Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : jberryl69 (12)  

Feedback:   All (602)  |   Reviews (6)  |   Comments (15)  |   Replies (581)

Other:   Replies Received (217)  |   Trust Ratings (27)

All Activity A summary of all the feedback from this user.
Shown : 51-75 of 603 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

My "usually" is generally because in most cases I already am ready to join a site and am double checking to see if there is a reason to NOT join.

12-18-13  07:26am

N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

"I probably would never do that" should really say, at least for me, "I WILL NEVER do that" since I refuse to piss away money on that type of useless technology.

12-13-13  08:43am

N/A Reply of Capn's Reply

"Quality quite time"? I can't remember what your media preference is but when I read that I think of all the "hiss & awe" and bovine noises most videos have and think "there goes the quite time".

12-12-13  07:15am

N/A Reply of Cybertoad's Poll

During the day, I will work on my material - but that is more looking at detail rather then body of work as a whole - I don't find myself getting all that excited during this time. It's more like being at work. At night is when I watch my finished products.

Reviewing/editing and watching. Two different times. Just the way it goes.

12-11-13  06:17am

N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

It depends - are we talking about the kind of bdsm that leave marks? Not so much - but some stuff on Kink.com I enjoy.

12-10-13  06:12am

N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

99% videos.

12-07-13  06:04am

N/A Reply of Colm4's Poll

I think that shooting in a shower brings a certain amount of static challenges to the videographer, but then that is part of the panache of the scene. Not as distracting or uncontrollable as shooting an outdoor scene where shadow & light are hard to control. While I like the idea of an outside shoot, these are not professional film makers, so their setup & technique is rather primitive, thus the results are mixed. Sound is something that is always sketchy in porn vids since they only use the camera mic to capture.

I guess I'll take the opportunity to mention my biggest pet peeve of porn sound which is the "hiss & awe" European non-talent and the bellowing of bovine female non-talent. Wonder what clown thought that added anything?

12-03-13  06:38am

N/A Reply of graymane's Poll

First, it would depend upon who the producer is and their sensitivity to drug use.

If a producer has a zero tolerance level, he'd not book someone he suspects of using. If a producer is ambivalent to drug use, then the criteria might be how it effects the production or his business in general.

11-29-13  06:22am

N/A Reply of Drooler's Poll

I'm in the group where my Playboy was stuffed under the mattress (1960s as a teen) so I'd say it was pretty soft. But then, not much of any porn after I turned 17. I really didn't get to the hard core stuff till the early 1980s with my hardcore introduction to the movie Deep Throat which has, to this day, defined my taste in porn to the T.

11-25-13  05:40am

N/A Reply of Drooler's Reply

Damn Drooler, I hope you don't think that I think I'm right in views. I understand and it was just a tease since all the prior comments were "NO TOYS". Sorry if you misunderstood. No offense intended sir!!

11-24-13  04:15pm

N/A Reply of graymane's Reply

not just you but everyone who doesn't like toys

11-24-13  10:05am

N/A Reply of Drooler's Poll

2 girls, "hard lez" especially WITH TOYS and oral rosebud play.

lol - I sometimes wonder if this is a porn lovers forum or a prude convention.

11-24-13  07:03am

N/A Reply of rearadmiral's Poll

^haha - I try to be a collector which is why I edit and hoard the rest. Hmmm - what I mean is (cause I chose "I keep them, but rarely view") my raw footage I view rarely, but my edited favs I view a lot.

11-21-13  12:24pm

N/A Reply of Cybertoad's Poll

I'm going to have to call this poll on a semantics violation because there is no "should" to it - perhaps "prefer", because that is what you're really asking. I do have to give Cybertoad some slack though since he is a disabled veteran.

Personally once I get down to editing a scene for content the scene is nothing but action. Forget the setup cause it's all about the sex. And while I do not watch solo performances, I would suspect that at least undergarments would be preferred.

11-17-13  07:01am

N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

^^ What Marcus said. Going a bit further, what is being considered a link?

Beyond e-mail links, I Google and up pops choices - I suppose when I click on one of them it's a link.

Within a story I'm reading is a reference to a website, like nfl.com . If I highlight that address and right click, I can open up a new tab with that address having been entered. I suppose this might be considered typing in a url.

