Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : jberryl69 (12)  

Feedback:   All (630)  |   Reviews (6)  |   Comments (15)  |   Replies (609)

Other:   Replies Received (222)  |   Trust Ratings (27)

All Activity A summary of all the feedback from this user.
Shown : 1-25 of 631 Page :    Next Page >

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
Reply
1
N/A Reply of graymane's Poll

Several years ago when I using DVD's to display content on my TV I purchased a couple of packs of recordable CD's & DVD plus around the same time a blu-ray device. Shortly after that I bought a new wide screen TV which promptly ended my need for any of the three items listed above since I can just plug in a 500GB external hard drive with the content and from that day the packs of recordable media and the playback unit sit unused.

When I got my new computer last year, the only reason I included a recordable DVD was to load up old software (like Office) I had because ALL content now is offered via the net. I haven't used a disk for two years now. I was slow in the TV purchase. I think cd/dvd/bluray technology has been dead for about four years if one spent the upfront money on the needed devices. I was stubborn and waited.

I like the streaming method of obtaining programs. When I download a program, it usually is in a zipped folder which I can store on my backup which takes the place of needing physical software media if it has to be reloaded. If you need a key to make the newly loaded software, I create a txt file with the needed info stored along side the zip file.


07-23-14  02:39am

Reply
2
N/A Reply of LPee23's Reply

With regard to the subject of 'older material', DFF would not be the only studio that has older material. But I would think it has to do with one's desire for specific older material that one desires. If you follow a retired performers work and want to collect it, you're going to have to suffer crappy video quality. (Think one of the more famous porn movies - Deep Throat.)

I once asked Jonni Darkko if he would redo any of his older work - He seriously doubted it due to lack of time & the cost constraints.

There is nothing amiss when a producer's catalog includes poor quality video, & while I'd love it remastered, better to have it available than not. Besides, it is content that already exists and has no continuing expense except the device on which it's stored. But then, isn't that one of the issues facing the end user own concerns with space in dealing with a collection?

I look at it like going to a library and finding an out of print book and then complaining that it's on the library's shelves because of the condition of the book.


07-22-14  06:36am

Reply
3
N/A Reply of LPee23's Poll

False - But could be True for those who believe there is a tit for tat relationship between culling & adding (which I don't). This is apparently the case (at this point) with 60% of the responding members (based on 10 votes).

07-22-14  06:22am

Reply
4
N/A Reply of Drooler's Poll

For any enlightened self respecting man it could only be a nose pad. What's the matter wit u guyz?

07-15-14  06:18pm

Reply
5
N/A Reply of Cybertoad's Poll

Speaking only for myself, I have, in the past, downloaded a specific person whose work I favor when that is all a particular website has to offer. So the price of some content for one person is extreme and that's my rational for doing it.

And while Pat might call me cheap, I'm not wealthy enough to afford but about $15-20 a month toward porn.

While this has not happened a lot, I have done it. I still don't feel guilty.


07-13-14  09:47am

Reply
6
N/A Reply of Drooler's Poll

huh?

07-03-14  05:24am

Reply
7
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

One can only guess about the Vid player - since it's microsoft you'd think it came in their updates. And firefox is always updating me.

07-02-14  12:19pm

Reply
8
N/A Reply of Drooler's Poll

Seeing a puss up close always reminds me of oysters which I love ... to eat. But while I find great pleasure in oysters I don't spend a lot of time looking at them. Eat being operative word there. So an occasional view is fine, though not all pussy looks the same (or like an oyster for that matter) and since it's outside of my niche it doesn't actually interest me all that much. While plenty of people find pussy & oysters 'yucky' I am not one of those folk.

06-29-14  04:12am

Reply
9
N/A Reply of David19's Reply

OK I see where you're going with that - I just misunderstood. As far as Evil Angel not having the kind of material that you like (and yes, for the most part it is hard core) there are photosets which contain images you might like - [img]http://hw02.images.famedownload.com/phot...previews/49717_1.jpg[/img]

06-29-14  04:04am

Reply
10
N/A Reply of David19's Reply

David, while I understand the sentiment, "There is so much free material available that there is usually not a lot of reason to pay." Usually the 'free' part of it is because people willingly rip off the artist's work which isn't exactly given away but is thievery.

While this type of download cuts across all types of genre from main line movies to music to porn. It is very easy to justify these actions but really if you were to reverse the roll - it being your work - I doubt you would be so generous.

Cutting to the chase, if everyone were to download their desired content for free, then there would be no capital for these people to operate with. There is your reason to pay.

Understand, you don't have to sign an AT&T contract to get content, but rather sign up through the PU website usually getting a nice discount, stay the month & download to your heart's content. I have my favorite sites which cater to my niche and that's how a lot of us support the industry.

