| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Just click on a photo of a girl, it should take you to a thumbnail page of about 8 -12 photos - then click on an individual photo to blow it up. But I must post this disclaimer - as I pointed out, I haven't received one of these e-mails since Aug 2011, so it's possible they might have changed how it works.
|
05-25-13 12:05pm
|
Reply
2
|
N/A
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
Have you ever asked for Met-Art's newsletter? If not, those can be viewed much larger than thumbnail. Maybe not full screen but pretty large - like about 4x6 inches... 1024x683 pixels dpi 72 certainly not what you'd get from the website (5600 pixels) but it still much better than a thumbnail.
|
05-25-13 09:33am
|
Reply
3
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
Boy Drooler, you made me go looking for the poll of May 13, 2013 which asked about thumbnail photos. But since this one was contingent on the whether full thumbnails influenced me to join a site or not, that made it different.
Interestingly in that poll I answered YES - that full thumbnails should be included but on your poll I answered NOT AT ALL, since I very seldom include still photos in my downloads and it would never influence my decision to join a site.
Most times if I want to include a still in my video edits I'll screen capture one out of the video. I do have a sizable selection of "balls deep 69" photos which are just there for my occasional viewing pleasure and were only available through screen capture.
The only other time I got into stills was from the preview e-mails that MET Art sent out. I would select certain ones to play with in my photo editing program. Between June 2006 and Aug 2011 they sent me over 500 e-mails, of which 120 of them remain unopened.
I guess you can ascertain from my ramble above the value of stills in my porn life.
|
05-25-13 04:50am
|
Reply
4
|
N/A
|
Reply of
GCode's Poll
While Jay choose #4 and I choose #5 it is interesting to not that except for #3 they all apply and I think that Jay and I are in agreement. Yes, there is a gimmick to it but that is enjoyable.
|
05-23-13 04:56am
|
Reply
5
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Reply
haha.... all I said was the word "perverted" reminded me of that... you know, like "perverted old men in trench coats". No point other than that... cept giving you another word to substitute for it.
|
05-21-13 10:43am
|
Reply
6
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Well, LLC and I are in agreement here, though some of the criteria for preference centers around shape perhaps more than size.
As an example, "Adult Superstar" Vickie Chase breasts are a very attractive 34C as was Kasey Chase 34B whereas Charley Chase 34D are a bit ponderous, Aurora Chase 34A a wee small and Brooklyn Chase 32DD too damn fake.
Also the height of the person contributes to the proportional symmetry of the breasts.
|
05-21-13 09:05am
|
Reply
7
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Reply
Would "whoremonger" be a more appropriate word rather than "perverted"?
Perverted draws up images of guys in trench coats at those adult theaters I went to in Denver in the 80s.
|
05-21-13 08:40am
|
Reply
8
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Jay G's Reply
Hah! - Well I didn't win Sat's Powerball drawing for $590.5 M so I missed that opportunity to be wealthy and since I don't believe in magic underpants, being a Mormon is out too.
At least I can say I've had some threesomes during my life but I had no financial obligations to those women.
|
05-21-13 08:37am
|
Reply
9
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Jay G's Reply
Maybe the harem idea is that you put them all to work and they have to learn to share. That kinda negates the 1 woman syndrome we suffer from.
|
05-20-13 11:26am
|
Reply
10
|
N/A
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
Ik2fireone asks "If you watch a movie, or read a fictional book, is that a fantasy?"
Certainly non-fiction might not be fantasy, though they could lead to fantasy day dreaming. To answer your question, the fictional book or just about any movie is fiction by definition so yeah they are. Even if it's based on one's experience or "true" events. Especially movie adaption of books.
|
05-19-13 01:53pm
|
Reply
11
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Jay G's Reply
While "harem" has at times been a fantasy of mine, I think the one area you failed to address would be the financial one, though some Mormon extremists seem to be able to make it work.
|
05-19-13 06:31am
|
Reply
12
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
Not so much the first one (Bored) but could be any or all of the last four plus Other (my vote).
