Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : gaypornolover (38)  

Feedback:   All (658)  |   Reviews (16)  |   Comments (71)  |   Replies (571)

Other:   Replies Received (246)  |   Trust Ratings (33)

All Activity A summary of all the feedback from this user.
Shown : 51-75 of 661 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
Reply
51
N/A Reply of lk2fireone's Poll

I don't really understand this poll. I know the phrase but I can't recall it in any advertising?

06-06-13  03:53pm

Reply
52
N/A Reply of careylowell's Poll

Hmmm interesting poll but I picked "other" because I'm not sure any of the other options are correct, at least not for everybody.

Personally I do not understand the whole straight men watching lesbian porn thing, but it seems undeniably popular with many and just because I don't get it doesn't mean it's wrong. I can't see any harm in it. It's a sort of standing joke that "lesbian" sex made for a straight male audience isn't a realistic potrayal of how real lesbians have sex, but so what? I wouldn't expect it to be.

I do know of some women who watch gay male porn but it's not really an issue as they seem happy to watch porn designed with gay men in mind and I haven't seen their custom change gay porn in any way, so it doesn't bother anyone.

Clearly heterosexual men aren't going to want to watch gay men having sex, and even if they found it unpleasant to watch that doesn't make them homophobic.

The fact is that the vast bulk of porn is aimed at heterosexual men. What heterosexual porn that there is aimed at heterosexual women would not include lesbian scenes.

Some straight men are clearly not into lesbian scenes, so I guess it's best for them to boycott any movies with it in and make it clear there is a market for non-lesbian porn aimed at them, but I am sure there must be lots of stuff out there without lesbian scenes?

Bottom line - porn producers make what sells - lesbian scenes are popular and they sell, it's simple and no need to make a big deal out of it or worry about homophobia. It's creating problems where none exist.


06-05-13  02:50pm

Reply
53
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Yes I've done several - the majority were sorted out quickly, though one or two seemed to cause a little confusion. Always got there in the end though!

06-02-13  03:38pm

Reply
54
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

"Frequent" is quite a specific and strong word, so I'd say an absolute minimum of three times a week.

I agree with Jay G that once a week seems pretty standard, so twice a week is great but still not enough to be called "frequent" in my book.


05-29-13  05:39am

Reply
55
N/A Reply of Cybertoad's Poll

Organise as I go - I just have them in seperate folders for each site, nothing fancy.

The download feature on Firefox is pretty good - seems to detect which studio folder it should go into automatically most of the time!


05-27-13  04:00am

Reply
56
Visit Amateurs Do It

Amateurs Do It
(0)
Reply of frank79's Review

Welcome to the site! Always great to have a new gay reviewer on board, we need more!
I hope you'll stick around and maybe develop more detailed reviews in future.


05-18-13  01:21am

Reply
57
N/A Reply of Colm4's Poll

I love bukkake but not into Japanese porn, so I prefer Euro/US. Sadly there isn't as much bukkake content available for gays as I'd expect and what there is is often Japanese/Asian or features young skinny "twink" guys which aren't really my thing.

05-18-13  01:19am

Reply
58
Visit Amateurs Do It

Amateurs Do It
(0)
Reply of frank79's Reply

Excellent, will have to check it out - thank you!

05-17-13  05:32pm

Reply
59
N/A Reply of graymane's Poll

I think it's mainly that less women are into porn, so I picked Other.

For the ones that are, any of the other reasons might apply really.


05-10-13  11:08am

Reply
60
N/A Reply of Lionheart's Poll

I feel bad saying it because I wore glasses since I was 8, but I hated them and never found them sexy on guys. Felt much better and more attractive when I finally got em lasered!

So no I don't much like them on guys in porn, though you very rarely see them anyway.


05-08-13  03:18pm

Reply
61
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Yes always - I want to know as much about a site as I can. Obviously archived reviews won't be current, so I keep that in mind, but in my experiences sites rarely change all that much in their basic style and ethos and an archived review might contain some useful info the authors of new reviews miss out on.

Obviously if a newer review mentions something has changed since then I'll take note.


