Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : skippy (42)  

Feedback:   All (103)  |   Reviews (24)  |   Comments (12)  |   Replies (67)

Other:   Replies Received (66)  |   Trust Ratings (23)

All Activity A summary of all the feedback from this user.
Shown : 51-75 of 103 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
Reply
51
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I see a lot of interesting comments about guilt here. Really? If your significant other walked in while you were masterbating to a porn video, you would not feel guilty, but if it was a live cam-girl, you would?
Cheating, mutually agreed upon with my wife, is me sticking my dick into another girl or another guy sticking his dick into her. Grinding to orgasm at a strip club doesn't count. Masterbating under any circumstances, live girl, booth girl, strip-club, cam-girl, Waikiki hooker, whatever..not cheating, just release. Heck, she's even given me money to go to clubs when I'm travelling for work.
So don't confuse feeling guilty with cheating unless you feel guilty because your sexual organ smells like somebody other than your significant other's sexual organ. That's cheating! Anything short of that, in spite of what others may think, is pretty much just for fun.


01-31-13  09:00pm

Reply
52
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I have preferences, but there are always outliers that I will join once in a while. In the grand scheme of things, the benefits of trying something different far outweigh the risk of being dissapointed...especially when your only talking $20 or so.

01-21-13  10:52am

Reply
53
Visit Watch 4 Beauty

Watch 4 Beauty
(2)
Reply of otoh's Reply

Hi,

Thanks! I try not to use DL managers because it tends to...dilute the best stuff with a whole lot of just OK stuff. I already have nearly 2 terrabytes of stuff collected since these sites first started appearing on the Internet and that's after I archived the oldest stuff.

That would make a good survey....how big is your collection...


01-21-13  10:49am

Reply
54
Visit Watch 4 Beauty

Watch 4 Beauty
(2)
Reply of luv lickn clit's Reply

Nearly all of the videos are behind-the-scenes sets of the photo shoots and are pretty short. A few were done separately at the photo shoot site with nice POV. It seems like the girls that have their own sub-sites have slightly better videos...Monika, for eexample. Nearly all of them are 2-3 minutes or less, probably to keep the size down. I think they are all 720p but a very few older sets, like some of those of the beautiful but retired Marketa, were remastered from lesser resolution. Most of the soundtracks are music and there at least a couple of older videos that have distracting animations or effects in them. Largest video file size I see is about 150k.

01-20-13  04:04pm

Reply
55
N/A Reply of graymane's Poll

It's the whole package, but some things trump others. The really good news for us is that, when you're talking porn sites anyway, there is plenty of variety and we can all afford to be picky!

01-17-13  07:20pm

Review
56
Visit Watch 4 Beauty

Watch 4 Beauty
(2)

84.0
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Excellent selection of beautiful models
Exclusive content
A few of the most popular European models
Nicely done, tasteful site
Navigation is good
Available file size is up to 5600k
Most videos are in 720p.
Cons: Single biggest gripe is username/password management
Only one set added every other day or so.
Videos are mostly ho-hum.
Bottom Line: I've been a member here a couple of times and keep forgetting to write a review. It is up there on the list of erotic/softcore photo sites, but just a tad below the frontrunners. Why? That's the hard part to explain.
Probably because the site only updates a few times a week and the collection is not yet maga-large. They've got about 350 models and maybe 1200 sets compared to, for example, Met Art's 2,000+ models and 12,500+ sets.

No hardcore sex. Just solo and girl girl scenes. BUT, there is a reasonable amount of in-your-face viewing, insertion, etc. and the girls in the girl-girl scenes seem pretty much into each other. Those attributes differentiate this site from FemJoy or MetArt,
There is a broad range of action in the photo sets. Same are nude girl in the woods, some are nude in public and some are girl getting off using her hands or toys. There are also a few peeing scenes if you are into that. There are far more toys in this site than in, say, Met Art. Maybe twenty percent of the sets have a toy involved, but it depends on the model and the toys seem to be included more as a prop than a utensil to be used for a specific purpose. In fact, there are a lot of sets where fruit and other things are included primarily for aesthetics.
The model's interaction with the camera is generally good. Each set has a mix of images with eye contact but this, too, depends on the model. A few of the videos are somewhat interactive but most are not. Many of the videos are just working the photo shoots. The amount of fun in the videos and shoots seems to depend on the model. The energy or playfulness in the sets tends toward reserved...again a function of the softcore genre..and the model.
The mix of indoor and outdoor scenes is good. The girls are mostly petite young Europeans, but there are a few Americans, a few latin americans and several full figured girls in the mix.
All images come batched in 2 zip file sizes and one PDF file compilation (really odd...), videos are a few minutes long and generally in 720p. You can get individual images in 5000x4000 or larger, but these are not in zip files.

