Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : Tom22 (6)  

Feedback:   All (49)  |   Reviews (3)  |   Comments (9)  |   Replies (37)

Other:   Replies Received (31)  |   Trust Ratings (19)

All Activity A summary of all the feedback from this user.
Shown : 26-49 of 49 Page :    < Previous Page

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
Reply
26
Visit Exclusive Teen Porn

Exclusive Teen Porn
(0)
Reply of MargulisAZ's Comment

You are right, there are maybe a few dozen Russian sites that all have generally the same "look" to them. I don't know about Exclusive Teen Porn, I've not joined this site. BUT, I can assure you that Teen Mega World is well worth the money. It's a network including about a dozen sites.

About half the sites are throw-aways, but the rest of them, like Teen Sex Mania, Gage and Gape, Teen Sex Movies, and several more are very high quality sites in my opinion. The girls are drop-dead beautiful and the video quality is high.

Some of the best camerawork I've seen on the net. For 20 bucks, if you have never joined before, its and awesome value. My subscription just expired about a week ago and I was very satisfied with the site and I'm not easy to please.


12-26-09  01:05am

Reply
27
Visit Explicite Art

Explicite Art
(2)
Reply of orgasmation's Review

I agree with you totally on the camera work, for the most part its just totally bad. They do manager to get it right in a very few videos --- like the "Emma - Hardcore" (not Emma Gun, the other Emma that they only have one video of) was done well. And they do have some fisting which is a plus, but the site really really needs to find somebody that knows how to run a video camera.

If they shot their videos the same way they do their still photo shoots, then they would have something. But they don't, in the videos, for the most part, its just face and ass all the time.

Maybe they have improved since I was a member, but I doubt it, this is a French site afterall, and of course the "French know everything."


08-02-10  07:31am

Comment
28
Visit Explicite Art

Explicite Art
(2)

I have no idea why people rate this site so high

I've joined this site twice. First time was maybe 4 years ago. Then I joined it again back in December of 2008. I was very disappointed both times.

I guess I should have done a review the last time, but I'll tell you from my experience back then, I would have rated this site in the mid-sixties range.

Their navigation is horrible, or at least it was in late 2008. And their camera work is awful, practically all they show you is close-ups of either the girls face or her butt ... and that's it.

They do have very good still photos, but the site price is way too high for just photos. If they would greatly improve their navigation and especially their video camera work, then maybe it would deserve a "90," but it sure didn't deserve anywhere near that the last time I checked.

08-02-10  07:12am

Replies (3)
Reply
29
Visit Fucked Hard 18

Fucked Hard 18
(0)
Reply of Drooler's Review

Very good review, thanks for taking the time to do it.

I totally agree with you on the ass slapping. It does nothing to increase the eroticism of the scene in my opinion and only makes her butt red, which I hate. I'm paying to see the girl's beauty, don't mess her up with that nonsense! And its a shame so many sites do this, I hate it.


04-25-09  10:43am

Reply
30
Visit Hardcore Youth

Hardcore Youth
(0)
Reply of dracken's Review

I know what you mean about the "no zip files." That's really a problem and it a shame because their photo sets are usually very nice. But even trying to download a single set, one picture at a time, quickly convinces you that your just going to have to let them go.

Way too much time and effort to get the pictures without zips.

What? Are they afraid if they make it easy to get the pictures that someone will maybe post them on USENET? If they had their thinking caps on, they would be happy if that happened. Its some of the best advertisement the site can get.


07-31-10  12:34pm

Reply
31
Visit Huge Strapon Lesbians

Huge Strapon Lesbians
(0)
Reply of MargulisAZ's Review

Good review, thank you!! The last time I joined Brutal Dildos they were putting really huge logos/watermarks on the screen that really ruined the videos because the marks were alway blocking the action and in the way about 80% of the time. Could you tell me if they have fixed that. And also please let me know if its a problem on the sister sites as well.

