Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : gaypornolover (38)  

Feedback:   All (659)  |   Reviews (16)  |   Comments (71)  |   Replies (572)

Other:   Replies Received (246)  |   Trust Ratings (31)

All Activity A summary of all the feedback from this user.
Shown : 26-50 of 662 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
Reply
26
Visit Young Straight Boys

Young Straight Boys
(0)
Reply of SFguy's Comment

Hey there my fellow gay PU-er! Great to see you back. Not a site I'd heard of so your comment is useful - I might have tried it but streaming-only and poor selection makes it a no-no, so you've saved me some dough! Thanks.

08-14-13  04:46pm

Reply
27
N/A Reply of careylowell's Poll

Other - I don't think any of those options will occur.

Pictures still seem to be going strong and there is still a market for them - so I can't see what would change that in ten years. Video has been around long enough to kill pictures if it was going to - there is clearly still demand for pics in the face of video so I can see nothing that would change that.

I agree porn does seem to have gotten progressively more brutal, but not all porn. I also don't see how it could go much further without being illegal, so I think we've seen as brutal as we're going to get.

Less brutal to attract women? There is already porn aimed at women, and porn not especially aimed at women, which is less brutal. Brutal porn is really a genre of porn, not porn itself.

Every night on prime time TV? I don't think so - attitudes to porn may be a little more liberal now but not that liberal - and the easy availability of porn on the internet would make it largely irrelevant anyway. Porn doesn't sppeal to enough people who are willing admit it to get the ratings on prime time TV.


08-13-13  04:12pm

Reply
28
N/A Reply of Drooler's Poll

Also I would say that porn producers sometimes forget that porn is a fantasy. If you do too much "behind the scenes" stuff, you're spoiling the fantasy.

Given the limitations of porn in terms of production values and especially the acting abiities of the models, it can sometimes be hard enough to suspend disbelief when watching porn without them showing you all the behind the scenes stuff too!


08-11-13  05:38am

Reply
29
N/A Reply of Drooler's Poll

I put "other" as it depends - if it shows them fooling around naked it can be kind of hot, but "bloopers" and just dreary shots of them setting up isn't sexy, and sexy is the whole point of porn for me.

08-11-13  04:06am

Reply
30
N/A Reply of Denner's Poll

Depends on the site really... some of the smaller sites really are one-man operations so you can't expect quite such a fast response.

I put 48 hours, though I'd hope it would be faster.

It shouldn't take it as long as a week because a site shouldn't have so many problems that it has lots of complaint e-mails to deal with.


08-09-13  01:32pm

Reply
31
N/A Reply of graymane's Reply

Heh heh oh Greymane you are such a sweet guy! I was only teasing - I don't mind at all! You phrase your questions however you like, I just specify what I mean when I vote is all.
The vast majority of users of this site are heterosexual males, I know that.
I don't go in for all this over-sensitivity and political correctness. I know when someone is trying to deliberately exclude or offend me and you could never do that!


08-07-13  09:23am

Reply
32
N/A Reply of graymane's Poll

Well I'd be ecstatic, but only if they had been worn so I had to choose "accept only if worn".

Otherwise if it's a new pair, they weren't really the porn star's in any meaningful sense, were they?

Incidentally if a porn star I was fond of was wearing panties I'd probably be put off him! But I chose to read "panties" as "jocks"!


08-07-13  02:41am

Reply
33
N/A Reply of surferman's Poll

I put very important, because I like fantasy scenes and for there to be a build-up before the sex.

08-05-13  02:50am

Reply
34
N/A Reply of martinlongbow's Reply

I expect it'll keep growing if you keep joining that many porn sites!

08-01-13  01:18pm

Reply
35
N/A Reply of Monahan's Poll

Just one at the moment, but plan to join a couple more soon and get writing some reviews which I've neglected for too long!

08-01-13  01:15pm

Reply
36
N/A Reply of Vegas Ken's Poll

I love it, but like was the strongest option I could pick!

I have a slight fetish for condoms and I wish they'd show the guy putting them on, which they almost never do. You see the cock uncovered before and after, and most porn gives you the "money shot" - cumming inside the person being fucked is rare in porn - so the condom is removed for that too.

Even without that fetish though I've never understood why straight guys object to this and why condoms are virtually never seen in straight porn. The focus is supposed to be on the woman, no? Why would it bother you to see the penis a little covered up?

Ultimately it's good to know the models are protected too.


07-30-13  12:18am

Reply
37
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Yes always - my browser is set to update itself automatically anyway, and I am sure Windows Media Player does as part of Windows updates too.

07-26-13  02:07am

Reply
38
Visit Purzel Videos

Purzel Videos
(0)
Reply of jeppegutt's Comment

HATE streaming-only more than anything else!

Why pay for that when for the same money other sites let you keep the stuff?

Streaming-only sites are like a store that charges you the same to rent a DVD as to buy it!


