Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : gaypornolover (38)  

Feedback:   All (656)  |   Reviews (16)  |   Comments (71)  |   Replies (569)

Other:   Replies Received (246)  |   Trust Ratings (33)

All Activity A summary of all the feedback from this user.
Shown : 51-75 of 659 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
Reply
51
N/A Reply of Monahan's Poll

Just one at the moment, but plan to join a couple more soon and get writing some reviews which I've neglected for too long!

08-01-13  01:15pm

Reply
52
N/A Reply of Vegas Ken's Poll

I love it, but like was the strongest option I could pick!

I have a slight fetish for condoms and I wish they'd show the guy putting them on, which they almost never do. You see the cock uncovered before and after, and most porn gives you the "money shot" - cumming inside the person being fucked is rare in porn - so the condom is removed for that too.

Even without that fetish though I've never understood why straight guys object to this and why condoms are virtually never seen in straight porn. The focus is supposed to be on the woman, no? Why would it bother you to see the penis a little covered up?

Ultimately it's good to know the models are protected too.


07-30-13  12:18am

Reply
53
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Yes always - my browser is set to update itself automatically anyway, and I am sure Windows Media Player does as part of Windows updates too.

07-26-13  02:07am

Reply
54
Visit Purzel Videos

Purzel Videos
(0)
Reply of jeppegutt's Comment

HATE streaming-only more than anything else!

Why pay for that when for the same money other sites let you keep the stuff?

Streaming-only sites are like a store that charges you the same to rent a DVD as to buy it!


07-23-13  09:09am

Reply
55
N/A Reply of LPee23's Poll

I assume squirting doesn't refer to the kind of squirting guys do that I love in the context of this poll!

I don't mind a little watersports occasionally for variety, though it's not a huge thing for me - so I picked "watersports only".


07-22-13  10:31am

Comment
56
Visit DILF

DILF
(0)

Little concerned - possible spam?

I have never joined this site, so I've never given them my e-mail address, but I have looked at the preview pages a lot.

Lately I have been finding e-mail which uses my full name (which I don't use in my e-mail address, either in the address itself or in the other information attached to it) and which mentions "dilf.com" in the title.

It may just be a spam company using the name of a trusted site, and to be fair the content of the spam e-mails don't seem to relate to dilf.com or be trying to sell that site, but it's never happened before and it's kind of freaked me out.

Has anyone heard of this kind of thing happening before?

Might be something for the site owners to look into - it may have nothing whatsoever to do with them, but someone is using their site name to get people to click on spam e-mails...

07-22-13  10:28am

Replies (0)
Comment
57
Visit CFNM College

CFNM College
(0)

Not only a clone but from previews, possibly no longer updating either...

Checking the previews for this clone site they haven't changed in months. This may suggest it is no longer updating - all the more reason to stick with the main site cfnm.net, which still has recent updates on its preview page.

07-21-13  10:55am

Replies (0)
Comment
58
Visit Absolute Cruelty

Absolute Cruelty
(0)

Strangley, still blocked in UK

I was interested to see the gay male equivalents and sister sites to this one (Breeder Fucker and Brutal Tops, from the same studio) are now advertising they are available in the UK - but oddly this site is still blocked. Possibly this may be updated soon, unless the content is even harder, though from what I could see of the previews I don't think so.

Still this may be a site they're going to quietly abandon soon as last time I looked it didn't seem to be updating, at least the previews.

This studio is so odd - this site used to be available in the UK whereas Brutal Tops and Breeder Fuckers weren't, now those two are available they've blocked this one. So odd for a UK-based studio!

07-21-13  10:53am

Replies (0)
Reply
59
Visit Paul Raymond.com

Paul Raymond.com
(0)
Reply of ptwreviews's Comment

That seems unusual for a well-known site listed on PU so it's very concerning. Have you contacted the biller directly? They should help if the site won't and you can at least get a refund.

07-21-13  10:49am

Comment
60
Visit Breeder Fuckers

Breeder Fuckers
(1)

Now boasting it is available in UK!

Well this site (and some of its sister sites from the same studio) seem to change their policies more often than a porn star removes their clothes!

However they are now proudly advertising they are available in the UK "for the first time".

This isn't accurate as I know they used to be available in the UK at one point, and then sporadically they seem to have let UK users in without shouting about it.

I hope that the fact they are now openly and proudly advertising their availability in the UK (with the British flag, no less!) means this might be a final and permanent change of policy. Here's hoping!

07-21-13  10:44am

Replies (0)
Reply
61
N/A Reply of Colm4's Poll

Hell no! I can see hot guys in clothes anywhere - clothing catalogues, magazines, the internet - the street! Why would I pay?!

07-19-13  04:34am

Reply
62
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Yep, pretty much all the time.