Thanks Much
Tom22


09-17-09  08:47am

Reply
32
Visit Ladyboy Gloryhole

Ladyboy Gloryhole
(0)
Reply of alexmedia's Review

Could you please tell me --- How's the camera work? Do they pull the camera back enough of the time so you can get a good look at the model?

I hate sites that only shows you the face, the ass and six square inches of skin at a time? I hope this site isn't like that.


07-31-10  07:19pm

Reply
33
Visit Moms Teaching Teens

Moms Teaching Teens
(0)
Reply of RagingBuddhist's Reply

No, I didn't email them about it. I guess I should have. But I've done exactly that before with other sites and got no results. However, posting the complaint here seems to get their attention sometimes, but not always.

09-22-09  04:48pm

Reply
34
Visit Moms Teaching Teens

Moms Teaching Teens
(0)
Reply of Drooler's Reply

Thanks for the tip Drooler, I'll have a look at that discussion.

09-22-09  04:45pm

Reply
35
Visit Moms Teaching Teens

Moms Teaching Teens
(0)
Reply of Drooler's Reply

I don't have any idea what they are thinking. I guess they want to be sure that if you see one of their videos posted on usenet or one of the video review sites, that you can't miss where the video came from, in case you want to visit the site and sign-up and get more. That's fine, I understand that, but do they have to make the logo so fricking big that it spoils the video? Of course they do not and of course they could put the logo at the top or along the side were it wouldn't get in the way. BUT NO... they got to have it in a prime viewing area.... JUST DUMB !!

And what's worse is when you look at their previews, of course the huge logo is NOT on those videos, so you have no warning. I would not have sign-up for this site if I knew my view was going to be obstructed like that.


09-20-09  03:19pm

Comment
36
Visit Moms Teaching Teens

Moms Teaching Teens
(0)

BEWARE: Huge Logo/Watermark on Videos that often blocks your view

This is really a shame, the videos on this site arenít bad but the site has elected to place a huge Logo/Watermark on the videos at the bottom left, that is ALWAYS a huge distraction and often blocks your view of the action. I donít know why so many porn sites choose to do this. They go to all the trouble of producing a decent video and then ruin it by covering a piece of prime viewing real estate with a huge logo. If they must have it, why not put it in a corner at the top or run it along the side of the video like Sapphic Erotica does? You would think common sense would prevail but for some reason it doesnít.

09-20-09  12:29pm

Replies (6)
Reply
37
Visit My Sexy Kittens

My Sexy Kittens
(0)
Reply of pat362's Review

This site looks like a re-cycle or clone of 'Seventeen' Video to me. I'm thinking the videos are not exclusive. Can you tell me if you think that is true or not. I've already joined Seventeen some time ago under a full trial. It was not too hot.

04-10-11  10:57am

Reply
38
Visit No Rest Network

No Rest Network
(0)
Reply of yadayada321's Reply

The problem is that, that doesn't help. You still see him distracting the models and destroying the scene.

08-02-10  01:24pm

Reply
39
Visit No Rest Network

No Rest Network
(0)
Reply of Denner's Comment

I sure do agree with you, I hate it when the cameraman starts talking, they need to shut-up and run the camera. It destroys the eroticism of the scene. But the cameramen want to be the star, well, they are not the star, they are the cameraman... shut up and run the camera for pete sake.

08-02-10  01:22pm

Reply
40
Visit Nu Dolls

Nu Dolls
(0)
Reply of Drooler's Review

I agree with you about not having enough light on the scene. I think they are really too dark, it's like going back to 1970's porn again. I didn't join the site, I just looked at their preview vids. Yep, they need to turn on the lights, no doubt.

12-26-09  01:29am

Reply
41
Visit Porn Pass For All

Porn Pass For All
(0)
Reply of RubberMan's Comment

If you browse to the individual sites you will notice the "bonus sites" listed will vary somewhat from site to site. You usually get about 35 bonus sites which will be the top 35 sites listed at the bottom of the page. In other words, count them and the first 35 listed is what you get. You won't get number 36 or any listed below that.