Now there is one other interesting thing on this site that I would never have even looked at if it were not for the comments of another reviewer. It's the magazine. It serves a similar function as the tease blog on other sites, but the range of topics is a little broader and more entertaining. What happens, for example, when you give a camera to a model and put her in front of a big mirror? From what I can see, she learns it is harder than it appears to be a good photographer. But sadly, much of the beautiful photography in the magazine section is zipped or catalogued and is not yet available in the photo-sets section. One of the magazine writer's recent obsessions named Emily is not on the rest of the site at all. So it is a teaser blog after all, I guess.

The single most annoying thing about this site is the password management policy. You cannot pick your own username or password so you get a random, impossible to remember username and password that can't be changed. And then on top of that, the site implements protocols that prevent your browser from remembering the username/password. Be SURE to create a PDF of the confirmation page (or a link to ccbill, the biller) if you ever want to get into the site again once you sign up. I understand they don't want passwords to be shared, but the guy who came up with this strategy should be flogged...and not in a good way.
Other annoyances:
-Navigation within a photo set, i.e. going to the next or previous image, is only available if you select the smallest view size.
-All of the images in a set are numbered 001, 002, 003, etc. That might not be a huge problem if you download everything in zip format, but if you want to keep only yor favorate images of a model, be prepared to rename everyting or keep multiple folders. Not cool.
-Although many of the images are available at something like 5760x4800 (that's like 7 feet by 5 feet at 72dpi), many of these larger images either aren't very crisp or clear or they have artifacts in them. I'm not sure why that is because a few other sites that have very large images don't have this problem. Maybe it is the algorithm used to compress or resize the images from the very large raw format they are probably shot in....I don't know. What I do know is that the large images can be dissapointing and they should work on fixing this.


Bottom Line: The site is definitely worth an annual visit. There is a lot to sift through, but once you do sift through it, there may not be enough updates to keep you for more than a month or two. I plan on coming back once a year or so.

01-17-13  06:57pm

Replies (6)
Reply
57
Visit Casting Couch X

Casting Couch X
(2)
Reply of Denner's Reply

Hi,

Just so you know, I'm not complaining at all about the way the trial was described at TBP. I am complaining about the way it was abused by the site. TBP was told the trial included three partial videos. OK, the site lied. I was charged the upcharge upon the third CLICK on the site. I saw one girl, returned to main, clicked on another. BAM! No warning or explanation of any kind! I was on the site for less than 45 seconds before they hit my credit card for $39.95! That's what I consider inexcusable... Would you accept that kind of crap from Amazon? What about Met Art? Would you tolerate a live chat site that didn't delineate between free and pay links and arbitrarily charged your card for browsing? No? Of course you would not. No reputable web site of any kind would rip off a customer like that if they EVER cared about that customer enough to want to see them again. Well, they will never see ME again! OK, I'm done.


You set this PU site up so people could give their honest opinion about the sites visited. This is my honest opinion.


12-08-12  04:40pm

Comment
58
Visit Casting Couch X

Casting Couch X
(2)

1-Day sign up is a FRAUD! FRAUD! FRAUD!

1-day intro is A FRAUD SCAM! FRAUD! FRAUD!
Only 1 video view allowed and viewing the 2nd video triggers an automatic $39.95 charge (which is more than the regular monthly charge)! NO WARNING OR REQUEST FOR APPROVAL!
Only 23 girls on the site as of 12/8/12
Each girl has 1 video except for doubles (3), so that is 20 videos, total!
$39 for that! Get real!

I saw right away that this site only has 20 or so videos, but they looked interesting, so I decided to give the 1-day membership a try. When the site did not like my username and asked me to change it, the cross-sales I had unchecked mysteriously became checked again. If I had not noticed it, I would have been charged $40 right then for a site I did not ask for and would not have even known about.

Once I got into the site, I started to download one video and was unable to right click and choose "download". As soon as I tried to EVEN LOOK AT a 2nd video, the page changed to an "UPGRADING ACCOUNT, please wait" page. I immediately paged back and tried another page. Same thing on the next page. Within 90 seconds, I got a call from my credit card company asking if I had authorized a $39.95 charge to Segway in Great Britain. Clearly, I did not! To ensure that they did not try to charge me again some other way, I had to cancel the card and get a new one issued.

There is absolutely nothing sleazier than baiting people with a 1-day intro pass and not telling them ON THE MAIN SIGNUP PAGE, what the limitations and expectations are. My experience with other sites in this network (SSC Group, LLC) has not been particularly good and I consider this baiting tactic just plain fraud!

Be very, very careful if you decide to join this site or other sites in this network. Clearly, they are a hit-and-run operation that does not care if they rip you off or not. DO NOT USE the 1-DAY PASS as you will almost certainly be charged the highest possible monthly rate just for clicking on a link to see what you thought you had already signed up for!

Oh, BTW, just to be completely fair, in the unlikely event that the webmaster for this network sees my review. Take a look at my 100% trust rating and then respond if you wish with a justification for the insanely unethical charging tactics you have. I will gladly retract this review if you can justify your tactics.