Thinking about myself, "no sex life" applies and porn helps my masturbation process. At my age, I can't remember the sex I had, so there is no recalling memories that will do it. If I could recall what my last sexual partner looked like, I'm not sure it would necessarily do it for me. Much better placing myself in the scene with a 19 - 35 year old.
I do recall some of my sex "acts" like rimming a girl friend and liking, almost to the exclusion of vaginal sex (never really did anal sex except with a finger or object), oral sex (both giving and receiving). So maybe not "by nature" but I'll cop to the perverted part.
The hobby part has come about from the vast collection of porn and trying to whittle it down into a viewing collection of about 100 scenes, edited for content.
|
05-19-13 06:28am
|
Reply
13
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Reply
Yeah - Peeing scenes make me squirm. The next big squeamish nitch is prolapse eating and tonguing, brought mainstream by Mike Adriano of Evil Angel. Makes me sweat bullets though there is something compelling about watching it.
|
05-17-13 03:51pm
|
Reply
14
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
I'm not a fan of it because half the fun is getting there and in shooting the "getting there" part it's too frenetic and gonzo with no continuity. Plus it is just these guys stand around whacking off.
|
05-17-13 06:48am
|
Reply
15
|
N/A
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Poll
Didn't this just get asked recently? Hate notebooks - not good for gaming.
|
05-15-13 10:15am
|
Reply
16
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I say yes since a thumbnail doesn't tell you its been cropped and if you making a judgement off the thumbnail that could easily discourage you.
|
05-13-13 10:26am
|
Reply
17
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Reply
NOBODY picks on you Graymane without some retort, rest assured. I thought he was a little over sensitive with all the "prove it" language - maybe his GF is beating him up. Hell, maybe she even wrote it.
|
05-10-13 11:20am
|
Reply
18
|
N/A
|
Reply of
David19's Reply
David - Hey! Don't pick on our Graymane, friend to all and father figure to some.
The assumption is shared by more than just Graymane and the question centers around participation not member gender (Khan could tell us the latter number). Generally there are about 25 active participants who take part in discussions on a regular basis and had you been one of that number, you might have reached the same conclusion.
|
05-09-13 06:24am
|
Reply
19
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
Who the hell understands women and why they do or do not do things?
|
05-09-13 06:06am
|
Reply
20
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I said "rarely" but most often if there is not a current review.
|
05-05-13 12:53pm
|
Reply
21
|
N/A
|
Reply of
gaypornolover's Reply
I learned it through trial and error - I just downloaded it this year so I'm no expert on the matter. I still manually ok each site. One of the issues is that some sites require you to turn on all the scripts for them to work - like show a video - which actually defeats the purpose in my mind and I don't turn on any sites permanently. Just temporarily. I have to do it for this site even though I trust it, I'll turn it on each time.
|
05-05-13 12:47pm
|
Reply
22
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
Amazon has Audible Audio Edition, Unabridged - quite nice, but i guess if it's reading I have to answer then online. The only mag I subscribe to is Nat Geographic. The newspaper here stop publishing a daily and went to three days. I've boycotted the carpetbaggers that run it so I don't even bother with their e-edition. Use to subscribe to Smithsonian but they started using cheap paper and upped their ads by 500% - and sleazy ads to boot.
|
05-03-13 01:39pm
|
Reply
23
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Reply
haha.. one can only try dude.
|
05-03-13 01:13pm
|
Reply
24
|
N/A
|
Reply of
gaypornolover's Reply
Every website sends out scripts and it's the only way you can assess them. So with the script blocker you can Allow a site but disable certain crap scripts like googleanalytics. facebook, twitter, etc. Or you can never allow a script permanently and do a temp allow for that one browser opening (another words, when you close the browser all your temp allows go away). I'm not sure that is what you had in mind but I feel it's none of their damn business what I'm browsing.
|
05-03-13 01:11pm
|
Reply
25
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Funny Drooler and well expressed sarcasm!
|
05-02-13 05:32am
|
