| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Reply
Yeah - Peeing scenes make me squirm. The next big squeamish nitch is prolapse eating and tonguing, brought mainstream by Mike Adriano of Evil Angel. Makes me sweat bullets though there is something compelling about watching it.
|
05-17-13 03:51pm
|
Reply
2
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
I'm not a fan of it because half the fun is getting there and in shooting the "getting there" part it's too frenetic and gonzo with no continuity. Plus it is just these guys stand around whacking off.
|
05-17-13 06:48am
|
Reply
3
|
N/A
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Poll
Didn't this just get asked recently? Hate notebooks - not good for gaming.
|
05-15-13 10:15am
|
Reply
4
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I say yes since a thumbnail doesn't tell you its been cropped and if you making a judgement off the thumbnail that could easily discourage you.
|
05-13-13 10:26am
|
Reply
5
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Reply
NOBODY picks on you Graymane without some retort, rest assured. I thought he was a little over sensitive with all the "prove it" language - maybe his GF is beating him up. Hell, maybe she even wrote it.
|
05-10-13 11:20am
|
Reply
6
|
N/A
|
Reply of
David19's Reply
David - Hey! Don't pick on our Graymane, friend to all and father figure to some.
The assumption is shared by more than just Graymane and the question centers around participation not member gender (Khan could tell us the latter number). Generally there are about 25 active participants who take part in discussions on a regular basis and had you been one of that number, you might have reached the same conclusion.
|
05-09-13 06:24am
|
Reply
7
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
Who the hell understands women and why they do or do not do things?
|
05-09-13 06:06am
|
Reply
8
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I said "rarely" but most often if there is not a current review.
|
05-05-13 12:53pm
|
Reply
9
|
N/A
|
Reply of
gaypornolover's Reply
I learned it through trial and error - I just downloaded it this year so I'm no expert on the matter. I still manually ok each site. One of the issues is that some sites require you to turn on all the scripts for them to work - like show a video - which actually defeats the purpose in my mind and I don't turn on any sites permanently. Just temporarily. I have to do it for this site even though I trust it, I'll turn it on each time.
|
05-05-13 12:47pm
|
Reply
10
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
Amazon has Audible Audio Edition, Unabridged - quite nice, but i guess if it's reading I have to answer then online. The only mag I subscribe to is Nat Geographic. The newspaper here stop publishing a daily and went to three days. I've boycotted the carpetbaggers that run it so I don't even bother with their e-edition. Use to subscribe to Smithsonian but they started using cheap paper and upped their ads by 500% - and sleazy ads to boot.
|
05-03-13 01:39pm
|
Reply
11
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Reply
haha.. one can only try dude.
|
05-03-13 01:13pm
|
Reply
12
|
N/A
|
Reply of
gaypornolover's Reply
Every website sends out scripts and it's the only way you can assess them. So with the script blocker you can Allow a site but disable certain crap scripts like googleanalytics. facebook, twitter, etc. Or you can never allow a script permanently and do a temp allow for that one browser opening (another words, when you close the browser all your temp allows go away). I'm not sure that is what you had in mind but I feel it's none of their damn business what I'm browsing.
|
05-03-13 01:11pm
|
Reply
13
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Funny Drooler and well expressed sarcasm!
|
05-02-13 05:32am
|
Reply
14
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
If you don't you should. And a scrip blocker too.
(NoScript is free - though a pain somewhat cause I don't turn off scripts to any sites I have to manually accept them each time I bring up a new site - but at least you can block the nosy mother fuckers who mine your data - yeah you Google.)
|
05-01-13 05:50am
|
Reply
15
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Yeah, the last time someone crawled into my bed to fuck they were wearing .... nothing. Can't imagine the appeal of footwear unless you have a heavy shoe fetish.
|
04-29-13 09:13am
|
Reply
16
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Well I too like Tanner, like her scene in Face Fucking, Inc. She does that kind of stuff well.
|
04-27-13 03:06pm
|
Reply
17
|
N/A
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Poll
What is tech support?
I usually take that to mean there is something technically wrong with the website, and when I've mentioned this to the webmaster (like a broken link) I know not whether it gets fixed or ignored.
If I need service with a billing issue then I see that as Customer Service. This usually only used when I'm cancelling a site and I've never had problems there.
|
04-27-13 06:10am
|
Reply
18
|
N/A
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Reply
Yeah Rusty, "teeny" tends to be a genre that doesn't do much for me either but under aged and not acting teeny (at least you know it's an act) makes me squirm. Of course, the deer in the headlights does not just stop when you turn 18 so sometimes it's like regardless of age, they seem under aged.
|
04-27-13 06:04am
|
Reply
19
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
haha.. point taken though my comment was more her body type sans the tats.
|
04-27-13 06:00am
|
Reply
20
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
You mean like Tanner Mayes?
|
04-26-13 07:51am
|
Reply
21
|
N/A
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
I lost patience with looking through the site for it but I will revisit it again. If it is anywhere then it will be found in the tab label "archive" which takes you to older issues of Met Art.
One of the reasons I lost patience is that after I tab a couple of pages, the next one would take me to a black blank page and I would have to leave and come back. Because the archive has some 15 pages with ... after about page five I couldn't get to the middle of the pages. But like I said I will try to do it again.
|
04-26-13 07:50am
|
Reply
22
|
N/A
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
All I know is that when I looked at the photos several years ago, it made me feel a wee uncomfortable. But that is not to say I know they or one of them, was under 18. I will say this though have researching it today, there is no other web presence I can find of the original model (Claire) nor Her Best Friend (which is was the title of the spread) other than references to this shoot. I would imagine that you can still find this spread in MetArt if one were curious enough to look. I know we have members who belong to MetArt so they could go look at the Met Mag from that date.
|
04-25-13 02:32pm
|
Reply
23
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
Going back over the METART archives this shoot was done by Peter Dominic for the June 14, 2003 issue and made the cover. One model's name is Claire and the other unnamed. Here is the intro to this 20 photo layout.
"Peter Dominic, the photographer of these lovely girls, has been working with Claire for over a year now. During one of his photo sessions with her, Claire brought along her friend, who said she was curious about what Claire had told her was a really fun and kind of exciting new activity.
Upon seeing Claire pose naked for a while, her friend started to feel shy and nervous. Peter could tell she was getting uncomfortable, so he asked if she’d like to join in. Hesitant at first, she soon fell victim to his charms and Claire’s assurance that it was all just in fun.
Now we can see the fruits of her decision. This incredibly cute and innocent teen is finally out in the open for all to see. Come in and give her the encouragement she deserves."
This cover can be viewed on thenude.eu - brown hair, hand supporting elbow with other hand on side of cheek.
I mean, what do you think?
|
04-25-13 08:36am
|
Reply
24
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
From one of the very early MET ART newsletters.
|
04-25-13 07:08am
|
Reply
25
|
N/A
|
Reply of
plan b's Poll
Soccer would be my second fav, followed by Ultimate Frisbee
|
04-23-13 07:24am
|
