| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
26
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
Who the hell understands women and why they do or do not do things?
|
05-09-13 06:06am
|
Reply
27
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I said "rarely" but most often if there is not a current review.
|
05-05-13 12:53pm
|
Reply
28
|
Gag Factor
(3)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
Well, I find the studio websites are a mixed bag. Some do it better than others and even within a site, some stuff stinks. Take Evil Angel for instance. Pretty easy to navigate but some of the older material I have to use the IAFD data base to see who's in a movie and if it contains the type of material I want because the web master does not label them at all. Just yesterday, I found a movie there that was totally incorrect - different movie by different director distributed through another distributor. I jumped all of that one.
|
05-05-13 12:52pm
|
Reply
29
|
N/A
|
Reply of
gaypornolover's Reply
I learned it through trial and error - I just downloaded it this year so I'm no expert on the matter. I still manually ok each site. One of the issues is that some sites require you to turn on all the scripts for them to work - like show a video - which actually defeats the purpose in my mind and I don't turn on any sites permanently. Just temporarily. I have to do it for this site even though I trust it, I'll turn it on each time.
|
05-05-13 12:47pm
|
Reply
30
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
Amazon has Audible Audio Edition, Unabridged - quite nice, but i guess if it's reading I have to answer then online. The only mag I subscribe to is Nat Geographic. The newspaper here stop publishing a daily and went to three days. I've boycotted the carpetbaggers that run it so I don't even bother with their e-edition. Use to subscribe to Smithsonian but they started using cheap paper and upped their ads by 500% - and sleazy ads to boot.
|
05-03-13 01:39pm
|
Reply
31
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Reply
haha.. one can only try dude.
|
05-03-13 01:13pm
|
Reply
32
|
N/A
|
Reply of
gaypornolover's Reply
Every website sends out scripts and it's the only way you can assess them. So with the script blocker you can Allow a site but disable certain crap scripts like googleanalytics. facebook, twitter, etc. Or you can never allow a script permanently and do a temp allow for that one browser opening (another words, when you close the browser all your temp allows go away). I'm not sure that is what you had in mind but I feel it's none of their damn business what I'm browsing.
|
05-03-13 01:11pm
|
Reply
33
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Funny Drooler and well expressed sarcasm!
|
05-02-13 05:32am
|
Reply
34
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
If you don't you should. And a scrip blocker too.
(NoScript is free - though a pain somewhat cause I don't turn off scripts to any sites I have to manually accept them each time I bring up a new site - but at least you can block the nosy mother fuckers who mine your data - yeah you Google.)
|
05-01-13 05:50am
|
Reply
35
|
Gag Factor
(3)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
Well I have to tell you that after I read that (though I'd read his review) I saw the date of mbaya's review which was on the 28th of March, so my educated deductions says "Nope".
|
05-01-13 05:12am
|
Comment
36
|
Gag Factor
(3)
|
|
04-30-13 07:47am
Replies (4)
|
Reply
37
|
German Goo Girls
(1)
|
Reply of
Anonymous64's Review
While having some reference to the billing practices of a web-site is good, I'm not sure you could actually call this a review of the site.
|
04-30-13 07:14am
|
Reply
38
|
Gag Factor
(3)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
Great reveiw Mbaya - Have had an interest in this site but the price + quality vids make it unreasonable. Not so much the archiving if the vids were watchable. Wasn't this a Brandon Irons joint?
|
04-30-13 07:08am
|
Reply
39
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Yeah, the last time someone crawled into my bed to fuck they were wearing .... nothing. Can't imagine the appeal of footwear unless you have a heavy shoe fetish.
|
04-29-13 09:13am
|
Reply
40
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Well I too like Tanner, like her scene in Face Fucking, Inc. She does that kind of stuff well.
|
04-27-13 03:06pm
|
Reply
41
|
N/A
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Poll
What is tech support?
I usually take that to mean there is something technically wrong with the website, and when I've mentioned this to the webmaster (like a broken link) I know not whether it gets fixed or ignored.
If I need service with a billing issue then I see that as Customer Service. This usually only used when I'm cancelling a site and I've never had problems there.
|
04-27-13 06:10am
|
Reply
42
|
N/A
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Reply
Yeah Rusty, "teeny" tends to be a genre that doesn't do much for me either but under aged and not acting teeny (at least you know it's an act) makes me squirm. Of course, the deer in the headlights does not just stop when you turn 18 so sometimes it's like regardless of age, they seem under aged.
|
04-27-13 06:04am
|
Reply
43
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
haha.. point taken though my comment was more her body type sans the tats.
|
04-27-13 06:00am
|
Reply
44
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
You mean like Tanner Mayes?
|
04-26-13 07:51am
|
Reply
45
|
N/A
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
I lost patience with looking through the site for it but I will revisit it again. If it is anywhere then it will be found in the tab label "archive" which takes you to older issues of Met Art.
One of the reasons I lost patience is that after I tab a couple of pages, the next one would take me to a black blank page and I would have to leave and come back. Because the archive has some 15 pages with ... after about page five I couldn't get to the middle of the pages. But like I said I will try to do it again.
|
04-26-13 07:50am
|
Reply
46
|
N/A
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
All I know is that when I looked at the photos several years ago, it made me feel a wee uncomfortable. But that is not to say I know they or one of them, was under 18. I will say this though have researching it today, there is no other web presence I can find of the original model (Claire) nor Her Best Friend (which is was the title of the spread) other than references to this shoot. I would imagine that you can still find this spread in MetArt if one were curious enough to look. I know we have members who belong to MetArt so they could go look at the Met Mag from that date.
|
04-25-13 02:32pm
|
Reply
47
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
Going back over the METART archives this shoot was done by Peter Dominic for the June 14, 2003 issue and made the cover. One model's name is Claire and the other unnamed. Here is the intro to this 20 photo layout.
"Peter Dominic, the photographer of these lovely girls, has been working with Claire for over a year now. During one of his photo sessions with her, Claire brought along her friend, who said she was curious about what Claire had told her was a really fun and kind of exciting new activity.
Upon seeing Claire pose naked for a while, her friend started to feel shy and nervous. Peter could tell she was getting uncomfortable, so he asked if she’d like to join in. Hesitant at first, she soon fell victim to his charms and Claire’s assurance that it was all just in fun.
Now we can see the fruits of her decision. This incredibly cute and innocent teen is finally out in the open for all to see. Come in and give her the encouragement she deserves."
This cover can be viewed on thenude.eu - brown hair, hand supporting elbow with other hand on side of cheek.
I mean, what do you think?
|
04-25-13 08:36am
|
Reply
48
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
From one of the very early MET ART newsletters.
|
04-25-13 07:08am
|
Reply
49
|
N/A
|
Reply of
plan b's Poll
Soccer would be my second fav, followed by Ultimate Frisbee
|
04-23-13 07:24am
|
Reply
50
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
How bout the answer, SOS?
|
04-22-13 12:08pm
|
