Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : joekramer08 (12)  

Feedback:   All (47)  |   Reviews (8)  |   Comments (5)  |   Replies (34)

Other:   Replies Received (27)  |   Trust Ratings (18)

All Activity A summary of all the feedback from this user.
Shown : 1-25 of 47 Page :    Next Page >

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
Reply
1
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I like anal scenes a lot. It just adds more variety when you're getting tired of seeing the same old thing after a while. I like a nice mix in my scenes - start with vag, move to anal. The more variety the better, I say.

10-06-12  06:12am

Reply
2
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I never download pics. they just don't interest me.

08-23-12  10:34am

Reply
3
N/A Reply of jberryl69's Poll

i don't usually talk to people about porn...it would be nice if people were laid back enough to openly discuss porn, but it's still a taboo topic.

08-21-12  04:32pm

Reply
4
N/A Reply of graymane's Poll

depends on how forceful it is....i don't like gagging and "face fucking"...but a slow sensual deep-throat is good.

08-12-12  07:02am

Reply
5
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

i don't really care to be honest. i'm into petite white girls, and there are plenty of those in porn so i'm happy. i suppose there are enough specialty sites out there to satisfy anyone's tastes.

08-10-12  05:53pm

Reply
6
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I HATE pov scenes because you never really get good camera angles...it's just the same repetitive shot over and over again...looking down at the girl's pussy with no view of the rest of her. I don't even bother downloading pov scenes.

07-31-12  05:27pm

Reply
7
N/A Reply of GCode's Poll

The main problem with sites today is bad camera angles. This is a problem that plagues so many sites. They don't know what people want to see. I hate when they waste so much time on closeups of a girl's face. In real life I can see a girl's face any time I want - I watch porn because I want to see a girl's body. I hate that whenever the girl gives a blowjob, they zoom in real close and just show her head - how about you zoom out and show me her face AND her body at the same time?...what a novel idea. I also hate when they feel the need to zoom in on just her vagina during penetration - you don't need to be 2 inches from her vag to show me the penetration - you can zoom out to show me the penetration AND her whole body at the same time!!!...let me SEE the whole girl, not just parts of her - it's not rocket science, but most sites get it wrong.

Try Teens spoiled me. Their camera angles are just so right. Once I saw their scenes, every other site started to annoy me with all the worthless closeup shots.


06-27-12  04:43pm

Reply
8
N/A Reply of Denner's Poll

It's all about the preview. The problem with a lot of sites is that you can't really get a good idea of what their videos are like because they don't provide video trailers and previews of their scenes. If the site would just put up a 20 second trailer for each scene, I would be able to see how they shoot their scenes. But if they don't provide trailers, then I'm left guessing and I will be reluctant to join their site.

03-19-12  03:21pm

Reply
9
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

i don't like large file sizes...a medium-sized file is big enough to see everything clearly...so it's pointless to download a gigantic file which takes up tons of HD space. medium to just-under-medium files are good for me. i prefer files to be about 500-600 MB...and a size of around 960x540 is good for me.

01-08-12  08:15pm

Reply
10
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

i actually prefer smaller files...they take up less space on the hard drive. As long as the picture is clear and the frame rate is 29-30 frames per second, I'm fine with a small video file.

12-04-11  01:29pm

Review
11
Visit 18 Only Girls

18 Only Girls
(0)

70.0
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: NOTE: I joined this site for the hardcore videos. I'm not a softcore guy or a photo guy, so I'm writing this review from the perspective of a guy looking for hardcore video scenes.


- A lot of hot girls. If you are familiar with the slender, tight look of European porn girls, then you will know the type of girls they feature. Many of the well known European porn girls can be found here...but this may be a bad thing if you're tired of seeing the same European girls from other sites.

- Very functional site design with all of the features you would hope to find on a modern porn site (streaming for each scene, nice search options, clean attractive layout).

- Downloadable files are offered in a nice variety of sizes and the video quality of the downloadable files is quite good.

