Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : ramscrota (12)  

Feedback:   All (114)  |   Reviews (22)  |   Comments (7)  |   Replies (85)

Other:   Replies Received (33)  |   Trust Ratings (18)

All Activity A summary of all the feedback from this user.
Shown : 26-50 of 114 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
Reply
26
N/A Reply of peepee's Poll

Huge loads, but they should be real. How often do we see s0ome stupid 'stud' produce a few pathetic drops of clear fluid! Pron producers should tell them to refrain from sex / masturbating for a few days before the shoot.
Worst of all is fake cum (as in tug job queens)


02-13-09  04:55am

Reply
27
N/A Reply of Vegas Ken's Poll

I prefer the face. But most studs need target practice. I know there's a certain amount of moving around when they yank their crank, but the snocistency with which they MISS the face (or most of it) is remarkable.

02-13-09  04:49am

Reply
28
N/A Reply of Vegas Ken's Poll

Talk about a no contest!!!!! Fake tits are the biggest turn off! They seem to me to be what guys complain about the most in porn stars, yet they keep putting them in! I simply don't get it. Fake tits should only be reserved for girls who have got nothing.

02-13-09  04:47am

Reply
29
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I prefer pubic hair, but is must be trimmed and neat. These bushes where there is jungle everywhere - that looks aweful! Yet the 'hairy' sites keep trading on that particular thing.

02-13-09  04:44am

Reply
30
N/A Reply of Vegas Ken's Poll

I prefer doggy. Especially if the girl has big tits. When the guy fucks ferociously, the tits swing around like a set of wrecking balls.

02-13-09  04:37am

Reply
31
N/A Reply of Drooler's Poll

B&W is crap, and a waste of time.

02-13-09  04:34am

Reply
32
N/A Reply of Vegas Ken's Poll

I much prefer to 'see the evidence', and watch her blow the semen slowly out of her mouth, and out o

02-13-09  04:33am

Reply
33
N/A Reply of Drooler's Poll

I assume single shoot is for a solo girl (strip). My rule of thumb is: 100 pics solo strip, 150 for a sex scene (eg insertion, gg, bg, etc) Anything more than this is tiresome, unless it's really good, which most of them are not.
Any shoot which cannot 'state it's case' within these limits is too long.


02-13-09  04:29am

Reply
34
N/A Reply of nygiants03's Poll

Squirting is like 'speaking in tongues' (religious experience); .0001 percent real, 99.9999 percent manufactured. Personally I think it's bullshit.

02-13-09  04:26am

Reply
35
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I one of those who has a virtually empty profile. That's simply because I haven't got around to filling it out. And In any case, the person w/o profile details doesn't necessarilly have anything to hid. Afterall, they can simply fill their profile with bullshit, and who would know?

02-13-09  04:23am

Reply
36
N/A Reply of lk2fireone's Poll

Most scenes the girls usually have their eyes shut, don't they? I think that's the best way around it. Goggles & protective ghar looks stupid, and rob the shot of it's erotic clout.

02-13-09  04:10am

Reply
37
N/A Reply of roseman's Poll

THE SMILE!!!!!!! With eyes a close second. In porn, if the girl has a smile full of character, and looks as though she's enjoying it, this counts for more than anything else.

02-12-09  05:41am

Reply
38
N/A Reply of Rick's Poll

I often visit Sir Rodney. However, this site is streets ahead of SR.
SR does the reviews, and people can submit comments. These comments are not reviews, and are usually short, to the point comments.
SR's reviews are, in my opinion, too soft. Sometimes he doesn't give a site the caning it deserves (On the other hand, sometimes he does.) It's usually up to the contributers (there isn't membership like on this site) to make up the shortfall.
PS according to Sir Rodney, his father was Lord Rodney!


02-12-09  05:36am

Reply
39
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I prefer exclusive. I've often found that the non-eclusive sites (so-called megasites) are full of recycled shit I've seen dozens of times before.

02-12-09  05:30am

Reply
40
N/A Reply of Drooler's Poll

Sites that insist on a code give me the shits. Usually they are difficult to decipher, and often these sites don't let you chose your own PW & UN in the first place. Worst of all are the sites that demand you to re-login after 5 minutes being idle, or 30m after previous login. The stupid ruprechts don't seem to realise that this kind of obsessiveness puts people off.

02-12-09  05:22am

Reply
41
N/A Reply of cblodg's Poll

The best discussion forum (apart from this site of course!)I found was on Girls Out West. The content of the site was satisfactory, but the forum really made it a lot of fun.

02-12-09  05:17am

Reply
42
N/A Reply of Pinche Kankun's Poll

I like the concept of solo girl sites - you follow her through her career, etc.
Having said that, I have yet to find a solo girl site that was any good. Most of their content would not stack up within a conventional site.


02-12-09  05:12am

Reply
43
N/A Reply of Getreal's Poll

I love tickle sites!

02-12-09  05:09am

Reply
44
N/A Reply of asmith12's Poll

Many guys wish their dicks were bigger. Mine is average length, and fairly thick. But my wife is of a small build, and sex is sometomes uncomfortable for us both. It also means that my favourite position (and hers too) - doggie - is out of the question.
So the size is relevant to where it's going!!!


02-12-09  05:06am

Reply
45
N/A Reply of nygiants03's Poll

We have a kid in our care who has a bucketload of problems. Was sexually abused in birth family, etc, etc. I'd never let him watch porn - he couldn;t handle it. So it depends on the kid.
But when we were kids (12 yo), we somehow got hold of porn magazines. My mum was disgusted! But I don;t think I was morally damaged by seeing naked women at that age - in fact, it seemed to me the most natural thing!


02-12-09  12:57am

Reply
46
N/A Reply of nadiencendia's Poll

I don;t think it's disgusting, I just think it's bullshit. What's the turn on?

02-12-09  12:54am

Reply
47
N/A Reply of Getreal's Poll

Latinas, Russians, and Maori women

02-12-09  12:52am

Reply
48
N/A Reply of RagingBuddhist's Poll

The price is important, because we look for value for money. I have no problem with the girls getting paid - in fact, I think they should get paid more on the bad sites, because undountably they have to put up with more bnullshit. But if the morons run a bad site, the dollar should bite their bums, and I think a rating of what the sites is worth would be good.

02-12-09  12:50am

Reply
49
N/A Reply of asmith12's Poll

I prefer them naked, but start clothed. For me, a really important part of the seduction is when one person takes the lead, and undresses the other. This is particularly good in a gg scene.

I don't mind a bit of clothing on, and variety is important. But it must be done in good erotic taste. For example, leaving an open see-through negligee on, open, in doggie position is great.

But by contrast, fucking with the knickers is bullshit, and has become a stupid cliche.


02-12-09  12:44am

Reply
50
N/A Reply of jd1961's Poll

To suggest that they are not amateurs imply because they get paid for it is absurd. The term 'amateur', to me, means girls who might do some porn to get by (eg students, unemployed, etc). Professionals are those who make a career - I imagine they might do strip joints, hi-class prostitution, as well as porn.

I think a lot of amateur girls do it for a bit of a kick, and by the looks on their faces, I think most of them enjoy it. The money is an extra bonus.


02-12-09  12:31am


Shown : 26-50 of 114 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.5 seconds.