a reason...

07-29-13  08:34pm

Reply
23
N/A Reply of Drooler's Poll

Depends on the model.

07-27-13  09:40pm

Review
24
Visit DDF Network

DDF Network
(6)

89.0
Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros: +Lots of movies (over 11,000), most exclusive
+Great model variety
+Great scene variety
+Easy to find niches
+Lots of updates
Cons: -Files are huge (~1.5GB per 20 minutes)
-In general, only about 1.5 years full HD, 3(ish) in 720
-Search features work, but not impressive
-(Minor)Sometimes, updates can be too similar, leaving you with a day without any new updates of interest
Bottom Line: The pros:
+This site has a ton of videos since they have been around for a long while. I say most exclusive because a few of the videos I came across were also on some other sites. Nothing really more to add here.
+This site has 13 major niche sites and the model variety to populate them. Most of the girls are European, but they range from the tight and skinny to voluptuous to plump. Needless to say, most of the girls are good looking. Many of them are the popular models that can be found on many other sites, so if you have found girls you like somewhere else, there is a good chance they have a few scenes here.
+As with the girls, the multitude of niches provide a good variety of scenes. While they have a Taboo site, it is not too intense and features peeing, whipping, bondage and some machines, but nothing too extreme. The big boob site is mostly real boobs, which is nice to me. They also have their versions of Glamcore in both bg and gg.
+Each nice has its own site, so it is typically easy to find a lot of videos that you want to see. Most of the niches have at least a few videos that can interest everyone
+There are at least 3-4 updates daily, so there is a ton of new content.

The cons:
-I know space is cheap, but these files get very big very fast. Some of the longer (35-40 minute) videos would get up to 4GB
-There are "only" about 1,500 full HD videos, which equates to about a year and a half, so browsing historical videos can quickly get you to 720 or less. It is surprising that a site this big took so long to get to HD.
-The search features have checkboxes to allow you to filter the videos and/or girls, but there were times that I felt (or even found through other means) scenes that met the criteria but did not appear in the search results. Oftentimes, I found myself going to the site that would be the closest match and then perusing the update history to find scenes that I may like.
-This is a minor complaint, but there were a few times where I would get 4 updates and they would all be along the same vein or days without at least one bg intercourse scene. This is something mainly to me, as I like having new variety every date and it is not necessarily their job to provide it.

Overall, I feel this is a very good site. Thee content merits a very high score, despite the limited HD, but the site design and functionality (which they are improving) brings this to be "Very Good" instead of "Excellent"

07-27-13  09:39pm

Replies (6)
Reply
25
N/A Reply of lk2fireone's Poll

For the power and flexibility, it is hard to beat a desktop

05-15-13  08:18pm


Shown : 1-25 of 41 Page :    Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 2.01 seconds.