| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
26
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
HA, when I first read this I just thought it said would you be in a porn if you could, which would be hell no because my average sized penis would be laughable compared to the other guys. But if it's non-nude, sure!
|
08-06-08 11:02pm
|
Reply
27
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I believe that's what the technical definition of a DP is, vag and anus. In the same whole is called DV or DA, double vag and double anal.
|
08-06-08 11:01pm
|
Reply
28
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Yeah, I'm not even sure what this is really.
|
08-06-08 11:00pm
|
Reply
29
|
N/A
|
Reply of
MargulisAZ's Poll
Oh cool, another one of my polls that ended up showing up! I of course would have to go with the hell yeah option on this.
|
08-05-08 12:51am
|
Reply
30
|
N/A
|
Reply of
MargulisAZ's Poll
Oh how awesome, I wasn't active on here in a while and I didn't get to see my own poll! Glad it roused such a discussion!
|
08-05-08 12:47am
|
Reply
31
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
Yuck, that's the only thing I can really say about it. ugh.
|
08-05-08 12:39am
|
Reply
32
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Don't really see the difference whether it's a gang bang or just a regular scene, either way there are guys involved. Not into gang bangs personally, but my hunch is that it doesn't have anything to do with the guys themselves but with the girl taking on that many guys that does it for people.
|
08-05-08 12:37am
|
Reply
33
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Monahan's Reply
Yeah, that's probably a reason I'm more attracted to the celebs I mention, because they seem kind of goody goody. That along with how they look physically of course. :D
|
08-04-08 12:34am
|
Reply
34
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Yeah, don't really care about the celebrity porn at all personally. Maybe that's because the celebs who have had videos don't interest me. If Natalie Portman or Keira Knightley was in a flick, you damn well better believe that would be in my library!
|
08-04-08 12:27am
|
Reply
35
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Poll
Yeah, sometimes I notice a review and think "wow", but I don't think it's my place to tell them how to review, since it's their own opinion. I just find it hard when a review seems to not be objective and all, and is written completely out of emotion of some sort or another.
|
08-01-08 07:12pm
|
Reply
36
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
Oh yeah, can definitely relate to that. I'm sure it's fairly common for most of us to tire of seeing the same girls over and over, even when initially they are very intriguing. Hell, there are countless girls that when I first saw them I couldn't get enough of them for a few months, only now to care less completely. Short attention span perhaps, but it is what it is. That's why the current trend of releasing old material on sites bothers me quite a bit.
|
07-31-08 06:51pm
|
Reply
37
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Getreal's Poll
Fisting is definitely the main interest for me.
|
03-23-08 02:46pm
|
Reply
38
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
this poll is great, lol. Perhaps we could all get personalized porn users t-shirts based on our preferences. Like on the front it could say the "I love porn users", but on the back for me something like "I've reviewed over 10 fisting sites!"
|
03-22-08 11:35am
|
Reply
39
|
N/A
|
Reply of
littlejoe's Reply
LOL, I would never have the courage to wear something that said that but it would be hilarious to see someone else in it.
|
03-22-08 11:33am
|
Reply
40
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
One thing that I think about at times is how awesome it would be if I could just stay completely away for 4-6 months and let a bunch of updates build up on all my favorite sites, but I just can never do it. It's so annoying waiting a week for an update on certain sites only to be disappointed because it sucks.
|
03-18-08 10:17pm
|
Reply
41
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Hey, I will freely admit I'm addicted to porn. So I have indeed tried to distance myself from it in the past, especially during relationships, but it's never completely gone away.
|
03-18-08 02:44pm
|
Reply
42
|
N/A
|
Reply of
apoctom's Reply
I agree with this. I have definitely seen my fair share of models that would probably be attractive if they weren't covered in tattoos. It's just gross to me when it's like that.
|
03-06-08 11:24am
|
Reply
43
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Davit's Reply
Lol, I can relate to this. I was in a 3 year relationship where the girl I was with couldn't stand porn, but she was way into fisting. Kind of odd, but there you go. She was only 17 at the time too (I was 19). The point is that she didn't know about me looking at porn either, but eventually I told her and she was not happy to say the LEAST! Ultimately she acquiesced to me viewing it "on occasion", which was a big relief to me because I'm not sure I would have the willingness to stop viewing either.
|
03-05-08 01:53pm
|
Reply
44
|
N/A
|
Reply of
roseman's Poll
I tend to agree that people who participate on this site, of the male gender, probably wouldn't have much of a problem with this. None of my ex's have been into porn really, but it would be kind of cool if they were I suppose.
|
03-05-08 01:49pm
|
Reply
45
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nadiencendia's Reply
I very much agree with this. I don't even pay attention to the guy on screen unless he's really fat or really old and it just makes everything look disgusting. Then I just feel sorry for the model more than anything.
|
03-01-08 11:53am
|
Reply
46
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
From my experience almost all new sites seem to start out with 20 or less full episodes of content at launch. Hell, even getting 10+ can be a gift, so while I would love to see 30-50, I really don't think it's likely to happen. People want to start making money, so from a business stand point I guess you just want to launch the site, and save the extra content you may have to give you a buffer on updates.
|
02-27-08 04:23pm
|
Reply
47
|
1 By Day
(1)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Yeah this sucks, this site used to be awesome and now I probably won't even join again. No reason to since there aren't any more new girls or shoots. How lame.
|
08-15-08 09:37am
|
Reply
48
|
1 By Day
(1)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Taking a closer look at the updates recently, it actually looks like ALL OF IT is remastered old material. Yikes, that's really scary if one of the best sites is now no longer updating any new material and models at all. Even the ones that do not say reloaded are old from what I can see.
|
07-31-08 07:34pm
|
Reply
49
|
1 By Day
(1)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Reply
I would imagine this is probably the main reason sites are doing this, to save money. It makes you look good that you update so much, even though there really isn't much more new content updated than any other site. I don't like it because I've already seen it all and like new material and new girls, but people new to the site or to online porn probably could care less, and don't even know. So unfortunately, it seems to be happening more and more on different site.
|
07-31-08 01:45pm
|
Comment
50
|
1 By Day
(1)
|
|
07-31-08 02:48am
Replies (19)
|
