Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : JakeOLantern (1)  

Feedback:   All (3)  |   Reviews (1)  |   Comments (0)  |   Replies (2)

Other:   Replies Received (1)  |   Trust Ratings (6)

All Activity A summary of all the feedback from this user.
Shown : 1-3 of 3  

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
Reply
1
Visit California Beach Feet

California Beach Feet
(0)
Reply of mbaya's Reply

I weighed that myself. The fact is that although the navigation sucks and it has a DL limit, the content is so extensive and so high quality that I upped my original 55 to 70 based on that.

It's like he wins the gold on 3 criteria, but totally bombs on the other 3. It would be a 50, stragiht half if the content wasn't so HQ. Fact is that I would join again in a year just to see what great pics and vids have been put up in the past year, it would just suck that it would take me all month to get through it because of the interface and DL limits.:)


06-01-11  07:45pm

Reply
2
Visit California Beach Feet

California Beach Feet
(0)
Reply of Lionheart's Comment

Yes. It's all about feet. Nobody gets naked.

06-01-11  07:21pm

Review
3
Visit California Beach Feet

California Beach Feet
(0)

70.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: + Super HQ pics (5k x 3.5k)and videos (HD)
+ 100% exclusive content from what I can tell, these are just girls that the photographer walked up to at the beach
+ Volume of content - goes back 6+ years
Cons: - No choice of pic sizes. Unless you have a 46" monitor this makes it difficult to view online. If you download it though you get penalized by getting locked out of your paid account for 24 hours and you get no warning.
- Daily download limit (everything is huge, so this goes quickly)
- Clunky navigation (its a stretch to call it navigation. Yes it's that bad!)
- High price
Bottom Line: Overall the quality, quantity and clarity of the content is excellent. The girls are hot and they are mostly amateurs the guy walked up to and asked if he could photograph their feet. The dialog in the videos is intesting. The girls talk about their feet as he asks them questions about same.

Navigation is old school thumbnails on a single page that scrolls forever, no menu's, no names for the girls, just a date and 3 thumbs. I found this to be a huge negative. At least put up a model directory.... content goes back to 2004 so there is a lot of content to wade through. It's like a library with no card catalog.

I would have given this a rating of 80 until I got banned from their server with no warning for doing nothing that I don't do on any other site I am a member of, especially in the high end 20-30/month price range... download the content. There was nothing stating anything about a download limit when I joined. Big negative. Seriously. With a fee of 24.95 per month the webmaster could shell up for a better host.

* Excellent quality and lots of content
* Thumbs down to download limits and stone age interface.

06-01-11  07:19pm

Replies (2)

Shown : 1-3 of 3  

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.71 seconds.