- Fairly frequent updates...however, there is a problem with the updates, which I will cover in the "cons" below.
Cons: - There can be frustrating camera work (too many closeups and odd camera angle choices that prevent you from seeing the girl or the action).

- Not many hardcore scenes...a large portion of the scenes are softcore masturbation vids.

- They update with new content often, but the problem is that many of the updates are just a photo set with no corresponding video. I have read that Diesel Media often posts the video on their other site Young Legal Porn. This seems like an attempt to get people to subscribe to their other site in order to access the video that goes with the photo set.

- I joined this site hoping to see more "artsy" filming style advertised in the tour, but upon joining I found that many of the hardcore scenes did not have this style. Many of the hardcore scenes on 18onlygirls.com have a VERY similar look to other sites like Teen Mega World, Euro Teen Movs, and First Anal Quest - Same male actors, same girls, same camera work, etc.
Bottom Line: The hardcore scenes on 18onlygirls.com come in 2 filming styles: "artsy" and "traditional". The "artsy" scenes are filmed by 2 directors named Ray Man and Dirk Milton, while the more traditional style porn scenes are filmed by a director named Anton Rusakov.

If you check out the tour, it is clear that 18onlygirls.com advertises itself as an "artsy" site with professional, high-end camera work...but once you join you find that only a portion of their hardcore scenes feature this type of camera work. Once inside, you realize that a lot of the hardcore scenes on 18onlygirls.com are more traditional and appear to come from the same people who film scenes for other European sites like Teen Mega World and First Anal Quest - I can't confirm this, but the scenes look VERY similar to other Euro sites. On 18onlygirls.com, the director of these more "traditional" porn scenes goes by the name of Anton Rusakov. If you're at all familiar with European porn sites, you can instantly recognize the same camera work, same lighting, similar sets, and same males actors from the other European porn sites. I'm starting to wonder if all of the various European sites have their scenes filmed by the same people, then they just lease the content out. At this point I have joined a few different Euro porn networks, and most of these sites look like their scenes come from the same director and crew (scenes on 18onlygirls.com, firstanalquest.com, euroteenmovs.com, & Teen Mega World all look EXTREMELY similar). Many times I have seen the same scene duplicated on completely different European networks. One of the only Euro networks that seems to have their own unique filming style is the Teen Core Club Network.

So, if you have joined some of the popular European porn sites before, the Anton Rusakov scenes will look very familiar. I wouldn't have a problem with all of these European sites looking the same if the camera work were better. Most of these Euro sites suffer from the same frustrating camera angles. If you have read my reviews before, you know that I place a very high importance on camera angles. Camera angles are the most important part of any porn scene, because the camera angles determine if you can clearly see the sex and the girl's body...and I think we can all agree that the reason we watch porn is to see sex and girls' bodies. There's nothing worse than clicking on a new porn scene with anticipation only to be disappointed when the camera man spends large portions of the scene zooming in on just the girl's crotch and stomach, or just focuses on her ass. Then there's the dreaded face closeup. Seriously - what is the point of zooming in on a girl's face in a porn scene? I can see a girls face any time I want by just walking outside of my house. When a naked girl is having sex, I WANT TO SEE HER BODY, NOT JUST HER FACE! Why can't they zoom the camera out to show me her body AND her face at the same time? For some reason most camera men in porn still haven't figured this out. I wish all porn producers would eliminate face closeups completely. Another thing that bothers me is when a girl gives a blowjob, the camera man always feels to need to zoom in on girl's face - why not zoom out and use this opportunity to show off the girls body as she gives the blowjob? (the only site I have seen that zooms out during blowjobs is tryteens.com, so I applaud them for that). So there is some annoying camera work in the Anton Rusakov scenes. Most of these scenes are decent, but not great. There are a few gems, however, where they really nail the camera work.