As an example (& I don't mean to beat a dead horse here), one can join Evil Angel for $15 for one month and download every thing you'd want that fills your niche. That $15 is what you alone would pay to go to a movie, eat popcorn & have a soda which you get to enjoy for about 90 - 120 mins.

And that sir is my perspective of free vs pay. Hope this gives you a reason to revisit your position.


06-28-14  12:46pm

Reply
11
N/A Reply of Randyman's Poll

Well - at least that's the way it is these days. I actually spend more time on this site than I do viewing porn. Sad day huh?

06-27-14  06:56am

Reply
12
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I do mention price if the perceived value suffers.

06-25-14  02:50pm

Reply
13
N/A Reply of Drooler's Poll

depends on which finger actually

06-24-14  07:52pm

Reply
14
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

When considering this question, do thumb drives count?

06-19-14  04:06am

Reply
15
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

While three of my four sit unconnected, the fourth is always connected to my TV unless I'm loading it with new content.

06-16-14  12:55pm

Reply
16
N/A Reply of LPee23's Reply

lol - I knew it really wasn't a trick question, it just turned into one. But look at the conflict of 1 & 2 - how can it be bad if you make more money with that strategy? One would be remiss if a survey of customers isn't done first.

I once worked for an trust attorney who's price for a trust was constantly keeping us in the weeds. My suggestion was to raise the price by 50% and if we lost 50% of the business (which was not going to happen - we lost 1/3 of the number we normally did) we'd break even but work less. In the actual case we got more money for less work. Now I know it's not the same thing exactly but if you putting a strategy in place (and true it might not work unless you tried it) to make more money let the suckers leave.

Netflix did this when they broke out their DVD & Streaming business into the same cost for each as the cost for both was. They lost my business but obviously their business has grown.


06-11-14  04:36pm

Reply
17
N/A Reply of LPee23's Poll

Not sure actually, but if the extreme is only a small portion of your offerings and you have done your due diligence regarding what your customers want (& don't want) then sure - give it a try. But it seems odd, in the world of porn, that if something offends you don't look. As a consumer, if you belong to a site you enjoy but are offended by niche offerings and would leave the site because of it, that just seems small - honestly I cannot believe that happens very often - certainly not enough to really impact a site. #1 & #2 seem to be a bogus assumption, because the bottom line of any business is to make money.

Evil Angel is a good example with their tranny movies. Only look at what you like.

Are you sure this isn't a trick question?


06-10-14  07:06am

Reply
18
N/A Reply of Cybertoad's Poll

Other = None

06-08-14  11:43am

Reply
19
N/A Reply of RustyJ's Poll

A naked vote can't be cast because it doesn't apply to the question since it is clothingless. As far as clothing is concerned my personal taste was always silk lingerie. In porn I'm not all that cognizant of what they wear unless they are wearing a latex mask which I dislike. I'm reminded of one particular scene with Rocco Siffredi face fucking the beautiful Lynn Stone, & while deep enough, the mask didn't do much for me (Rocco's Way to Love).

06-03-14  07:11am

Reply
20
N/A Reply of Monahan's Reply

Even natural big ones leave me 'meh'. I know it can present back problems and have had a friend have hers reduced because of it. I suppose my ambivalence reverts back to my love of ass & legs which have always had my attention. Ankles too. I find myself checking out the babes' ankles and if there is no delineation from her calves, I stop looking. I mean this about real life, not porn life. With porn life if she can deepthroat then she has my attention. A good example of that is Mercedes Santos from her scene in Throatjobs. She was the bomb but she's not real looker if you know what I mean, she just knows how to do it very well.

05-23-14  01:20pm

Reply
21
N/A Reply of turboshaft's Reply

You know Turbo I kinda took the question to mean natural breasts but I guess in retrospect it could include fake titties. I guess I assumed natural because most of us here hate plastic.

05-22-14  04:48pm

Reply
22
N/A Reply of Cybertoad's Reply

Hell Yeah CT!!

05-22-14  04:42pm

Reply
23
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

C is perfect - just a little overflow in my hands. Besides, more than a mouthful is a waste.

05-20-14  12:13pm

Reply
24
N/A Reply of graymane's Poll

Sorry - while I did answer "never" it is because of one minor detail. There is NO "close, or surrounding" me and the only "expressly being of opposite gender" is when she pops up on my screen deep throating cock.

05-10-14  09:48am

Reply
25
N/A Reply of snickelb's Poll

I'm ambivalent mostly but a certain sense of urgency within the scene makes it believable.

05-09-14  06:02am


Shown : 1-25 of 631 Page :    Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 1.01 seconds.