07-23-13  09:09am

Reply
39
N/A Reply of LPee23's Poll

I assume squirting doesn't refer to the kind of squirting guys do that I love in the context of this poll!

I don't mind a little watersports occasionally for variety, though it's not a huge thing for me - so I picked "watersports only".


07-22-13  10:31am

Comment
40
Visit DILF

DILF
(0)

Little concerned - possible spam?

I have never joined this site, so I've never given them my e-mail address, but I have looked at the preview pages a lot.

Lately I have been finding e-mail which uses my full name (which I don't use in my e-mail address, either in the address itself or in the other information attached to it) and which mentions "dilf.com" in the title.

It may just be a spam company using the name of a trusted site, and to be fair the content of the spam e-mails don't seem to relate to dilf.com or be trying to sell that site, but it's never happened before and it's kind of freaked me out.

Has anyone heard of this kind of thing happening before?

Might be something for the site owners to look into - it may have nothing whatsoever to do with them, but someone is using their site name to get people to click on spam e-mails...

07-22-13  10:28am

Replies (0)
Comment
41
Visit CFNM College

CFNM College
(0)

Not only a clone but from previews, possibly no longer updating either...

Checking the previews for this clone site they haven't changed in months. This may suggest it is no longer updating - all the more reason to stick with the main site cfnm.net, which still has recent updates on its preview page.

07-21-13  10:55am

Replies (0)
Comment
42
Visit Absolute Cruelty

Absolute Cruelty
(0)

Strangley, still blocked in UK

I was interested to see the gay male equivalents and sister sites to this one (Breeder Fucker and Brutal Tops, from the same studio) are now advertising they are available in the UK - but oddly this site is still blocked. Possibly this may be updated soon, unless the content is even harder, though from what I could see of the previews I don't think so.

Still this may be a site they're going to quietly abandon soon as last time I looked it didn't seem to be updating, at least the previews.

This studio is so odd - this site used to be available in the UK whereas Brutal Tops and Breeder Fuckers weren't, now those two are available they've blocked this one. So odd for a UK-based studio!

07-21-13  10:53am

Replies (0)
Reply
43
Visit Paul Raymond.xxx

Paul Raymond.xxx
(0)
Reply of ptwreviews's Comment

That seems unusual for a well-known site listed on PU so it's very concerning. Have you contacted the biller directly? They should help if the site won't and you can at least get a refund.

07-21-13  10:49am

Comment
44
Visit Breeder Fuckers

Breeder Fuckers
(0)

Now boasting it is available in UK!

Well this site (and some of its sister sites from the same studio) seem to change their policies more often than a porn star removes their clothes!

However they are now proudly advertising they are available in the UK "for the first time".

This isn't accurate as I know they used to be available in the UK at one point, and then sporadically they seem to have let UK users in without shouting about it.

I hope that the fact they are now openly and proudly advertising their availability in the UK (with the British flag, no less!) means this might be a final and permanent change of policy. Here's hoping!

07-21-13  10:44am

Replies (0)
Reply
45
N/A Reply of Colm4's Poll

Hell no! I can see hot guys in clothes anywhere - clothing catalogues, magazines, the internet - the street! Why would I pay?!

07-19-13  04:34am

Reply
46
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Yep, pretty much all the time.

07-06-13  08:45am

Reply
47
N/A Reply of Vegas Ken's Poll

Almost all online now, but I do buy the very occasional DVD, if it's on sale or maybe has a movie not available to own online.

It's funny because I won't do it with regular movies or TV shows, where it's DVD all the way for me, but I will for porn.

I still have hundreds of old DVDs and even videotapes I can't bear to part with though!


07-05-13  07:42am

Reply
48
N/A Reply of Denner's Poll

I find PU reviews the most helpful when written by one of the better contributors - somehow amateur reviews just seem able to give me a better "feel" for how the site really is than professional reviewers.

TBP site facts are very useful of course but I tend not to find their reviews quite as helpful somehow.

Previews are useful too, but you need reviews to let you know how accurate the previews are and exactly what you're getting, with any hidden traps or downsides previews will never tell you!


06-30-13  03:35pm

Reply
49
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I put slightly but I suspect the novelty would soon wear off. I haven't been very impressed with 3D movies in the cinema lately - they don't seem as impressive as I expected them to be somehow, and the glasses are a pain in the rear.

06-29-13  03:42am

Reply
50
N/A Reply of Drooler's Poll

I try and cancel immediately as most sites auto-renew every month and a month is usually enough for me even for the best sites - I'll then re-subscribe a few months later when they have new content.

Occasionally I put it off a while though and a few times I've missed the date and wound up being auto-renewed - slightly annoying but just one of those things.

I hate auto-renew but I can't do much about it since boycotting sites which use it would mean boycotting 99% of sites and I'm not willing to do that, so it's an pain in the ass I have to live with!


06-29-13  03:38am


Shown : 26-50 of 662 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 1.22 seconds.