At Porn Pass for All, you get all of the "All Exclusive Websites" and then I'm not sure what happen after additional sign-up. I think its best to take what they initially give you at Porn Pass for All and then if you want a specific site after that subscription dies, go to the specific site you want and sign up.


09-20-09  04:58pm

Reply
42
Visit Sapphic Erotica

Sapphic Erotica
(0)
Reply of exotics4me's Reply

VLC's video player solved the problem, thanks guys for the tip !!

02-15-09  03:51pm

Reply
43
Visit Sapphic Erotica

Sapphic Erotica
(0)
Reply of elephant's Reply

Thanks elephant, I'll look into that. It's good to know there are other options out there. For some reason I just don't trust Microsoft upgrades, I guess it has something to do with the fact that their upgrades usually fix one problem but create ten more. I really don't like messing with my configuration when its working good. And Microsoft just loves creating these situations where you are forced to upgrade. They could of course provide a new codec for their older players, but they won't, it's all about marketing and it irritates me.

Sapphic Erotica needs to warn people that this upgrade is required for their newer videos, but of course they will not do that because they know a lot of people just don't want to take the risk. Shameful.


02-15-09  11:26am

Reply
44
Visit Sapphic Erotica

Sapphic Erotica
(0)
Reply of exotics4me's Reply

Thanks for the heads-up on VLC's video player, I will check that out.

02-15-09  11:17am

Comment
45
Visit Sapphic Erotica

Sapphic Erotica
(0)

Beware: High Def and Mid-Quality Vids May NOT Work for You !

So far Sapphic Erotica has been an enormous disappointment. Not that many fisting videos, really horrible navigation, small single pictures for previews and for me, the high quality downloadable videos don't work.

Sapphic Erotica seems to be using a WMV codec that is not compatible with older Windows Media Player programs. The WMV videos I've downloaded don't work, when played they only provide sound, no picture.

I went to the Support page for the site and it states that you must have Version 10 of Windows Media Player. So make sure you have version 10 or higher before you sign-up or the high quality videos will not work for you.

The previews for the site work fine without version 10 so this took me by surprise. I fear doing the upgrade to Version 10 because I can't risk a configuration problem right now.

Since I can't view the downloadable high quality videos the site is pretty much worthless to me. I requested a refund from Virtual Access Billing (VX Billing) but they refused and would not refund even though I explained the problem.

02-14-09  08:49pm

Replies (7)
Reply
46
Visit Teen Sex Mania

Teen Sex Mania
(0)
Reply of elephant's Comment

Thanks for the heads-up, this does look like a great site. It needs top grow a bit of course but WOW their girls are great!!

11-30-08  10:11am

Reply
47
Visit VideoBox

VideoBox
(6)
Reply of videobox's Reply

Thanks for the reply. I found the URL for the old style User Interface and I'm glad it still exist.

When I was talking about previews, I meant photo previews, those are smaller with the new UI. I like video previews to determine if I will join a site. But after joining, its much easier and faster to rely on photo previews.

The URL for the old interface, in case someone wants it, is:

http://www.videobox.com/s/

I suggest you put a link on the new interface to the old interface, or maybe its there already and I didn't see it. But otherwise people won't know the old interface still exist.


03-03-11  06:24pm

Comment
48
Visit VideoBox

VideoBox
(6)

Hate the new video interface

Too bad, they have ruined this site. The old interface gave you large previews, was fast and easy to navigate. None of that is true with the new interface. I doubt I will ever join this site again, the new interface waste too much time and is too frustrating to use.

Fortunately many of there competitors still use the older and much better interface. They will get my business from this point forward.

New is often not better.

02-13-11  02:06pm

Replies (4)
Reply
49
Visit VideoBox

VideoBox
(6)
Reply of messmer's Comment

I currently have a 4 month subscription and yes sometimes its jerky, but most of the time its fine. It might have to do the the load on the server at given times of the day.

09-20-09  03:27pm


Shown : 26-49 of 49 Page :    < Previous Page

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.5 seconds.