So I had some frustration with traditional style "Anton Rusakov" scenes, but I found that the "artsy" scenes were actually more frustrating. The solo scenes and "artsy" hardcore scenes are filmed by 2 directors who go by the names Ray Man and Dirk Milton. I was very disappointed by the camera angles in these scenes. The film quality and lighting were excellent, but the annoying camera angles made these "artcore" scenes virtually unwatchable. I found that in these artcore scenes the camera would always be zoomed in and only focused on one part of the girl's body...so you rarely got a good view of the girl's entire figure. This was maddening to me - here you have these beautiful naked girls and they're only showing you her legs or her stomach. What the? In the artsy style hardcore scenes, the camera would often just take a side view and zoom in on just the 2 pelvises of the actors...no view of the penetration and no view of the girl's body. Ugh. You can have all expensive cameras in the world, but if you don't show the viewer what they want to see you are wasting megabytes on these scenes.

There are some decent Anton Rusakov scenes to be found here which are filmed in a more traditional style found on other European sites...but the "high-end" solo scenes and artsy hardcore scenes are almost unwatchable due to the frustrating camera work and baffling camera angles

07-29-12  05:27pm

Replies (1)
Reply
12
Visit 18 Only Girls

18 Only Girls
(0)
Reply of dieselman's Reply

Thanks for responding, Dieselman. I do have a complaint about the scenes on the site, however. Like I mentioned, the camera angles on all of the scenes are too focused on closeups of the girl, but I'd rather see her whole body at once. It is very frustrating watching the scenes when all I can see is her breasts, or her face. Please zoom the camera out and just show her whole body for most of the scene. I assume that the camera man is doing the closeups to try make the scene more "interesting", but closeups aren't interesting - they're frustrating. seeing the girl's body is interesting. Her body is enough to keep me interested. Just zoom out, leave the camera alone and let her do her thing.

07-05-12  05:56pm

Comment
13
Visit 18 Only Girls

18 Only Girls
(0)

Early impressions - disappointed.

I just joined this site a few days ago and so far I am pretty disappointed. I joined this site mostly for the hardcore scenes, but the filming style on most of the hardcore scenes is not quite consistent with what was represented on the tour page. I was expecting a more "artsy" and professional filming style like the scenes shown on the tour page, but once I joined I found out that most of the hardcore scenes look just like scenes from other known Euro teen sites such as Teen Mega World and First Anal Quest - It appears that many of the hardcore scenes here are filmed by the same person who films for those other sites - here the director goes by the name Anton Rusakov. I do not like his filming style and I do not like the camera angles used by this director (he uses way too many extreme closeups and doesn't zoom out to show the girl's body enough).

So, most of the hardcore scenes on this site look like they are right from Teen Mega World and First Anal Quest (not the exact scenes, but clearly filmed by the same people or same director, because the camera work and sets are identical to those other sites...although a few of the scenes on here I have seen duplicated on other sites, so there's no telling how many of these "Anton Rusakov" scenes may be borrowed or shared with other sites).

There are some hardcore scenes here that do utilize the unique "artsy" camera work that is advertised, but not nearly as many as you would expect based on the tour. And even the "artsy" scenes suffer from frustrating camera angles. So I was disappointed by a lot of the scenes here, no matter what style they were shot in.

06-30-12  09:56pm

Replies (3)
Comment
14
Visit Bangbros Network

Bangbros Network
(5)

first impressions

Just thought I'd chime in with my impressions. I've been a member of this site for over a month and haven't had any shady billing issues yet. Like people have said, they do some tricky things to make you think you have access to things you don't, but if you're careful and only click on things that are part of the "BangBros Pack" then you should be fine. It is frustrating though.

The main "HOME" page of the members area is full of sites you don't have access to, but it's displayed in a way that could trick you into thinking you have access to those sites. At the top of this "HOME" page it says: "Your Library - Listing of the products you have access to", but you don't actually have access to most of these sites unless you pay another $19.95. When they say "Listing of the products you have access to", they don't actually mean these sites are part of your current membership, they mean you can add access these sites if you pay more...so, their wording is somewhat deceptive when they say "Listing of the products you have access to"...but problems can be avoided if you are careful and have read the warnings in the comments and reviews here on The Best Porn.