In the meantime, I recommend to everyone to STAY AWAY FROM THIS SITE AND NETWORK!

12-08-12  12:18pm

Replies (6)
Reply
59
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I'm not into pregnant, but there are a few scenes where girls in shape, but lactating. That's kind of interesting.

12-08-12  10:36am

Reply
60
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

In college. Half the frat house was watching as we were on a beach weekend... I saw one or two as they walked by, but didn't know they were ALL watching until we were done and I don't think she ever knew.

12-08-12  10:30am

Reply
61
N/A Reply of Drooler's Reply

Ditto for me. The MA network is tops, although you don't get access to all of the sites without paying extra.

12-08-12  10:25am

Reply
62
N/A Reply of Denner's Poll

Depends on your definition of gay site. If gay means men only, then no. If ALSSCAN is a gay site (lesbian), then yes.

12-08-12  10:22am

Reply
63
N/A Reply of Denner's Poll

All of the above.

12-08-12  10:17am

Reply
64
N/A Reply of OneMan's Poll

My answer is F: too much fake grunting, groaning and moaning.

12-08-12  10:10am

Reply
65
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I never do the live webcam thing but once I was on Met Art and saw a girl named Mila, one of my all time favorite models, in an active webcam. I got into a 1 on 1 with her. She was everything I imagined she would be and the interaction was terrific! 10 minutes and $50 later (including tip) I was the happiest guy on earth. That will be the only time....probably...

12-08-12  09:59am

Reply
66
N/A Reply of Cybertoad's Poll

Kind of a gap there. I download more than 10 but less than 50.

12-08-12  09:55am

Reply
67
N/A Reply of graymane's Poll

I've known several dancers and a handful of pornstars. I WOULD marry a dancer (most of the ones I knew were financing their educations and got out). I would NOT marry a pornstar. The problem is that literally all of the pornstars I've known have been drawn into pornography from dancing, then nude modeling, then porn. Somewhere around doing porn, the sense of normal gets really messed up. The girls are highly influenced by the folks around them, most of which have a twisted sense of what normal is. The result is implants and enhancements, extreme acts, and other things that the girl might not normally do. And that is just the external influences. Layer on the childhood background some of the girls have which say it is OK to do porn. Something tells me conversations with her dad would not be particularly normal. Then there's the psychology of the girl herself. Ever heard of polyamorous? It is a very poorly understood psychological condition of a person who can't love just one other person. It is one of the effects...or maybe one of the motivators behind many pornstars.
I'm not saying there aren't a few pornstars out there with terrific, perfectly normal personalities. What I am saying is that I would find it difficult to maintain common values with most pornstars, which is a primary basis behind marraige, isn't it?
I am very happily married. Porn is a release and a fantasy. Why screw that up?


12-08-12  09:38am

Reply
68
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Two words...CROSS SELLING! I have unchecked all the boxes, only to find them mysteriously rechecked after something like a mistyped CC was corrected. Once or twice I didn't notice until processing was complete. NOTHING misses me off more than that and I've blasted several sites because of it.

12-08-12  09:23am

Reply
69
N/A Reply of graymane's Poll

Hello? King sized bed! Towel off and move to one side or the other!

12-08-12  09:20am

Reply
70
N/A Reply of messmer's Poll

I did not vote on this one since the answer "in whatever location is the least obtrusive" was not an answer. Danni's hard drive had a huge logo but most of the time they put it in whatever corner worked best. Most of th esites I prefer don't have them.

12-08-12  09:17am

Reply
71
N/A Reply of Claypaws's Poll

You really need an "Other" here. For me it is the whole package, including the girl, set, quality of photography, etc. So it is a 1x1x1x1 thing where something missing(a 0)= 0.

12-08-12  09:13am

Reply
72
N/A Reply of Cybertoad's Poll

With most girls, a little makeup is a good thing. I absolutely can't stand the bright color or rainbow eye shadow common in Eastern European countries. Makes a girl look like a clown.

12-08-12  09:09am

Reply
73
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

See my response under "TVs" poll. Including game consoles and computers, I have 12. Never watched a blu-ray porn, though. :-(

12-08-12  09:07am

Reply
74
N/A Reply of Drooler's Poll

If I find a model particularly attractive, I will move all her stuff into my OMG folder, regardless of name. There are about 10 girls in there now out of about 200,000.

12-08-12  09:04am

Reply
75
N/A Reply of Colm4's Poll

I don't really have TVs. I have A/V setups in 3 rooms with A/V recievers, Tivos, stream-capable Blu-Ray players, and game consoles. One setup is a dedicated A/V room with the setup bove, plus a PC, a projector and 12 foot projection screen.

The problem with TV and TV related services is that they are too clean. I can get PPV porn on any hotel TV, but not in my own home because Amazon and the other mainstream vendors won't carry it. Huge, huge, HUGE market opportunity when you consider what VCRs did for the industry.


12-08-12  08:57am


Shown : 51-75 of 103 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 1.23 seconds.