07-06-13  08:45am

Reply
63
N/A Reply of Vegas Ken's Poll

Almost all online now, but I do buy the very occasional DVD, if it's on sale or maybe has a movie not available to own online.

It's funny because I won't do it with regular movies or TV shows, where it's DVD all the way for me, but I will for porn.

I still have hundreds of old DVDs and even videotapes I can't bear to part with though!


07-05-13  07:42am

Reply
64
N/A Reply of Denner's Poll

I find PU reviews the most helpful when written by one of the better contributors - somehow amateur reviews just seem able to give me a better "feel" for how the site really is than professional reviewers.

TBP site facts are very useful of course but I tend not to find their reviews quite as helpful somehow.

Previews are useful too, but you need reviews to let you know how accurate the previews are and exactly what you're getting, with any hidden traps or downsides previews will never tell you!


06-30-13  03:35pm

Reply
65
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I put slightly but I suspect the novelty would soon wear off. I haven't been very impressed with 3D movies in the cinema lately - they don't seem as impressive as I expected them to be somehow, and the glasses are a pain in the rear.

06-29-13  03:42am

Reply
66
N/A Reply of Drooler's Poll

I try and cancel immediately as most sites auto-renew every month and a month is usually enough for me even for the best sites - I'll then re-subscribe a few months later when they have new content.

Occasionally I put it off a while though and a few times I've missed the date and wound up being auto-renewed - slightly annoying but just one of those things.

I hate auto-renew but I can't do much about it since boycotting sites which use it would mean boycotting 99% of sites and I'm not willing to do that, so it's an pain in the ass I have to live with!


06-29-13  03:38am

Reply
67
N/A Reply of Wittyguy's Poll

Nothing I need unless something breaks!

06-21-13  03:32pm

Reply
68
N/A Reply of lk2fireone's Poll

I don't really understand this poll. I know the phrase but I can't recall it in any advertising?

06-06-13  03:53pm

Reply
69
N/A Reply of careylowell's Poll

Hmmm interesting poll but I picked "other" because I'm not sure any of the other options are correct, at least not for everybody.

Personally I do not understand the whole straight men watching lesbian porn thing, but it seems undeniably popular with many and just because I don't get it doesn't mean it's wrong. I can't see any harm in it. It's a sort of standing joke that "lesbian" sex made for a straight male audience isn't a realistic potrayal of how real lesbians have sex, but so what? I wouldn't expect it to be.

I do know of some women who watch gay male porn but it's not really an issue as they seem happy to watch porn designed with gay men in mind and I haven't seen their custom change gay porn in any way, so it doesn't bother anyone.

Clearly heterosexual men aren't going to want to watch gay men having sex, and even if they found it unpleasant to watch that doesn't make them homophobic.

The fact is that the vast bulk of porn is aimed at heterosexual men. What heterosexual porn that there is aimed at heterosexual women would not include lesbian scenes.

Some straight men are clearly not into lesbian scenes, so I guess it's best for them to boycott any movies with it in and make it clear there is a market for non-lesbian porn aimed at them, but I am sure there must be lots of stuff out there without lesbian scenes?

Bottom line - porn producers make what sells - lesbian scenes are popular and they sell, it's simple and no need to make a big deal out of it or worry about homophobia. It's creating problems where none exist.


06-05-13  02:50pm

Reply
70
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Yes I've done several - the majority were sorted out quickly, though one or two seemed to cause a little confusion. Always got there in the end though!

06-02-13  03:38pm

Reply
71
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

"Frequent" is quite a specific and strong word, so I'd say an absolute minimum of three times a week.

I agree with Jay G that once a week seems pretty standard, so twice a week is great but still not enough to be called "frequent" in my book.


05-29-13  05:39am

Reply
72
N/A Reply of Cybertoad's Poll

Organise as I go - I just have them in seperate folders for each site, nothing fancy.

The download feature on Firefox is pretty good - seems to detect which studio folder it should go into automatically most of the time!


05-27-13  04:00am

Reply
73
Visit Amateurs Do It

Amateurs Do It
(0)
Reply of frank79's Review

Welcome to the site! Always great to have a new gay reviewer on board, we need more!
I hope you'll stick around and maybe develop more detailed reviews in future.


05-18-13  01:21am

Reply
74
N/A Reply of Colm4's Poll

I love bukkake but not into Japanese porn, so I prefer Euro/US. Sadly there isn't as much bukkake content available for gays as I'd expect and what there is is often Japanese/Asian or features young skinny "twink" guys which aren't really my thing.

05-18-13  01:19am

Reply
75
Visit Amateurs Do It

Amateurs Do It
(0)
Reply of frank79's Reply

Excellent, will have to check it out - thank you!

05-17-13  05:32pm


Shown : 51-75 of 659 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.31 seconds.