05-05-13  09:54am

Reply
62
N/A Reply of jberryl69's Reply

Thanks for the heads up, appreciate it. I'll do some further research on this, you've given me a good explanation to understand the basics of it, which I appreciate,

05-04-13  02:37pm

Reply
63
N/A Reply of Cybertoad's Poll

Novels and books, I love reading. I'm holding out against eReaders too - I can see the advantages but I am old-fashioned in many ways and I just prefer physical books.

05-03-13  04:02am

Reply
64
N/A Reply of jberryl69's Reply

Oh dear, I didn't even know there was such a thing!

I am a bit cautious though - I used an Ad Blocker once which was wonderfully effective, but also stopped things I wanted without me realising. For example, I use cashback sites whereby if you do your online shopping via their site, you get cashback on your purchases.

Suddenly my purchases stopped tracking and I couldn't figure out why until I guessed it might me that - when I turned it off, the problem went away.

So I tend to live with the ads now.

I suspect a Script blocker might do similiar stuff?


05-02-13  02:53pm

Reply
65
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I think my browser (Firefox) comes with one as standard. It seems to block 99% of pop-ups, but one or two porn sites defeat it (that "Live Jasmine" one seems best at by-passing it).

The only non-porn site which seems able to defeat it is TripAdvisor, which always manages to sneak a pop-under past it!


05-02-13  10:30am

Reply
66
Visit Wow Girls

Wow Girls
(4)
Reply of critic's Comment

Not doubting you at all, but that is a very unusual arrangement for a site - usually they charge you more for the first month and then it reduces if you stay a member to reward your loyalty.

With this site, it makes no sense to remain a member - it would be better to cancel your membership at the end of the first month and then rejoin!


04-30-13  02:28am

Reply
67
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Barefoot for me please... looks odd if they're otherwise naked to be wearing anything on their feet.

04-29-13  01:42am

Reply
68
N/A Reply of lk2fireone's Poll

I've put "other" because I'd say the majority of the time I've had a good fast response, occasionally I don't. Depends on the site, but most are OK.

It tends to help if you join well-regarded sites using sites like PU as a guide of course.


04-27-13  03:35am

Reply
69
N/A Reply of plan b's Poll

None of them... and I had to Google "hackey sack"! I voted for that though because it looks kinda fun!

04-23-13  03:21pm

Reply
70
Visit Twink BF Videos

Twink BF Videos
(0)
Reply of mikala's Review

Hey mate good to see a review from you, we need more gay reviewers on this site. Welcome to my Trust List!

04-23-13  03:01pm

Reply
71
Visit Mandy Roe

Mandy Roe
(0)
Reply of Crispin's Review

Welcome to the site! Sorry about your bad experience with this site but I hope you'll stick around - it's always good to warn your fellow users against sites like this that would rip us off - I HATE site which don't respond to support e-mails!

04-22-13  04:52pm

Reply
72
Visit Mandingo Mama

Mandingo Mama
(1)
Reply of marcdc1's Review

Shame the site isn't up to standard - I admire the lady for still being active in her sixties!

04-22-13  04:49pm

Reply
73
N/A Reply of Cybertoad's Poll

Much the same as now I think. I can't see them trying to tighten them up in most countries as it's largely fruitless, but I can't see them taking the time and effort to make them more relaxed either - generally unless there's a big demand for something these things get ignored.

If existing laws are unenforceable they tend to just leave them on the books and pretend they're not there!


04-21-13  05:29am

Reply
74
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Yeah, as long as it uses a trustworthy biller and there looks to be good content.

If I liked the content it would be a shame there's no more to come, but it's still there to enjoy what there is.


04-19-13  05:08pm

Reply
75
N/A Reply of GCode's Poll

Sometimes I'll take the plunge - I'd be cautious but if the preview is really good it's hard to resist sometimes.

If the site is new then it's understandable if there's no reviews, but if it's an older site I'd be more suspicious I guess.

I have submitted a few sites to TBP/PU and nominated them for reviews... but ultimately the first review has to come from someone - I've benefited from reviews from others so I have to return the favour!


04-17-13  04:42pm


Shown : 51-75 of 661 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 1.25 seconds.