Rather than just take you to the area where you actually have true access (such as the "BANGBROS" tab or "ALL WEBSITES" tab at the top of the site), they start you out in an area full of sites that you don't have access to yet. However, the thumbnails for these sites have small lettering under the image that says "get full access for $19.95", so there is at least something there to indicate that you don't have access yet...but if you don't pay attention, I can see how you'd think you had access to one of these upsell sites.

Basically all you need to know is - when you enter the members area, go to the top and click on the "ALL WEBSITES" tab - this will take you to the sites that you actually have access to with your current membership. This is the area that should be the "HOME" page, not the area they have now.

Also, when you watch streaming videos, there will be thumbnails for other videos along the right side that might be for sites you don't currently have access to. Or when you click on a certain girl's profile, it will show all of her videos - but there may be videos mixed in there that are on sites you don't have access to. So you have to be aware of the sites that are part of your "BangBros Pack" and make sure to only click on those videos. I haven't clicked on the wrong video yet, so I can't confirm if you are automatically billed for sites just by clicking on the video.

Other than these annoyances, it's a good site with a ton of content. I'll have a full review in a few weeks.

03-31-14  05:46pm

Replies (5)
Reply
15
Visit Bangbros Network

Bangbros Network
(5)
Reply of BenThruston's Review

Just thought I'd chime in with my impressions. I've been a member of this site for over a month and haven't had any shady billing issues yet. Like people have said, they do some tricky things to make you think you have access to things you don't, but if you're careful and only click on things that are part of the "BangBros Pack" then you should be fine. It is frustrating though.

The main "HOME" page of the members area is full of sites you don't have access to, but it's displayed in a way that could trick you into thinking you have access to those sites. At the top of this "HOME" page it says: "Your Library - Listing of the products you have access to", but you don't actually have access to most of these sites unless you pay another $19.95. When they say "Listing of the products you have access to", they don't actually mean these sites are part of your current membership, they mean you can get access these sites if you pay more. This wording is somewhat deceptive, but problems can be avoided if you are careful and have read the warnings in the comments and reviews here on The Best Porn.

Rather than just take you to the area where you actually have true access (such as the "BANGBROS" tab or "ALL WEBSITES" tab at the top of the site), they start you out in an area full of sites that you don't have access to yet. However, the thumbnails for these sites have small lettering under the image that says "get full access for $19.95", so there is at least something there to indicate that you don't have access yet...but if you don't pay attention, I can see how you'd think you had access to one of these upsell sites.

Basically all you need to know is - when you enter the members area, go to the top and click on the "ALL WEBSITES" tab - this will take you to the sites that you actually have access to with your current membership. This is the area that should be the "HOME" page, not the area they have now.

Also, when you watching streaming videos, there will be thumbnails for other videos along the side that might be for sites you don't currently have access to. Or when you click on a certain girl's profile, it will show all of her videos - but there may be videos mixed in there that are on sites you don't have access to. So you have to be aware of the sites that are part of your "BangBros Pack" and make sure to only click on those videos. I haven't clicked on the wrong video yet, so I can't confirm if you are automatically billed for sites just by clicking on the video.


03-31-14  05:32pm

Reply
16
Visit Bangbros Network

Bangbros Network
(5)
Reply of 2 Free K's Reply

I agree. I really don't like many of the girls in American porn anymore - too many tattoos, breast implants, lip injections, fat asses, and women in their mid 30's.

I have moved to mostly European sites like Try Teens. These Euro sites have beautiful, natural looking girls who are 18-20 years old.


06-30-12  10:20pm

Reply
17
Visit Blacks on Blondes

Blacks on Blondes
(0)
Reply of Tom22's Review

I agree with your views on porn camera work. I really wish they would learn to zoom out and let us see the girl's whole body from head to toe. It's a shame that in most porn scenes these days the camera man is always zooming up close on just one part of the girl's body (just her face, just her ass, just her tits)...you can't appreciate a girl's body if you can only see one part of her at a time...this philosophy that "closer is better" seems to have infected every studio and website these days...such bad camera work.

