Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : Marcus (45)  

Feedback:   All (398)  |   Reviews (23)  |   Comments (19)  |   Replies (356)

Other:   Replies Received (159)  |   Trust Ratings (24)

All Activity A summary of all the feedback from this user.
Shown : 51-75 of 403 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
Reply
51
N/A Reply of asmith12's Poll

I'm not fussy at all really. Whether it's the Fame Girls teasing or Tia Ling leaving nothing to the imagination, both can be sexy in their own individual ways.

09-14-13  04:54am

Reply
52
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Somewhat likely.

I've done this in the past with several sites, and I'll do it again at some point I'm sure, but at the moment I'm trying different sites before settling on 'the one'


09-10-13  03:24am

Reply
53
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I don't mind them, but they're not the most sexual, sensual act a porn star can perform really. Far prefer blowjobs or even titjobs.

09-04-13  03:37pm

Reply
54
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I think so, yes. When you consider the amount of time given up by webmasters and models, the equipment they need to use (cameras, lighting, computers etc), web hosting, paying for the payment processor etc etc...

I wish when sites become archive sites (eg, Karla Spice) they'd drop the membership fee, though. But generally for active websites, I think $20-30 is very good value.


08-29-13  10:50am

Reply
55
N/A Reply of Claypaws's Poll

For me it was a coin toss between 'how they perform' and their 'body shape/size'. I voted for how they perform in the end, though, as I'm more open-minded body-wise as I like slim, nubile models to fuller, curvier (albeit not fat), whereas if they're not very good performers or good in front of the camera, then it's hard to find any enthusiasm for them.

08-27-13  12:52am

Reply
56
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

For me, it's very important. The latest site I've joined, Miss CJ Miles, doesn't have zips and I don't know where to start in downloading them, particularly as it's not even a case of right-clicking the thumbnail and saving the target file.

08-25-13  12:30am

Reply
57
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I said 'rarely' - most sites I join seem to use CCBill or Epoch.

08-19-13  11:20pm

Reply
58
N/A Reply of Drooler's Poll

I voted 'I like it a lot' on the basis it is in addition to regular updates, not as an alternative.

08-11-13  04:05am

Reply
59
N/A Reply of Denner's Poll

24 hours, although if it's not a problem with access etc, I wouldn't be too fussed if it was within 48 hours.

08-09-13  08:29am

Reply
60
N/A Reply of graymane's Poll

I voted for 'take it or leave it' - I guess I wouldn't mind opening the post and finding a pair of Karla Spice's undies, but it's not really something that I care for to be honest.

08-07-13  03:39pm

Reply
61
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Bodybuilders are a step too far, but I like athletic figures, such as Jessica Ennis (GB Heptathlete) and even Zuzkalight who is a fitness blogger.

08-03-13  12:41am

Reply
62
N/A Reply of Monahan's Poll

Just one. I normally try and keep it to one, although often there's an overlap (I quit one, and join another) so it's more likely to be two.

08-01-13  12:33am

Reply
63
N/A Reply of Vegas Ken's Poll

Wow, not sure I can remember such an even spread of results before! I'm on the fence - rather not 'see' them, but I think with STDs it's hard for me to have too much of a moral objection.

07-31-13  02:35pm

Reply
64
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Hate it.

07-28-13  06:29am

Reply
65
N/A Reply of Drooler's Poll

Good question! In my case, I normally do. Sometimes it gets a bit of getting used to, but yeah, I normally like it. Unfortunately, sometimes, I'm not so keen - particularly if a model is raven haired and then tries to go blonde (eg, Chica's Place)

07-24-13  12:29am

Reply
66
N/A Reply of pat362's Reply

I wouldn't count reading PU as viewing porn, kind of like I don't count reading film reviews as watching a film. I interpreted 'viewing' as enjoying videos/pictures/content, or browsing porn sites.

07-20-13  02:31pm

Reply
67
N/A Reply of Randyman's Poll

It varies, but I'd say it averages 1-3 hours. Often more. Sometimes less. Kudos to anyone who votes 12+ hours!

07-20-13  03:57am

Reply
68
N/A Reply of pat362's Reply

I think we're quite different to be honest as I don't understand why I 'must' want more than non-nude. I think Ella, Sandra and Virginia were a lot more exciting, sensual and sexual than a lot of nude models I follow.

07-16-13  03:06pm

Reply
69
N/A Reply of Colm4's Poll

I've been a member of Fame Girls several times before. With regards to NN being 'pointless', I find the art of tease can be extremely exciting if done well. More so than a lot of sites where they're showing everything.

07-16-13  11:18am

Reply
70
N/A Reply of Drooler's Poll

I'm not sure if it was THE first site, but it's definitely the one I remember as being one of the first.

Mine was Anna Angel, which was by far the best amateur solo site I knew of at the time. I was a fan before she even went topless. Unfortunately updates became more sporadic, then nothing was downloadable, then she went AWOL so updates virtually stopped.

She has her new site now (Ann Angel XXX), but that is just as bad, just for different reasons.


07-14-13  01:45am

Reply
71
N/A Reply of Colm4's Poll

Love yours, RagingBuddhist

07-13-13  01:00am

Reply
72
N/A Reply of Colm4's Poll

This is my current wallpaper: http://i.imgbox.com/abxAxfqN.jpg

It's Jessica Ennis, a British athlete, so I voted 'a pretty clothed woman'

She's bit of an idol - she looks absolutely great IMHO, but she's also such a great role model and a great athlete.

If I could have something more porn-related it'd probably be one of the Fame Girls - probably Ella, and if not, Katie.


07-12-13  02:33pm

Reply
73
N/A Reply of Vegas Ken's Poll

Online only - never bought porn DVDs :)

07-05-13  09:38am

Reply
74
N/A Reply of Drooler's Poll

I'd say video updates, followed by model updates.

What I did with Throated was to go through the videos, and if I liked the performer, would then go and seek more from her.


07-02-13  12:48am

Reply
75
N/A Reply of Denner's Poll

PU review, by far. The TBP reviews are helpful for some technical details, but the way members' areas change, they're often out-of-date as soon as they're added.

06-30-13  01:47am


Shown : 51-75 of 403 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.8 seconds.