When I want to go to my Twitter account, all I have to do is type in the first letter or couple of letters and the address is offered to me, or a window of other similar addresses are offered and I can pick the appropriate one. I suppose this might be considered typing in a url.

But honestly, I never type an entire url out.

11-13-13  04:48am

N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

As long as it's an oral massage - lol nothing sexual about that is there Pat?

11-11-13  07:43am

N/A Reply of jberryl69's Poll

Well, I've done it on more than one occasion.

Early on I joined Amateur Throats because I wanted a Kasey Chase scene. Disappointing I must say, but the site had an outstanding throating of Jade Indica (my first time seeing her).

My most recent foray into a site for one person was 21Sextury for Lola Taylor. And that was about all I got out of that except one scene with Sophie Lynx.

Not always worth the price of admission but you never know when you'll find someone new to appreicate.

11-10-13  06:54am

N/A Reply of graymane's Poll

There are so many answers to that question, with the Thedebilman666 answer covering them all.

Geez, go look at 21Sextury model page and see how many grannies there are. Somebody's gotta like watching them.

I've seen porn careers end early and start late (think Desi Foxx who started at 48 with her daughter Elle or Jessica Sexton who started with her daughter at 54).

11-08-13  07:11am

N/A Reply of Khan's Reply

GD Khan - I didn't have a hidden agenda with my question. I was wondering not why you posted the question but what you were referencing which you answered ...

"a lot of the tv show ads (both for shows and products) seemed to focus on sex or at least, sex appeal. I wondered if our users here thought that mainstream media might be getting overly saturated with this one subject."

That said I now have a basis for an answer. lol - I'm still undecided about a definitive answer.

Apparently our society hasn't had too much - sex sells. It is interesting that some think that mainstream tv shows are made to numb the masses which means that sex is pretty prevalent. Ever notice how the majority of murder victims are women on tv shows?

But on the other hand, I saw a tv piece regarding tweens who were looking (with their moms) for Halloween costumes at a local store and 95% of them had sexual overtones with plunging necklines and revealing lots of leg. So, for some it's too much.

It helps I guess that the US lives under the pressure of prudes who think that breast feeding in public is obscene but bombing the shit outta someone is top of the news. Go figure that warped thinking.

11-05-13  12:44pm

N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I'm a bit confused by the question. If the author would like to elucidate a bit, maybe I could find an answer.

11-05-13  06:30am

N/A Reply of atrapat's Poll

There have been some highs and lows (90s vs 70s) and I feel the average really doesn't tell you a lot except as a statistic, though perhaps the lower the average goes, it maybe just shows you the poor choices you made.

11-02-13  09:59am

N/A Reply of careylowell's Poll

I chose "Don't wanna" mostly cause of the humor it contains, but given that I have the opportunity to be a NAHO, I much prefer some light clothing - as in underwear. Overall, not really nudist driven.

10-30-13  03:32am

N/A Reply of graymane's Poll

Why I skip all BUT the fellatio in a scene - If had nothing else other than fellatio all scenes would be perfect.

10-28-13  06:04am

N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I answered "depends" but I think this needs to be expanded on somewhat.

Pre-sex interviews seem reasonable.

Giving loud directions or making social comments during the sex is fucking stupid and amateurish. Girls engaging such conversation - fucking stupid and amateurish.

In real life, the director yells "CUT!", explains what he wants and re-shoots, which I wish more directors would do when the actors are not following direction. Most directors seem to go with it cause it's "Gonzo" but they seem to think that means anarchy and no direction, yet, as we tend to notice, it is overall a formulaic sequence.

Scott Hancock whispered to the girls so it wasn't all that intrusive but some director yelling "FUCK HER FACE!" (PornPros shoot of Gracie Glam w/Chris Strokes & Eric John - this director, whoever he is ALWAYS did that which would just ruin the scene and piss me off).

I just wish they would be professional about it.

10-24-13  07:19am

N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I punched "other" only because you very seldom really see more than one camera, though I would should be the standard set up for a shoot. I've watched some great one camera shoots, though I've watched some that sucked royal too, and for those, even two camera's might have been a waste. Any camera work depends on the skill of the operator - if he/she has the attention span of a flea, well - ya get what you pay for.

10-20-13  02:16pm

Shown : 51-75 of 603 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 1.33 seconds.