01-15-12  10:58am

Reply
18
Visit Casual Teen Sex

Casual Teen Sex
(0)
Reply of Meniss Limited's Reply

Ok, thank you for clearing that up. I will definitely be joining this site soon! I've been wanting to join the Meniss sites for a while now - I love the zoomed out camera angles that show off the girl's body.

09-17-12  04:44pm

Comment
19
Visit Casual Teen Sex

Casual Teen Sex
(0)

Can you download the scenes, or is it streaming only?

I have seen multiple people claim that new scenes cannot be downloaded on this site, and that the scenes are streaming only (on this site and sites run by the same company - Meniss Limited). Can someone confirm this? Does this mean that after a certain date they stopped allowing members to downoad scenes?...or does this mean that when a scene is new it can't be downloaded at first, but then after a few weeks it is made available for download? (similar to Evil Angel's model) I would really like to know once and for all what the deal is with the downloads on these Meniss Limited sites.

UPDATE: I looked into it some more and found this comment posted in 2010: http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=54932

Hopefully this "streaming only" issue was all just a misunderstanding, but I'd still like to get an update on this issue and make sure the videos on the Meniss Limited sites are still downloadable. In the official TBP review it is stated that in the site's FAQ section that "new scenes are not downloadable" and TBP reviewer suggested that in the future that they wouldn't offer new scenes for download. Can anyone update me on this? Was this whole thing a misunderstanding?

06-24-12  02:48pm

Replies (2)
Reply
20
Visit Dog Fart Network

Dog Fart Network
(1)
Reply of rearadmiral's Review

Thanks for the review. I have been thinking about checking this network out for a while. Maybe I will get around to it some day.

08-12-12  08:19pm

Reply
21
Visit Double View Casting

Double View Casting
(1)
Reply of Capn's Reply

I'm pretty sure Double View Casting offers a photo set for each scene...but I can't really remember, to be honest. I don't really have an interest in photos, so I didn't pay much attention. I know for sure First Anal Quest has photo sets for each scene, and that site is the same set up as this one, so I would assume Double View Casting has photo sets as well.

09-28-11  07:16pm

Review
22
Visit Double View Casting

Double View Casting
(1)

69.0
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: -This site is essentially the "sister site" of First Anal Quest. It is run by the same people and you will find that most of the girls from First Anal Quest also appear on Double View Casting. The scenes on both of these sites are pretty much identical in style and quality...So, seeing as that is the case, my review of this site is pretty much the same as my review for First Anal Quest.

-As with a lot of these European sites, the best thing about this site are the gorgeous, young girls. That is what drew me to this site. I was tired of trashy "porn chicks" and wanted to see some truly fresh, tight, young girls without fake tits and tons of makeup. The girls are great. Just about every girl on this site looks to be 18 or 19.

-most scenes feature anal if you like that
Cons: -Like First Anal Quest, the camera work is not great. They waste too much time on closeups and don't show the girl's whole body enough. Too often the camera will be too zoomed in on just the penetration so that you can't even see the girl's body or her face. I prefer camera work like that found in the older scenes at tryteens.com - very zoomed out to show off the girl's whole body.

-not many updates

-Simplistic, outdated site design. Not as easy to navigate as some others

-they use mostly one male actor. I belive he is known as "Timo Hardy" in the industry. There is sometimes another male actor who looks similar to him. Unfortunately, Timo Hardy often can't keep his dick hard, and he is in almost every scene - a shame.

-this site is newer than First Anal Quest, so there aren't as many scenes yet.
Bottom Line: When I joined this site, I also got access to First Anal Quest, so the sites come together and the sites are very similar...I think you only get access to both sites if you join through Double View Casting. If you join through First Anal Quest, I don't think you get access to both sites. The main difference between these 2 sites is that Double View Casting features the gimmick of being able to switch between camera angles during the scene from "POV" to the "regular" camera angle. In order to do this you must download their special "player" and you have to separately download each scene twice (once for each camera angle) in order to have access to this "switching" functionality. Or, if you don't want to bother with that, you can just download the file for each scene in the "regular" camera angle and treat it like any other porn site. I personally hate POV movies because the POV camera angle just gets boring and I can't get a good view of the girl's body from POV angles...so, I never even bothered to download their special "player" and try their "angle switching" functionality. I only downloaded the "normal" camera angle of each scene and treated them like any other porn scene.

-I'm not sure I can recommend this site due to the bad camera angles (excessive closeups). There are better teen sites out there that offer better camera work (tryteens.com is a good one). It's a shame their camera work isn't better. They have all of these beautiful girls, but you rarely get to see their bodies due to the excessive closeups.

09-26-11  07:14pm

Replies (4)
Reply
23
Visit Euro Teen Movs

Euro Teen Movs
(0)
Reply of Denner's Comment

I often wonder if any of the European sites have truly exclusive content...they all just re-use the same scenes from what I have seen - all of the Euro porn seems to come from the same creator who just leases out the same scenes to different sites. i have seen the same scenes duplicated on so many different Euro sites and networks it's not even funny.

08-12-12  07:07am

Reply
24
Visit Evil Angel

Evil Angel
(4)
Reply of RustyJ's Reply

yeah, you are right. I just wish they featured more younger girls who fit in the "teen" category.

09-26-11  07:22pm

Review
25
Visit Evil Angel

Evil Angel
(4)

78.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Great site design. Easy to navigate and find what you want. Has everything a modern porn site should have in terms of design. Sure, it could be a little better, but compared to a "bare bones" design like First Anal Quest, this site design is in another league.

-You can stream each scene to preview the entire thing to make sure it's good before downloading...no guessing games here.

-There are some great scenes from top notch directors like Jay Sinn.

-Plenty of anal if you like anal.
Cons: -The girls on this site aren't the best. A lot of the women are older (in their 30's). The women are often typcical "trashy" porn chicks with big asses and fake tits - I hate fake tits. Evil Angel also tends to use the same girls over and over, so you will get sick of seeing the same girls repeated in scenes. I wish they had more young girls (18-22) and more in the "teen" genre.

-Evil Angel unfortunately doesn't put up its newest scenes right away. In fact, sometimes it takes them months after a DVD is released before the scenes are put up on this site.

-The quality of the downloadable scenes is inconsistent and often poor. They offer WMV or MP4 format in various resolution levels...the problem is that many of the WMV videos have pixelated picture, and strange color shifts - just not good quality (even in the so-called "high quality" formats).

-the male actors are often old, washed up porn guys who can't keep their dicks hard anymore - big negative here.
Bottom Line: there are some great scenes, but the quality of the downloadable scenes can be bad, and it's very inconsistent. You never know if the video quality will be good until you download the file. Many times the MP4 version will look better, other times the WMV format will look better...sometimes neither version is very high quality (even if you download one of the "higher quality" files). The WMV format files often have weird color shifts and pixelated picture, and the MP4 format files sometimes suffer from choppy frame rates. This means you sometimes have to download the scene twice to see which file format actually looks better. The quality is just very inconsistent and unpredictable. The WMV files are usually bigger files, but the quality is often worse than the smaller MP4 file. You wonder why the WMV file is so large if the video quality isn't good. In this day and age this type of inconsistent, poor video quality on a pay site just shouldn't happen.

The women are often old, and Evil Angel tends to repeat the same women too much in their scenes. The male actors are often old as well and they have trouble staying hard...nothing ruins a porn scene more than a guy with a limp dick. It would be nice to see some fresher, younger actors (male and female). Evil Angel seems to be a haven for aging porn actors.

So, with these issues, this site isn't quite as good as it should be. Despite it's problems, I would recommend this site - There are some great scenes, but you'll have to sift through a lot of mediocre ones in order to find the good stuff.

09-25-11  10:25am

Replies (2)

Shown : 1-25 of 47 Page :    Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.62 seconds.